Saturn Smith

Orbital Matter
Editor’s Pick
SEPTEMBER 17, 2009 5:09PM

Happy Constitution Day!

Rate: 8 Flag
Recently, a friend on Open Salon asked how I managed to keep reading and writing about politics, when the last few months have been so full of disappointment and frustration. Part of my answer was simple dorkness:

I've been reading a lot about the American revolution -- right now I'm working on an Alexander Hamilton biography -- and everything about that time reminds me that everything we're looking at now, all of the ugliness, all of the craziness -- it was ten times worse back then, and the country was much shakier at the time, too. I mean, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams both took over newspapers to essentially slander each other's characters, Alexander Hamilton was killed by a former vice president in a duel, and now we remember them as wise heroes of a kinder age. And they fought all their battles when the country could've easily broken apart around them. So I spend some time telling myself, OK, things suck, people are getting crazy and illogical, but -- at the end of this, even if things go as badly as they possibly could, we'll still have the status quo, which is a functioning government, regular elections, and continued chances to change things every time we go to the polls.

I've kept thinking about this as time has gone on and as I've read more about the early years of the Revolution. Unlike now, every one of those early patriots had to go to bed with the fear that he would wake not to another day of controversy in America, but to a new day of no country at all. Anarchy and chaos were real possibilities. No matter how terrible things get -- and yes, they've been pretty terrible of late -- I have never gone to sleep thinking that, perhaps, tomorrow, there will be no more United States.

Maybe that's terrible optimism. Governments rise and fall all the time in the world, in countries small and large, and people survive. I'd like to think that I'm not so blindly tied to my nationality that I could survive in a world without America, where an American identity was meaningless -- but I'm not sure it's true.

Thus today is of special import for me. It's Constitution Day. Two hundred and twenty-two years ago, on September 17, 1787, the new Constitution of the United States of America was adopted by the Constitutional Convention, signed by the 39 delegates, and sent out to the states for ratification. The National Archives, where the original text still lives, headlines it as "a model of cooperative statesmanship and the art of compromise," and that has continued to be true throughout its history. We may not agree upon its meaning, always, or its deployment, but Americans almost to a person seem to agree upon its value. Our stability as a country -- and we are a shockingly stable union -- rests most firmly upon the survival of this document.

That's not to say that the Constitution is a stony, implacable thing. In fact, for all the stability it's inspired, it's hard to mark even a concrete date of its birth.  It would take another three years before the Bill of Rights were added, in 1791, and it's been amended another 17 times since then. Even now, there are several proposals for amendment before Congress, and 11,000 amendments have been proposed over time. Sure, it's been used for good and for ill, to justify moments of greatness and horrible errors, but it's still there, binding us to a common set of purposes. Is it outdated? Moldy in language and, certainly, in its descriptions of who should be a citizen? Absolutely. But what do you expect from the oldest written national constitution in the world? Perfection? No -- never in our Constitution. It is a document notable for its mistakes, but also for its ability to rise above them, to amend its own content without changing its real purpose. It is a truly American thing.

So -- go forth and celebrate like it's 1787. Lift an ale (Sam Adams, maybe?), try the Which Founding Father Are You? quiz (I'm James Madison), take a stroll about your free and enduring country, and meditate on the meaning of the document still holding us together:
 
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
 
 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Yes, you're right. Jefferson et al. hired pamphleteers to copy their viscious gossip about their opponents -- adultery, incest, theft, murder -- the worst stuff you can imagine. So it's nothing new. But it wasn't that widespread.

A great book on this is Gore Vidal's "Burr." Historical fiction to be sure, but I believe most of it.

Thanks for this. R
I'm interested in Burr as he (of course) constantly crops up in my Hamilton reading. I'll have to add that to my growing list of to-reads, John! Thanks for the rec.
Thanks for the excuse to lift a Sam Adams, and to value the Constitution all the more. I appreciated this particularly, ". . .every one of those early patriots had to go to bed with the fear that he would wake not to another day of controversy in America, but to a new day of no country at all." Right you are. Thanks for this post.
reminds me of the Roseanne show when they changed out the old Becky for a new actress and John Goodman said in a scripted line about Becky: the same. only different.

our world over time: the same. only different.
neat! happy constitution day to you too!

john blumenthal, what do you mean when you say "it wasn't that widespread"?
"But Americans almost to a person seem to agree upon its value." Yes! But, what do we do to make it more than a hopeful, optimistic version of our daily lives. Those of us with jobs can feel very good about it, so can those receiving unemployment benefits... I go back to the question in my post: How equal are the Senators to the Homeless people? As sunny as our Constitution is, as much as it has helped hold things together...what does it really do for destitute people, the people on the streets of Washington D.C. and elsewhere. Let's celebrate it's POTENTIAL, as well as it's history.
vidal is careful about facts, and 'burr' is pretty good history, as well as a good read. it's worth reading to remind/inform our
selves that the sainted founding fathers were in fact just as vile as the current crop of politicians.

if you trouble yourself to read private correspondence by the writers of the constitution, you would stop using the word 'democracy' in connection with the usa. it was not their intent, and broadening the franchise did not change the nature of the constitution.
It is amazing, what we've achieved, this little experimental country.

Hah! I'm James Madison too. Now I gotta go look him up, learn more and share with others. ;-)
I am only 2/3 human under the original constitution, so I'm only 1/3 happy about it.
Yeah, it is a terribly flawed document in many ways -- but those amendments, and just the idea of ready amendment, I applaud that, you know?
Another great piece Saturn. It helps keep everything in perspective when the 'history in the making' around us threatens to overwhelm. I just have one question. How many OSers took that quiz and WERE NOT Madison? :)
For true dorkiness, we have a miniature golf course in the western suburbs of Boston with a US Constitution theme. The place is a mixture of traditional cheesy putt-putt golf (windmill, whale, etc.) with an American Revolution overlay--e.g., the last hole is three colonial muskets stood on end, with the hole in the middle of their butt-ends. As you walk the course, a chorus of voices recites the Constitution over a p.a. system. As Jack Paar used to say--I kid you not.
What a better way to celebrate Constitution day than repeal the patriot act, RICCO, and most of the BS drug laws that are not only working but totally unconstitutional.

It does not surprise me that those in power would challenge the restraints of the Constitution, what does surprise me is how quickly we rollover in the name of security when they do.
I took it trying to be Alexander Hamilton, PunterJoe, and wound up as John Rutledge. How does one become Hamilton?

Con, that is excellent. I will have to make a pilgrimage, someday.
Most important to me now is this.. The Constitution was written in ENGLISH.. not Spanish.

I am so disgusted by the Hispanic immigrants.. (not Vietnamese, Korean or Tagalog.. who all do endeavor to the English language)... it is the Hispanic that comes to America, to absorb the benefits of this document and the others.. yet change the fabric of this society without adopting the language it was created in.

Majority of Hispanics feel they must be adapted to.. not adapt.. as clearly reported by the Pew Hispanic Reports.. btw.

And this is why this document is weakened each year in the passing.. because it was never meant to be remolded to other cultures.. but to stand as a beacon for all cultures. That's how American twists itself into an unrecognizable state.

This is the culture that does not respect what America was founded on.. and in.. English.. and the current government.. oddly enough.. doesn't either.

If you look for pretzel logic.. and you find it.. beware.. corruption is at it's center. Life is too simple to not see clear truths.

Where chaos is twisting.. and corruption is its center... that's akin to evil.
I find it hard to agree with any of that, Victoria. The Constitution is a constantly evolving document and was meant as such; claiming the language implies a desire to exclude misses much of the point and the culture in which it was written. America wasn't particularly homogeneous at its founding. I don't think it's fair to say that it intends a cultural exclusion now for those who come to America guided by its principles, no matter what language they originally read the document (or hear of its promise) in.

The more technical argument to this is, simply, that naturalization still requires a test that's more stringent than most born-here citizens ever have to face, so those from any country who choose to make America their home plausibly have a deeper understanding of the written Constitution than many of us born into the rights granted in that document and its amendments.