
AFP photo
“Christo”fascist Prick Santorum, trying to distance himself from his strong insinuation of yesterday that President Barack Obama isn’t a Christian and he is, today essentially stated that he believes that humankind should do as it pleases to planet Earth. (It’s in the Bible, after all!) Another great “save” there, prick!
Repugnican Tea Party presidential wannabe Prick Santorum, embattled because of his strong insinuation of yesterday that President Barack Obama isn’t a Christian, today “clarified” that he believes that Obama is a Christian, but that it’s Obama’s “worldview” that he takes issue with. The Associated Press reports that Santorum said of Obama today:
“I am talking about his worldview, and the way he approaches problems in this country. I think they’re different than how most people do in America.” …
The former Pennsylvania senator said Obama’s environmental policies promote ideas of “radical environmentalists,” who, Santorum argues, oppose greater use of the country’s natural resources because they believe “man is here to serve the Earth.” He said that was the reference he was making [yesterday] in his Ohio campaign appearance when he denounced a “phony theology.”
“I think that is a phony ideal. I don’t believe that is what we’re here to do,” Santorum said. “We’re not here to serve the Earth. The Earth is not the objective. Man is the objective.” …
Um, when did Barack Obama ever state that we are “here to serve the Earth”?
Um, when did even any “radical environmentalist” state that we are “here to serve the Earth”?
Is Prick Santorum talking about the “Christo”fascist idea of what Paganism is? Is he, in code, calling Obama an Earth-serving Pagan? Is he calling “radical environmentalists” and Obama supporters Pagans? (Not that there is anything wrong with being a Pagan — the majority of them are a lot more fun to be around than are those evil pricks like Santorum who call themselves “Christians.”)
I ask these questions because environmentalism isn’t about “serving” the Earth. It’s about saving it. Not “serving” it, but conserving, preserving it.
Environmentalism isn’t about whether we should put humankind or the planet above one or the other. That’s a false choice fabricated by the science- and planet-hating wingnuts. Environmentalism is about how humankind and the planet (and the rest of the planet’s lifeforms) are so intertwined.
But, if we have to put one above the other, let’s fucking face it: We humankind need the planet, but the planet sure the fuck doesn’t need us. It can do just fine without us, as it did for the billions of years before we human beings arrived on the scene, and if we carry out the insane irresponsibility of Prick Santorum and his ilk far enough, that’s exactly what will happen: The planet will be free of human beings once again, because we human beings will have wiped ourselves out.
The Bible that Santorum — who, while we’re on the topic of serving, clearly serves the Vatican – thumps indeed puts mankind above the Earth and its natural resources, including, of course, all other of its lifeforms. But that Bible was written centuries and centuries ago, and its ignorant authors knew nothing about science. They knew only superstition. Also at that time, the planet’s human population was small enough that indeed it seemed to the human beings of that time that the Earth could take all of the abuse that mankind could dish out.
But now we’re at more than 7 billion human beings, and the planet is showing obvious signs that it can’t take more abuse. The melting North Pole alone demonstrates that fact, and as I’ve found myself having to pop antihistamines significantly early this year because of all of the trees that already are blossoming in Sacramento even though the start of spring is more than a month away, global warming appears to be quite real to me.
Yes, I suppose that it is about “worldview.”
And Prick Santorum’s worldview — in which mankind is the master of the planet and therefore may do to the planet and its resources whatsoever he pleases – is defunct. Worse, it’s a recipe for the extinction of the human race (not to mention the other species that humankind is wiping out right now).
I suppose that Prick Santorum and his “Christo”fascist ilk want their “Armageddon,” and therefore they’ll do everything in their power to bring it about. (“Armageddon” is not pre-ordained, of course, and any such mass extinction of mankind most likely would be caused by mankind’s own stupid actions, not by some divine intervention.)
Those of us who are sane and who therefore are not bound to the scribblings made by ignorant men centuries and centuries ago, but who value facts and science and logic and reason over ignorance and fear and superstition, indeed have a different worldview than does the Neanderthal Prick Santorum (wait — that’s probably an uncalled-for slam against the Neanderthals).
And those of us who do not share Prick Santorum’s Bible-and-Vatican-based worldview do not wish to go down the dark path that he would drag us, kicking and screaming. As the planet gets hotter and hotter, it would be, indeed, an awful lot like hell on Earth.


Salon.com
Comments
I wish someone would tell Santorum to start talking about his plans for this country instead of throwing dung around and then lying about having thrown the dung. R
Others: Glad you liked this piece. I didn't write it as much as I channeled the Goddess, just let her take over the keyboard...
Indeed, Santorum's worldview is in stark contrast to ours. And it does seem to be a battle between the old and the dysfunctional and the destructive patriarchal worldview and the more inclusive, more just, more functional, saner worldview that still struggles to be fully realized. (I'm tempted to refer to this worldview as the "feminine," but we do need a balance between the two polarities; it's that the feminine has been suppressed for so long that it certainly seems to be -- well, it IS -- the antidote to our patriarchally caused problems.)
Zumalicious, Santorum HAS been telling us his plans for the nation, and they include banning contraception (and of course abortions), allowing (if not even encouraging) more environmental degradation, more unnecessary warfare, and the continued oppression of women and non-heterosexuals and non-"Christians" and other groups who won't kiss the stupid white man's ass.
I'm pretty clear as to what we'd get with a President Santorum.
How does Prick have so many followers, Mango? Well, like attracts like, and ignorance, bigotry and hatred -- the dark path -- is the path of least resistance, the path of the spiritually lazy, is it not?
Righteous Rick should read his Bible, you know, the part where God charges man to have dominion over the earth. Apparently, RR doesn't know the meaning of the word "dominion". It means to care for, not to rape and pillage for personal benefit. That's the trouble with Kindergarten Kristians, like the Pharisees of old, they pick and choose from the sacred text to suit their sins and foibles.
If anyone doubts what a Sanitarium presidency would look like, let the come visit the missing mountain-tops here in TN and in WV, places utterly ravaged by the "Clear Skies Initiative" aka "welfare for coal companies".
Indeed, Santorum wants to protect Big Coal and other forms of planet-killing profiteering. That, I think, is primarily behind his fuck-the-planet-(the-Bible-SAYS-so!) stance. He probably wuvs British Petroleum, too.
The Old Testament, to me, is pretty much nothing but mythology, a cultural artifact. To me, if you call yourself a "Christian," that means that you follow Jesus' teachings -- and those aren't contained in the Old Testament. (If one doesn't want to follow Jesus' actual teachings, but wishes to follow only the Old Testament, he or she can become Jewish, I suppose...)
That said, agreed, "dominion over the planet" should mean "good stewardship of the planet," and that certainly isn't what the Repugnican Tea Party is all about.
Finally, I'm not sure how to primarily label Santorum: as a moron or as evil. He's both. And yes, Frank, I can't see Santorum beating Obama, either. Therefore, I hope with all of my heart that Santorum emerges as his party's candidate. However, even if he doesn't, his high-profile whackery is harming Mitt Romney and his party. Praise the Lord!
GREAT post, Robert.
-R-
Ah, Santorum. The only alternative to the Robot Romney.
What a silly spectacle these Republicans are.
Ha. Most people don’t think like Mr. O.
What, RATIONALLY?
Tis true, though.
Arg.
I like your defense of Environmentalism. Which to me is equivalent with Sanity.
Preserve, not serve. Good point, loved the Pagan reference.
Alas, you know damn well Santorum views anyone who doesn’t share his, how to put it delicately,
Metaphorically-backward views,
Is a pagan to him.
Well, let him spew nonsense. And pray to Gaia or SHE WHOM WE SERVE
that people are in a rational mood on Election Day……………………….
I wonder what he thinks of mr. mitt’s “Christianity”..
Although I sometimes write of the "Goddess," I'm not referring to a literal deity, but to the feminine principle in general, and the feminine principle includes such things as taking care of the needy and the vulnerable (and not subjecting them to social Darwinism), viewing peace as preferable to war (although sometimes war is necessary, but rarely), and demonstrating good stewardship of the planet -- not because you worship the planet, but because, as you point out, James, of out SANITY you don't shit in your own fucking nest.
Taking care of the planet IS "serving" humankind, since humankind depends on the planet for its continued existence. Duh.
Anyway, I fucking hate Prick Santorum, and pretty much every time he opens his mouth the Goddess overtakes me and I must blog about his sorry, evil, ignorant ass.