Sexting Is Stupid

Sexting Is Stupid
Company
The Institute for Responsible Online and Cell Phone Communication
Bio
The Institute for Responsible Online and Cell Phone Communication is teaching Responsibility 2.1C, our unique concept of Digital Responsibility for a new digital generation. It is our belief that we cannot treat 21st century problems like "sexting" or "cyber bullying" with 20th century solutions and reactive "old school" threats, reprimand and curriculum. For more information please visit http://www.iroc2.org or http://www.sextingisstupid.com

JUNE 3, 2009 1:07AM

Sexting, Safety And The Social Norm: Are You "Norm"al?

Rate: 1 Flag

As our planet’s geographical boundaries become increasingly irrelevant due to the rapid advancement of digital communication, our global community has become more intimate, and our digital actions more pronounced. Technologies that our most intelligent ancestors could only dream of are now a daily afterthought that many of us take for granted.

Surviving in our rapidly evolving digital and virtual worlds requires a proactive digital mindset and an acute awareness of the social norm, “Responsibility 2.1C”. If you or a loved one utilize digital technology without a concurrent and necessary concept of 21st century responsibility, it is very likely that in your lifetime you will be directly or indirectly affected by the dire consequences that accompany poor (digital) judgment.

Ironically, this same technology bridging the communication gap between countries and generations, has proven that like our planet, it can instantly take from us, just as easily as it can reward.

When our ancestors first discovered the flame, they learned quickly that irresponsible use of fire will often lead to a burn. Armed with this very simple (now basic) knowledge, our predecessors proactively passed down this information through generations to ensure civilizations across our (once flat, then round, then vast, and increasingly shrinking) planet possessed a proactive acute awareness that “playing with a dangerous tool like fire can burn”. While this lesson was later adapted to include breakthrough inventions like the candle and the stove, the underlying concept never changed. Heat + Irresponsibility = Burn.

If we “fast forward” to today’s generation, with each sunrise comes a new idea, invention or gadget tied to the use of digital technologies. The innovative ideas and ingenuity our generation not only possesses but transforms into reality have forced all of us collectively and as individuals to rapidly adapt to a new way of working, a new way of living, a new way of communicating. However, lost in our rapid adaptation to these new technologies and “toys” was the creation of a uniform and proactive concept of responsibility, and a system to arm our digital generation with the knowledge that irresponsible utilization of these technologies, or “toys” can do more than burn, they can disintegrate an entire social system in less than ½ of 1 second. In Other Words: Digital Technology – 21st Century Responsibility = Annihilation.

The real irony here however is as innovative, brilliant, and “tech savvy” as our generation would say we are, pre-21st century civilizations with no universal form of written or verbal communication were able to collectively and proactively communicate safety and responsibility (about the flame and repercussions of irresponsible use) to future generations for adaptation to new technologies like the stove, and yet, in an age where a single image can devastate an entire community, in an era where the aforementioned image can be sent around the world in less than a second from the touch of a button, in a time when (global) communication is so easy and mindless we don’t even consider the processes required to execute our (instant) messages, it appears that nobody in our “advanced civilization” really ever stopped to ponder and prepare us, as a now digital society, for the concurrently devastating consequences poor judgment summons when irresponsibly utilizing these rapidly evolving and distributed technologies and “toys”.

As we continue our expeditious and reactive adaptation to technology, we concurrently continue to neglect the required understanding of how we ourselves (not to mention future generations) should formally behave and communicate responsibly to avoid the aforementioned annihilation. To employ a continuous and ongoing patchwork process as the means for curing rapidly evolving digital diseases like sexting, cyber bullying or sextcasting would ensure that our generation, and those to follow will forever be challenged with new, more dangerous digital diseases that will ultimately cause exponential harm. Executing reactionary based technologies and programs using pre-21st century concepts to digital disease once it has become a national issue fuels the inevitability that society’s demise will ultimately result from our own hands.

(The previous paragraph for a less technical audience: Reviewing what your kid did on a parental “spy” program 5 hours after they posted a nude picture of themselves will not shelter them should the image become viral. Requesting seminars on an ongoing basis to continuously reach an audience about a digital issue you read in today’s paper will not prepare that audience for a disease that presents itself tomorrow or in 2012, and cannot proactively prepare that audience for the very trend that prompted the seminar to begin with as a headline you read today is most likely about a trend that started years ago like sexting. In fact based on the recent headlines, it seems the national exposure of sexting has actually increased the frequency of incidents. Perhaps this is because rebellious youth will always do the opposite of what authority tells them unless they clearly and selfishly comprehend the personal long term harm and consequences of their actions.)

It is vital that our global leaders understand what is at stake here, and that technology offers no pity, remorse, or flexibility to fame, money or power. Strong social influence may shield some of our citizens from pre-21st century based rules and responsibilities like fines, lines, and poverty, but the President himself, the leader of the free world (today, or 20 years from today) could not recall an embarrassing image should it become viral through digital technologies without infringing upon our civil liberties.

Responsibility 2.1C is our generation’s flame. It is our generation’s basic concept of digital responsibility, safety and awareness. It is a necessary social norm that must be conceived and passed down to future generations starting today. As inventions and technologies are created, 2.1C can be adapted, however, as was the case with the flame, the candle, and the stove, the underlying concept will remain. Society’s ability to conceive, practice and communicate this very simple, uniform and established concept will assist us in proactively avoiding digital Armageddon.

Some may say this piece is a bit melodramatic, over the top, and unrealistic. To those of you that fall into the aforementioned group, I wonder if you were Jessica Logan’s mother if you wouldn’t feel like your world has ended. If you, your child, or your parents were at the epicenter of a digital issue like sexting or sextcasting with nowhere to run as technology is everywhere. I wonder if you would maintain the very thoughts you had a moment ago if your child or loved one was taken by a predator that located them because their school or corporate logo was visible on their shirt in somebody’s digital image. The aforementioned examples are a microcosm of tragedies that destroy multiple lives every day, and requesting a seminar to retroactively deal with specific issues on a case by case basis will ensure that this trend continues.

Sexting is a prehistoric concept compared to what is already here destroying lives at a rapid rate, and what lays on the digital horizon. Just as our ancestors could only dream of the technology we have today, we would be ignorant to think that a continuous evolution of technology and the new diseases they will present will not reveal themselves over the course of our lives and our childrens' lives. Our generation must be focused on preparing for diseases as they arrive in society, not a headline.

Now is the time for us as individuals, a nation, and a global community to understand, adapt to, and communicate Responsibility 2.1C. The proactive understanding of this social norm will save thousands of lives as it provides our generation, and generations to follow with the knowledge required to responsibly utilize current and future technologies and proactively cure digital disease. It is our generation’s chance to make a fresh start while we still can, by learning the lessons of our forefathers, and ensuring we have a firm grasp on how to use new tools and technologies before we rapidly innovate and distribute a potentially lethal tool as a sophisticated or innovative “toy”.

Digital Technology + Responsibility 2.1C = A Social Norm of 21st Century Safety, Responsibility and Awareness.

To learn more about Responsibility 2.1C, and how this concept can be communicated to your community for free ASAP, please visit www.iroc2.org.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I must be living on another planet... I was aware that kids sent pics around. I was not familiar with the term "sexting". Thank you for educating me.

One thing though.. Regardless of how society chooses to address this phenomena, I sincerely hope we do not put children in front of those that dress in "wigs" and "medieval costumes". (the law, court, etc..) The consequential publicity, could potentially harm the child more than the "offence".

I hope society finds a way to introduce a way of educating our children (and Adults) to the consequences of this behaviour. Rather than focusing on the punitive..

Thank you for this article and the link
in response to you comment....that is exactly what The Institute for Responsible Online and Cell-Phone Communication does. Proactively communicate responsibility to kids and adults BEFORE they get themselves into trouble.

Find more info about this self funded nonprofit at www.iroc2.org.
[quote]The practice of taking nude or semi-nude self-portraits and distributing them via a cellphone or the internet has come to be called "sexting" and has resulted in teens being arrested in a number of states under child porn production, distribution and possession charges.
The Tunkhannock case involves two photos depicting the three girls. One photo of Marissa Miller and Grace Kelly shows them two years ago at age 13 lying side by side while one talks on the phone and the other makes a peace sign with her fingers, according to the ACLU complaint. The two are photographed from the waist up and are wearing white opaque bras. A second photo shows a girl referred to in the court document as "Jane Doe" photographed outside a shower with a towel wrapped around her waist. Her breasts are bared.
Last October, Tunkhannock school officials discovered that male students had been trading these and other photos, showing various states of undress, on their phones. Officials confiscated the phones and turned them over to Skumanick’s office, which began a criminal investigation.
Skumanick told an assembly of students that possessing inappropriate images of minors could be prosecuted under state child porn laws.
Anyone convicted under the laws faces a possible seven year sentence and a felony conviction on their record. Under a state sex offender law, they must also register as a sex offender for 10 years and have their name and photo posted on the state’s sex offender website — the latter requirement will include juvenile offenders when the law is amended later this year.
Skumanick, who is running for re-election in May, also sent a letter to 20 students, including the three girls, who were found in possession of images.
In a meeting with the students and their parents, he said he would file felony charges against the students unless they agreed to six months of probation, among other terms. He gave the parents 48 hours to agree. The parents of the three girls in the ACLU suit refused to sign.
Skumanick then threatened to charge the girls with producing child porn unless their parents agreed to the probation, and sent the teenagers to a five-week, 10-hour education program to discuss why what they did was wrong and what it means to be a girl in today’s society. The girls would also have to subject themselves to drug testing — a standard probation term in the county.
In an interview with Threat Level, Skumanick defended his actions, and said he offered the agreement in an attempt to avoid prosecution while still teaching the teens a lesson.
[End Quote] Source: http://tinyurl.com/qupsxv
I sincerely believe there has to be a better way than this... However misguided, these are children NOT porn merchants. There is no suggestion these children were creating porn for profit or any other sinister motive.
I will be talking about this subject with my (adult) kids and I hope they will educate their kids, which are of course my Grandchildren.
Again thanks for this
Under a state sex offender law, they must also register as a sex offender for 10 years and have their name and photo posted on the state’s sex offender website — the latter requirement will include juvenile offenders when the law is amended later this year.

Please forgive my enthusiasm for your post...

I simply did not realise such insanity was so abundant... The snip from my last comment defies belief... I am completely bloody dumbfounded..
Do not feel the need to apologize.

In fact, if you would like to learn more about our organizaiton and how we are the only one on the planet providing a proactive cure for current and future digital disease (there are FAR worse issues than Sexting)...please contact the Executive Director Richard Guerry through our website at www.iroc2.org.

Perhaps we can bring our free seminar to your community.

Best,
Rich