“It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool,” Abraham Lincoln famously said, “than to speak out and remove all doubt.”
One of the banes of instant Internet communication is the ease of impulsively dashing off the first, angry thought you have. The angrier you are, the logic seems to go, the more passionate – and therefore what you say must be so. Unfortunately, passion and logic are polar opposites.
And “I’m entitled to my opinion” is no defense. After all, expressing a foolish opinion (no matter how entitled you are to it) is precisely what Lincoln was talking about.
In fairness, having a vibrant Internet discussion is wonderful, and some InstaComments are sharp and insightful. But those who would be wise to heed Mr. Lincoln’s admonition detract from that vibrant discussion by spinning off-topic into universes unknown. In the end, such postings are why God invented skimming.
The other day, I happened on comments that followed a ThinkProgress article about Herman Cain reacting badly to Jon Stewart ridiculing the former pizza king’s hyperbole.
One leaped out. Not because the words were worse than most, but because they were typical – and attached to credentials. Written by Shelby Emmett, clearly she wanted her job as “Policy and Advocacy Coordinator at Healthy Teen Network” to add gravitas to her words. Given that the organization promotes its “advocacy on Capitol Hill” on its website, one does wonder whether or not Ms. Emmett’s angry and increasingly off-topic statements mesh with the stated goals of her institution.
What they offer, though, is perfect example proving Abraham Lincoln’s warning.
Ms. Emmett began by emptying her pistols, “liberals [sic] are racist. Liberals only see groups.” – And I stopped right there, bursting out in laughter. In her very first two sentences, she managed to already contradict herself. Lumping all liberals into one group, and then chastising liberals for only seeing people in groups.
Never mind that the point is ludicrous. It’s an old conservative trick: criticize your opponent’s strength. It doesn’t matter if it’s not supportable, it forces your adversaries to defend themselves. This not only makes it look as if they actually have something to defend – and co-opts their strength as your own – but more, it moves the discussion away from the actual issue.
Ms. Emmett had already made clear her lack of objectivity, but I moved on to the next sentence, curious to see what how deep she dug her hole.
“YOu [sic] think black people need extra help,” she spun off-topic, “and that we can't do anything without daddy government.”
I have to admit, I started laughing again. But that’s only because I’d just checked the website of the Teen Network, for which Shelby Emmett is the Policy and Advocacy Coordinator. And on their very own “Policy and Advocacy” page, the second “guiding principle” is – “Our Belief that policy must address the needs of marginalized populations.”
In other words, the Teen Network wants government to help minorities. In other words, Ms. Emmett’s own organization believes that because of societal barriers black people do need extra help.
That’s why, when you’re so red-hot zealous, and impulsive, irrational passion takes over, it gets in the way of objective fairness and reason.
And so, she continues:
“If we leave the liberal plantation we are called sell outs....that's the truth.”
Well, of course, it’s not “the truth. And if someone tells you what “the truth” is – and it isn’t – it makes everything suspect that they say. And that includes trying to tar liberals again with that racist “liberal plantation” smear, intended to link them to the despicable slave plantations where actual racism existed. Real plantations, of course, were the polar opposite of liberalism.
Certainly Ms. Emmett, as Policy and Advocacy Coordinator of the Teen Network, knows that. But angry InstaComments get in the way of sense. And keep proving Abraham Lincoln right.
And so, with difficulty, I made it through to her last sentence: “When liberals stop thinking I need them to succeed then talk to me about how wonderful your liberal views are.”
Of course, one would hope that any Policy and Advocacy Coordinator understands that “liberals”(never mind that she sees them all as a group) don’t remotely think minorities “need” them to succeed – but then, one would also wish she grasped that her very own organization specifically states that marginalized minorities do “need” government assistance.
Still, it’s polite of Ms. Emmett’s offer to let me talk about how wonderful my liberal views are.
Wonderful liberal views include the 40-hour work week, child labor laws, federal deposit insurance, the TVA, Civil Rights Act, Social Security, Medicare and unemployment insurance.
Not one to leave well enough alone, however, Ms. Emmett got into an online debate and gave further evidence how InstaComment can whirl off-topic into reckless hate.
“16% unemplloyment [sic] in the black community...now that's racism!!”, she writes, oblivious of contradicting herself again – still dividing the world into the very groups she’d earlier blasted liberals for doing…while suggesting that a fix is needed for blacks, despite her having just said that blacks don’t need that very help.
That’s as far as I got reading Shelby Emmett’s thoughts. After all, it’s a bit conversation-ending when someone who is a Policy and Advocacy Coordinator, lobbying for government assistance, ends one rant by writing –
“hence why everyone is sick of your left wing marxist, state controlling, EPA regulating liberty destroying ideals.”
Perhaps this is the position of the Teen Network. Perhaps not. I don’t know.
But in the end, this isn’t about Shelby Emmett at all, but rather how instant opinion in the heated-passion of the moment shouldn’t necessarily be taken as thoughtful discourse. And that Abraham Lincoln was right about pausing a moment – Better to remain silent and thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt.
Robert J. Elisberg
Tidbit Bay
Robert J. Elisberg
- Location
- Los Angeles, California,
- Bio
- Robert J. Elisberg has been a regular contributor to the Huffington Post since 2006. His writing has appeared in such publications as the Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles Daily News, and Los Angeles Magazine, and served on the editorial board for the Writers Guild of America. He has contributed political writing to the anthology, "Clued in on Politics," 3rd edition (CQ Press).
Born in Chicago, he attended Northwestern University and received his MFA from UCLA, where he was twice awarded the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. Most recently, he wrote the comedy-adventure screenplay, “The Wild Roses,” for Callahan Filmworks.
MY RECENT POSTS
- The Writers Workbench:
Portable Chargers
May 23, 2012 10:38AM - “Soon To Be a Major Motion
Picture”
May 07, 2012 09:20AM - Happy Maurice Cheeks Day!
April 27, 2012 10:34AM - The Writers Workbench: The
Other Tablets
April 24, 2012 11:39AM - Good News! Mitt Romney Never
Ate a Dog
April 20, 2012 10:18AM
MY RECENT COMMENTS
- “Thanks for the
comment.”
April 20, 2012 04:45PM - “Thanks. Research R Us.
That said, to be completely
fair,
although Hollywood
des…”
January 17, 2012 01:47AM - “Thank you. Of course,
one is only as good as the
subject
you're interviewing.
I…”
November 16, 2011 12:34PM - “Just to put a
perspective on
this:
A few days
after I initially wrote that
article…”
August 23, 2011 05:25PM - “Here's how much the
Republican Party has changed:
Ronald
Reagan probably
couldn'…”
August 03, 2011 02:42PM
Robert J. Elisberg's Links
- New list
- No links in this category.

Salon.com
Comments
But I take your point Sage ; cure can be worse than illness :D.
Good post never the less RE :). And somewhat pertinent to OS now and then..
Rated for life's little irritations.
> considerable talents upon calling a fool a fool?
Thanks for your note. A few reasons. One, as you yourself say, "I agree this is necessary." Also, as another commenter stated, "Gnats are tiny, but they're also persistent." Indeed, this is not the problem of a single "gnat." And one hopes that if the widespread problem is pointed out explicitly, and if other people are then able to understand the problem and also grasp that they too might be held accountable for what they say, rather than believing they can hide in anonymity and rant about anything, they might think twice in the future.
But mainly -- as I stated in the piece, this was intended as just an example of what is pervasive. It would be impossible to quote the unrelenting flood of all such rants to address the problem, so to make the point I chose one alone and dissected it by way of explanation. And I chose this particular posting because, unlike many, it wasn't anonymous but rather had "credentials," which I thought not only made the problem more egregious, but also more symbolic of the whole issue.
After all, this was a lobbyist in Washington, someone you'd think would have the common sense to be thoughtful in public, yet was as out-of-control ranting as any. And in the end, honestly, I thought it was on the borderline of reprehensible. Furthermore, I don't think anyone should think they get a pass in life just because you don't think many people will notice -- when you step out into the world, you take on a responsibility. And if you say something stupid, you should be told so. And responsibility and even politeness dictates that you should be told why.
Believe me, I did recognize it could be perceived as overkill. But whether or not one agrees, I actually thought about this first and had my reasons. As noted above.
And who knows, I might just do it again...
americans are political children, adolescent is a better characterization, they have opinions but not the power to act. so they whine, they shout, they stamp their feet and they sulk- but they never take steps to enfranchise themselves as political adults. that would need patience and determination and neither quality is characteristic of america.
The 'price' of 'looking foolish' is a small one to pay if doing so induces someone to recognize that I really do have an interest in that certain topic, offer me the benefit of their counsel, and thus aid my learning process.
I suspect that one of the reasons that children are very appealing during their process of gaining knowledge is that they have no fear of "looking foolish" by just openly speaking their thoughts.
I'll coin my own adage:
" If all keep silent for fear of looking foolish, from whom would we learn what things are foolish and what wise?"
(*_*)
.