Many, many years ago I saw a piece on the TV, which showed the effects of population. It was a closed cage, a few feet on a side, such that it fit in a laboratory room. In it were rats. The point of the experiment was to document the changes, if any, in the physical and behavioral aspects of the rats as their numbers increased. Suffice it to say, nothing good came of it to the rats. I think this guy was the experimenter; certainly he did such experiments. Wikipedia was down when I wrote this up; now it's back so here's the write up. There they are.
What got me thinking about the rats was an earlier story about American's appetite for out of season and out of country foods; blueberries in February and the like. (I didn't save the link; this one looks similar; it's AP so would end up nearly everywhere.)
Now, put this (imported food dependence) together with the primary, secondary, tertiary breakdown used by economists to describe what an economy makes, and what is a buck worth? Or put another way, as physical resources become scarce, what will the US have to trade for real stuff? Who wants CDOs for food? Have a nice day.
Dr. Keynes Was Right
It's the Distribution, Stupid
MY RECENT POSTS
- Triple Crown
May 22, 2012 10:48AM - Welcome to Oz
May 22, 2012 10:14AM - For Want of a Merkin...
May 17, 2012 02:26PM - Dee Feat is in Dee Flation,
Part 18
May 15, 2012 10:21AM - Ah! Steer, the 1%-ers Favorite
White Meat
May 11, 2012 01:54PM
MY RECENT COMMENTS
- “I have been perpetually
shocked by the inroads made by
Get
Rich Christianity;
esp…”
2:21PM - “Will they suspend your
Dallas passport?”
May 23, 2012 09:31PM - “Ms. Drew, I learned
since I penned this, was given
("earned"
is a bit
o…”
May 16, 2012 08:10AM - “There are a few new
higher level openings at JP
Morgan. I ran
a lemonade stand
a…”
May 14, 2012 06:26PM - “I recently typed, don't
recall which missive off the
top of
my head, that the
Dar…”
May 11, 2012 10:41AM


Salon.com
Comments