
I want what I want when I want...and you don’t care what it does to the rest of us. Like someone else I know.
Human beings have desires – small and grand, pure and base, fleeting and lasting – and we spend every moment of our lives satisfying one or another of them. (After all, even when we do things for others, it is to satisfy some desire of our own, including the need to do good or connect.) The 9th episode of Season 3 of Mad Men, “Wee Small Hours” takes us deeper in what several of the characters want (and don’t want), and their mostly-frustrated attempts to satisfy those desires. Some, like Betty, find the cost too great; some, such as Don and Sal, take the plunge. Others like Carla find their dreams temporarily deferred, and tragically, some like the four small girls killed in Alabama, and later, Martin Luther King, Jr. himself, will have their lives snatched away before their dreams can be fulfilled.
The episode opens with Betty being ravished by Henry Francis on the ridiculously overstuffed antique fainting couch she recently bought (to her decorator’s horror) – an image that we quickly learn to no surprise is merely a dream, broken by the ringing phone and her baby’s cry – her real life calling.
Betty’s arc in this episode is perhaps the most predictable, and even clichéd. After her sizzling and glamorous Roman Holiday with Don, she temporarily revived and seemed happy, but to Don’s puzzlement in the last episode, that cocktail of a jaunt has had a bitch of a hangover, making Betty realize just how small and boring her normal life is.
And we feel this disparity too – as played by the extraordinary beauty January Jones, Betty has always seemed out of place in an apron in suburbia, but never more so than after we’ve seen her looking like a movie star in Rome, speaking fluent Italian, and fending off men right and left. Clearly this is where she belongs – in an exciting and glamorous life, without kids, without a husband, traveling and able to exercise her Italian and whatever other foreign tongue she’s mastered that we don’t know about. (After all, we just learned she was an Anthro major in college!)
Of course, as another character will say later, we know where that road leads – and Betty doesn’t want to end up a “party girl” like Holly Golightly or the old roommate she saw in Manhattan one night with Don. Always the good girl, she chose marriage and children instead, and while she picked a promising man who has become very successful, she was no Lorelei Lee – she didn’t marry for money but for love.
Betty is at heart a romantic, and nothing symbolizes that more than that absurd fainting couch. Like Hilton, she wants the moon, and nothing less. When she gets a (much) lesser offer from Henry of a romp in his office, she turns it down flatly (even after his generous offer to upgrade it to a motel) and names what it is – tawdry. When Henry says he doesn’t know what she wants, she nods in agreement – she doesn’t know either, but we feel she’s getting warmer.
Like her self, Betty’s mistakes are attenuated. With the exception of her fling in the bar, she puts out feelers only to withdraw when she gets a response. (She’s the exact opposite of Harry, who in this episode hilariously declares that “I’m not going to panic and do something stupid like I usually do.”) Henry tells her that he had to wait for her to act, since she was the married one, and even this seems to take her by surprise, as if the idea of being anything other than the traditional passive woman just doesn't occur to her. (A theme echoed when the fundraising woman has to tell her, “No, dear, you begin” to get the meeting started.)
Given her intense self-control and fear of acting, it’s not surprising Betty’s married to a man who, while calculating and in command at work, has poor impulse control when it comes to drinking (and driving) and women.
After having been symbolically castrated (or at least roped and tied and branded) by having to sign a contract in order to keep his job, Don is feeling more constricted than he ever has in his life. On the one hand, he’s literally flying high, visiting hotels all over the world and being asked for advice by Conrad Hilton, the big kahuna client he courted and has now landed. But as characters in this show repeatedly find, getting what you think you want doesn’t always make you happy. In fact, on this show, I think the score so far is that, well, it never does. Which is why they’re all out there still searching for what will make them truly feel content.
Just as The Sopranos showed not only the emptiness of contemporary American life with its focus on status and materialism in the form of possessions like McMansions and SUV’s, but suggested that the relentless pursuit of middle class affluence could be considered criminal in its cost to the world, Mad Men (created by Sopranos alum Matthew Weiner) depicts both the unsatisfying emptiness and moral and personal cost of pursuing the American Dream, which (as Don notes) by the early 60’s had Americans living as only royalty did in other countries.
That American dream takes center stage in this episode, as espoused by Conrad “Manifest Destiny” Hilton, who seeks to put a Hilton in every corner of the world, convinced that he’s spreading not just capitalism and democracy but God, which we have and those rotten Communists do not. The show’s writers boldly draw a parallel between the lauded Marshall Plan that restored Europe after WWII (and which was intended to, and by all evidence succeeded at, preventing World War III, since economic devastation triggered Hitler’s rise) and America’s economic and cultural hegemony as it gets going full steam in the 60’s, driven by commercial products, as well as products for commercials, the very thing that Don creates.
Hilton: You never heard that?
Don: I did, but when I hear you say it, it sounds beautiful.
Don and Hilton (appearing in a requisite cowboy hat) are in league to win hearts and minds (before that phrase will be applied so famously to VietNam), and I think we are meant to feel the hubris and danger of a seemingly innocent business collaboration with an arguably noble purpose – to get Americans to travel more to other countries. The problem lies in how they are to travel: in their cocoon of Americanness, sheltered inside Hilton hotels that reproduce the familiar comforts of home (if your home comes with room service) thus foiling the very point of travel, which is to experience other cultures and be opened up.
Tourists may only be obnoxious, but Americans doing business abroad, especially that pesky military industrial complex that Eisenhower had just warned the nation about, were escalating their involvement not just in Viet Nam but in many other countries, doing great harm in their attempt to spread their Americanness. Mad Men’s writers make this connection explicit when Hilton talks of wanting his hotels to be like “missions” spread out all over the world, evangelizing and converting those godless heathens to our way of life which he assures Don, people want once they see it. And in fact, often that has been true, leading to great environmental and cultural cost.
Hilton: America is wherever we look, wherever we’re going to be.
Don: That’s very good.
Hilton: You’re the one who said that to me.
Don: Well, I guess it’s not that memorable.
If Hilton is on a mission to spread God the Father (and his son, the Holy Dollar), then Don is simply on a mission to find the father. When Hilton tells him that he’s his “angel” and more like a son to him than his own (famously dissolute) sons, having bootstrapped himself up just as Hilton did, Don is moved almost to tears and after thanking him says “I mean that” – an admission of how often he doesn’t tell the truth.
Having recently hallucinated about his father (in the motel room with the two proto-hippies who robbed him) and having been sideswiped by Betty’s sour mood after their rapprochement in Rome, as well as chafing under his many contractual obligations (both at home and at work), Don grasps at Hilton’s approval, despite having just recently explained to Betty the art of keeping people wanting you rather than the other way around.
Don’s famous elusiveness that seduces all who encounter him is being eroded by his increasing commitment in all areas of his life, but never more so than when he finally lets himself want something: Not just Hilton’s approval but his love (as Hilton astutely notices). Having been as smoothly seduced by Hilton as he has seduced countless others, Don experiences a karmic turnabout when Hilton also mimics Don’s own withdrawal and parsimoniousness of feeling. Don has failed to give Hilton exactly what he wants and while that’s not an unfamiliar experience in his marriage, being rejected so soundly by a client is clearly foreign to him, leaving him scrambling and uncharacteristically clumsy, telling Hilton: I’m sure there’s a way to fit that into this.
But there isn’t. Hilton acknowledges that the campaign Don has produced is clever -- it just isn’t what he wants, which is literally the moon. Having shared moonshine with this gruff paterfamilias in the wee small hours, as well as having been made an honorary son, Don is blindsided by the rejection, as well as confounded by his rare failure to understand what a client wants. Interestingly, while missing the aspirational “man on the moon” idea, what he heard was the domestic side – about turning exotic places into home – a neat symbol of how Don himself is being tamed and domesticated.
I’m going home and the whole idea is to run there. ~ Suzanne to Don
Don’s desires also seem to be coming home. While they at first turn to Betty, who he reaches for eagerly after they return from Rome, having been spurned by her, he doesn’t stray far. As expected, he pursues Suzanne Farrell, Sally’s former teacher, who he marvels at running into (while she is out running both away from and back to home, herself). As she points out, he’s taking a huge risk by having an affair literally so close to home, but he say she doesn’t care, that in fact it’s a sign of how much he wants her, and after a predictably short nanosecond of hesitation, she succumbs to the Don Draper charm as all women must, no matter the cost to their own lives. (Was Don the model for James Bond?)
Don: I can’t stop thinking about you.
Suzanne: Because I’m new and different. Or maybe I’m exactly the same.
As Suzanne herself says, she knows where this road will lead, and so do we. Or will it? Are we deep enough into this series that Don and Betty might divorce, and Don take a second wife? Hard to believe, even if Suzanne has that second wife feeling about her – ostensibly different in many ways from the first wife in both looks and attitude, and yet, we feel, destined to turn out the same, as Suzanne herself astutely points out. Don sees Betty as a child (and she often seems to behave and feel like one) and Suzanne takes care of children – Don surely must think this is an upgrade.
While Don is at least temporarily satisfying his desires, Sal’s are put on hold, at least till the tantalizing end of the episode. In a painful turn of events, he loses his job after rejecting the advances of a client, the Lucky Strikes favored son Lee Garner, Jr., thus accurately showing that not only women are victims of sexual harassment. Sal may be secretly longing for sex with a man, but like everyone else, he wants to choose his partners, and not give into a man he rightly calls a bully. A seemingly minor point, but one that is not always accorded gay male characters, who are all-too-often depicted as ready for anyone, any time.
Sal: There’s been a misunderstanding.
Lee, Jr: I know what I know.
Sal, like everyone else in this episode, wants what he wants, when he wants it – and not when or what someone else does. He pays dearly for this, not just by being fired, but also profoundly humiliated by Don, even after he has bravely confessed the truth of what occurred. We see a very ugly side of Don when he suggests that Sal should have given in to the client (after chiding Harry for “sticking his nose” into the account, he apparently wishes Sal had done the same), and with his phrase “you people” implies an entire litany of homophobic insult that he doesn’t give utterance to. With $25 million a year and the agency’s entire fortunes resting on retaining the account, and coming after Hilton’s rejection, Don’s feelings are understandable but unforgivable. Once again, greed and American business are indicted, with a literal pound of flesh being demanded to fulfill the demands of the marketplace.
Don: Because nothing could have happened, because you’re married?
Sal: I swear on my mother’s life
Don: You sure you want to do that? Who do you think you’re talking to?
Even for a episode full of them (even Sally want a case to put her pencils in), Sal’s storyline positively bulges with sexual innuendo and symbolism, from Pete sucking down cigarette smoke merely to please Lee Jr as well as telling him a joke with the punchline, “And the hillbilly said, that ain’t my finger” to Sal’s explanation of the ad (“We want people to focus on the Lucky”) and joke to his film editor (“You sound like you have a pastrami in your mouth”) to Lee Jr’s double entendres (“I had a long wet lunch,” “I told you, I want what I want” and “Let’s take a risk together, shall we, Sally?”) as well as his poignant evocation of the desires of a closeted gay man to be seen (“I want him staring right at us at the end”) which Sal notes will make the TV ad’s viewers uncomfortable, just as many straights feel when asked to face gay people directly and as equals.
The twist comes in Sal’s final scene, in which we see him phoning Kitty to lie about working late, while standing outside a park where several seemingly gay men gather. Has Sal decided that freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose? Is he about to lose his gay virginity? More importantly, is he doing it in desperation, or even in preparation for a sacrifice he feels he must make in order to save his career? I fear so, and the sadness in his tone and face in that scene seem to make it clear that he’s not there in eager anticipation.
You know what they say about the south…down there, it’s not 1963, it’s 1863.
~ Coupla white chicks talking about civil rights at Betty’s fundraiser.
In the background as always, Carla has a small but poignant storyline in this episode, one in which we sense her own desires largely through the subtle yet revealing emotions that play on her face (kudos to actress Deborah Lacey for her fine portrayal, in both senses of that word.)
Having observed Betty’s encounter with Henry (who has rashly shown up at the door to try to sweep her off her feet – not the type of "moon" that Betty is looking for, at least not when she’s at home in her suburban shorts rather than in her flowing and flowering dress on the fainting couch), Carla seems entirely wise to Betty’s lies. Betty at first appears to care about how Carla sees her, going to the trouble of arranging a fundraiser at her house to cover her tracks (as well as wanting to see Henry again), rather than simply seeing Carla as a clueless or obedient domestic who doesn’t matter. Yet she finds the death of the four girls in Alabama a reason to back off on civil rights, utterly missing the look on Carla’s face as she blithely opines that the country just isn’t ready yet, and misses a similar look when she chides Bobby for barking at Carla only to follow it with the devastating reason: “She works for me, not you.”
As Langston Hughes wrote, “What happens to a dream deferred? Does it shrivel up like a raisin in the sun? Or does it explode?” It’s hard to imagine Carla (who outdoes even Betty in her extreme personal control) ever bursting out with her own dreams and wishes, but then this is the 60’s, and that’s exactly what happened in that decade: Formerly buttoned-down, play-it-safe types surprised not only their co-workers and families with what they did and said, but shocked themselves with what they were capable of – and what they realized they wanted.
In the wee small hours, things happen. People have sex, but they also have conversations, dreams and dark thoughts. They realize that what they have isn’t enough for them, or agonize over having been told that they themselves are not enough. Either way, it’s enough to keep you up all night.
Go back to sleep. ~ Don to Betty


Salon.com
Comments
i'm curious to know if Conrad Hilton was Bipolar because his behavior is so erratic and downright creepy -- im' not judging the mentally ill. i'm bipolar 2 myself. -- or is it just the creepy actor playing him. thank you for explaining the meaning behind all of the interplay between him and Don and i guess it's good that Don was seduced and humiliated as he's done to so many other people, but i found myself longing and longing for someone decent to show up, to cut through the evil and the late night phone calls when there is a newborn baby to consider...
and then Don goes after the schoolteacher in his usual pattern and you're so right about Betty behaving like a child. she seems clinically depressed to me. maybe this show just isn't for me anymore. i like some kind of balance in life and on tv. love love love and graittude
This episode was painful with every main character further trapped and frustrated and most of them acting very badly. I've been mostly sympathetic toward Don, in spite of the many bad and unwise behaviors, but this is too much. Betty, with her romantic dreams, seem to lack a clue as to what would really satisfy her, so she blunders on in her completely self-centered way. Sal's situation is just tragic and difficult to watch.
I'd like to see the focus off Don and Betty for an episode. It starts to feel that we are trapped with them in a stifling relationship. It also feels that all the plot arcs are on a downward trajectory.
It's so hard to watch these characters reaching for what's just beyond their grasp. Or, as you say, that what they want is not quite how they pictured it.
So many clever connections you've made: Connie's wanting to spread the word of the Father, while Don reaches for a demanding and less-than-perfect father figure in him.
The over the top sexual innuendo - even Sally's pencil case! Hadn't thought of that.
Connie asking for the moon - echoes of the recent moon landing - and I couldn't help but think of Jimmy Stewart's lasso...now I'm just rambling, but that's how my mind flits after one of these episodes.
Oh, and I was wondering about Connie's mental state, too. His sleeplessness and grandiose ideas sound manic. His angry outburst and disappointment in Don could lead to a real downswing.
Looking forward to the next episode, and your recap. Thanks.
I also sensed a warmth with Miss Farrell that don's earlier trysts lacked... foreshadowing?
On the other hand, I thought Betty's "tawdry" remark was a bit much - who is she kidding, after she sexed up a stranger in the back room of a bar?
Want more Peggy, and a return of Joan.
Hope
I'm almost done with Mad Men. I'm tired of Don because he doesn't learn anything, ever. What does he want? If he just wanted to sleep around, he wouldn't be so mopey all the time, because he would be doing exactly what he wanted to do. But he's unhappy, so he's obviously not doing what he wants. God, what is his problem? Why is it so hard to talk to your wife? He asked Sally, "What's the matter?", why can't he do that with Betty?
Yeah, we need to get away from Don and Betty, or just Don, really. They're getting rid of and neglecting the interesting characters--Joan, Sal, hell even Pete, who I really dislike after last week's episode (yet another example of the unthinking advantages of being white, male, and in Pete's case, privileged). Don is SO BORING. Get over yourself, Don.
Rated
Don was also bullied in this episode - by Conrad Hilton. Connie pushed Don's "daddy" button, and Don grew up trying to please - or avoid punishment by - a bullying, abusive father.
Matt Weiner is a genius at character psychology.
I wondered this week, and I've wondered in previous episodes how Don can be so brutal to the few people he really seems to like (Peggy and Sal). His performance with Sal was particularly contemptable, and I hate the thought that Bryan Batt might no longer be in the series. I'm with the reader, who said we need to see more of some of the other characters and get away from Don and Betty for awhile, although I love the use of Carla as sort of a Greek chorus to the goings on in the Draper household and in the larger world. I have no idea how this season will end; as of this episode, it looks like several of the characters are on a downward slide, but Weiner always surprises us.
anyway, lovely analysis--thanks!
Like many of you, I found this episode (and the 2 previous ones) dark and disturbing. I also agree that Don and Betty's merry-go-round is getting a bit tiresome -- clearly for them and also for us -- and that the other characters could use more air time and story development (although please god, don't make me watch Peggy have sex with Duck again!).
While life and people are in fact repetitive to an extreme degree, art can't be -- or only if it uses that repetitiveness for effect (see Groundhog Day). While I love that MM is more realistic and measured than almost any other TV show, it still needs to move forward, and I'm hoping we get some real movement for at least a few of the characters before the end of this season.
I'm intrigued that several of you thought Hilton might be bipolar. I hadn't thought of that, and it's plausible to some degree, but I didn't see him as acting manic (and I've known a few manic people), just driven and obsessive as many successful people are, and as he had to be to build what he did. (Wikipedia says nothing about it, although it does have the tidbit that ex-wife Zsa Zsa Gabor said he raped her, resulting in her pregnancy. yikes.)
Theodora, I also found Lee Jr a verrry creepy character. But entirely believable.
Procopius, glad if I can help! And I completely agree that the themes still resonate today -- in fact, I think the point of the show is to illuminate the beginnings of what is now embedded and unquestioned in our culture. It illustrates how we got here, and in the recent past, so that it's not a longstanding condition that can't be changed.
Rita, thanks! And I like your noting the "game face". It is indeed a show about social masks, and how much more they were required in that era.
Suz, thanks. I also wonder where there is to go with the character arcs, and agree that everyone seems to be going down. As much as Weiner said he didn't want to use it that way, JFK's assassination (which we know is coming up soon) was a watershed moment in American life when illusions were shattered and the later 60's could be said to begin, bringing enormous changes that so far have only been hinted at. I think they are taking the characters where the country went in that time, which was indeed very dark in many ways (although also freeing and exciting in others). But it's a tough alley to walk down.
Nora, thanks for missing me! I like the connection you mention to George lassoing the moon - -perfect! not a stretch at all.
Brian, Don was truly despicable at that moment. But I admire the courage of a show that lets you dislike its characters so much. American TV and movies have an unyielding imperative for "likable" characters (even curmudgeons and bigots are portrayed that way, not to mention murderers and gangsters!) which I find stifling and even infuriating. I think part of the challenge of this show is to watch people who aren't smoothed out for palatability and also don't act anachronistically, displaying tolerances that they wouldn't have actually had at the time. It's tough at times, but it's one big reason I love the show --- its fearlessness in that respect.
I also always think of that line that a studio head (can't recall which one) said about making Gone with the Wind into a movie back in the 30's - he wondered why anyone would want to see it, as "it's just the story of a bitch and bastard." Yet obviously hundreds of millions of people did. Don and Betty (not to mention a few other people on the show) could be typed that same way.
Hope, thanks! and I look forward to you commenting more on the MM posts if you are inspired.
Highland, great observation, and an important and deliberate theme in the show -- to expose that privilege and how much it bought. I think Don has asked Betty what's wrong, but she doesn't know (other than wanting him to be faithful) -- just as she didn't know what she wanted in this ep... or in general. Not that Don couldn't be a better husband or communicate more effectively with her, but I see Betty as a full half of the problem.
Walter, thanks!
Serfer, have you noticed that they have a therapist listed in the credits as a "mental health consultant"?? At first I thought that was just for Betty's sessions with the shrink and her depressive behavior, but I suspect it goes further than that. And I agree that the psychological insight of the show is one of its great strengths -- and for me, its fascination. I also think you're right about Hilton manipulating Don deliberately with the "daddy button". No one as successful as he is (or Don is) gets there without being able to do that to people.
Doris, thanks so much for your correction! I fixed the reference. I hope you'll pardon this tired late night blogger for the error.
Adele, I agree that Don is in fact brutal to people like Peggy and Sal, but I don't see his behavior as being at all unusual in business in that era -- it was truly swimming with sharks especially in high pressure worlds like advertising, and in fact still is. The brutality is just more nuanced in certain ways, for legal reasons. I've seen execs lunge across a table in anger and grab employees by the lapels and get away with it. And that was long after such behavior was illegal at work. Back in this era, employers could do literally anything short of murder to employees (even rape them) with impunity. And employees thought that was just the way the world was. And in fact, it's the way the world has been for most of human history, and still is to a large degree, depending on where you are.
I like your describing Carla as "Greek chorus" - yes! Only most of the time, the chorus is all suggested in her face, as it had to be for women in her position.
Yakky, thanks!
I don't believe for a minute that Sal is out of the show. My bet is that he will have sex with the repulsive Lee Jr, save the account and his job or some such. I hate that thought, but it's my guess.
One thing I'm finding a little difficult to digest is the idea of Betty being so hot for anybody so soon after having a baby. Is it just me, or there anyone else out there who's had a child finding this a little weird? Although maybe that's what stopped her in the end. I think that what she desperately wants is the romance, but not really the illicit sex. She wants to be wanted more than she's wants anything.
I have a bit of a different take on the Don/Sal exchange. While I have no question that Don is contemptuous of Sal's sexuality, I think his contempt was really about Sal's inauthenticity. The Lucky Strike guy is a bully, but there was something a bit disingenous about the way Sal reacted. He did humilate the bully, by acting in away that didn't acknowledge what they both knew. If let's say it had been Peggy, she would have found a way to reject a client without bruising his dignity. So, Don knowing what he did about Sal's one night stand with the bellhop, found the self-righteousness unprofessional. And to some extent he may be right.
But that's Don, he has the self-confidence to navigate that dangerous 60s world where nobody seems to know what the fuck they're doing. Which makes it so interesting that the so totally misread's Hilton. The LAST thing that Hilton would want to hear is that he's exporting ordinariness. He wants to be seen as an explorer, an innovator, a commander. That strategy is for McDonald's. He's exporting luxury, not hamburgers.
I agree with you about the fine job Deborah Lacey is doing as Carla. Her reactions are so subtle, that I'm going to have to go back now and re-watch it to see if she's reacting to what she thinks is an affair, or the fact that Betty is going to be fundraising for Rockefeller. I think it's interesting that Rockefeller was probably more of a liberal on civil rights than Betty seems to be. That comment about maybe it not being the "right time" yet for civil rights, is about the 100th nail in Betty's coffin for me. But I've never liked her, which is what makes it, I guess, too easy for me to forgive Don. God I hope that Susan Farrell is the second wife. I really want Sally to have an actual mother.
1) Not sure I agree about Don and Betty being on a merry-go-round ... that would imply them returning to the same place over and over again. In my view, they are clearly headed off to two separate destinations .. they just happen to still be married. I think Don is just a restless soul in search of the love he didn't grow up with ... I think Betty is trapped in a life not to her liking (as many of you have pointed out) and is on a one-way trip to the asylum, at worst, or Betty Ford clinic, at best. As for Don and Suzanne, my guess is she's going to be his bridge into the new world to come - every time I see him in his fedora, it hits home that he is in jeopardy of being on the wrong side of the chasm of change that is coming.
2) I think not all toward Don is fair with regard to Sal. Don clearly has established he is discreet toward Sal with regard to Baltimore, and goes so far as to say as much. I think what is lost is that Don separates his personal search from the professional situation, in that the firm comes first no matter what. He is surely saying to Sal that he should have "taken one for the team", and given the possible catastrophe that losing Lucky Strike can mean to the firm, is disgusted that Sal's sexuality has put the firm at jeopardy, and that Sal wasn't "dedicated" enough to do what the firm needed in the situation - that more was at stake than Sal "giving in to a bully". For those of you who aren't part of the financial world, it's not a nice place today, and it surely wasn't in the 60s.
I have to say, though, the near-canonization of Betty Draper that I’ve read from some around the Web is irritating. In the end, she and Don deserve each other. As we saw in Rome, Betty would could have slid into Don’s Palm Springs interlude with the Jet Setters and fit every bit as well, but both of them have chosen other roads, other journeys and seem unwilling to accept the price of those passages.
Matt Weiner’s “Sopranos” connections are coming through loud and clear this season. The darkness, the messiness, it all seems familiar to those of us who eagerly followed the New Jersey crime crew. And just like in that HBO series, there are no complete sinners or saints in this show. David Chase knew how to draw us toward his characters then repulse us and Weiner follows suit. Carmela Soprano was no better than Tony and the same goes for Betty and Don Draper.
Betty doesn’t want to end up as Holly Golightly? As said on the aforementioned HBO series, “This is the life we chose.” That goes for both Drapers and if equality is what we are working for, then more fans of this show need to embrace that standard. I’ve read it postulated that what Betty wants is some noble romance. Forgive me, but I think what Betty wants is whatever she believes she doesn’t have at that moment.
Betty uses her physical beauty as a tool, her allure as a bargaining chip. Whether it’s a tow truck driver on the side of the road, a comedian/client of Sterling/Cooper, a fellow rider at her equestrian club or a politico, she is quite comfortable slipping into her kewpie doll character and using those slowly batted eyes to full effect. She’s aware of the nuance, what’s real and what’s not, yet she plays the game anyway.
We also see that while Don is a cad, Betty has her own foibles. She’s childish, manipulative, vain, self-centered, spoiled, elitist and self-pitying. Her callowness toward her two oldest children is now customary and one is left with the distinct impression that before long, she’ll grow bored with Baby Gene as well. He’s simply the new toy right now.
And I got the feeling Betty didn’t care how Carla perceived her in-house meeting with Henry Francis, just that Carla might blow her cover.
My favorite parts of this episode revolved the long-suffering maid and the continual indignities she suffers from these suburbanites. Betty assumed Carla too dense to see through her hastily proffered “running bath water” excuse as the woman could easily ascertain Betty was in the middle of doing laundry. Betty’s admonishment of Bobby’s tone with Carla wasn’t ordered because the kid needed to be more respectful of adults, but merely because Carla was Betty’s chattel. “She’s my toy, not yours,” in other words.
As an aside, I always rankled at that power dynamic between middle class children, their parents and their domestic aids. The children were always instructed to refer to other adults by their last names – Mr. Smith, Mrs. Jones, Ms. Jackson – but when it came to the people who made their well-ordered and clean lifestyles possible, it was completely permissible for the kids to refer to them as if they were other children. It amazed and horrified me that others couldn’t see what was being displayed and instilled there.
The insensitivity of Betty’s statement about the inopportunity of the Civil Rights Movement was self-evident. But the best part was when Betty and her coterie of neighborhood Stepford-types stood at the Rockefeller fundraiser discussing that very movement and the march on Washington. One woman described the assemblage as African-Americans “descending” on the capital, which brings to mind violence and danger. Then, these denizens of lily-white privilege and existence characterized segregation as disgusting but over their shoulders we see the only person of color in servant’s attire assuming her expected servile duties.
Don, Roger and Pete have always been asses in their own ways but it appears everyone else if following down that trail.
I also believe this show is suffering by focusing too much on the Drapers to the exclusion of others. Peggy and Joan have been scarcely explored this season, Harry and Paul less so and Ken has all but vanished. maybe that’s good because if the rest of the season has been any indicator, their absence is their absolution.
I just wanted to add that now I actually hate Don Draper for the way he fired Sal. His eyes were incredibly cold and cruel. And it's true, he won't treat this new girl any differently than he treats Betty, who I am beginning to think is almost unreachable. you asked once why you thought Betty was so nice to the baby and so cold to her other children, and my thinking on that is that if you can't be caring and loving to your own newborn, you're pretty much hopeless as a human being. and now I am wondering about Betty. Your post was good in that it explains much of Betty's behavior, but as my grandmother used to say, she's old enough to know better. Doesn't she ever ENJOY any of the small things in life? My parents had a horrible marriage but I can remember us laughing about things, watching my younger sisters learn to walk and playing games with them. these people enjoy nothing. it's becoming tedious. Almost everyone I knew growing up had horrible marriages. in fact, they are all divorced now. it really didn't keep them from enjoying life. it was just kind of a fact of life, for the women as well as the men. They were still able to enjoy their friends and families, extended and children. Betty is so dull with everyone.
Don seems intent on enjoying life no matter how things go wrong at home or at work, but does he really enjoy himself? I doubt it. And Betty was right about Conrad Hilton: By golly, he's nutty.
Juliet, Betty did seem a bit, um, sprightly given she says her baby is 2 months old. You can't even have sex again for 6 weeks, right? And she was a bit unrealistically thin but then we do know she was very focused on her weight during the pregnancy (and always). But I agree that with Henry she was looking for romance, not sex. I mean, she'd just had hot sex with Don, a much more attractive man, in Rome, and he wanted more when they got back. I don't think sex is what she's missing in her life. Don seems to desire her often enough, even when he's diddling someone else.
Your take on the Sal situation is interesting. I get what you're saying, but I'm still on Sal's side. Sexual harassment is what it is. I agree that Peggy would have handled it more diplomatically, but don't you think that's a bit of a M/F difference? also, Peggy's sexuality is known and the pass would have been within it. It's clear Sal's reaction was in part due to being closeted -- even to himself, as far as we can tell. (Not that he doesn't know his desires but that he's fighting and denying them vs. guys like Lee who are indulging them but closeted.) It would be a much much bigger deal for him than Don understands.
I liked this analysis of yours very much: "But that's Don, he has the self-confidence to navigate that dangerous 60s world where nobody seems to know what the fuck they're doing." Yes! I'm very curious how he's going to navigate the changes ahead, though. "Understanding Don" mentioned the sight of him in his fedora and wondering if he can "transition" to the late 60's -- I felt the same way seeing him in it. He seemed so of his era. I wonder if he can wash that Brillcream out when the time comes....
I would hope Suzanne would be a good mother to the kids, but you know, stepmothers don't always treat the kids well, and strangely, people who love to work with kids don't always like their own or do well with them. Esp since she'd probably want to pop out her own kid, which she'd prefer to the 3 others. And Betty would get the kids in the divorce so they'd be worse off than they are now, with Don there less often -- esp in that era, divorced dads saw their kids very little, sometimes not at all. Esp since Betty would undoubtedly remarry and her new husband would become their "father" in the style of the time.
Understanding Don: I mostly agree with your B&D analysis although I would like to think that Betty still has the option of having her consciousness raised and breaking out of the whole "feminine mystique" thing she's trapped in and going to a fuller, richer life as well. So I don't see her as only having the choices you name, although it remains to be seen.
See comment to Juliet just above re: the fedora - I agree! And I love your phrase "the chasm of change that is coming." Wish I'd written that!
I agree that Don separates business and the personal. (Channeling the Godfather??) I think a missing piece of info is that he doesn't know Sal hasn't had gay sex and is trying not to. He assumes he has encounters like the one with the bell hop all the time and so, hey, why not blow the Lucky Strikes guy? If Sal could have said what the real situation was, perhaps Don would have been more understanding. Perhaps.
Kevin, thanks for your long and juicy comment! (Ooops, I sound like Lee Jr there) You said a lot, very well, but I'll just respond with a few hits:
I'm surprised Betty gets "canonized"! this is where it helps that I don't read other sites/analyses. I actually feel tougher on her than Don, myself. I also like your catch that she would have been at home with the jet set in Palm Springs -- I can see that since the Rome episode although I think the promiscuity would have put her off. At least at first. But maybe the girl has the potential to get her freak on if she could just dump the kids? I also agree to some degree that Betty wants whatever she doesn't have. But I think the main thing is that she's trapped in a paradigm in which she was raised (by very controlling parents) and hasn't the resources (intellectual, emotional etc) to get out of it. At least not that we've seen yet. She doesn't seem a very deep or capable person.
I very much liked your analysis of the racial issues -- completely agree with what you wrote. I also noted Carla in the background as the white women talked about DC, etc. Subtle but effective. And I agree about Weiner showing his Sopranos roots. The shows are cousins in many ways, I think.
Latethink, you make a great point about how most people even with tough or unhappy lives have moments of happiness and fun. I think Betty does, too -- not just in Rome, either -- but indeed it is rare for both her and Don to look really happy even for a short while. I think that is what wears on people with this series and I think it has to break at some point -- they have to find something better, even if it's elusive and fleeting. Otherwise it's too oppressive. Perhaps Don will fall in love with Suzanne and truly "get happy" at least till the shit hits the fan.
Lea, thanks! and I wondered if anyone had lived near that area. It does seem they strive to get that stuff right, so fun to know it's all accurate.
Theodora, I'm still not quite seeing Hilton as bipolar but it's entirely possible. I know many bipolar people are highly functional, creative and successful, even boosted by their mania to some degree.
Janet, what an astute observation about the parallels! I think that's spot-on. And I'm glad we're getting into Don's "daddy stuff" - it makes a nice break from the womanizing etc.
Syd, Kris, Owl, Susanne and Crystal: thanks!!
Hells, the thing that jumped out at me as inaccurate in this ep is that January Jones, like most actors (I have noticed) is left-handed (when we see her writing to Henry).
Kids were absolutely forced to write right-handed even when I was in grade school in the early 60's and at the time she went (30's), they definitely would have been trained out of it (including by tying their left hand behind their back!). And a good girl like Betty would certainly have obeyed that training, even into adulthood, having bought the idea that it's wrong to be left!
But then looking at the credits on this ep, I was struck by the similar/overlapping character names in this show. Suzanne Farrell and Marilyn Farrelly, Henry Francis and Francine Hansen, Burt Peterson and Bert Cooper. Of course, in real life, that happens, but TV shows and movies usually take great care to make character names quite distinct to prevent viewer confusion.
That makes me wonder if it's deliberate (on such a carefully constructed show). Are they trying to underline the sameness of white middle class life in the suburbs at that time, when people were acting and living so similarly?
And that brings to mind Suzanne Farrell's joke to Don in this ep about how the men seem alike because they're all wearing the same shirt (at the eclipse event with the kids).
Yeah, I'm thinking it must be deliberate.
Of course, there's still only one Duck and one Crab. Thank god.
Don is clearly chafing under the restrictions of being "under contract." I kept expecting him to explode at either Roger or Betty: "Well, you're the one that wanted me to sign that damn contract!"
One of the interesting things about "Mad Men" has been the dialog, with the characters speaking in what amounts to code. An example in this episode is Don and Sal's conversation. Don never comes out and says, "You should have let him fuck you!" or "I know you're a fag;" it's encoded in the subtext. But I noticed in this episode that people are actually saying what they were thinking more. Henry, for example, plaintively exclaiming, "I don't know what you want." Sal being forced to actually explain what he meant about "being cornered." It wasn't a big change, but I found it noticeable, and I'm not sure I like the change.
Suzanne is a foreshadowing of what the 60s and 70s wrought with women: she's barefoot. She lives alone. When called on her flirtatiousness, she replies, "So?" She's not fully realized as a independent agent, though; perhaps in a few years, she would have kicked Don's womanizing ass out the door.
One small thing: Don was right about his campaign. Hilton's desire to show "Hilton on the moon" is childish and stupid, and would make him look absurd. Perhaps Don lacked the confidence (of an independent man not under contract?) that he had when he told Peggy in an earlier episode, "Sometimes clients don't know what they want." Would a non-contract Don have been able to be more forceful with Hilton, and saved the situation? Who knows.
I'm always glad that people continue to weigh in on the episodes later on, so hope no one is discouraged if they're a few days -- or even weeks -- late to add their thoughts.
Doug, great thoughts as always! But I don't think the contract is why Don didn't challenge Hilton -- I think it's the father-approval stuff. Hilton set him up beautifully with that wee small hours hotel room chat when he tells Don he's like a son to him. After that, Don couldn't say No to him on anything, or stand up to him.
I didn't talk about it, but I loved the scene with Bert Cooper getting Don to sign the contract. Coop is like one of those old lions or bears you see dozing and think are beyond harming you and then they flash their power. He was masterful with Don. And I love that something that was planted in Season 1 (Pete telling Bert about Don's real identity) came to fruition in Season 3.
I like your analysis of Suzanne as a transitional woman of the time -- well put.
And I also agree with your assessment of how characters talk in code. I think that's one of the things they do spectacularly well in the series -- capturing how people did that at that time vs. the way we blurt everything out now (we live in the TMI era). And showing us that was valued vs. how we value directness, honesty and authenticity. People who were blunt or more direct were very much looked down on -- immigrants were seen that way and ethnic groups like Italians and Jews were regularly criticized for that very quality of emotional openness and verbal directness that we now value. It was actually considered shameful to "say what you mean"!
I think the degree to which that's changed in American society is one of the most profound and yet often unnoticed changes in the past 30-40 years and this series very rightly gives that shift its place, by showing how most people used to talk in middle class white American society ( not just upper crust WASPy circles).
And an unrelated note: GQ has an interview with January Jones that fans might find intriguing, especially for how un-Betty Draper like she comes across. (Of the photos, I will say nothing.) You can find it here: http://www.gq.com/women/photos/200911/january_jones_mad_men_cover_story?currentPage=1
I totally agree about Cooper. He's always been this kind-of eccentric background presence, but at that moment, he was genuinely scary.
It's funny about the language. Yankees (and I'm 0ne myself!) are supposed to be so blunt and straight-spoken, and yet here we're seeing a totally different aspect of upper-crust Yankee culture. (And it's interesting, because Yankees are also supposed to be laconic.)
I feel sorry for Henry, even though i don't like him, given how he initiated the pursuit of Betty. He doesn't know what Betty wants, but then again, neither does Betty. I've been in that situation, back before I married Sami; it's tough.
I wondered about January Jones' posing in GQ. Tracy Clark-Flory on Salon seemed to feel that it was all about GQ wanting to be Maxim or Esquire. Me, I wasn't so sure. I'm not a woman, but it wouldn't surprise me if Jones wanted to break out a little of the "buttoned-down" image she projects on "Mad Men". I mean, Daniel Radcliff did Equus, after all. It's not unknown.
My general feeling about Clark-Flory on these types of issues is to sigh and think, "Ah, be young and have so few doubts!"