Climate Change Hits North Dakota, Again (and Again)
Record temperatures in the arctic have been linked to the snowstorms this year that are currently causing the fourth-worst flood of all times in Fargo, North Dakota. Last year, they had the fifth-worst flood of all time, and two years ago, the worst ever. It's been that kind of decade for the Dakotas. As climate change gets worse and worse, I imagine the world will need many, many more sandbags, or, perhaps, the world will need many more sandbag replacements (NYT):

As Fargo, N.D., confronts its third major flood in three years, local governments, businesses and residents are shifting to a number of modern alternatives to hold back the waters of the Red River.
“I’ve seen enough sandbags for a lifetime,” said Alan Kallmeyer, who enlisted dozens of friends and co-workers the last two years for a full day of this grueling masonry, filling and stacking thousands of sandbags around his riverside house.
This year, Mr. Kallmeyer bought a device, already used by several of his neighbors, that rings his house with a four-foot-tall tube of water. The device, known as an AquaDam, cost nearly $8,000. But it took just a few strain-free hours to set up and will be just as easy to take down.
It's interesting to note that those who can't afford $8,000 in home protection will likely be relying on the old technology (sandbags) this year -- and those who can't afford even those will, likely, just be overrun. Climate change, like every other national problem we face, is going to hit those who are poor the hardest.
Along the way, though, it does seem like someone could be making a flood of money -- pun intended -- by coming up with ways to stop flooding before it starts. A guy who will pay $8,000 for an aqua fence might be convinced rather easily to pay an extra 2 percent at the gas pump if someone could make a credible, clear case for how it might stifle this record flooding in the future. You might also now be able to make a much clearer case to the people of North Dakota about Climate Change being a threat to national security: in 2009, North Dakota had to "borrow" National Guard troops from a nearby state to combat the floods, since most of its service members were in Iraq or Afghanistan.
The only plus side I can see to climate change being made real in daily life is that it might make folks more willing to do something to stop it. Otherwise, I'll be looking forward to those who called for people to move out of New Orleans to begin asking citizens in the flood plains of the Midwest to abandon their homes and livelihoods instead of giving up the habits that will make those landscapes uninhabitable.

Salon.com
Comments
Sometimes I think Mother Earth is shrugging her shoulders in dismay...and we should all be listening.
Excellent post, unreservedly.
▂ ▃ http://www.goodshopping100.com/ ▂ ▃
very good web,believe you will love it.
exquisite watches shirts,bags,hat and the decorations.We have good reputation, fashion products,
favourable price.
■■■FREE SHIPPING,accept paypal
▂ ▃ http://www.goodshopping100.com/ ▂ ▃
Linking a particular weather event with climate change (as per human-induced changes to the flux of light energy at the top of the earth's atmosphere via CO2 emissions) is fraught with experimental issues, uncertainties and a lack of knowledge of the true variability of the climate without our involvement.
It seems that every time we hear that climate change is causing something/will cause something, the story changes because we learn that actually the earth can make a great deal more weather patterns all on its own. For one thing, you ignore the fact that we have seen much stronger oscillations between El Nino and La Nina in the last 1o to 15 years than in the previous 30. With the strong La Nina that we have this year, temperatures all over the upper and western US are below normal and well as precipitation above normal.
So which is it? Excess snowfall from melting of Arctic sea ice combined with a natural process (Arctic Oscillation) or just the natural interactions between the continents and the heat content of the Pacific Ocean (El Nino/La Nina)?
I certainly don't know and I would hazard a guess no one knows either. But you've put yourself on a limb.
What happens if you're wrong? Is climate change not an issue anymore if it didn't cause this flood? If it is still an issue, stories like this one can make it harder to solve.
First, more recently, is this presentation, which concludes that even though global warming/climate change is ongoing, there is not an associated increase in the amount of floods happening worldwide. There is no trend in either direction in this work.
Second is
'However, observations to date provide no conclusive and general proof as to how climate change affects flood behaviour.'
In fact, more rivers had shown decreases in flooding according to that work.
So not only can we not decipher whether a specific flood is due to natural causes or is enhanced by a human-induced increase in the greenhouse effect, we cannot even tell what the effect of global warming/climate change is on floods in general.
Caution can be wisely used in this context in my opinion.