Out of My Mind

The Musings of a Woman Who Thinks Too Much

Nelle Engoron

Nelle Engoron
Location
California,
Birthday
May 01
Bio
My Season 5 "Mad Men" commentary is on Salon.com rather than here (see my last blog post). *****My e-book, "Mad Men Unmasked: Decoding Season 4," is now available on Amazon! ***** I'm a writer/editor/consultant who lives in the SF Bay Area. I write about all kinds of things, but am particularly intrigued by movies, relationships, gender issues and "Mad Men." (Scroll down the left sidebar for links to what I've published elsewhere as well as a selection of my blog posts.) I'm writing a novel about religious and romantic obsession and have completed a memoir, "Seeking," about my (successful) quest for love, which included personal ad dates with 200 men. Email me at "Nelle@NelleEngorondotcom" Amazon author page at: amazon.com/author/nelleengoron

Nelle Engoron's Links

Books I've written
Articles of Mine on Other Sites
Movies, Movies, Movies
Mad Men Commentary
Musings, Memoir & Humor (on many topics)
Editor’s Pick
AUGUST 17, 2009 3:35AM

Toto, We're Not in Sterling-Cooper Anymore (Mad Men)

Rate: 16 Flag

  Don Draper puzzled

 

 "Can you believe this?" ~ Ken Cosgrove

 

Sterling Cooper isn't what it used to be:  The British invasion has arrived ahead of the Beatles (and they brought some ants), they're firing people right and left (but only people we've never seen before and so have no emotional investment in) and nothing is quite as it used to be. 

That's the whole point, apparently -- or so says creator Matthew Weiner in the after-episode preview of the new season, while Vincent Kartheiser (who plays Pete Campell) jokes, "It's just like that show 'Mad Men,' only better."  Uh, hang on there, Vincent.  I'm not so sure about that. 

The agency is in flux, Don's almost in a stewardess, Sal's almost in a bell hop, Betty's nearly in labor, Ken's in ecstasy, Pete's in hell, Peggy's in a snit, Joan's in a funk, Bert Cooper's into the brandy, and I'm not sure I'm even in the same series.

"Our stories are straight." ~ Don to Betty

After two seasons of complex storylines larded with symbolism that can take repeated viewings to unravel, we get a fragmented episode in which  the unsettling British takeover of the agency is played out against a visit to the client London Fog, leaving me to wonder if creativity has dropped sharply in the writers' room while we've been away.  And don't even get me started about the revelation that Dick Whitman was named after the part of his father that his prostitute mother wanted to chop off.

Sal's "a little excited and a little shocked," but I'm afraid I'm only the latter.

Where are the relationships we've come to know and care about?  At first, Don and Betty appear closer than we've ever seen them, but then Don moves on a stewardess without even a moment of the hesitation that he showed last season before descending into infidelity once again.  Peggy seems to only care that her secretary is dissing her, Joan floats through the office like a woman who's already checked out of her job, leaving us no hint of where last season's rape by her fiance has left her, and Pete throws a predictable tantrum that tells us nothing we didn't already know about him.  The rest of the cast appear as if only to reassure us they weren't axed during the hiatus. 

Meanwhile, the same old jokes are trotted out:  Roger loves his Stoli, Don comes up with a brilliant ground-breaking ad campaign while taking a catnap, Pete's petulantly unable to be satisfied with anything in his life.

 

"Limit your exposure." ~ Don's new ad campaign.  Hardly an endorsement or enticement for a TV show!
 

Only a few moments stand out as fresh and real:  Sal's possibly first sexual encounter with a man, powerfully and honestly played by actor Bryan Batt; Don's reassurance to his daughter Sally that he "will always come home and you'll always be my girl" after she tries to destroy his suitcase so he won't disappear again; the way a very pregnant and exhausted Betty softens as Don tenderly strokes her belly and talks her into sleeping.

Like Betty, Mad Men is in its third trimester, and things are getting awkward and uncomfortable.  Let's hope that in both cases, there's new life to come that makes this all worthwhile.

In the meantime, I did love Trudy's hat.

 

 

"It's a gynocracy."

"I hadn't noticed."

~ The two Brits (so unimpressive I didn't catch their names) discussing Sterling-Cooper

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I agree. It was fairly conventional.
wow, i'm sure you're right. but i'm clearly an idiot because i loved this episode. for once, i didn't feel so depressed while watching it that i wanted to jump off something. i loved when don said that to Sal, that he was acknowledging him being gay but telling him to stay on the down-low. and i liked the british element. the revelation in the beginning was just stupid and meaningless. but i liked everything being in flux, for some reason. i liked everyone beign shaken up. i'm sure they will ahve an episode next week that will be suitable grim and depressing and also brilliant. im' grateful to have one that doesn't elave my reeling. i swear to god, wellk, everyone knows abnout my lvoe of animals and especially dogs, but when they had tthat episode where Dutch or Duke or sometihng put his dog out into downtown manhattan, i almost stopped watching the show. had the similar feeling when people were equally brutalized.

okay, i'm shutting up. please don't mock me for my minority opinion. i LOVE this show and i love your review. love lveo lveo and gratitude
I can't wait to see the episode - was busy with other things last night - but I remember not being impressed with the opening episodes of season 1 or season 2, so it'll be interesting to see where it goes from here.
I agree Peggy needs to stop whining , take names and kick some Brit butt. Don I thought did hesitate at least a millisecond after the kiss with the stewardess, contemplating marriage. I loved the subtlety- her contemplating how cheating on her fiance would affect her marriage, him then realizing that 'what the heck...'. It was there, just wonderfully restrained. Similarly, I thought Joan's coldness and detachment might be a reference to her having been raped - realizing that her perfect escape came with a horrid price, but resigning herself to this fate. Perhaps what Weiner et al are building towards is the ongoing personal struggle most of us endure between accepting our fate and being masters of it. In that sense, the Yank/Brit struggle is yet another strand in the tapestry. I know I'm anxious to find out.
Very good summary, and my thoughts and sentiments exactly. Couldn't believe that after such an explosive finale last season, this episode wouldn't address: 1.) Joan's rape 2.) Betty and Don's altered relationship and, most importantly, 3.) Peggy's confession to Pete!!

But maybe Owl_Says_Who is right, regarding season openers. I do hope so!
I figure that the first episode of the season is usually going to be devoted to "set-up", and introducing new characters and/or storylines. So, we'll see...

But, yeah, some explosive things happened last season that seem to have been swept under the rug - although things have a way of coming back around 0n this show.

I am still very confused about Don/Dick's early life.

And Trudy's hat, OMG! I would have loved to have seen that actress's reaction when wardrobe put that on her head!
I have to say this season kick off left me a little flat. Are we just picking up 8 months later? Or did I miss some shows? I will give it time and wait and see.
With the massive amounts of promotion they've been doing, they're likely hoping to draw in a ton of new viewers.T his episode set the stage, introduced everyone for the newly expanded audience, and I'm thinking we'll get to the good stuff soon.
I have the same feelings I had after the season 2 opener - it doesn't seem to follow up on the cliffhangers, it doesn't really stand well on its own as an episode. It says "this is where we are now" but doesn't say how we got there. But this time, I trust the storytellers to fill in those gaps as we go, like they did last season.

Like, why are Pete and Trudy so happy all of a sudden? There's still no talk of a baby in the picture, but there is an ease and unstrained affection between them I haven't seen before.

BTW, I think we have had our answer re: Joan. She's still wearing the ring and she's planning to quit. She's made her decision.

I was wondering about Peggy's talk about the secretary - at first it just seems like she's gossiping with Joan, which really isn't her way. Knowing that it is her secretary, I wonder how long it's going to take for her to take charge. Wonder why she's hesitating?
It's still too early to tell but the season has only just begun. That's the exciting part! Congrats on the EP! Very much well deserved!

:)
I was so glad to see Mad Men back that I wasn't viewing with a very critical eye. However, I do understand your disappointments with this episode. I tend to agree with those who look on it as a setup for the season and hope for more clarity and momentum.

According to an interview with Matthew Weiner that I read, it is supposed to be six months after the end of season two and not only is Joan married, but so is Roger.

One thing I didn't care for was the fugue state of Don, imagining or hallucinating his conception and birth.
I stayed up way too late writing that! (only 1:30 AM, here, but bad enough) I obviously missed a few things in my haste to put some thoughts down, and the lack of any follow up on the Peggy-Pete drama is one of them. But then, that's too huge a storyline to cram into this episode. Pete seemed to have moved on, though, which deflates the intense impact that scene between them had last season.


Rebecca, I also thought of how last season's premiere episode was panned by a lot of people. I don't recall feeling that way. And I think they're a tough nut, esp for established culty shows like this one-- you can't really satisfy your viewers. I do get they didn't want to just do same-old same-old, especially since the whole story direction is now about change, but I thought this was a poor combination of quite a bit of same old (tired jokes) and then fragmented stabs at the new. I could go all grad school and say that it created in me the viewer the same feelings that the characters are having (and that would be true) but I'm not entirely sure that was the intention-- or if it was, if that's a good strategy for a TV show! Also, I also noticed how close Pete and Trudy seemed, which was unexpected given all we've seen of their relationship so far, not to mention Peggy's revelation.

Jeanette, of course I'm very willing to see what they do from here, and I trust any rockiness can be smoothed out. But it seemed a poor start to me, not up to their usual standards in any way. About DD's early life -- have you watched Season 1? That fills in a lot, and in some great episodes (e.g. The Hobo Code). I thought this flashback was just, well, bizarre (for one thing, it's not a true flashback but a fantasy since Don wasn't there or was a newborn and couldn't know what happened). To me, it absolutely cheapened the powerful depiction of his upbringing that was shown in Season 1 and made it some kind of backwoods joke.

And I actually did love Trudy's hat! It was very Audrey Hepburn. Trudy is considered to be the most "fashion forward" woman on the show and that hat was spot-on. She looks like she stepped out of a spread in the hottest fashion mag of that day.

Theodora, your comment actually made me laugh --in a good way! I agree the show can be very grim. I laughed several times at this one, but it seemed like cheap laughs. I almost included a comment from my partner K in my review. He only watches intermittently with me, but has grown to like the show more and more, but he said about halfway through, "There are some good jokes in here, but otherwise it feels like a soap opera." I think he nailed it. (BTW
oh man! Half of my last comment got cut off for some reason. Dang. Let's see if I can reconstruct it, while also responding to some new comments in the meantime.

Theodora, the dog storyline was almost unbearable to me, too! I did get the double meaning of what Don says to Sal, but it just seemed a bit too obvious to me, like picking London Fog as the client during the "British Invasion" show.

Brian, I agree that Joan's reaction does make sense in the way you describe. But we know she can't leave the show, so guess there's a broken engagement ahead. More soap opera-y stuff. I also didn't see Don hesitate to be unfaithful. Instead he responds to the engaged stewardess's saying that he might be her last chance at a fling, "I've been married a long time...there are lots of chances." I thought he seemed to have endorsed infidelity as a lifestyle and to have lost his moral conflict over it.

MTodd, Betty's pregnancy gives us a rough time estimate -- should be 5 to 6 months after end of last season.

Suz, I didn't get that Joan is married -- she sounds like she's still engaged, since she "can't wait to get out of this place" and he wanted her to quit when they married. If they wanted to convey that she's married, they didn't accomplish it in this ep!

Luis, thanks! and thanks to everyone else that commented. I think I lost some more thoughts when the system ate half my other comment - sorry.
I also have to say that I found it hilarious that after my last post, "I was Peggy Olson," that the show seemed to try to prove me wrong:

First, by showing not just Peggy but DON using a typewriter!! (After I said secretaries did all the typing for everyone in that era.) And second, after I talked about how disempowered women were at work in that era, there's the exchange I quoted at the end of this post when the British male assistant says the office is a "gynocracy" because Joan had made him look bad in front of his boss (which in retrospect I wonder if was deliberate, which gives me hope for Joan, if so). It's not of course, but it felt almost like the show's writers were responding to me. heh.
Great post. Just finished Season 2 last night. This was great to wake up to...thank you.
We tried to watch Season 2 and it just wasn't happening. But this sounds like a great review if I could figure out all the people and subplots!
Here's that interview with Matthew Weiner:

http://sepinwall.blogspot.com/2009/08/mad-men-talking-out-of-town-with.html
Palindrome, I reviewed the end of Season 2 in my 2nd post here at OS, "God and Advertising" if you want to look back....

MaryT, it would be hard to come in late, especially to an episode like this. But really any of them. Like all good dramas, a lot is built up over time and they don't bother explaining things for newbies. Even for those of us who watch it every time, there are things that are hard to catch on first viewing.
Suz, thanks for giving the link for that interview with Weiner - very interesting, although I'm not sure some of his explanations hold up (e.g. the stuff about Don committing to his marriage and yet still being casually unfaithful doesn't make sense in his interview responses any more than it did for me on screen). And I think he's relying on those bare feet a bit more than he should to put his theme across to the viewers. But I was glad to hear him confirm some perceptions I had -- e.g. that this was Sal's first physical encounter with a man.

I found his thoughts on how he creates the show intriguing -- and he seems to promise that the next episode of this season will be better, so that's good news! and I thought it was funny to have him reference soap operas after my saying this ep flirted with that.
"And I think he's relying on those bare feet a bit more than he should to put his theme across to the viewers."

It's all pretty odd.
I never believed Don wouldn't be straying again, I did think it might not be so soon. Sheesh Don--salt peter, ever hear of it?
A little off topic but this episode was much better than the weirdness HBO foisted on viewers of TruBlood last night. That show has completely gone off the rails, to which you might legitimately say, how can you tell?
I also have a problem with the time frame. Most of the mergers between medium agencies to create mega agencies did not start to happen in the late 80s. In 62 Madison avenue was the hub of the advertising world not England. What we know as the modern agency started in NY in the early 60s.

The writers for some reasons are trying to apply what is happening in today's corporate world to this show. It is not a deal breaker, but it is far from realistic.
Sorry, I thought the ad for London Fog was just brilliant in the context of the recent revelation of Sal's sexual predilictions. I can count at least five different levels it worked on, including a couple about the relation of hetero and homosexuality in a brutally heterosexist world.
Stagger, I don't get HBO so haven't seen True Blood. But I think it's really tough to keep up the quality in a show over time. Mad Men has set a very high standard in the first 2 seasons and I understand they may stumble now and then. I only hope it's just an episode or two and not this whole season! But it's easy to sit back and criticize; far harder to create great entertainment, much less art.

MTodd, that's very interesting. I don't know the history of advertising that well, but certainly mergers occurred a lot more in the 80's and 90's in general. I had a different objection than you do to the British thing which was that I felt the Brits were portrayed fairly stereotypically so far: uptight, drinking tea, wishing for a good pub. I had a British boyfriend eons ago and when I complained once about how Americans were depicted (literally as cowboys) on a British TV show we were watching together, he slammed right back with how the British are usually portrayed on our shows. And he's right. But I thought this show would aim higher. Of course we'll see how it plays out, but on first impression...I'm not impressed.
Don't despair just yet. I think, on some level, that the producers want us to feel as discombobulated as the characters themselves. It opens with Don having confusing visions of his pasta. We have Kenny and Peter being pitted against each other. We have Salavatore finally coming "out" if only a little in an out-of-town way and only almost , being "saved" by the fire alarm and caught by Done. . The slogan that Don comes up with is actually cleaver, in that it is actually a message from Dona to Sal. TRue, Peggy didn't have enough to do but she has just been promoted under the previous regime and, thus, seems better able to flat above the chaos. I am sure that, even with the changes, MM will hit a new stride.
I have to agree with the review printed in the Los Angeles Times this morning. The show is like a Japanese tea ceremony: very detailed, unfolding slowly, each action to be appreciated on its own and as part of a larger, unified event.

The "gynocracy" comment is to be savored as future episodes are presented. Maybe it's not as much of a "man's world" as it appears to be.

The episode had a different feeling from the prior seasons, but I'm not sure how I feel about that. What happened to Duck Phillips?
Actually, there were a lot of mergers in the 1960's, and some of the biggest were Transatlantic, but it was American firms buying British ones. See "The Advertising Handbook" By Sean Brierley. The show is fiction, after all, so some revision of history shouldn't come as a surprise.
I liked this episode, loved the hat. So much of what I love about this show is the era, the clothes, the art work. The actors are good and entertaining and if sometimes the story doesn't quite measure up, I forgive them.

This may have been addressed in comments but Don was born to a prostitute, and then given to the john's wife to be raised because the prostitute (don't know her name) died in childbirth, but then the wife of the john had her own biological child and treated Don (Dick) terribly.
latethink, I was able to piece together that much.

But, what I'm wondering is how and why the prostitute's child ended up with the wife of the "john". Doesn't seem a very likely sequence of events!
The golden age of advertising happened between 1965 and 1969. Advertising and marketing was not yet a science and more was dependent on creative thinkers instead of focus groups, studies and accounting. As a result there was a lot of landmark advertising done. As today there was also a fair amount of crap produced as well.

That is not to say there is still not good stuff being produced, but companies want to break new ground, but are afraid of take chances so they end up playing it safe with things that worked in the past. But the problem is the future introduces a whole new set of problems and variables that may render past successes a failure.

There was a time when a creative director could pitch an idea and companies would run with it based solely on the word of the agency. That does not happen as much these days. When someone does something that really breaks through it is a matter of months before everyone else is copying it.
I have mixed feelings about the episode. I do really like the way he's brought in the Brits to show some of the cultural contrast. I enjoyed the secretarial/gender politics. The way that Joan couldn't seem to decide whether to treat this male secretary like shit, or then give him more status that was appropriate. And I like the way that the show isn't just going to stay U.S. centric.

Yeah, it's kind of unsettling to see Don betray Betty again, so easily. But, god, she is so vacuous, and blandly cruel to her daughter, it's hard to feel empathy for her for very long. Plus I love the way that Don dealt with Sal's secret. It just passed right through his brain and morphed into this brilliantly perverse raincoat ad. It's a very very thinline between flat and subtle. Guess I'll have to watch it over again, which I so love doing.
I promise I won't watch it until you tell me to.
I agree, but for the slim pickens of highlights you mentioned, this was an empty husk of an episode - wholly unsatisfying. I went back to check the writing credit as soon as it was over and was shocked to see it was none other than Matthew Weiner - what gives? There was a quote from Elisabeth Moss saying every episode this season could be THE episode - I don't know whether to be encouraged or worried after seeing this opener. It's like the old saying about Chinese food, except it didn't take 20 minutes to be hungry again!
In my last post i said that you would probaly get a string of EPs for this "Mad Men" thread...I guess I was right.
Loved it -- especially for Bryan Batt. Sal's foreshortened zipless fuck was beautifully staged. The look of joy and horror on Batt's face was perfect.And please order me that bellboy ASAP!
Speaking as a gay man of 62, I've been in many sexual situations that -- minus the fire alarm-- unfolded just as rapidly.

The really interesting question is "What Does Don Really Think?" He sees Sal and the bellboy through thw window. They're not in a clinch but he knows "something has happened" because the bellboy's shirt is off. Is Don hip enough to know about Teh Ghey? Does he know that P.J. Clarke's was prime crusing territory for adventurous gays back in the early 60's? Or is it simply that now that "Sal Has a Secret" he feels a special kinship with him?

Can't wait for the next episode.
I loves me some Jared Harris, and I hope they use him well. (He'd be Unremarkable Brit #1--the Axeman Cometh).
Thanks for all the further comments!

David Smith, as I mentioned in my review of last season's closer (linked at end of post above) Duck's goose was cooked when he tried to set himself up as President of the new company without knowing that Don didn't have a contract and so could walk away. Don won; Duck lost and left.

Jeanette, we see Don's fantasy about how that happened - the midwife showing up to hand over the child since Don's father's wife kept having stillborn children (which she knew, since she also delivered them). I don't know if that's how it happened or a fantasy. I don't think it's that unlikely in the rural area they depict him growing up in (on a farm). She wasn't some big city prostitute, but a young woman who made money that way out of desperation, probably out of a shack or room of a house, the way women always have in areas like that. Small towns are different, and even more so then. I didn't find it implausible at all. Hell, they probably were all neighbors and knew each other.

MTodd, nice observations about how advertising was more instinctual and less research driven in the MM era! We haven't seen too much reference to research on MM. I can't recall where I read it now (I've been reading a lot of MM articles) but maybe in Salon, that Sterling Cooper is deliberately not portrayed as being cutting edge and that it's intended to be seen as a dying relic.

Juliet, after the fact, I read some other reviews of the ep and one said they thought the London Fog ad idea was solely a coded message from Don to Sal and would never fly with the clients as they were depicted (very conservative) and I agree. It seemed highly implausible, especially for that era. But that was part of made it stick out for me -- unlike other ad ideas of Don's, it wasn't smoothly integrated into the story and plausible as an actual campaign. It was a plot device.

Good boy, Steve. If only K. were as obedient as you are.

David E, I think Don is pretty accepting in certain ways. Not with Betty (see the bikini incident) but of other men, and definitely of secrets (see Peggy and the baby). I think this stretches his understanding (he's a typical het male of the era, after all) but I think he'll be cool with it, and I think the last thing Don would ever do is expose someone else's secret. I did think Sal's story and how Batt played it was the strongest part of the whole episode. It was really quite moving, and I'm looking forward to further Sal developments this season.

Dr. FeelGood, well, aren't you ALWAYS right?
Too much reality TV, Silkstone. Too much reality TV. We need some real writing again for Godsakes!
Silkwood. .. you might read this. . . the last comments posted here were from August. . . but I bet you have figured out by now that Joan married her rapist. She talks to Betty, when Betty comes to the office, about getting pregnant when Greg becomes chief resident soon and Roger says to her, at one point, "Good night, Mrs. Harris". . . She married the guy after he raped her. I think Joan is in a lot of denial about lots of stuff. And I think, sadly, that women don't always consider forced sex to be rape.