Gay marriage, like many important social issues of the day, has true believers on both sides, and they usually aren't very open to compromising their values. Both sides hunker down, nobody gives an inch, and the issue remains unsettled for years or decades to come.
An old saying regarding negotiating states, and I paraphrase, that a "good outcome is one in which neither party is completely happy." Often times the sensible middle ground, while upsetting to the activists, provides the solution that has the best chance of working out.
My solution will please one group more than another, but having said that, I propose that gay marriage should be legal in all fifty states, but for women only.
Let's face it, lesbian sex is cool but gay guy sex is gross. Since 50% of gay people are women, and 50% are men, this seems like a fair and equitable compromise.
Pardon me for bragging, but it makes me feel very good about myself when I am part of the solution rather than part of the problem.


Salon.com
Comments
I'm not going to bring up the serious issue of gay panic as a pathology.
Yes Scribble, good name for it: The "ick factor."
There is a ballot initiative in Washington today, R-71, "Protect Marriage in Washington." One of those convoluted measures where No means Yes. I saw a sign posted that said "God Wants You To Vote No On R-71." I didn't even know that God got involved in local politics. Yes, it's time for us to worry about issues that actually matter, i agree.
::shakes her head::
Really on that line about recreational activity. Really. Roger. Really. Roger. Really.
I support this. Two of my most dear cousins in New York City are also considering this issue. Thank you for your post.
Hope
P.S. Please join me for tea today. I love your company.
Sometimes a compromise doesn't meet anybody's needs.
When the sermon was "What we can learn from Jesus going on vacation," I was outta there.
See you at the next equinox.
Bernardine, thanks. I'm going to read your "Chester Arthur: piece now.
Why are we so obsessed with other people's sexual behavior, and why does it have anything to do with the granting of civil rights?
Frank, I once dated a toaster. She was the best thing since sliced bread. I also dated an FM disc jockey but I broke up with her because she wouldn't talk to me when we were in a tunnel.
But so off the subject! These "pro-heterosexual marriage" people need to stop. They make absolutely no sense. Also, I dated a wonderful goat in college, but my friends and parents disapproved. I've been resentful ever since.
What can I say? Politics, like everything else, is all about mememememe.
R.
Personally, I think everyone should have the right to marry. Misery loves company. (But you should have to get a license to breed.)
I have another compromise proposal:
Marriage is between somebody in a tux and somebody in a white dress.
I can't understand why anyone wants to get married - not if you are the washer of the dirty underwear. I guess if you are the one that just magically always has clean underwear then it isn't so bad (guess which one I am?).
I'm in favor of anyone who wants to get married being able to do so. I also think everyone should have to pay a big "get married" tax. It will make sure they are really serious and help us with the deficit - win/win!
Rated for almost getting me a new computer!
;)
There are many books out there with instructions (some even have diagrams) that will help you.