Guy Lodge and Jeff Wells have remarked about the new poster for A Single Man, which seems to be going out of its way to hide the fact that Colin Firth plays a (solitary) gay man. This isn't a new thing. Marketing campaigns often go out of their way to hide character traits or story arcs that may be 'uncomfortable' to the alleged mainstream moviegoer. But the threat of onscreen homosexuality seems to be the biggest target of selective hiding. Much amusement was found in the marketing campaign for The Talented Mr. Ripley ten years ago. While the pleasantly spoiler-free trailer only hinted at the major first-act plot twist, it gave absolutely no hints that Matt Damon (who really should have received an Oscar nomination) was in fact playing a homosexual. Scary stalker and possible murderer? No problem, but don't let moviegoers know that he's queer too!
And let's not forget the DVD/Blu Ray cover art for I Love You Man, which made sure to shove Rashida Jones awkwardly onto the poster, next to Paul Rudd and Jason Segal. That one wasn't quite as egregious, as Jones was the fiancee of Rudd's character, and the third lead of the film. But the oh-so subtle reason for tossing her into the cover art ('it's a bromance, but they're straight honest!') should be acknowledged. For what it's worth, DVD box art has often altered from the original theatrical artwork to make any number of films seem more 'audience-friendly'. The worst recent example was for Jodie Foster's The Brave One, which replaced genuinely haunting artwork with a photo-shop design that could have been crafted by my toddler in her weekly pre-school computer class.
But the all-time winner in the 'hide the homo' award still belongs to the folks behind the campaign for Transamerica. To be fair, the theatrical trailer and posters were honest about the fact that Felicity Huffman was playing a transgendered man who was about to get sexual-reconstruction surgery. But the trailer and the posters went out of the way to sell the lie that Huffman's son Toby was a rough-and-tumble heterosexual male. The trailer went out
of its way to highlight a thirty-second scene where Kevin Zegers's Toby flirts with and makes out with a random teenage girl in a bar (Stella Maeve). Some newspaper ads even had Maeve on the poster with her arm wrapped around Toby. In fact, said character was a drug-addicted homosexual who eventually ended up working in gay porno (I certainly hope the mediocre movie was not implying that gay men automatically give birth to gay sons, but I digress). But even that all-too common bait and switch was too much honesty for the DVD poster art.
Scott Mendelson
Scott Mendelson's Blog
Open Salon's resident movie nerd and box office geek.
Scott Mendelson
- Location
- Woodland Hills, California, United States
- Birthday
- April 02
- Bio
- A ten-year Salon reader, Mendelson also has a film and politics blog/column at Mendelon's Memos: located at: http://scottalanmendelson.blogspot.com/.
He is also a free lance voice over artist and occasionally contributes film reviews for www.ValleySceneMagazine.com.
MY RECENT POSTS
- The 'problem' w/ BEAUTY & THE
BEAST is the Beast, not Belle.
January 18, 2012 01:17PM - When explicit slurs become
part of everyday language...
November 10, 2011 12:43PM - When studios blew the best
chance to legitimize the
NC-17.
October 28, 2011 10:49AM - Review: Puss In Boots (2011)
October 26, 2011 12:38PM - Weekend Box Office review
(10/02/11)
October 02, 2011 01:39PM
MY RECENT COMMENTS
- “Hate to tell you this,
but I saw The King's Speech
four
months ago, back when
it…”
March 14, 2011 10:34AM - “There is a single press
screening for The Rite
tomorrow
night, but other
responsi…”
January 24, 2011 02:42PM - “I don't watch either MTV
show, so I may be very
wrong
here.
But when
16 and Preg…”
January 11, 2011 02:06PM - “Yes, I am perhaps
unintentionally slighting
Carpenter's
creepy ghost
story, but &…”
December 14, 2010 11:26AM - “Just got back from Tron:
Legacy. It's easily one of the
worst
films of the
year.…”
December 14, 2010 01:23AM

Salon.com
Comments
Our society, I agree, is backward and, let's face it, getting stupider every day.
It's so terribly sad.
1) What is the character's relationship with Julianne Moore? Is his homosexuality the focus of the plot? If the central emotional drama involves Julianne Moore (in a platonic sense even), then featuring them together on a poster makes sense.
2) I also happen to love Julianne Moore, and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone, so putting her on a poster is definitely a way to attract my attention. A movie poster is there to sell you on the movie. Highlighting a popular actor, regardless of their role in the film, isn't a crime (in fact, in a genius twist, Drew Barrymore was plastered all over the advertising for Scream, and then they went and killed her in the first 5 minutes of the movie, and then the TRUE lead, Neve Campbell, took over)
3) What I take from the poster above is the following idea: I have no idea what the movie about, but seeing those two actors makes me suspect that it's some kind of indie film. The framing of the shot tells me that there's probably some level of emotional and probably sad drama happening there.
However, in a larger sense, I do get what your point is, particularly with those other films.
Also, men give birth? I'm outta the loop on you youngsters and your world, it would seem.
*Creaks back to her rocking chair.*