Words from another yard

Links and comment from Scott Rosenberg
JULY 8, 2009 2:16PM

Why people blog — and why journalists keep missing the point

Rate: 12 Flag

There is a shortsighted misunderstanding of the motivation of most bloggers that I keep encountering as I’m out there talking about Say Everything. The people asking me questions are naturally, for the most part, journalists; and as I write in the book, journalists as a class have a particularly hard time understanding why most people blog.

This jumped out at me as I read this passage in today’s Wall Street Journal review of Chris Anderson’s “Free,” which was written by Jeremy Philips, who is executive vice president of Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., which owns the Journal along with vast tracts of the media landscape:

If you have a blog, “no matter how popular,” the revenue from AdSense — a Google service that places ads on Web sites — will probably never “pay you even minimum wage for the time you spend writing it.” Of course, that’s fine for bloggers more interested in fame or influence than in money or for blogs (like Mr. Anderson’s own) that are loss leaders for more lucrative endeavors, such as writing books or making speeches. But if you have to earn a living from the Web, “free” can be a problem.

Note the alternatives Philips offers: You might blog for money. You might blog for fame or influence or as a “loss leader” for your real business. But nowhere in his world is there room for the actual motivation that drives most bloggers: a desire to express themselves, to think out loud, to exult in the possibilities of writing in public — and learn from the pitfalls, too. Maybe there’s a payoff in enhancing your reputation, but there can also be a payoff in simply enhancing your experience at communicating your thoughts and ideas. Speaking to a big crowd is alluring but speaking even to a small group of friends is rewarding, too. For the great majority of participants, blogging is a social activity, not an aspiration to mass-media stardom.

It is very hard for journalists to understand this because the opportunity to express themselves in public has always been a part of their professional birthright. So they won’t notice that motivation even when it’s staring them in the face. When you point this out, you are almost always greeted with a sort of cynical sniff: You can’t be serious. But I am!

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
That is it exactly... and even worse, we have to do this ourselves precisely because journalists are soooo bad at it... i.e., at writing about real people and what we really want/need/desire especially those inside the beltway who are so free with their projections... as if we could ever possibly feel as entitled as so many of them do.
Great catch! They really don't get it, do they?
Thanks for pointing this out. And there's another motivation, even for people who are used to being published regularly. I run into this from time to time with other journalist friends. They don't seem to understand the difference between, free and freedom. There's a cost to your thinking and to your writing when everything you write is for money. You can lose touch pretty fast with those subjects that drive, and that should be driving you to write. The subjects you would write about whether you got paid for it or not. What kind of writing life is it when the only things you write are the things that other people want to pay you for?

I"m not knocking getting paid. And I'm absolutely not knocking the experience of working with good editors. But you also need to be able to get in touch with your obsessions and passions too. And blogging is unparalleled for that.
I have a self-selecting audience of people who actually enjoy letting me natter on about my pets. What's not to like?
its just a grownup version of show and tell, huh!! in a very convenient form....
just tell those ppl who dont get it to try out this site!!
If I don't blog the world will fall into chaos, ruin and self-depravation.

Well, my world anyway...
Yes he can be serious. And right, too. Ever since the free association, fact deficient, pyramid free, opinion dominated style of journalistic writing started up, we are hungry for the facts.

We are also able to bypass the elitist corruption of the print media: we don't have to be celebrities, socialites or civic and corporate powermongers in order to talk about our cats, troubles and triumphs.

And as with music and the visual arts, some of us discover later in life that we were lied to in school. We actually can write things that people will read.

"For the great majority of participants, blogging is a social activity, not an aspiration to mass-media stardom."