Stories From A Life

Been there. Done that. Writing about it.

Sally Swift

Sally Swift
Location
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Birthday
June 14
Title
VP, Repartee
Company
Swift Retorts
Bio
sally: a journey, a venture, an expression of feeling, an outburst, a quip, a wisecrack ... me

Editor’s Pick
APRIL 7, 2010 10:06AM

Abuse, Accusations, Denials, Sex, Tap-Dancing: Vatican Idol

Rate: 31 Flag
 

 

"Father, can I talk to you about becoming a nun?"

"Certainly, my child, come into the rectory and take off your clothes."
===============

"Father, have you molested young teenage girls?"

"Such a harsh term, Bishop. They look up to me. Especially on their knees."

"Well, thank god you haven't molested boys like so many of your brothers!"

"Certainly not, Bishop! How distasteful. I'd like to return to my own country."

"Go with god, Father. And stay with your own Bishop."

================

“We cannot simply throw out the priest, so he is just staying in the bishop’s house, and he is helping me with the appointment of teachers.” Bishop Arulappan Amalraj, Ootacamund, India


Yes, I made up the italicised quotes, but the last one is real, from the New York Times and the A.P. It's part of the latest Catholic Church sex scandal and the Vatican's attempts to sidestep it.

"The priest" is Rev. Joseph Jeyapaul, a Catholic priest from India who's now under criminal charges for sexual abuse allegedly committed in 2004 while ministering to the faithful in Crookston, Minnesota.  

Here we go again. Priests molesting, communities protesting, law enforcement not arresting because the Vatican's divesting. I want to scream.

The Pedophile
The local Minnesota bishop says he felt responsible for potential future victims and asked the Vatican to step in. The Vatican threw it to the bishop in India to "monitor" Father Jeyapaul's contact with minors.

So India is keeping an eye on Father Jeyapaul but they won't extradite him and they might consider the Vatican's idea that he agree to "laicization," i.e. being removed from the priesthood.

Defrocked. Oh the horror. Oh the danger.

He'd still be Catholic, but not a priest. Not a criminal either. Just a man free to continue to seek fresh young female prey any time, any place. Without consequences.

A Vatican lawyer insists they're cooperating with law enforcement on extradition efforts. Hmm. They gave a Minnesota prosecutor the priest's address in India. Finis.

We could have found that ourselves online.

The story of yet another pedophile priest being defiantly protected by the Catholic Church is outrageous. The back story is literally mind boggling.

p and l

The Protectors
The "laicization" suggestion came from one of my favorite hypocrites, Former San Francisco Archbishop William Levada (above, right).

Cardinal Levada is now Prefect for the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith. Ahem. That was Pope Benedict's job when he was Cardinal Ratzinger under Pope John Paul II.

A monumentally political post, the Pope's top Cardinal. Running the Vatican office responsible for enforcing church doctrine, punishing wayward sinners and ...wait for it... dealing with pedophile priests.

(I love that quaint distinction. Apparently the Vatican feels "pedophile priests" aren't quite "wayward sinners.") 

But wait, the connection gets better: as the late John Paul II's policy wonk, Cardinal Ratzinger, aka "God's Rottweiler"  was in charge of covering up handling the huge pedophile priest scandal in San Francisco. During ...wait for it... the tenure of none other than Archbishop William Levada.

Under Ratzinger, the Vatican's Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith "clarified and streamlined its procedures in 2001 to respond to accusations of sexual abuse by priests," as the NYT reports.

Oh really? How's that been working out? Is there a solid system in place to deal with pedophile priests? Well. No.

The Politics
Back then, Ratzinger was big on tossing politically incorrect, dissident theologians out on their ears for not toeing the party line.

Pious child molesters, not so much.  C'mon in guys, we'll cover your tracks and hide your disgraceful acts.

Now, as Pope Benedict XVI, he's passed that torch to Archbishop Levada, another harshly conservative doctrinarian.

Here's what they stand united against: abortion, euthanasia, feminism, gay marriage, homosexuality and lifting the celibacy requirement for priests.

Uh, Your Holiness? Cardinal Levada? About those last two. Horse is out of the barn. And roaming all over the world. With your blessings.

Levada was a principal player in his city's pedophile scandal cover up. A statement from The Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, ''Regarding abuse in the San Francisco archdiocese, Levada has been slow to act, harsh to victims and committed to secrecy.''

And get this: Levada's on record as having said that priests should seek counsel from their bishops and consider refusing communion to Catholic politicians who support abortion.

Yikes! No wishy-washy stance on separation of Church and State for this tyrannical theologian. What a trinity of traits: unyielding, unforgiving, underhanded.

Just the person you want at the right hand of the Pope, inspiring the faithful, bringing Catholics back into the fold. What a pair of role models these two make.

What a tradition to pass on to the next generation.

The Point
Pedophilia might get a priest fired if he's caught, his story's really bad and the media pressure gets too hot. Never mind. He's still a Catholic, still on the stairway to Heaven.

Yet a pro-abortion politician isn't worthy of communion or redemption. Just a cast off sinner on the road to hell.

The Vatican has historically shown a level of arrogance and hubris in direct opposition to the teachings of its own faith. Yes, it's a political world. But sexual abuse of children by their supposed spiritual leaders is too eggregious, too horrific to be ignored.

To defend, protect, support the offenders is a crime against nature. Against humanity. Against God. Who are these men to do such crimes without fear of retribution?

In the end, this isn't about religion or politics. It's about Right and Wrong. There's only one group lower than pedophiles ... the powerful hypocrites who protect them.
 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Stupid "rate" button won't work. But really, really well stated, Sally.
the people who defend the catholic church on this issue are missing the point (which you make so clearly and with such justified anger): that the church and its bureaucracy knew, it hid the abusers and then it lied about what it had done and what it knew. absolutely indefensible, all of it.
Thanks Owl. Rate button's wonky all over site today.

femme, I don't understand blind faith in the face of such blatant, cynical leaders who literally depend on the faithful for cover.
Well, the one thing about the Catholic church that seems certain--there is no need for them to change because they are ensuring that they will become obsolete in their current incarnation. Their obscene wealth has always manage to provide a barricade of sorts before, but I am not sure even that will help. I hope not. For all the reasons you list above in this important post, I hope they have done themselves in.
Great post! Hopefully they'll go bankrupt from all the lawsuits and then they'll just be a bunch of dirty old men that go to prison
Go girl. Truth is power. You make your case.
Great post Sally, thanks for weighing in on this. Is it any mystery that an ex Hitler youth pope would have character issues, and prove he cannot be trusted as a protector of the innocent? Rated.
I'm glad you point this out as pedophilia. Lifting the celibacy ban would do nothing for that. These are men who prey on young boys and letting them get "married" won't change a thing. Same with the few who are preying on girls/nuns. Men who want to get married and have families don't actually become Catholic priests. It's a voluntary action, like becoming a Buddhist priest.

And as for your comment: "I don't understand blind faith in the face of such blatant, cynical leaders who literally depend on the faithful for cover," there are many of us who feel exactly the same way about our current over the top corrupt Congress in the U.S. so these things are not limited to the realm of the Church only.
Much better post than Maureen Dowd in the Times this morning. Well said.
The refusal of the church to accept responsibility is astounding. Each new revalation brings the same legalistic posturing from the church. How do they not see that this is a moral issue, as well as a legal one?
This is the same Pope who, very shortly after his election, blamed "neo-paganism" for the Holocaust, even though it happened in countries that were overwhelmingly Christian. Pope Palpadict can't even speak responsibly about the crimes of others, so it really doesn't make sense to expect him to speak responsibly about the crimes of his own Church.
Amen, Sally. The institutional bureaucracy protects itself.
This is the best written and truth bearing post I've seen on this issue yet. The hypocrisy of the Catholic Church knows no bounds - and I do define it as the "church" as all roads lead to Rome.

What gets me the most is how spiritual faith has been confused with blind obedience.
Preach, Sally!
Rated.

Lezlie
sophieh, their wealth has protected and insulated them for so long, I wonder if it will ever change. Richest country in the world while serving many of the world's poorest people.

Poppi, there you go. Would be nice to see some of them as dirt poor dirty old men but who will ever win a lawsuit big enough to wipe them out? Local churches will go under before the Vatican does... in fact, instead of the Vatican.

Lea, this is just the tip of the iceberg. So much more truth needed to be believed by those who blindly support The Church and won't use their power to stop it's misdeeds.

SheilaT, I have never liked or trusted this pope, especially because his past was followed by such horrendous behavior as John Paul II's right hand man. What a nickname, 'God's Rottweiler.'

Deborah, I'm not sure I see a parallel between blind faith in a Church which openly supports pedophiles and a Congress which takes bribes. Both are wrong, but allowing pedophiles to hide behind God is, to me, a much greater evil.
Wow, Dog, "much better than Maureen Dowd" is a compliment I don't take lightly. I have to admit I hadn't read her column, so now I'll go see. Maybe the NYT will hire me too. heh

jimmy, you hit the main point of my outrage: morality. They set absolute laws for moral behavior and even thought, yet they break those laws constantly in the worst ways possible without apology.

motherwell and Stim, we agree, this pope, this Vatican has raised politics and bureaucratic spin to an evil art form. With no accountability.

Sparking, thank you, it's not easy to write about something so wrong. You said it all, right here, "What gets me the most is how spiritual faith has been confused with blind obedience."

Lezlie, I'll preach, but only if you make up your own mind at the end. :)
Let's clarify Catholic doctrine: If you rape an altar boy, it's bad; but it's even worse if you use a condom.
This is one of the reasons why I can no longer be a Catholic. I was raised as one. My parents used to joke about the priests and boys. It was well known. My mother used to say she was glad she didn't have boys who would be altar boys.

I like Liberation Theology and that gave me hope, but then you have these good people being hounded out of the church. I have a private dialogue with God. I don't want to be part of the Papal Bull.

Excellent read! Thanks.

Lucy
Bonnie, your first comment cracked me up. Your second one is on the money. I am appalled there's been no major outcry, but I am not a Catholic and don't know what kind of defiance might entail. Surely there must be many priests and parishioners who don't support such despicable behavior. Does no one ever speak out against the Vatican?

pandore, thank you.

jp1954, seems pretty clean that's the priority system.
Lucy, so sorry I missed your comment! You had already answered part of my question to Bonnie. I'm very glad you've been able to maintain your own faith your own way. I have many "lapsed" Catholic friends who feel the same.
Sally, my mind was made up before I read your well-done piece. I simply meant that I am in total agreement. I am what they call a recovering Catholic who has been sick of the hypocrisy for many, many years.
sally, thanks for this. It really does make you think about priorities. Perhaps the idea is that every life is sacred....before birth and after they grow up. but not at the most critical dangerous time.

when they are vulnerable little children.
Lezlie, got it, didn't want to assume anything.

dolores, that's what it comes down to for every adult, especially those with power over minds, hearts and spirits: protect the children... and certainly Not their abusers.
The Catholic Church is what NAMBLA would be like if it had money, power and cassocks.
why get upset about the catholic church? they are only hypocritical child molesters. the american government is engaged in mass murder. let's start fixing there first.
Can you fucking believe this shit?