Watching the peaceful assembly of thousands of students, teachers, parents, and alumni on the UC Davis quad yesterday, it was clear to see that the Occupy movement has evolved far beyond its initial stages of disorganization, uncertainty, and lack of solidified motive. Back in September, while still in its earliest stages, the movement received only half-hearted support from those that stood on the sidelines, and heavy criticism from non-supporters, who discredited the movement for lacking any tangible goal or purpose. These criticisms were warranted, to an extent; the subject matter raised at the first several demonstrations on Wall Street ranged anywhere from an unfair tax system to animal cruelty, seemingly unrelated issues.
Over the next few months, however, the movement would push past these criticisms, crystallizing itself into one larger-than-life statement: that all of the issues being raised in the countless demonstrations across the country, including police brutality, budget cuts, tuition hikes, political funding, and media bias, are not problems, but merely syptoms of the institutional failure of the neoliberal system. In this sense, the movement has embraced its own so-called "disorganization" by recognizing the economic connection between its many valid yet scattered arguments.
Unification of sentiment isn't the only thing that has changed in the past few weeks. The Occupy movement, which initially lacked any central leadership, is slowly building up a (very literally, since most of these events take place outdoors) grassroots organizational structure of its own. These demonstrations aren't merely rallies or marches anymore; in places like Oakland and UC Davis, they have evolved into public assemblies where there is an open dialogue to not only identify the issues at hand (rather than simply chanting and complaining about them), but also to engage in a collective brainstorm for solutions. After the 12pm rally in Davis yesterday, students broke up into "committees" where they voted on various proposals (like the dismissal of campus police) on a 90% basis. This method was borrowed by UCD from its counterparts at Occupy Oakland, who have also been using it as a means to collectively problem-solve. And while this approach still has its organizational imperfections, and in many ways remains purely symbolic, it reveals that the Occupy movement has anything but lost its momentum, and instead has grown larger, more organized, and ever more committed to a peaceful approach.



Salon.com
Comments
good show here. out.
--upton sinclair
"One withstands the invasion of armies; one does not withstand the invasion of ideas."
--victor hugo
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."
supreme court justice louis brandeis
occupy party reaches critical mass/seismic effect--now what?
Nothing has changed. You still have masses of people who want to hold signs with sayings that they can't even define much less tell you how to solve.
Expain "corporate greed" in terms that you can put verify every corportation against.
Rated
To deny the obvious corporate greed that is virulently and relentlessly destroying everything decent in US society is beyond ignorance, beyond stupidity and smells of some sort of malignant agenda.
To have an effect the ballot box must offer a choice. It doesn't.
Occupy Wall Street is not a spontaneous movement, but a subversive movement that has been in operation much longer than the two months they have been in the public’s eye and claim to be.
Research shows that Iowa Citizens For Community Improvement is linked to many other socialist groups. All are connected to and promoted the Occupy Wall Street movement i.e. Iowa Citizens For Community Improvement; Progressive States Network; National People’s Action, and many more, ECT. These are all Progressive/Communist/Socialist organizations and are but a few established left wing socialist organizations all across America.
When you read their mission statements one can see they have been in existence for some time, much longer than the violent Occupy demonstrations.
All these organizations intend on making American a Communist/Socialist country.
While we all want change for the betterment of mankind, it is important that we have a County left, and that everyone can enjoy freedom with the opportunity to get ahead. Occupy will not leave us with that kind of country.
The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.
Beware of what you are signing up for!
I am continually reminded of a conversation I had with a young Vietnamese woman on election day in Vietnam. "Did you go vote?" "No bic (understand) vote." Following a minute of pidgin English and pantomime she replied, "Oh, you mean pick new boss." At first I thought she had chosen the wrong word and then I realized that she had no illusion that elected officials spoke for her.
We are at that point, and as Jan points out there is no choice between candidates.
I hope that there will evolve some cohesion of thought and goals. You would think that this process would come about on college campuses. What is happening on campuses? Does anyone actually go to school in a real classroom anymore? Is this a virtual revolution? rated
"All these organizations intend on making American a Communist/Socialist country. " J. McCordy
It is long overdue that the media should raise the bar on ideological debates by allowing advocates of socialist communism debate with the corporatist capitalists of the Republican and Democrat parties..
Would that direct participatory democracy in the United States, facilitated by modern technology, supersede US's 18th century representative republican democracy, revolutionary devolution may have a chance to set the stage for a more just, humane and ecologically sound evolution of humanity.
If those are seemingly unrelated issues how would you define unrelated issues? What do you mean by “disproportionate taxes”? Last I heard we have a progressive tax system, meaning by design taxes are intended to be disproportionate. Many occupiers I’ve seen seem to want raise taxes on the rich, are you suggesting they should be advocating proportionate taxes (a flat tax)?
The movement has changed things. Admit it. Don't admit it. It doesn't matter anymore. It's caused a change in what we discuss; its message includes the entire population.
BTW, corporate taxes are an example of double-taxation. When corporations distribute their profits it gets taxed at the income tax rate of the individual which receives said income. You are free to advocate raising the corporate tax, but there is absolutely no political will from both parties, as they are both astutely aware of the concept “it’s not wise to bite the hand that feeds you”.
*I have replaced the word disproportionate in the first paragraph so as to be more clear.
Show me one thing you said that currently expresses criticism of the movement? Kudos for expressing your opinions (that’s what Open Salon is for), but there is nothing worse than someone with an obvious bias who thinks they are objective. If you don’t believe me, take a look at the polls which clearly suggest the public has lost support for the movement, and not the other way around, as your “criticism” suggests.
Of course, Fever also thinks anything relating to race is racist, so there's a lot of evidence he's incapable of critical thinking.
Way to go, Fevie. You're batting .001!
Here's an early Black Friday gift special for you, Fever. I'm sure you don't have one...
http://www.merriam-webster.com/
there are a lot of products on sale. Which one is better for 48 years old mom? Handbag,glasses or biniki? Please help.
You are assuming that the actions of the police were "brutal" and that the actions that the police took against her happened. If she is lying about the miscarriage doesn't that add to the possibility that what happened to her is also a lie?
If a woman who is expecting whats to go to a peaceful protest, more power to her. If she wants to go to a place marked by violence, where by your thoughts violence is going to occur, shouldn't she be held to a higher standard? Doesn't she have a duty to not do something that has a high degree of danger?
According to you the police are brutal. They will do brutal things to the people that they meet at these protests. Should it happen? Of course not. Are you saying it's going to happen? Yes you are. So she should know that if she goes and confronts the police she will get beaten up, she did, and according to her it happened. It shouldn't have, if it did, and according to her it did. You say she has zero blame in what she claims happened to her.
You make choices everyday. You suffer from what happens from those choices. You drive, you get in a car accident, it was your choice to drive. It's a measure risk. The odds are you are not going to get into a car accident, but they do happen. People win the lottery and get struck by lightning. I don't play the lottery and I don't go out in a thunderstorm with a large metal pole. Do you?