I thought some might be interested to know what we have learned in Washington State during the first year with our new law. The Washington State Death with Dignity Act was passed by voter initiative on November 4, 2008 and became law on March 5, 2009. In the language of the Act,
"The law allows terminally ill adults seeking to end their lives in a humane and dignified manner to request lethal doses of medication from physicians."
All of the data cited here can be viewed on Washington State Department of Health Web Site where statistics for the first year are reported.
The number of requests for medication is not known, although I personally know that many persons seeking to use the law never made it through the process which requires having two physicians agree, making three requests (2 oral and one written), and a waiting period. In some parts of the state, there are no participating physicians, meaning the law is meaningless to many who would like to use it.
The health department only receives and collects data for persons who complete the complex process and actually receive the medication for use in hastening their death. In the first year of reporting, 63 persons received lethal doses of medication (either secobarbital or pentobarbital) and 47 of these died during this time period. Of those who died, 36 died following ingesting the medication and 7 died without taking their medication. Status for 4 of the deaths is unknown at this time (whether or not they took the medication or died without it).
Of the 47 participants who received medication and died during the twelve months from March 5 2009- March 5 2010:
- their ages ranged from 48-95 years
- 79% had cancer; 9% had neurological conditions such as ALS (Lou Gehrig's disease) and 12% had other chronic illnesses such as lung and heart disease.
- 98% were white, non-Hispanic
- 46% were married
- 100% cited loss of autonomy among the reasons for requesting medications; 91% cited loss of ability to enjoy life; 82% cited loss of dignity
- 94% of the deaths occurred at home
- 72% were enrolled in hospice at the time of death
The time to unconsciousness following taking the medication ranged from 1-20 minutes and the time from ingestion to death ranged from 9 minutes to 28 hours. Most died in less than 90 minutes. Three persons vomited after taking the medication and five awakened after ingestion, although all persons ingesting the medication died.
As an aside, I am aware that not all of the participants were given pre-medications to prevent nausea and vomiting, and some were unable to ingest all of the medication. Of the deaths that have been attended by volunteers of Compassion and Choices (accounting for about 80% of them) all took pre-medications and most died within 20 minutes.


Salon.com
Comments
I'm glad that these kinds of statistics are kept, so that people can see first hand what is involved.
I do find it amazingly intriguing that 100% cite loss of autonomy as their reason for requesting this procedure.
I'm beginning to believe that the term needs to be changed from "death with dignity" to "autonomy of life", and perhaps that subtle but important change will help more people understand the need for this service.
I also believe that, like abortion, assisted suicide should be seen merely as a medical procedure, not a moral issue
R
But seriously, it's good someone is actually respecting people's wishes.
It could have been a little inflated because had it been around the previous year, some choosing to die in its first months may have done so earlier.
On the other hand, after it's been around for a while, it could get better known, be more readily available, and lose whatever slight stigma it may have initially had.
Thanks for providing some perspective.
Thanks for posting this.
Yep, Susanne, you’re right; it is interesting. Thanks for the heads-up.
I think we need to rethink our views on suffering and what we can do to end it when possible. There is no real value in prolonging suffering simply to appease an antiquated view that we must prolong life at ALL cost without consideration of “quality of life”.
Such decisions should be private, personal, and legal. These stats show how the suffering can be minimized even in the process of dying.
RATED
_______
Thank you , Risa.