Breaking the Celluloid Ceiling: Kathryn Bigelow's Triumph

Kathryn Bigelow made cinematic history this week and is poised to make more.
On Saturday, Bigelow became the first woman ever to win the Directors Guild of America’s (DGA) most prestigious award, Best Directorial Achievement in Feature Film, for “The Hurt Locker.” And, as expected, Bigelow’s name was on the list of Oscar nominations announced this morning. She is now the odds-on favorite to become the first woman ever to win the Oscar for Best Director when the Academy Awards are held on March 7th. The same director has won both the DGA award and the Oscar 55 times out of 61 years of overlapping nominations.
Bigelow’s DGA win for a highly praised but little-seen Iraq war drama over the highest-grossing film of all time was considered a shocking upset. Bigelow’s ex-husband, James Cameron, recently won the Golden Globe Award for directing “Avatar,” and had become the presumed DGA and Oscar winner for a film that has enthralled viewers with an imaginary world created by state-of-the-art technology. Bigelow’s other competition for the DGA award and now for the Oscar is equally impressive: Quentin Tarantino, for his popular but controversial World War II revenge fantasy, “Inglourious Basterds,” Jason Reitman, director of the zeitgeist-y “Up in the Air,” and Lee Daniels (a rare African-American nominee) for the searing domestic drama, “Precious.”
Only six other women have ever been nominated for the DGA’s feature film prize, and in 80 years of Academy Awards, only three other women have been nominated for the directing Oscar: Lina Wertmuller in 1976 for “Seven Beauties,” Jane Campion in 1993 for “The Piano” and Sofia Coppola in 2003 for “Lost in Translation.” All three were also nominated for the DGA award, as were Randa Haines for “Children of a Lesser God” in 1986, Barbra Streisand for “Prince of Tides” in 1991, and Valerie Faris for “Little Miss Sunshine” in 2006 (co-nominated with Jonathan Dayton). None of them won.
While Bigelow’s Oscar nomination this morning was unsurprising, it was a shock that her low budget independent movie garnered as many total nominations (nine) as that ticket monster “Avatar” (which cost a staggering $237 million to produce and has grossed $2 billion in ticket sales to date). The one-two punch of the DGA award and the multiple Oscar nominations (including for star Jeremy Renner for Best Actor) raises the previously remote possibility that “The Hurt Locker” may nab the Best Picture Oscar away from front runner “Avatar”.
One of the few women given the chance to direct mainstream Hollywood films, Bigelow is notable for eschewing the comedies and relationship dramas that most female directors (such as Nora Ephron and Nancy Meyers) stick to. Instead she’s broken the old “No Girlz Allowed” club rules by directing action films such as “Blue Steel,” “Point Break,” and “K-19: The Widowmaker.” Focusing on a three-man bomb squad in Iraq, “The Hurt Locker” portrays a virtually all-male world defined by macho competition and bonding, but also by the universal wounding of war.Given the overwhelmingly male composition of the voting pool for directorial awards, Bigelow’s choice of subject matter has probably helped her to go where no woman has gone before. Despite the increase in female studio executives, producers and screenwriters, Hollywood is still a notorious old boys club that largely shuns movies about or made by women, treating every “Julie & Julia” and “It’s Complicated” as some sort of fluke rather than as the golden sign of an under-tapped market.
While many movies aimed at women are flimsy at best and embarrassing at worst (‘Sex and the City,” anyone?), there are also brilliant filmmakers like Jane Campion who seek to portray women’s experience on screen with raw fidelity. Unfortunately, most toil in the fields of little-seen, low budget independent films. With an $11 million budget barely recouped in ticket sales to date, “The Hurt Locker” is only a tiny notch above such art house fare in the commercial terms that are Hollywood’s lingua franca, despite being a rare combination of thrilling action film and riveting drama.
As gratifying as Bigelow’s breakthrough is, it’s only a first, tentative step toward Hollywood recognizing the value of both women’s work in film and of their lives as subject matter for movies. Like many female trailblazers, Bigelow has won the respect of men by doing business on their terms and producing work they can relate to: a movie in which scarcely a woman appears. Even if she triumphs again at the Oscars, it may be a long wait before we see a true "women's film" win a major award.


Salon.com
Comments
The first woman ever to win an oscar for Best Director? In 2010? Yeah, example #156 how far behind women are still in America when it comes to equality.
OE, yes, Lupino was a pioneering woman director, although she ended up working mostly in TV. I also always liked her as an actress. And she directed a fave film of my childhood, "The Trouble with Angels"! But she was never even nominated for any directing awards (and given the B movies she got to direct, not surprising).
Deborah, yup. But as I noted in my post before this one, since so few women get to direct films, especially those that will get noticed for major awards, there's a very small pool to draw from. So what has to happen first is that more women need to get the chance to make movies!
Thanks for staying on top of it, Silky.
Steve, you cracked me up. But I know just what you mean. Sometimes I like the executive summary vs. doing the work myself.
Wendy, the predictions are now that Avatar will take Best Picture and Bigelow the directing Oscar. It's uncommon for those prizes to split but it happens (e.g., Ang Lee for directing Brokeback Mountain and Crash for BP a few years ago.) I think that's a real possibility, but I also now think Hurt Locker may win BP. Jeremy Renner getting nominated for Best Actor and the total 9 nominations show this film is more highly thought of in Hollywood than people had surmised. And let's face it, they'd know that they were making history while also rewarding good work. What's not to like?
Mary, thanks! You know, Roger Ebert has said that he never knows what he thinks of a Tarantino film until he's seen it twice. I thought but writing about Basterds right after I saw it months ago, but I think he's on to something, and I haven't been able to bring myself to see Basterds a second time yet. It was quite the intense experience seeing it the first time. I may have to see it again on DVD and then I'll really know what I think of it.
I figure the Academy will split - give her Director; give Avatar best picture. they like that kind of symbiosis.
Great review, there's much here I didn't know, having been out of show biz for a while...
Thanks, Sally!
WSFTC, just call me the Gold Bond powder of bloggers, if I keep the chafe away. (Sorry but when I see typos like that, I can't resist. I make them all the time, too.)
Steven, so all's forgiven?
You have convinced me to make an effort to see Ms. Bigelow's film.
Bonnie, I'm glad Cameron has that self-awareness. As well as having had a lot of success, I'm sure it's been chastening for him to realize how people perceive him. And as I said in another post's comments, I would bet he's sincerely happy that his ex is getting recognition, even if he also would love to get as much recognition for Avatar as he can, since he put years of his life into it and is very proud of it.
Stim, I have to give Cameron that match-up on points - I didn't care for Point Break (I found it silly) and T2 is quite a good action film that still holds up, and was really state-of-the-art when it was made.
Cameron is quite a gifted director, esp technically. But I value other things more than technique in movies.
Susan, I haven't heard of those books -- thanks for the recommendations! I always recommend Molly Haskell's 70's classic "From Reverence to Rape" about the declining role of women in movies in the 20th ce. Another infuriating eye-opener.
Greenheron, I love French films, even when they're so French that they crack me up. Our local SF Chron movie critic is nuts about them, and about strong female actresses, from any country but especially France, and he's always writing columns that are love letters to French films and the roles they give women that American actresses don't get. Sadly, he's mentioned that many even successful French films (not to mention films from more obscure countries) never make it to the US even on DVD. (He recommends buying DVD's from Canada or England to fill the gap.) Like you, I love to use them to practice my French a little. It isn't bad when I have the English subtitles to clue me in!
Coogan, wow, quite an endorsement! I haven't seen nearly as many war films as you have, so it's great to hear that perspective. I thought it was brilliant in showing us the utter uniqueness of the experience of being a soldier in a war. And it did so realistically, unlike, say Apocalypse Now, which is often surreal (although that may suit the subject matter) -- it shows us both the mundane side and the extreme drama, and I never felt I was seeing something that couldn't have actually happened (or has happened). And Hurt Locker's portrayal of the psychic and relational cost is done so subtly (again, unlike many war movies) and yet was searing. Which I loved because I hate the tendency of American movies to hit you over the head with over-played emotions or "the meaning of it all."
Avatar could have grossed a trillion dollars. It's still crappy - even with all the bells and whistles. It's 3-D triteness.
I hated to make this comparison because trust me, I have no right: but when I used to produce my own experimental TV show some years back (Thrush TV for all you diehards), I'd often purposefully load the cast with hot men and put them in compromising positions.
It became a bit of a running joke. I figured it was MY turn to be Boss. I even did a show called the "Male Objectification Show." I had a casting call for it and everything. You should have seen what they had to do to get in my no-pay project. Poor men. Poor, poor men.
Honestly, I've been surprised that her breakthrough hasn't been covered more for being a milestone for women in film history. The focus has been largely on her competing with Cameron than on what a breakthrough this is (or isn't, in some ways, as I say above).
I wrote about the competition with Cameron, too, but before she'd won the DGA. To me, once she won, that was the real story, and Cameron faded to the background.
Great post!
Great points!
Part of that effort–– part of the solution!
Brava!