The interwebs – and the San Francisco Bay Area, which is quite literally Facebook territory – have been abuzz since news of the social networking site’s IPO broke Wednesday. Within hours, anyone with a mic or a keyboard was thoroughly a-riff: Would the projected $5 billion trigger a new housing boom? Would it save the California economy?
Or was Facebook nothing but a data-mining outfit, selling our info to the highest bidder, and before long, so over. With nearly half the world’s internet users logged on, how could it grow?
But while the opinionators were opinionating, a good percentage of the social networking site’s 845 million users (58 percent of them women, by the way) were madly liking, sharing and updating their news feeds to call out – if that isn’t too mild a word — Susan G. Komen’s decision to defund Planned Parenthood.
The irony that an organization that proclaims its dedication to curing (there’s some debate on that, too) breast cancer would pull the plug on the funding for free mammograms was way too much. The backlash was fast, furious and viral. And it was in our Face.
Within hours, Komen was under immense pressure both within and without the organization. They backpedaled. Top officials resigned. Racers for the cure decided, well, not to. Comments like this one — I was sort of done when they partnered with KFC to turn the buckets pink – that was a key notion that they weren’t terribly concerned about women’s health. — took on a life of their own.
And Planned Parenthood? By Wednesday night, it had received $400,000 in donations. On Thursday, New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg pledged to give Planned Parenthood $250,000.
For far too long, Planned Parenthood has been in the crosshairs of conservatives, who have tagged the organization as nothing but — as the erstwhile presidential candidate Michele Bachman once called it, “the LensCrafter of big abortion” — when in reality, Planned Parenthood is a prime provider of health care for women who can’t afford it. (Abortions only make up 10 percent of the services it provides.)
As we’ve written before, we know of one woman, in fact, whose life may have been saved by Planned Parenthood. She discovered a lump in her breast shortly after losing her work-related health insurance. Where did she turn for a mammogram? Yep, Planned Parenthood, which ultimately shepherded her through the scary process of not only the diagnostics, but ultimately surgery, chemo and radiation.
And so, while some folks might look at Facebook and see a cashbox that will fill our local watering holes and pump some life back into the California economy – and while others argue that it’s nothing but a narcissistic echo chamber that keeps us fixated on the trivial — at least for today, we can see it as something else: the social engine that may well have saved at least one woman’s life.
By the way, this was my favorite update.
To which the only possible response is “like!”
Tagged: Facebook, Planed Parenthood, Susan G. Komen


Salon.com
Comments
Seems like th SGK had this blow up right in their faces. If they think Right-Wing Political pressure hurts, they ain't seen NOTHIN' yet! They knuckled under and severely undercut their own purported message. Thanks but no thanks, I'll donate to Planned Parenthood and the American Cancer Society from now on.
R/
R
RATED
More like 3%. Stephen Colbert did a marvelous piece about this that is also rapidly spreading across Facebook at the moment.
http://gawker.com/5791100/watch-stephen-colberts-defense-of-planned-parenthood
Komen can kiss my ass. I'd rather support Planned Parenthood and the American Cancer Society.
Susan G. Komen for the Cure was witness to the power of social networking galvanized to enforce social responsibility. No matter what Zuckerberg and Co were thinking, doing or hoping when they created FaceBook, what happens now is ultimately in the hands of the userbase to a large extent. Not necessarily what the interface looks like, or how the messaging and connections sections actually function, no. How it's actually used in our world, our societies and people it brings together for various reasons is completely out of the inventor's control.
FaceBook's true potential, which many may see as a serious weakness, is that it allows people to speak out, connect and communicate wherever an internet connection can be had. I think, in most cases, the potential for ensuring we truly empower people in a more democratic way through social networking is the greatest reason for using FaceBook.
I started off Hating FaceBook. I don't know if I'd be willing to completely give it up at this point. Not so I can gossip, but so I can connect with others willing to speak up, speak out and demand their personal power be accorded them from our politicians, leaders (hah!) and execs attempting to maintain control through it.
SOPA, PIPA and Susan G. Komen for the Cure. Progress in action. What's next?
--R--
Rated.
Hey, can I look you up on Fbook? Maybe we should start an OS subgroup -
Well it is 300K+ per 3M served as you said. 10%. That is like saying I sell 3M hamburgers a year and only 300K pizzas, so I am not int he pizza business.
So one in ten walk in and get an abortion. And you have to assume not all who walk in are pregnant so the % of pregnant women who walk in for "options" that get an abortion is higher than 10%. If even 10% of total served are pregnant than the math says 100% of pregnant women get an abortion.
If 20% walk in pregnant then 50% of pregnant women are getting abortions. etc.
You cant justify abortion clinics just because they do other things other than abortions. That makes no sense at all. It is not clear that PP does just that to cover the abortions.
How is it any different than a dedicated clinic performing 300K abortions?
I don't hear much push back for the other services provided.
So why not separate the services so we can know exactly what % women walk in pregnant and walk out not.
Then we will have the truth instead of rhetoric and statistic manipulation.
And lets have a clear accounting of ALL the donations and who is giving money allocated to include abortions and those that are not. Let the players show there faces and let them all reap the rewards/criticism.
Everyone that is awake now knows Koman's position. It doesn't matter if one thinks she did the right or wrong thing or changed her mind for right or wrong. The point is now everyone knows and can respond accordingly.
So let them all come forward. But they won't.