Robert's Virtual Soapbox

(or, The Sanctimonious Professional Leftist's Blog)
JANUARY 22, 2012 4:01PM

Did Newt just swiftboat Massachusetts Mitt?

Rate: 6 Flag

Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich makes a campaign stop in Laurens, South Carolina

Reuters photo

Former U.S. Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, pictured above campaigning in South Carolina, where he decisively was victorious yesterday, now goes on to Florida in his quest to prevent the coronation of “Massachusetts moderate” Mitt Romney as the 2012 Repugnican Tea Party presidential nominee.

My bad — I just now watched the Newt Gingrich ad in which Gingrich states, correctly, of course, that “Massachusetts moderate” Mitt Romney hails from the state that brought us supposedly ultra-liberal Democratic presidential candidates Michael Dukakis and John Kerry. (Of course, it’s not the denotation there that is critical to the ad’s effectiveness, but it’s all of the ad’s connotations.)

The ad was talked about primarily as the ad that nails Mitt for speaking French — just like John Kerry does (the ad features brief clips of both of them speaking French) – but the ad in general likens Romney to Kerry and Dukakis and essentially asks how anyone from Massachusetts can be a real conservative.

The French connection (indeed, the ad is titled “The French Connection”) is interesting, however. It serves several purposes, I think: It’s meant to indicate Romney’s supposed otherness and supposed un-Americanness (maybe even treason?) and Romney’s supposed effeteness (the French, after all, are cowardly and weak, no?); and, of course, it’s a great slur steeped in the anti-intellectualism that is so much a part of the American right wing (many if not most of whom cannot speak or write even their mother tongue correctly): He speaks French! Fluently!

It also, of course, speaks of socioeconomic class: John Kerry is rich and John Kerry speaks French. Mitt Romney is rich and Mitt Romney speaks French. They both went to expensive, exclusive Ivy League schools, where they had the luxury of learning French.

This long has been a problem for the Richie Rich wing of the Repugnican Tea Party: How to appeal to the Cooters and Skeeters and Jebs and Jethros — the “tea party” wing of the party whose votes the Richie Riches need in order to win elections – when the Richie Riches are about as far away from rednecks as you’re going to get.

However, up until now, for the most part the Repugnican Tea Party candidates who appeal primarily to the rednecks haven’t openly, publicly assaulted the aristocratic wing of their party, so Newt’s attacks on Romney’s lofty socioeconomic status seem rather novel. (“Kamikaze,” actually, might be the better word for it…)

Apparently Gingrich’s attacks on Romney in the deep red state of South Carolina worked wonders. I mean, Gingrich beat Romney in South Carolina yesterday by double digits, and since 1980, whichever Repugnican presidential primary candidate who won South Carolina also went on to win the party’s presidential nomination.

And if Gingrich wins again in Florida on January 31, it could be all over for Romney. It doesn’t matter how well Romney has been polling in the upcoming primary states as of late; if he widely is perceived as a losing candidate after having lost South Carolina and Florida, it could start a rapid domino effect that will make his previous support in those upcoming states evaporate rapidly – just as it did in South Carolina.

Romney, we know now, didn’t actually win the Iowa caucuses; the state’s Repugnican Tea Party now says that Rick Santorum won, and, as The Christian Science monitor notes, Santorum having won Iowa, Romney having won New Hampshire and Gingrich having won South Carolina “is the first time in modern GOP primary history that three different candidates won those three states.”

This indicates a Repugnican Tea Party that still is in serious disarray and that might not be sorted out for weeks to come. And if Mitt does manage to make it out of primary season alive, he might be so badly damaged that his chances of beating President Barack Obama in November are greatly diminished — and, ironically, all along Romney has polled better against Obama than have any of his primary season competitors.

We know what we would get with a President Gingrich, I think. One of Big Brother’s main slogans was:

WAR IS PEACE

FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

Possessing intellect – such as knowing a foreign language — is a weakness, you see, among those who can barely speak their own native English (a.k.a. Newt’s base). And the only way to be “safe” from “terrorism” and other “evil” is to have perpetual warfare against the “evildoers,” which a chickenhawkish President Gingrich no doubt would embrace, just as chickenhawk George W. Bush did. And don’t even get me started on the topic of freedom (freedom, oh, freedom – that’s just some people talkin’…).

President Thomas Jefferson apparently could speak Latin, Greek, French, Italian and Spanish on top of English. “President” George W. Bush barely fucking could speak English. That’s how “far” we Americans have come.

And now, we have in Newt Gingrich a man who essentially would represent a third (and maybe a fourth) term by George W. Bush.

I mean, it’s no accident that upon his recent departure from the race, Texas Gov. Rick Perry — who also had wanted to continue the policies and practices of the unelected Bush regime – endorsed Newt Gingrich.

P.S. For all of the undeserved shit that First Lady Michelle Obama gets from the wingnuts, I find Gingrich’s current wife, Callista (pictured below in South Carolina last week), to be (like Newt) a fucking skank ho. I mean, when she was his aide she apparently had an affair with Newt for six years while he was still married to his second wife (with whom he’d been having an affair while he still was married to his first wife).

Gingrich had a six year affair with Callista Bisek -- now Callista Gingrich -- before divorcing his second wife

AFP (that’s French) photo

That, and the creepy Callista Gingrich looks just like the femme fatale (there’s some more French!) in Tim Burton’s “Mars Attacks!”:

Careful! She bites

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
"Possessing intellect – such as knowing a foreign language — is a weakness, you see, among those who can barely speak English (a.k.a. Newt’s base)."

That's the impression I'm taking away from yesterday's results, and it's something I've long noticed in the Tea Party wing of conservatism. We need to remember that 40% of Americans think that God literally made the world 10,0oo years ago or less, and 53% of Republicans don't believe in climate change while among Teabaggers that number jumps to 70%. Hell, a lot of these people still believe Saddam Hussein attacked us on 9/11; what can you do with a block of voters who choose to remain ignorant of easily verifiable facts except pander to them in a language they do understand, i.e., the language of ignorance, fear, and hate? Anti-intellectualism isn't just a tendency in conservative cirles, it's a requirement, and the GOP candidates all recognize that fact. Romney himself recently attacked Obama's foreign policy for being, among other adjectives, nuanced, because, of course, nuance is a BAD thing to people who pride themselves on not knowing jack shit.
Agreed. Gingrich, of course, can carry off the anti-intellectualism thing a lot better than can the patrician Romney, and it seems as though we're going to see the rift that long has existed within the Repugnican Party -- between the Bible-thumping rednecks and the gilded aristocrats -- blow right open here shortly. (Well, actually, methinks that it already has.)

Of course, I remember when Billary Clinton, during the looong 2008 Democratic primary season, when she became increasingly desperate, tried to swiftboat Barack Obama, calling him an elitist who looked down upon those who love God and guns, and tried to cast herself as one of the beer-guzzling rednecks. It was beyond pathetic, and it indicates that the real fight isn't between Repugs and Dems -- the Coke Party and the Pepsi Party -- but is between the wealthy and the rest of the us...

According to Wikipedia, by the way, Romney's mandatory Mormon mission was in France, which indicates that he learned French when he was quite young -- Mormons are expected to go on their missions right after high school or right after college, I believe. He did attend Harvard, though. (John Kerry attended Yale.)
Great post...and I LOVE the picture from "Mars Attacks"...after all, there is a moon of Jupiter called Callisto.
Gingrich, Romney and Obama are all doing their job; they move their lips make noise and avoid discussing anything important like the actual issues. This is designed to ensure that no mater who we pick the corporation can continue pulling the strings.

Any one who actually wants to address important issues will be boycotted by the corporate media that is doing what ever it takes to prevent real democracy by keeping the propaganda machine full of crap.
Kind of strange to me that you are lambasting the only candidate with a Ph.D. for being anti-intellectual. Gingrich is the only intellectual in the race.
Yes, it's said that Gingrich probably knows French, too. However, it's obvious that he's playing the anti-intellectual card.

Of course, Gingrich also plays the white supremacist card, too.

So can we really call him an intellectual? Would an intellectual peddle hatred and ignorance like Gingrich does?

Maybe Gingrich is an evil intellectual...
P.S. The mere possession of a degree doesn't make one an intellectual. I mean, fuck, George W. Bush has an MBA from Harvard or Yale (I can't remember which one and don't feel like looking it up -- I think it's Yale, though...).
zachery: Agreed. Americans think that we have a "free" press. Not when our mass media are owned and controlled by self-interested corporations do we have a "free" mass media.

Indeed, the owners of the mass media want Obama or Romney, because both milquetoast candidates promise a continuation of the status quo. Therefore, yes, any candidate who threatens the pro-corporate status quo will be largely ignored (Ron Paul) or villified (Ralph Nader) by the mass media. (The left-leaning ones, in my observation, are much more likely to be attacked, though, than are the right-leaning ones, who tend to just be ignored.)

Those who work for the corporately owned and controlled media know what they can and cannot say -- if they don't already know it intuitively, they will be instructed quickly (or fired) by their overlords should they transgress. Most of those who work for corporate media overlords seem willing to sell their souls for a paycheck (and, better yet, some fame), although they are much more like hookers than they are anything like journalists.

So: The media environment is tightly controlled. The corporately owned and controlled media don't report reality, but attempt to create reality as the media owners want reality to be.

This is why the Internet has boomed: It offers an alternative to corporate mass propaganda.

And the success of the Internet is why the corporations want to destroy it (except for corporate purposes). The idea that we peasants should have ANY FREEDOM from the corporate media overlords, that we should flow around them, since they only obstruct the truth, that we should have citizen journalism, and that we should share with each other subversive/"subversive" ideas that the corporate overlords won't entertain within their proscribed forum, drives them crazy, and so they would LOVE to shut us down. And they would do that through a series of laws over time that, taken together, would return us to where we were before the Internet took off: having no other alternative than the corporately owned and controlled media forum.

Don't even get me started...
Great post, love it!
R♥
The surprising thing is that they haven't learned to do a better job making their propaganda more subtle. Only a complete idiot or someone who was thoroughly indoctrinated from birth could possibly believe the corporate media is credible. they may be counting on it being difficult to gather information from other sources and the public being complacent but that seems to be failing to, maybe; if the current protests aren't followed up be reform then they will be proven to be right.
Right on! Great photo of Callista and sexpot alien from "Mars Attacks." She does look like a robot. Rated.
I wish I could rate this over and over, along with the comments.

Ignorance is sure bliss.
And yeah. I can see why the corporate types want to end our right to read any source of information we seek out.
Knowledge is a dangerous thing.
write more Robert. Much more.