Bitch, Bitch, Bitch! Time to Shut Up About Palin & Letterman

That Pogo cartoon about Earth Day was co-opted as a key feminist symbol in the 1970's. A reminder to women everywhere that we can be our own worst enemies.
Our version said, We have met the enemy and she is us.
It helped us remember that fear of owning our own destinies must not hold us back from achieving them. That we must unite among ourselves to get results.
And most of all, that we must not get bogged down in dissent over empty oppositional rhetoric or distracted by fatuous misogamy clearly designed to bait us.
It's 40 years later and Pogo is still right. The enemy is still us. She has a name. Sarah Palin. And a cause. Self-promotion.
Just when I believed --having been told self-confidently (and even self-righteously) by women under 50--that today's women have feminism under control, along came Sarah Palin.
Undermining women's rights by ignoring the real issues in order to advance her own agenda, Ms.(ha!) Palin is not a feminist. She's a craven opportunist.
We must stop playing into her --and the Right Wingnut's-- hands. We have just simply got to shut the fuck up about David Letterman.
Was his joke inappropriate? Of course! Was it crafted to support or encourage the rape of teenage girls? Oh PLEASE!
It was one line in a Top Ten list -- a 'bit' well known to be deliberately ridiculous and often barbed. Many public figures have been briefly skewered, including the children of prominent politicians.
All but Palin took it in the spirit --no matter how immature-- it was intended. In this case the joke was also a reflection of the political reality that Sarah Palin and her family have spewed their personal lives all over the media whenever it suited their purposes.
Now it suits Governor Palin to use the Letterman joke to deflect interest or investigation into a long list of alleged improprieties which could derail any change for her potential advancement on the national political stage.
David Letterman apologized. Sincerely. And invited Governor Palin to meet him on the public airways whether to accept his apology or debate her view of his behavior.
Joan Walsh wasn't afraid of hitting the airways to take on Bill O'Reilly. She emerged victorious by her reasoned, accurate responses. And her refusal to stoop to the level of the lowest common denominator.
Is the former Republican Nominee for Vice President of the United States incapable of doing the same? Yes. She only knows how to snipe from the sidelines, strings pulled by political puppeteers angling for a right wing moment in the sun.
"It's Politics, Stupid!" Palin's not protecting her daughters or the cause of women's rights. She's promoting this continuing furor to turn an ill-advised remark to her own, and her foundering party's, advantage.
Has it occurred to no one that by continuing her charade of outrage in keeping this supposedly painful episode alive, Mrs. Palin is allowing --encouraging-- it to publicly humiliate her precious children??
Was Letterman's one-liner even all that misogynistic? I say no. It was a JOKE. Bitch and moan all you want but, like The Onion, Gawker, thousands of other web sites, publications and comedians, Letterman has a right to make jokes about anything and everything. You don't like it, turn off his show.
Please, do not turn a comedian into the anti-feminist anti-Christ. If you do, you become one of Them. The censors. The angry, self-righteous do-gooders who love nothing more than to tell the rest of us how to live.
Please, do not elevate a one-liner to a Right Wing cause celeb on the say-so of a woman who doesn't know the meaning of the word feminism.
By the way, I've read Salon's articles positing Letterman's culpability in keeping misogyny alive. I suggest we look in our own back yard before throwing too many stones.
Look at the Broadsheet pages featuring
Letterman and Palin: Both jerks!
On the same page, under the heading Blogs We Like are these:
Angry Black Bitch
Bitch Ph.D.
Jezebel
Colorful. But who's to say they're not contributing to the idea that it's okay for anybody to call us bitches and ho's? Becasue if we say it, then it must be so.
Until that stops too, the enemy is still us.

Salon.com
Comments
"Undermining women's rights by ignoring the real issues in order to advance her own agenda, Ms.(ha!) Palin is not a feminist. She's a craven opportunist. " So true.
i wasn't paying attention today because i was so disgusted but it looked like someone in politics cheated and apologized publicly so, god willing, the palin thing could be over. for now. love love love and thanks for this terrific post.
The problem with this is… to date only two votes have been cast in their favor… their own!
I think they are in the last 5 seconds of their 15 minutes of fame. Thank god!
And by "us", I mean my percieved political opponent, Sarah Palin.
"We have just simply got to shut the fuck up about David Letterman."
As evidenced by my 21 paragraphs about the subject "we" (you) need to "shut the fuck up" about.
"Has it occurred to no one that by continuing her charade of outrage in keeping this supposedly painful episode alive, Mrs. Palin is allowing --encouraging-- it to publicly humiliate her precious children??"
Has it occurred to you that this ridiculous premise is a pre-emptive defense for scumbags who attack other people's children? That nothing Sarah Palin can ever say or do will legitimate attacks on her children, and to make such an argument is to say the "Bitch was asking for it"?
I don't want to get into the (insane) attacks Palin launched in retaliation, but the fact remains that Limbaugh was a scumbag to go over Chelsea, Letterman was a scumbag to go after either Willow OR Bristol, and people who come down on different sides of that due to partisanship are bad feminists and bad people.
The first thing this is about is hypocrisy, and especially the hypocrisy of the "family values" crowd. Who best to be the standard-bearer for a foundation that purports to support "abstinence only" sex education? Why the unmarried teenager who has just become a mother and proved -- yet again -- the failure of that idiotic policy.
And let us not forget, that foundation is supported by an apparel company that profits from selling suggestive clothing to pre-pubescent girls and employs Britney Spears as a spokesperson.
As for the joke, it was clearly over the line, and Letterman has admitted as much. Frankly, he has always been a little too mean to suit me, the kind of comedian who makes a career out of tearing down other people. Johnny Carson he ain't.
Of course, he's not alone on that score. That shtick is what got Imus in trouble, too. Comedy is a dangerous game -- ask Michael Richards or Jonathan Winters.
Sanctimonious Sarah, on the other hand, has made herself an easy target, and by using her children to promote her ambitions, she has made them targets as well. If she didn't want her children to become involved in the joust, she should have left them home. Instead she used them as props.
Worse, her vile V-P campaign was clearly designed to incite racists and psychos on the Far-Right fringe. Anyone who spews that kind of bile and encourages murderous rage in people has no business complaining about an off-color joke. As it is written in my Bible, "he (or she) who sows the wind will reap the whirlwind."
With proper kudos, I'll quote Tom Cordle in his comment's entireity.
Palin is the poster girl for what's wrong with America and feminism. She's a hypocrite of the highest order.
Great piece,
Rated
If she incites negative public outrage, she whines that she is being mistreated.
Letterman could have shut this dog and pony show right down by not even mentioning the controversy. He's playing his own cards though, and is clearly enjoying the improved attention and ratings.
In the end, for some, it is as profitable to attack the Palinocracy as it is to BE the Palinocracy.
Rated!
Has it occurred to you that this ridiculous premise is a pre-emptive defense for scumbags who attack other people's children?
How about bringing reality into the picture? Letterman is a COMEDIAN. It is his job to make fun of all sorts of things, including other people. Was the joke in poor taste? Absolutely. Should he have even bothered saying it? Oh, geez. Everyone makes mistakes. Some are more hurtful than others. Hopefully people learn from their mistakes. The joke was intended to be directed at Sarah Palin, and Bristol was just the vehicle for the joke (and make no mistake, Letterman thought he was taking a jibe at Sarah and Bristol, NOT at Willow). This wasn't even in the same league as those two idiotic shock jocks that attacked transgendered people on the public airwaves. Not even close. Politicians are fair game for comics, always have been. Sarah Palin is no different and should not be looking for preferential treatment, 'cause she isn't going to get it.
Letterman made the joke publicly, and he publicly apologized for it.
What more do you want?
You don't see Bill Clinton crying for Letterman's head, nor are George Bush or Elliot Spitzer or John Edwards. Get over yourselves, people.
BTW, Excellent piece Sally. Rated.
Governor Palin does not have to deflect interest or investigations into a long list of alleged improprieties. She was cleared of each and every one of them.
As far as Letterman saying he is sorry, well if the last one was the first one, this would have gone away very quickly. The fact that he couldn't man up and just do what he finally did and not try to make another joke about it is what kept it in the news.
She was right about no going on his show and increasing his ratings. He has been behind the Tonight show for years. He would have loved the added viewers that Palin would have brought to him. As for Joan going on O'Reilly, he doesn't need the ratings boost. He has been number one for over 8 years. He beats the rest of the people he goes against combined. The ratings boost went to Salon because of the number of viewers the Factor has.
Letterman is know for his left leaning politics. So why is it that Imus got canned and not Letterman? Imus realized the screwed up as soon as the words came out of his mouth and manned up. Letterman had to have his arm twisted. Imus went on other shows and spread the word that he was sorry. Where has Letterman done that? All the race pimps came out against Imus. Where are the feminists against Letterman? Both told a joke that should have not been told. Imus just said it. Letterman read it, rehearsed it, and then did it on TV. No off the cuff remark for Letterman. He had a chance to cut the joke, but he did it anyway.
As for those who want Letterman's head on a plate, they need to go away. It was a bad joke, you are right about that. He finally did the right thing. Imus should not have been fired, and neither should Letterman.
Now the one point you're totally correct about, it's time for this issue to die.
As I have stated before, I am the same age as Chelsea Clinton- "He's a Comedian!" was a bullshit excuse for Limbaugh's attacks then, and it's a bullshit excuse now.
Hell, Bill, even now you can't see the difference between a Politician ("fair game") and her family ("Bristol was just the vehicle for the joke")
It is UNACCEPTABLE to use anyone's child as a vehicle to attack them, and people who do so should face serious consequences, including AT A MINIMUM being required to issue a sincere apology.
You people who disagree should have an epi-pen handy, lest this exposure to principle cause a fatal allergic reaction.
To reply...
I want to thank those who agree with me for understanding that we are letting a tempest in a teapot distract from the real issues of discrimination and sexism.
Thanks to Tom and others who offer reasoned additional points which I should have made myself. But hey, then I'd leave Tom et al with nothing to say and that's not fair. Really, I do appreciate the deeper insights.
To those who disagree, you make my point... we are all free to say what we want. I choose not to through further light on your point of view, which is also my right.
Teddy, nice to see you! And thanks, that's the real, current me up there sans my hot new fire engine red glasses.
Cat, a little heavy on the rhetoric, but I'm also on record saying Imus shouldn't have been fired, repulsive as his behavior was.
Thanks all, debate away, see you later!
No, Wycked, the "reality" is that a "comedian" made a "joke" about a "famous person" and included "members of their family". He was most certainly making fun of the waffle that the Palins did regarding Bristol's pregnancy. The man is ANYTHING but a misogynist and your inability to recognize "humor that is in poor taste" from "a lazy, misogynist attack" is very telling.
For the record, I don't much like Letterman. I honestly do not find the man very funny. But I recognize his right to make fun of Sarah Palin. If she wants to continuously use her family in order to further her own agenda, why the hell shouldn't comedians be able to play on that?
Last response to you. Thanks for playing.
After reading the first blurb about it I've tried to ignore it - having to suffer only furtive glances at headlines. That CNN and other sites are even shoveling this schlock at us only shows how debased they've become.
Obama's puppy - I don't care. Michelle's arms - I don't care. Jon and Kate - not only don't I care, I don't even know who they are or why any website thinks I should care!
Sal, another great one. And thanks for going with Alex.
But to give your thoughts more respect than they deserve- you asked "If she wants to continuously use her family in order to further her own agenda, why the hell shouldn't comedians be able to play on that?"
1. The "comedians" were not playing on her using her family, they were slut-shaming her daughter. The joke was not about Bristol being used as a photo-op, but about Bristol's implied promiscuity.
2. The reason Palin's bad behavior doesn't excuse others' bad behavior was also covered in the "two wrongs don't equal a right" day in Kindergarden- I'll see if I can get you the Cliff notes.
I hope this has helped.
Thanks, Sal!
Call it what you want, Wycked. I'm not gonna get into a comment war with you on someone else's post.
That's simply rude.
i say they're not contributing to the idea that it's okay for anybody to call us bitches and hos, just like how black guys who use the n-word don't make it okay for me to use it. we get to name ourselves. we also get to refuse those names when they're meant unkindly.
i'm not a bad feminist or a bad person for laughing at letterman's joke. we are not here to validate each other: we're individuals. this attitude is what prompted mccain to choose palin as a running mate in the first place. her vaginal credentials do not matter to me: i get to reject her, and it doesn't mean i'm not a feminist. it means i'm me, and that should be enough.
wycked, you make my gender look weak, and that's your right. i do not want the protection you demand. and neither did palin, once upon a time:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9Y8FKAsxmk
why shouldn't that matter now?
The never-too-late, great Larry Flynt rode this pony all the way to the Supreme Court, so Dave don't have to:
"In Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988), the United States Supreme Court held, in a unanimous 8-0 decision (Justice Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of the case), that the First Amendment's free-speech guarantee prohibits awarding damages to public figures to compensate for emotional distress intentionally inflicted upon them." [wiki]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And although the skyrocket-that-became-a-miserable-parody-of- himself-Lenny-Bruce won his first obscenity trial in SF, he subsequently lost his way, exemplifying winning a battle, but not the war, but only because both the locus and the reason for the war had changed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's ridicody -- hmm... parodiculous.... hmm. Let's invent a new word for that Woman from Wasilla.
Connie Mack - how 'bout Wasilly Woman?
you OWE me!
Stacey, I'm confused. Did you just compare me to Sarah Palin?
Connie and Sandra, now you've both got me singing Wasilly Woman.
bstrangely, I stand by what I said. If we call ourselves names we are saying it's okay for others to do so. Just as Bill Cosby has called on Black comedians to stop using the n word, women should stop giving tacit approval of the use of words like bitch and ho.
this is a huge hurdle i see for feminists. i am not a symbol for your choices, and you're not a symbol of mine.
incidentally, it's "jezebel" not "zezebel".
sarah palin is doing this now on the talk show circuit. she freely makes women into talking points instead of treating them like real human beings. that is misogyny. i don't think she means to do it, but that's the crux of her complaint about letterman: she doesn't want him to apologize to her daughter, she wants him to apologize to ALL young women.
she is not my emissary. she's not my mother. we should be free to disagree with each other, instead of imagining new ways to blame women for inequality. i don't think men do that to each other. why do we do it?
I smile at such a Sally! I'm sure you've heard all the Sally phrases...but that's an antique one I really like and it suits you. Not that you are a 'sally'...you know....xox
bs, thank you for pointing out my Jezebel typo, a major faux pas in this post. I've fixed it. I hope you'll attempt the same with your sense of scale and humor.
are you joking in this post, or do you really mean what you seem to be saying? sincerely, i'm not giving up even the tiniest fragments of my identity based on what some blogger does.
if that's not the point of what you're saying, then please accept my apology. but if it is... why can't you talk about it?
...THIS JUST IN...OBAMA SWATS A FLY!!!
Good grief, what is becoming of our society?
These explanations lead inexorably to the green-eyed monster, which I think is alive and well in this debate. I would venture to posit that if you group Palin's detractors in categories, homely women who share the view that abortion is some sort of enema would predominate. If the show fits, wear it.
Say what you will about her political and economic policies. But to decry her contribution to the cause of feminism is just plain nuts.
Don't play dumb. Ann Coulter says she hates feminists and blames them for any number of things (except for her right to vote) and she's a very successful woman in a male dominated field.
It's possible for women to be successful in whatever they do and still contribute nothing to feminism.
i mean, she hasn't got any kids and she's not married. either she is:
celibate
using the world's most effective birth control
willing to abort babies so she can keep her career
which do you think it is? is she "responsible" or a baby killing spinster?
But maybe you're on to something. Maybe deep down she is a closet feminist, as I suspect her greatest motivation to be not the disarming of the feminist movement but the approval of men. That's why she called John Edwards a fag. She thought men (her peers, her fans) would like it.
Most women don't have to resort to things like that in order to disarm a man.
And how she looks has nothing to do with whether or not she contributes to women's causes. I shouldn't have to remind you of that, Gordon.