AUGUST 29, 2009 12:03PM

The Prisoner Problem

Rate: 14 Flag

Seeing that AMC was redoing that old ITV chestnut The Prisoner, I could not stifle a groan. We know what “new and improved” means by now; I think AMC ought to concentrate on doing something original, and that they already do well, like Mad Men. The new Prisoner will star Jim Caviezel, who played Jesus, and Ian McKellen, who has played everything else.

 

For those caught up short, The Prisoner was a one-season 1967 British import TV series, all too short and sweet. The premise—spelled out in an unusually long intro per episode—centered around a spy who abruptly resigned his license to kill. Packing for an apparent holiday, he is gassed, only to wake up in a quaint-ish village, actually a nutter house for National Security cases. Think Guantanamo Bay with cottages and tea service.

 

The Prisoner—only referred to as No. 6—is taunted and meddled with by an ever-changing barrage of site managers always named “No.2”—the personnel changing as he almost casually—and fatally—sabotages their careers.

 

Looking on now, it is hard to recall how “controversial” it once was. The Prisoner was full of non-sequiturs, unexplained motives and shady outcomes. As a political allegory, it seemed to be uniquely critical of some British shadow government, though the allegiances of the masters of The Village were never established. “Whose side are you on?” was answered with “That would be telling.”

 

The Orwellian and Kafkaesque backbones of the series—a society where everyone is only a persecuted number, where contacts are eliminated quietly never to be seen again, where paranoia is as good as daily bread—were discussed and re-discussed in the era. The bumpy and contorted ending, an almost Felliniesque carnivale where the escaping Prisoner—No. 6—appears to discover he may have been No. 1 all along—and drops off some of the characters on a highway and returns inconsequentially to his flat—well, it threw people.

 

Nowadays, it all seems as harmless as any Man from UNCLE episode. We have since seen stranger, and as for endlessly-evolving red herrings, if you grew up on Twin Peaks or The X-Files, you may have no ken as to what the shouting was about.

 

What still stands out is the force of Patrick McGoohan’s personality. He combines a sort of creepy-sexy appeal that suggests the love child of James Bond and Hannibal Lecter. As a charismatic actor and the creative source of the series (he wrote most of the scripts under pseudonyms, which only mirrors the layers of identity confusion in the stories), McGoohan seemed to be playing off both his fellow actors and the audience. The obvious and would-be hamstringing themes (“I’m a man not a number!”) are undercut by sly humor and The Prisoner’s seeming awareness that he, at all times, is one step ahead of the other numbers.

 

The Village could be seen as a kind of purgatory for the Smartest Guy in the Room, an ego Mystery Play where the deus-ex-machina is always one’s own quiet cool. The Prisoner is a monument to British male self-abstraction, the ability to be in an inner landscape while the rest of the world is a shouting match of bumping shoulders. One might argue that few creatures have been evolved to be Operatives better than the average Brit of the era—so it may be that The Spy is an allegory of national character.

 

I first saw The Prisoner when I was thirteen, and I didn’t really get it. It was hard to follow. It was like Waiting fot Godot as written by Ian Fleming. But I sure liked it a hell of a lot better than Doctor Who.

 

This forms a facet of a subject I have muddled around earlier about, the idea of British culture as digested by American kids sitting around the Boob Tube. Whether we were zoned out on Five Million years to Earth (Quatermass and the Pit) or The Avengers or Doctor in the House, we were building an appreciation, a false knowledge, of English culture in our heads via television. This might frighten some Britishers, should they take stock of what they were saying about themselves. And the same palliative might be advised globally for consumers of Magnum PI and Seinfeld and Family Feud about the like-so reflected memes of American culture.

 

If you watch Quatermass and The Prisoner and even The Avengers, you begin to get a creepy sense of the confirmation of Orwell’s suspicions: there is some fundamental authoritarian and human-negating rot at the center of Britain’s Security Culture. And no doubt our own.

 

I’ve never bought the idea of many that Brit TV is more “cerebral” than American—it just covers for its lower budgets with talk, more or less like British foreign policy. But in that fancy brogue—think McGoohan’s rolling thunder of rrrr’s—there are gems of cultural insight whilst we, as American telelprogrammers, have become so deceitfully adept at covering our own rancid spoor.

 -30- 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Hmmm . . . I'll have to look into the original. Your review makes me curious.
I just re-watched that first season on DVD and I can't help liking Patrick McGoohan, and he is just as you described.

But my favorite line in this was: "It was like Waiting for Godot as written by Ian Fleming." - PERFECT - and so fucking funny - talk about nailing it.
I first saw The Prisoner (the original) in a Cold War class. There was a long silence afterwards and then great debate. I'd say it was a successful class.

The love child of James Bond and Hannibal Lecter, eh? Well, that has got to be the epitome of creepy-sexy.
I'v3e never heard of this show, though I'm familiar with The Avengers and Patrick McGoohan. I''ll keep an eye out for the show.
If any of you have an "on demand" service on cable, and an AMC prompt, there are probably some old Prisoner episodes to watch there, to stoke you up for the "new" show. The random selection brought back some memories, but also I was pleased that, older than thirteen, I'm a little sharper...(?)
One season? Wow. I've made references to it, occasionally, mainly when talking to people my age (teenager in 67), and my references were always understood. It's such a part of our TV culture (at least in my head) that I figured it must have been around longer. Thanks for the memories...
Your cultural analogies are great food for thought. I have a friend in Britain I'll have to get to read this and see what he says. As to the Prisoner ... for me, it was great; right at the time everbody was trying to ride the James Bond train, but the only one I remember that looked at spying as less than heroic. But a remake? The Prisoner was Patrick McGoohan ... his character for page to production to screen. I can't imagine anybody else duplicating his flavor.
Gawd, I LOVED The Prisoner. I had no idea it was being re-made. Thanks for the heads-up, you brilliant sleuthing canine, you.
I liked The Prisoner, but I never looked too deeply into the symbolism. This is probably because of an evangelical friend who wanted to tell me all about the hidden Christian allegories in the show. But I should take another look, now.

Speaking of Britain's security culture, I really liked MI-5/Spooks. It didn't seem any more realistic than American spy shows, just different--very British.
For British TV - my favorite remains "Monty Python's Flying Circus."
Heh, I suppose everyone sees allegories of their own. I never really tuned in on anything christic. I tend to see The Prisoner episodes as allegories of the little victories we have to eck out against our social mileu, which are always overshadowed by the inescapability of the box we look out of...
The local library here has the original "Prisoner" on DVD, but I've never watched it because episode one always seems to be checked out, or else it's gone for good. I figure a show like that, you've got to watch episode one. Interesting idea, that British TV is seen as more "cerebral." America's adolescent inferiority complex, again? Is "The Avengers" more cerebral than "Wild, Wild West?" I couldn't answer that, but Emma Peel in leather seems to trump Artemis Gordon, despite his clever inventions. But then I watched every episode of "Lost in Space" three or four times, so what do I know. Another excellent post, Scoub.
i'm so pissed off at you for not PMing me about your posts!!!! i'm on a break. i shouldn't have to search them down. i had to read this one. never saw the show and don't know why. i have to seek it out now, of course. this is a brilliant dark piece, another one, dude. thank you. the british go very dark in their procedurals and other dramas. i agree with you, they do cover technical glitches with words words words. and they are veyr clever. we are too. some of us. you are. i enjoy jim cavasiel in a prurient way so i'm not upset about the remake. i would love it to be equally dark. i'm watching the US version of State of Play this week, hopefully. saw the british one. i want to see if it lives up to it at all. sorry. i'm all over the place. stressing about the city inspecting my subsidized place on Tuesday even though it's mostly clean now. love love lvoe and gratitude. we are now past big brother and 1984, i suspect. way past. what i know confirms that and then there is what i don't know...
Maybe it's a good personality-type pigeonholer: Are you a "Dr. Who" person or a "Prisoner " person?

So, if these are cultural indicators, what does "Monty Python" say about the Brits?
Monty Python could be seen as the lunacy of The Village applied on a national scale--it depends on drop-offs of logic and expectations (now for something completely different...). It is certainly subversive.

(hurm) Interestingly, "Monty Python" is the name of a troupe leadership person, but he never appears--like Sgt Pepper. "Number 6" is an abstraction of the Agent's name, which is never mentioned. "Dr. Who" isn't; he is only ever called "The Doctor." The title is an in-joke itself: "I must tell the Doctor..."

"Doctor who?"
I agree with your premise. Unfortunately what passes for dialogue these days is infantile. Better to have computer generated graphics and explosions than have the characters "talk." This is one program I will pass on when it is released.
The one saving grace of a remake may be Jim Caviezel, who I really liked in some remake of The Count of Monte Cristo.

When I was young, I could remember thinking that the British were just inherently cooler than we were. Nerdy friends would go on and on about how they appreciated Pythonesque humor more than anything on our soil. Personally, I liked Benny Hill and the great tits on his shows...The innuendo.

But really, who gives a flying shit..I like what I like and could give a flying walrus from where it emanates.

Now I'm off to find these episodes on the interwebs..
I found the original oddly mesmerizing as a kid and in part because of an underlying homosexual tension whose explanation should probably be given to a therapist instead of the public. This as well as the tension of wanting to be free to make my own decisions and develop my own personality and to fight against the "man" (by which I meant mom and sometimes dad) as did most people my age in that era were part of the attraction.
I grew up in a culture that was pulling back the curtain to reveal what was underneath not just politically but artistically as well.(Night Gallery, The Prisoner, Archie Bunker). This pared down show, so minimalist to be almost abstract was a valuable part of that. I am concerned not only about it losing something in the translation but the lack of anyone in the right frame of mind to receive that translation. I don't see many people clamboring for political truths these days so what will the new #6 have to say? and will we even give a shit?
I've been sort of mulling the political input of TV over lately--not of the nightly news, but the X-Files and "Government Warehouse" genre that has enhanced such suspicion and disaffection with the government. I might write something on that subject soon...