Scott Mendelson's Blog

Open Salon's resident movie nerd and box office geek.

Scott Mendelson

Scott Mendelson
Location
Woodland Hills, California, United States
Birthday
April 02
Bio
A ten-year Salon reader, Mendelson also has a film and politics blog/column at Mendelon's Memos: located at: http://scottalanmendelson.blogspot.com/. He is also a free lance voice over artist and occasionally contributes film reviews for www.ValleySceneMagazine.com.

Editor’s Pick
JUNE 30, 2009 9:59AM

Because girls only go to movies with romance in them...?

Rate: 22 Flag

Apparently, once again, women are being told that they only go to movies for the mushy stuff.  Check out this quote from David Germain's AP box office rundown:

"The sequel broadened the franchise's fan base. Females accounted for just 40 percent of the audience for the first "Transformers" but 46 percent for the sequel, (Paramount vice chairman Rob) Moore said.  Much of that was due to the on-screen romance for the characters played by Shia LaBeouf and Megan Fox, who were relative unknowns when the first movie came out.

Really?  You really think that any more than a handful of women went to see Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen because of the thirty-seconds of romantic bantering between Megan Fox and Shia LeBeouf?  Right, just like the only reason women saw 300 was because of the five-minute subplot involving the queen's attempts to rally support for her husband's army.  And, don't forget Star Wars Episode One: The Phantom Menace, which drew females only because of a female-friendly subplot involving Anakin having to say goodbye to his mother in order to run off to become a Jedi.  And of course, the only reason any girl would ever go to a horror film like Scream is because they enjoy the ten-minute finale where the 'last victim' empowers herself, escapes certain death and slays/stops the murderer.  No, it's not that women like getting scared and/or they enjoy blood and gore too, it's purely about female empowerment fantasy if you're a female.

All the examples above were actually punditry offered in the wake of those movies' successful box office runs (all but Scream were offered on opening weekend).  God forbid we acknowledge that women often see loud, violent action adventure films and intense, gruesome horror films for the same reason that guys stereotypically see them.  Some women like watching stuff get blown up.  Some women like laser guns, space ships, and lightsaber sword fighting.  Some women like getting scared and/or watching teenagers getting hacked to death.  And yes, some women love the idea of hundreds of ripped, half-naked warriors hacking each other to pieces with swords.  Some women of course like that for prurient reasons, but others still just enjoy the hack/slash carnage.  On that note, just as many guys saw Transformers 2 partiallyto ogle Megan Fox, I'm sure more than a few women, young and old, went to Revenge of the Fallen in part to stare at Shia LeBeouf.

It's long since time to retire the sexist notion that women only go to movies that have 'womens' issues' or have 'feminine-friendly' subplots. Women go to movies for all kinds of reasons, many of them gender-neutral.    True, some women go to movies like Transformers 2 or X-Men Origins: Wolverine because their romantic partner wants to go.  And yes, some women go to such movies because they find the lead actors attractive.  But it should be all-too obvious that many, if not most women who go to such movies go because they like them.  They go to action films for the action, scary films for the scares, and science fiction fantasy for the science fiction fantasies.  It's a pretty simple idea, but the pundits and executives still haven't figured that out.

Scott Mendelson

For more essays involving gender and the movies, try "Sex and the City and the differences between male and female escapist fantasy", "Yes, Twilight is sexist, but...", and "Chick Flicks that aren't" at Mendelson's Memos.

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Well done. I offered to take the Future Mrs. Wonderhorse to a flick this weekend - her choice. I was all prepared to have to see "The Proposal". Her choice?

"The Hangover".

I do love that woman.
Yuck on romantic comedies, but my dad loves them. I went to Star Trek instead.
So true. I, personally, like war movies. I think that it's important that we remember where we came from, in part so we know where we're going (or what to avoid). My choice in movies generally has nothing to do with romance or "hot" leading actors.

Back to the kitchen now, since they think that's where I belong....
Saw this over at the Huff Po. Good stuff. I've long wondered about the belief in Hollywood that you need to include a romance in an action film, or girls won't go see it. Yes, because watching stupid-faced Katie Holmes distract Christian Bale from doing important Batman stuff is super enjoyable if you have a uterus.
Now to be fair, one of the things I liked about Rachel Dawes in Batman Begins was that her primary role was not that of the love interest. She was a moral compass for a young and angry Bruce Wayne, and her declarations on the importance of justice and mercy were what prevented Batman from being a murderous loose cannon. Of course, alas, in The Dark Knight, her primary role was that of love interest, a prize to be won between two men, and then only a pawn in The Joker's scheme.
Maybe it was just Katie Holmes that bugged me (or perhaps it's my irrational love for Maggie Gyllenhaal), but I really preferred Rachel in the second movie. She felt a lot more active, in terms of doing actual lawyer stuff, and she felt a lot less simpering when deciding between Bruce and Harvey. I never felt she was an object for the men to fight over - if anything, it was clear that Harvey really respected her skills and treated her as a confidant and equal peer when talking about work.

Of course, again, as a person with a uterus, I only paid attention to the romance. The above paragraph was probably just something my boyfriend told me to write :D
Very interesting. I have been a young adult librarian for more than 20 years. All librarians know that girls read books about both girls and boys, but boys too often refuse to read books about girls.

Both my husbands were happy to go to romantic movies.
I took my daughter and a bunch of her friends to see Transformers 2 on Sunday night for her birthday. Mostly teeny girls and a few boys and the girls LOVED it. I thought it was funny that you mentioned Wolverine as well ... another one that they went nuts over. Of course they are all extremely aggressive athletes so it doens't surprise me that they tend to lean towards the action movies.

Insight into their take on the love story thing ... They all remember Shia L. as nerdy Lewis Stevens from that Disney show Even Stevens so they have no interest in him. They also mostly find Megan Fox to be "whore-ish", so no real interest in her ... so I guess they mostly liked it for the noise and action and explosions. I, however, appreciated Tyrese Gibson who should have had a larger role or played Epps in the nude ... either way would be fine with me.
Maybe it’s just me, but the idea ‘average-Joe’ Shia LeBeouf hooking up with ‘sex symbol’ Megan Fox seems like much more of a male fantasy then a female one. I’d rather watch something blow up then see either of them get romantic with anyone.
Thank you, Scott, for being one of those rare reviewers not prone to stereotyping women's interests. I hate rom-coms, but my SU loves them. We both love gory horror movies, and we both enjoy period dramas.
Why do reviewers assume that women watch rom-coms for the romance and not the comedy? Oh, right, women don't have senses of humor...

For myself, it's more about the quality of the movie. I will choose an action movie over a serious emotional movie if it gets better reviews and doesn't pander (too much - because face it, they pretty much all pander to some extent) to stereotypes. Life is too short to watch crap, and a lot of the action movies that are made are crap - just a lot of blowing things up and chasing/being chased, for no particular reason. A movie has got to have a good story line to get my money.
Scott,

It is intriguing how marketing often raises interesting sociological questions. So, let’s see …

We’ve got an increase from 40 percent to 46 percent, and a portion of that increase, according to your quoted Paramount vice chairman Rob Moore, is due to “…the on-screen romance for the characters played by Shia LaBeouf and Megan Fox, who were relative unknowns when the first movie came out.”

I think there are two elements being addressed in Rob Moore’s statemt; one is the romance, and the other is the increased star factor of both Shia LaBeouf and Megan Fox.

I know a few women and they are all less drawn to “action films” than are all the men I know. My wife loves a good scary film just as much as the next person, but if there is a romance involved, it makes that film more attractive to her. I, however, do not attach nearly the same of level of significance to romance in a scary movie, nor do any of the men I know.

Men and women do, to some extent, view things through different filters, and so it seems reasonable to me that the romance and the increased star power of the two young actors might account for some of the small portion of increase attributed to those factors. But that doesn’t say that women only like movies with romance. I know women who hold political and historical interests, as well as liking a good scare, or a good thriller. As I think over the list of those women, though, every one of them is more attracted to romance than the men I know. Is that an insult to them?
People went to see 300? I had assumed the audience was entirely made up of some beastly sub-human species that normally hid in basements, playing fantasy FPSs. I watched it because of the brilliant work by Bill Holley, which has to be the most amazing color work since Saving Private Ryan. It anchors my list of the worst films ever made.

That completely off-topic rant aside, in my experience, women like action films about as much as men of the same age. Perhaps they are slightly more demanding in terms of plot.
Let's see...I'm 46 and female, and my favorite movies are (in no particular order): Dr. Strangelove, Grosse Point Blank, Beetlejuice, Kill Bill Vol. 1, Blazing Saddles, and Bridget Jones' Diary.

I'm not real sure what this says about me, but my friends don't call me Quirky for nuthin.
Great post. Thanks for writing about this. It goes along with the bullshit notion that girls need to wear pink and buy everything in pink and boys have to wear blue and buy everything in blue and that girls and women don't play baseball and all that bullshit.

I can't stand social conditioning in any form!!!
1. I don't think Shia Lebeouf is hot. He's cute. And watchable. And a decent actor. But not hot.

2. Megan Fox Is hot, and some chicks like to look at other hot chicks.

3. I love scifi and ET and light sabers, etc. I also like to watch things blow up.

4. I am a woman.
Postscript:

With temps here in North Bay in the upper 90's I went to two movies this weekend (no AC @ home): Transformers and Taking of Pelham. And I tell ya what, Tony Scott, when the camera and the action was out of doors, delivered a couple of Awesome action scenes involving cop cars. Made people Jump out of their seats. Made me grab my face, like you do when you say, Oh My God, he's not --!

Interesting movie, Taking of Pelham 123. It's like two movies in one, the crazy, jumpframe hyped up outdoors part; and the snipey, mind gamey, quick dialogue indoors part. But sure had fun with the loud outdoors part. (Didn't think Travolta's character was Quite developed enough. Denzel did a good job with the martyred nerd role, almost nebbishy.)
I loved 300 for that scene between husband and wife before he heads off to an inevitable death. Yummy.

Sheldon: If you're reading: The Proposal sucked. The Hangover--one of the best comedies I've ever seen...smart, funny, intelligent, great music and cinematography, even the crudeness is not gratuitous. Smart woman you've got there!
Well huzzah. A genderless dumbing-down of entertainment. Progress.
Thank you! I haven't seen a movie in months because I am impaired by small children and what do I want to see more than anything else? Drag Me to Hell, thank you very much movie execs. Romance is highly overrated and I'd like them to realize that.
Amen, but ewww re: Megan Fox.
Okay, this is not my finest writing. Not feeling inspired, but I have to say something.

My mom loves action/adventure, kung fu, and "guy" comedies. I was raised on Bruce Willis, Harrison Ford, and Chuck Norris movies. I love superhero movies, especially if they're good. I just wish that there were more good action movies with smart female characters. Star Trek has a great girl, but that's just one girl. I was pissed off that the Watchmen killed off the lesbian in the beginning sequence. I was really disappointed by Haley Berry's Catwoman. She rocks. Catwoman rocks. But the movie sucked.

Hey, Hollywood, make some good action movies with girls in them!!!

Rated.
I'm female and yes I like romantic comedies, but I also enjoy horror, suspence and action films. What I really hated about Transformers 2 was that ALL of the females other than "the mom" were totally "slutted out". Funny, but I don't remember many girls in my college looking/behaving that way...maybe that only happens at Princeton. Sigh.
I'm waiting for a film to be made of Stone Butch Blues...other than that...I go see stuff for all kinds of reasons. But mostly, I see stuff that gets me interested in seeing the story based on the trailer. I dunno...pure action films...not so much. It has just been pointed out to me, that I am a more 'stone' butch than was previously thought. But, I like stuff like Age of Innocence and Pulp Fiction is one of my favorite films. Great post.
Most movie producer's ideas of true romance differs from my own, so it needs to be combined with great comedy, adventure or a biographical element for substance. Love anything that makes me laugh, no matter how silly and a good sci-fi or who-done-it that challenges my imagination! It's all good! Just a movie junkie.
Actually the true 'guy' movies are not the action movies. The true guy movies are the stooopid screwball comedies: Jim Carrey, the 3 stooges, Borat, Beavis and Butthead, South Park, Ernest goes to ***, Harold and Kumar, etc. This is the type of movie that gets men rolling on the floor and women rolling their eyelids.
My wife used to regularly run screaming from the room whenever I watched MTV's Jackass- which I found unroariously funny, and she found it gratingly stupid.
I remember when people went to the movies for the air conditioning
I agree... that "Jackass" is completely stupid. No brains needed there!
Mary - LOVED "Hangover". I haven't laughed my arse off like that in quite awhile. And Julie, "Drag Me to Hell" is a kick!
just want to add my voice to the chorus who loved Drag Me to Hell, funniest movie of the summer, old-fashioned horror movie without gratuitous torture and brutality, my favorite popcorn movie of the year so far, along with Star Trek

(and Transformers 2 absolutely sucked, worst movie I've seen years for more reasons than I can count)
Hated Transformers ( with a capital H - oh ... redundant redundancy). I was dragged to that by the husband. However, I Love ( with capital L) well done action: Bourne films, James Bond with DC, and X-men flicks. I just can't stand it when they spend all that money on CGI and refuse to write a half decent script.

And really - robots with testicles? Robots humping legs? Ugh. It wasn't even cult bad.
Well....I guess that it wasn't bad, it was just juvenile. I prefer the X-men flicks, Spiderman, Dark Knight. They all have their ups and downs ( X-men 1, brilliant, Wolverine-not so much).
and i like chick flicks. it's all so complicated...
I can't stand most "chick flicks." They bore me to tears.

I loved the first Transformers, but yeah...the second one sucked monkey balls.

I would much rather watch robots fighting, stuff blowing up, etc. Give me a good action flick any day over the so-called "romantic comedies." I might not be close to the norm, though...I watch professional wrestling with my boys, and get just as into it as they do (the buff guys in tight briefs make it easy to watch.

Great post. Rated.
Joseph, my 11-year old son, dragged me to "Transformers 2;" he wanted to see the gadgets. And I'll tell you the truth: I *tried* to ogle Megan Fox. Really I did. I mean, what else was I going to do; whip out my iPhone and watch an episode of "Fringe?" (I would have tried, but "Transformers 2" was way too loud; I couldn't hear Anna Torv.)

But I couldn't ogle her. Aside from her weird voice--am I the only one who thinks she upped her squeaky-and-breathiness quotient in this film to near Jackie O levels?--she's *too damn skinny*. She's there on a motorcycle for no reason other than to show us her ass--she *doesn't have one*. She's running around in a tight, low-cut top so we can enjoy the jiggle factor; she *doesn't have enough cleavage to jiggle*.

She's pretty enough, I suppose, but she's right in line with Kate Beckinsale and Charlize Theron and too many other skinny Hollywood actresses. Give me a Christina Hendricks or Asia Argento or (please!) Monica Bellucci any day.
I love action flicks. Sometimes, I like romantic movies, but honestly, most of them are swill these days. And I REALLY HATE the aggressive tear jerker movie. You know, kids and cancer or mom and cancer or someone and cancer or someone and a dog or cat or horse or gerbil with cancer, okay, well, maybe not the last one. But seriously, I hate that shit. I must be a MUTANT WOMAN right? ::roll of eyes::

I didn't see 300 because I heard from my comic book/graphic novel friends (I am, yes, a geek) that it didn't match the graphic novel well enough.

These money guys need to move a bit more into the 21st century. Their AGE is showing.