Current President Barack Obama successfully campaigned on healthcare, though his plan wasn't much good then, and has since evolved into a giant, gift-wrapped, insuance company stimulus package. His political stock in freefall, Obama tossed the hot potato to Congress, tasking it with the passage of some semblance of healthcare reform by the close of his first year in office. As we know now, and suspected then, there was no Congressional miracle to pull Obama's numbers out of the political toilet. Healthcare remains the hot topic, and fear of what monstrosity Congress might adopt and how much it will cost us has generated more and more popular support for the concept of a single-payer univeral healthcare system (or at least a public option to keep the health insurance industry "honest"). But the longer this process drags on, the less likely it seems that a healthcare reform package more beneficial to Americans than American corporations will ever pass, and it is all the more likely that we will end up with a pricy plan that doesn't perform as advertised. The recent Supreme Court decision granting corporations similar rights to individuals with regard to political donations would appear to make this a virtual certainty.
Of course, I suppose that we can always hope that the Democrats will decide to screw their political futures by getting down and dirty. Buy off the necessary number of Repubs (and wavering Dems) with pork products and ladder boosts, and pass the plan that the people want. But that also seems unlikely, as too many politicians are blinded by love of the office, power and prestige they command.
So what are our options? There are the obvious ones, of course; email/write/call/visit your elected officials, spread the word by blogging and writing letters for the opinion pages on your local newspapers and national publications, talking to friends, family and anyone else whom you can persuade to listen. And then there are the not-so-obvious options.
The United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights , which was adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations--including the U.S.--in 1948, states in Article 25:
"Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services..."
As the United States has not even come close to these standards, there are those who feel that the U.S. should be considered noncompliant with regard to conformity to the standards of international law. I suppose it's within the realm of possibility for member nations of the UN to float the idea of imposing sanctions upon the U.S. until we come into compliance, but only because nothing is impossible. I suppose it is also possible that the matter will someday come before a court brave enough or stupid enough to further the practice of holding the U.S. to the standards of international law where the issue in question is not specifically addressed in existing national law, but let's hope that's not the case.
There is another option; obscure but completely legal, and feasible to boot. All it requires is for Americans to emulate the example of Americans who came before us, and do what Americans have traditionally done in times of discontent: act.
Our Constitution provides the American people with a method to amend it, without the need for Congressional cooperation. This method is stated in Article V of the U.S. Constitution. To date, it has never been used, but there's no time like the present. In general, two-thirds of the legislatures of the states must call for a Constitutional convention for the purpose of proposing a Constitutional amendment(s). The proposed amendment(s) would then become part of the Constitution if three fourths of the states ratify it.
Many states are already facing enormous deficits, in large part from the costs of Medicaid (government program that provides healthcare to the poor). This may make the states easier to persuade than Congress. If a Constitutional amendment guaranteeing healthcare as a basic human right were to be passed, Congress would have no choice but to make universal healthcare a reality, for every American.
The limitation to this option is that it depends upon the will and the action of the American people. In recent times, it seems that we as a people have become complacent. Sure, we complain. Lots of us complain. But few write letters to the editor; fewer bug their elected officials; even fewer renounce the coziness of their couch potato perspective and protest, or visit, or start a movement. The American ideal lives on, while the American reality is depressing. Let's break out of this fast-food, fast-buck, obese, overspending, debt-riddled, cash-crunch, shady-sub-prime-mortgage mold we find ourselves in, and remember that we are not helpless. We are free citizens of the U.S.A., with freedom of speech, and a free press, and the right to peaceably assemble, and we have the ability to change our nation for the better.
All we have to do is act.


Salon.com
Comments
Act and ye shall receive. That's what I believe. Sounds like you believe it too.
I like your idea of a Constitutional Convention. There's actually a group here in California working to put a proposition on this November's ballot to have just such a convention for our state. Should be quite interesting.
It could serve as a model for other states, as well.
Also, go to www.commondreams.org, to George Lakoff's post on starting a movement (I believe, it's listed under 1/25/10). He's got some great ideas--and an organization to join, with plenty of ACTION to take.
Our Democracy is disabled and dysfunctional. It's time for The People to lead, and the "leaders" to follow.
"If not you, then who? If not now, then when?"
Maybe it's true that the only people who can handle power are those who never wanted it in the first place. I hope not, because we'd be pretty much doomed.
I also think that we need to find a way to elect those who actually represent different financial situations, at least to a certain extent. Someone who's been through poverty as an adult, or the "lower middle class", to represent the interests of all the families who struggle to get by on two incomes, who lack McMansions and private schools and vacations that last longer than a weekend.
I know that racism is not absent from our culture. However, I wonder how many of the attitudes and comments that are considered racist are actually bias against financial status, or rather, the lack thereof.
Maybe a reality TV show where the winner becomes a Congressman or -woman and wins half a million dollars, or an American Idol-style show where the applicant with the best speaking, diplomacy and other political skills gets a ticket to the White House, and lunch with Angelina Jolie or Dr. Dreamy.
Hell, maybe just a lottery, where, in order to collect your $75 million dollars, you gotta serve some time in political office--a randomly selected candidate would be preferable to some of the psychopaths and power-mad loons currently running things.
Class--it's the one verboten topic in our Corporate Media. We are a very class-divided society, though no one gets to talk much about it. "Theories Of The Leisure Clas" by Veblen is a famous, very interesting book on class--though excruciating to read because of the author's writing style.
You wanna get into some HEAVY DUTY stuff--read George Seldes' works. He was once known as "The most censored man in America".
He wrote about press censorship, fascism in America, corporate psychos, class-based oppression, and any damn thing else he felt like writing about. Helluva guy.
One of the best. Take a peek at his "Sawdust Caesar" or "Lords Of The Press" or "Facts And Fascism". He was the real deal, a Journalist Warrior Giant in a world of pygmies.
Darryl, I do think our freedoms are being stripped away, publicly but cloaked in the guise of "temporarily necessary for security". Maybe politicians should be required to state their positions on a large number of issues, then can automatically be tossed from office if they ever vote otherwise without an explanation the public find plausible! As for voting, I take issue more with people voting who haven't bothered to find out anything about the candidates. This basically means that the media chooses the outcome of any given race, as too many Americans behave like sheep--or lemmings, depending on how bad the result is!
T.S., unfortunately I think that those in the health insurance biz think exactly that. The fitter you are, the less expensive to insure and more profitable to have as a customer. I wonder if the politicians will ever be able to shake the cloak of money and figure out that the best people to consult regarding reform do not include those who made things the way they are in the first place.