Scott Mendelson's Blog

Open Salon's resident movie nerd and box office geek.

Scott Mendelson

Scott Mendelson
Location
Woodland Hills, California, United States
Birthday
April 02
Bio
A ten-year Salon reader, Mendelson also has a film and politics blog/column at Mendelon's Memos: located at: http://scottalanmendelson.blogspot.com/. He is also a free lance voice over artist and occasionally contributes film reviews for www.ValleySceneMagazine.com.

AUGUST 31, 2008 3:29PM

"No issue stance yet recorded..." Random Thoughts on Palin

Rate: 0 Flag

by Scott Mendelson

First off, congrats on McCain from completely swiping the news cycle away from Obama. If this was going to be the pick, I'm genuinely surprised that they didn't 'accidentally' leak it yesterday as was rumored to be the plan.

Since everyone is noting the slight similarities, I wonder if Obama and co (or more likely an unaffiliated 527) can haggle Tina Fey into doing campaign commercials for them, basically portraying Sarah Palin and explicitly laying out some of her conservative opinions and bits of scandal. Something along the lines of "I may oppose a woman's right to choose, even in cases of rape and incest, but that's ok, cause I'm a woman too!" or "I'm currently under investigation for firing my safety commissioner after they refused to fire my former brother-in-law, but it's ok because you all hate your brother-in-laws." Regardless, I'd imagine that Ms. Fey will be doing plenty of guest cameos on SNL this season. At the very least, Hillary Clinton now has a new arch-nemesis, and Geraldine Ferraro has a shot at redemption (it's a shame that Elizabeth Edwards' rep is tarnished as she would be useful here too).

Point being, McCain seems to have picked her because she's a very conservative female politician with a good biography and a generally attractive appearance. Basically, he's trying to shore up the hard-right base, and he's cynical enough to hope that women (especially some former Clinton supporters) will vote for him simply because his VP selection is a woman. Furthering the inexplicable nature of this pick, there are plenty of very qualified Republican women in various government offices right now, such as Kaylee Hutchinson or (ideology aside) Condi Rice, but instead McCain went with a more or less novice, breaking the first rule of VP selection - 'because I could die' (and breaking of said rule will further make his age and health a major issue in the coming weeks).

The irony of course is that McCain's best line of attack against Obama (because it had a kernel of plausible truth to it) was that Barack Obama was a foreign policy novice and lacked experience, and that much of his success in politics came from the aura of celebrity (I don't agree, but it was a solid point of criticism). Now, after Obama attempted to blunt said criticisms with his VP pick of Joe Biden, McCain has gone and picked a running mate with zero foreign policy experience, someone who is more or less unknown that will now become an instant celebrity more for her position (the first female VP candidate of the GOP) than for her (modest but genuine) political accomplishments. Quite frankly, I can't wait to see Joe Biden debate Palin on foreign policy, or even domestic policy (imagine - the first woman GOP vp candidate vs the old white male who wrote the 'violence against women act'). Although now anything short of a massacre would be considered a disappointing performance by Biden.

Come what may, history will be made in November. It's just a shame that the shattering of one glass ceiling may cause death by a thousand cuts.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
You say:"(it's a shame that Elizabeth Edwards' rep is tarnished as she would be useful here too)."

How is Elizabeth's rep tarnished? By being the spouse of a cheater? If that's the case, then Hillary should be at the bottom of the totem pole, not near the top.

Have I missed something?
In an otherwise good piece, you tarnished it with the exact issue that Wayne raises. For shame.
Add my voice to the chorus of being puzzled by Elizabeth Edward's "tarnished" reputation. Unless you are "Dr. Laura" or Rush who believes a spouse is to blame for her husband's infidelity, then I just don't understand where she has done anything wrong.

Edwards is undoubtedly keeping a low profile simply because she doesn't wish to have the media picking at the scabs of fresh wounds. I can't say I blame her.
I was referring to this article: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/wayoflife/08/26/elizabeth.edwards.ap/?imw=Y&iref=mpstoryemail

As for my own opinion, I hold Edwards in less esteem that I might otherwise because she allegedly knew full well about the career-killing affair and still encouraged John Edwards to run for president. He's first and foremost to blame and I've written about that elsewhere. But if what has been written about Edwards' knowledge of the affair, and the horrible risk that she allowed her husband to take, then she too deserves some culpability. Not for the affair, or even for the cover up, but rather for endangering the Democratic Party and thus the entire nation.
I think it is ridiculous to hold Elizabeth Edwards to a higher standard than her husband. Elizabeth Edwards is no more responsible for John Edwards behavior than I am. Blaming Elizabeth Edwards for John's transgressions and his "risk" to the democratic party is akin to blaming Hillary for the impeachment ordeal of Bill Clinton and blaming Laura Bush for Iraq and New Orleans after Katrina.