Scott Mendelson's Blog

Open Salon's resident movie nerd and box office geek.

Scott Mendelson

Scott Mendelson
Location
Woodland Hills, California, United States
Birthday
April 02
Bio
A ten-year Salon reader, Mendelson also has a film and politics blog/column at Mendelon's Memos: located at: http://scottalanmendelson.blogspot.com/. He is also a free lance voice over artist and occasionally contributes film reviews for www.ValleySceneMagazine.com.

Editor’s Pick
FEBRUARY 28, 2010 10:55PM

Open Salon box office in review (02/28/10)

Rate: 2 Flag

This will be shorter than usual. First of all, there isn't all that much news to report and second of all, I spent the day at Disneyland which was far-more crowded than usual. Curse you, "Captain EO"! You marred my Sunday in three dimensions! Point being, I'm quite pooped. So... "Shutter Island" pulled a repeat at number one this weekend, dropping just 44% for a $22.6 million-second weekend and a new total of $75.5 million. Despite the mixed reviews and word of mouth, the Scorsese thriller is still the only real event movie out there for people who don't need a return trip to Pandora.

While I didn't care for "Shutter Island" one bit, I am heartened that a moody, complicated, 2.25-hour, non-sequel, R-rated thriller from Martin Scorsese is a genuine smash hit. In this day and age, it's always refreshing for an adult-driven genre picture to reach heights only usually accorded to franchises and animated films. The picture is Scorsese's fifth-biggest domestic grosser and will be number 03 by next weekend. Whether or not it can surpass the $132 million earned by "The Departed" is an open question, but it won't have any demo competition until "The Green Zone". Said 'Bourne goes to Baghdad' thriller opens March 12th (I have no idea if that's accurate, but it's sure how the Paul Greengrass/Matt Damon film is being sold by Universal).

Number two and three went to the openers. Both performed a bit above expectations. Kevin Smith's "Cop-Out" nearly doubled his previous personal-best opening weekend with $18.2 million (his previous high, "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back", opened with $11 million back in August 2001). This also marks one of Bruce Willis's best debuts over the last decade, as his star-power has decreased since he stopped working with M. Night Shyamalan. It's his eleventh-best opening weekend, and most of the bigger openings were from the 1990s. This isn't just a case of waning star power as much as Willis choosing non-commercial ventures. No one expected "Alpha Dog" or "Lucky Number Slevin" to play like "Armageddon", so this solid opening with a purely commercial picture is a good sign.

As for Kevin Smith, this will easily surpass his biggest-grossing picture, as he's never had a picture gross over $31 million (so good on Warner for only spending $30 million on this picture). I'd argue that the whole 'Kevin Smith gets tossed of an airplane' controversy helped push the film into the public conscience, it still doesn't excuse how the media covered said event (it was treated as 'Ha ha, Kevin Smith is fat!' rather than 'Hey, Southwest Airlines ejected a passenger who clearly was not too obese to fly!'). As it is, Kevin Smith pictures are often greeted by one controversy or another (Kevin Smith vs. the Catholic Church, Kevin Smith vs. GLAAD, Kevin Smith vs. the overexposure of 'Bennifer'). It will be interesting to see how the film plays long-term. Despite terrible reviews, it still pulled in a solid 3.06x multiplier, implying theoretically positive word of mouth. It will also be interesting to see if Tracy Morgan gets more film work as a result of this opening, as the film was clearly sold on his antics as much as Bruce Willis's star-power.

Number three went to the remake of "The Crazies", which Overture opened to $16 million (at a cost of just $20 million). The surprisingly well-reviewed remake of a 1973 George Romero picture pulled in a 2.68x multiplier, which is about normal for a horror film. With this opening and "Law-Abiding Citizen", "Capitalism: A Love Story", and "Righteous Kill", Overture is quickly establishing itself as a major player. For what it's worth, my wife and I watched the original version of "The Crazies" last night, and it's a shockingly good and genuinely disturbing little picture. If the remake is any good, might I suggest you check out director Breck Eisner's previous film, the vastly underrated "Sahara"?

Anyway, fourth place went to the film that cannot be killed (until next weekend, when it will likely be killed), "Avatar". Dropping just 15%, the James Cameron epic crossed $700 million in its eleventh weekend. Aside from crossing the $706 million in domestic sales, the film's overseas takes has topped $1.84 billion, which means that "Avatar" has made more overseas that "Titanic" made worldwide. The new worldwide total for "Avatar" is a staggering $2.5 billion. Alas, this will likely be the last weekend of tiny drops, as Tim Burton's "Alice in Wonderland" opens next weekend and will steal all of the IMAX screens and most of the 3D auditoriums.

The only limited releases were "A Prophet" ($163,773 on nine screens) and "Formosa Betrayed" ($77,326 on fifteen screens), "Art of the Steal" ($39,019 on three screens), and "The Yellow Handkerchief" ($37,296 on seven screens). Roman Polanski's "The Ghost Writer" expanded to 43 screens and made another $789,064. It's new total is $1.04 million. While the film is not cheap ($45 million), Summit Entertainment is only on the hook for whatever they paid for North American distribution rights, so this should be a nice non-"Twilight" feather in their cap to go along with their likely Oscar glory for "The Hurt Locker" (be it just Best Director or Best Director and Best Picture).

Other than that, it was just a matter of various films crossing arbitrary marks. With $99.9 million by Sunday, "Valentine's Day" will cross $100 million by the time you read this, making it the decade's first $100 million grosser. Ironically, the first such milestone of the last decade was "Erin Brockovich", also starring Julia Roberts. "Percy Jackson and the... too tired to type out the full title for this terrible movie" and "Dear John" crossed $70 million, while "The Wolfman" sits at just $57 million (on a budget of $150 million). "Crazy Heart" crossed $25 million and "When in Rome" crossed $30 million. At $248 million, "The Blind Side" is less than $10 million from passing "Star Trek" after dropping just 14% in its fifteenth weekend.

That's about all that's fit to print this weekend. Join us next weekend for the likely-to-be huge debut of Disney's "Alice in Wonderland". While I likely won't see it until opening night (it was a choice of seeing it early by myself or waiting until Friday and letting my wife come along), I do hope it's closer to this than to this. Alas, if you've read this, you know where my instincts lie. Also opening is the Antoine Fuqua police drama, "Brooklyn's Finest" (also from Overture, natch) and the Independent Film Channel Jon Hamm thriller, "Stolen". Oh AT&T U-Verse, why do you not carry IFC On Demand?

Scott Mendelson

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Apprently aesthetics are so five minutes. What REALLY counts is money.

So take it away Liza!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkRIbUT6u7Q&feature=related
I'm wondering how true the film is to Lehane's book, which, for me anyway, avoided the problems you mention in your review. When I finished the book, I wondered how it could be treated on film convincingly. I assumed that with DeCaprio playing lead and Scorcese directing it had a good chance of working. Evidently not, but I'm still looking forward to seeing it.
Bravo for letting your wife come along to see Alice in Wonderland! :) While I don't mind seeing movies alone, seeing them with company is much, much better. I love talking to someone about a movie immediately asfter the end credits roll.
I have no qualms about seeing movies alone (if work is slow today, I'm finally going to check out The Ghost Writer), but for stuff that my wife actually wants to see, I do try to wait for her.
Shutter Island is a lovely film. Not an earth shattering film, but well made and with more than a few shivers. And, as I say in my OS review of the film -- http://open.salon.com/blog/shockroomhorror/2010/02/22/shutter_island -- it is great to see film artists of this caliber making what is essentially a horror movie.
Thanx, ShockRoomHorror. Maybe you would be so kind as to answer the question I posted here: does the film compare favorably with Lehane's novel? That had me guessing right up to the end, altho I did wonder if the same effect could be created in a movie versi0n.

I'm guessing that Scott either didn't read the book, or can't be bothered answering questions posted on his reviews. I'll now visit your review.
Meh. The mood was totally off base in Shutter Island. The first few scenes were backed by a hauntingly dark cello intonation, but by the time you get to the 'shocking' twist there is no music at all. For such a good book, I think the director really dropped the ball on this one. The atmosphere was basically the background score. And by the way, Avatar sucked. Once you get past the awesome 3-d, you realize the characters and plot lines had absolutely no depth. Sure, they spent thousands developing a language for the Na'avi, but their culture was completely undeveloped. The female lead spoke perfect English half the time, and the other half was a grunting, pointing savage. That resurrection ritual could have been so much cooler, instead it felt like it was thrown in at the last second to make a sequel possible. Do they worship one tree or four? Didn't they realize that riding into machine guns with spears was a losing strategy? I mean, for the love of God, the Eewoks in return of the jedi put up a better fight. At least they used the trees.
The movie i'm now convinced is underacknowledged is Terry Gillian's "The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus." (If I've got it straight.) It is clearly a masterpiece--Monty Python finds it's classical roots. I read a review that panned it so made the mistake of not going until it was convenient for me. It's now had a long word of mouth run at an indie theatre in NYC with the audience coming back more than once--the typical story--if a movie requires a little work to understand it's billed "high brow" and movies continue to be mostly garbage. I dare a thinking person to go and not try to work out the puzzle in their dreams.
I don't care how good "The Ghost Writer" is, I will not be seeing it, as I refuse to give one more cent of my money to Roman Polanski. I hope no-one else does either.
My how DEEPLY MORAL you are "BeeGee." We all have much work to do if we aspire to kiss your Crocs.
Apparently Disney changed their mind after I asked nicely. If we can arrange a sitter, my wife and I will be seeing Alice on Wednesday night.

As for supporting Polanski, I'm not unsympathetic (I went more for Brosnan than anyone else). But unless he has points, Polanski has already been paid and you won't help or hurt them by seeing a movie. As it is, you can find a reason to boycott any work of art if you look hard enough. Should I deny myself the pleasures of Airplane! and Top Secret because David Zucker turned into a right-wing reactionary after 9/11? Should I have denied myself from seeing the new Martin Campbell movie because his leading man has some issues with Jews? I understand the conflict, but judge the art, not those who make it. After all, to paraphrase Medger Evers, if you don't see The Ghost Writer, Polanski either won't know or won't care.
It's heartening, I suppose , that "Shutter Island" is a hit because it suggests an audience for a smarter major release, but that's slim consolation for those who sat through the movie's two hours and eighteen minutes. One of things I like Martin Scorsese, personally, is that he's an extreme movie fan--at his best he's what Quentin Tarentino wants to be, blessed with an observable genius--and one appreciates that he wanted to make something in the style of Val Lewton. Lewton, though, didn't poke around his set ups nor erupt with gratuitous verve as Scorsese often does; his thrillers "I Walked With a Zombie", "Cat People" and "Body Snatcher" , though rife with a psychological nuance, were stylish and efficient engines of excitement. Ninety minutes, more or less, was what it took for the problematic results of a protagonist's plight to slam you up against the wall. Irony , effectively deployed , was essential to Lewton's artistry, a wrinkle, a turn, an unexpected result that could alter the entire tone of the film; Scorsese, too often arty and not at all artful, hasn't the slightest grasp of the ironic touch. The twist in "Shutter Island"--the man investigating a disappearance in an insane asylum is himself insane--startles no one; the audience is basically tipped off by the escalation of weird events. Believability has nothing to do with it; rather it's more plausibility, the extent to which you're willing to suspend disbelief to allow the genre to work it's distractions on you. The delusional nature of Leonardo DiCaprio's character was as unexpected as a phone bill. Another issue hampering the film's effectiveness is DiCaprio's youthful appearence; seasoned law enforcement officers don't look like they just got back from a shoot for Tiger Beat. He compensates , or tries to, by scrunching up his face in sustained series of pruny faced close ups, but the effect is of a watching a man suffer through a bad headache, an unintended irony for the viewer waiting for the movie's quality to improve. Relief came, of course, in the form of the end credits.