Out of My Mind

The Musings of a Woman Who Thinks Too Much

Nelle Engoron

Nelle Engoron
Location
California,
Birthday
May 01
Bio
You can email me at "Nelle@NelleEngorondotcom" & follow @NelleEngoron on Twitter. I'm hosting a live radio show on Monday nights at 6:00 PM PDT to discuss this season of Mad Men. You can listen live (and call in to talk to me if you like) or download the broadcast afterward. For information, go to www.blogtalkradio.com/madmentalk **My "Mad Men" commentary for last season (Season 5) is on Salon rather than here -- go to http://www.salon.com/writer/ nelle_engoron/ to find all my Salon articles. **My book, "Mad Men Unmasked: Decoding Season 4," is available on Amazon in both e-book and print versions.** I'm a writer/editor/consultant who lives in the SF Bay Area. I write about all kinds of things, but am particularly intrigued by movies, relationships, gender issues, belief systems and "Mad Men." (Scroll down left sidebar for links to a selection of my blog posts.) I'm currently writing a novel about religious and romantic obsession and have completed a memoir, "Seeking," about my (successful) quest for love, which included personal ad dates with 200 men.

Nelle Engoron's Links

My articles on other sites
Movies, movies, movies
Mad Men writing on OS
A sampling of other blog posts
My book
Editor’s Pick
AUGUST 9, 2010 6:59AM

The Good News: Mad Men Season 4, Episode 3 (Commentary)

Rate: 19 Flag

 

good news

 

 

I started thinking of everything I was sure I knew was true -- and how flimsy it all might be. ~ Anna Draper

 

The good news this week is that Mad Men returns to form with a rich and entertaining episode layered with meaning even in the seemingly throwaway asides. Three major characters struggle with bad news – Don learning that Anna Draper has terminal cancer, Lane finding out his wife wants to end their marriage and Joan worrying about Greg being sent to Vietnam – but joy still finds its way in, as each connects with a person who reminds them not of the preciousness of life (that would be, well, too precious for this show) but rather the absurd pleasure to be found in simply living, especially in mid-twentieth century America.  This path to release isn’t automatic – each earns it by choosing to see things as they really are instead of holding fast to the flimsy matter they’d called truth. In challenging personal assumptions and illusions, each finds the way to a more authentic experience, just as the country they live in has begun to do.

 

You should swim as much as you can there -- it will clear your head. But no cliff diving. ~ Anna to Dick 

 

Life’s a beach, and then you die, the saying on t-shirts goes.  In “The Good News,” people talk and sing of beaches – in Cape Cod, Hawaii and Acapulco – but no one makes it there, not even Don, who’s booked himself a New Year’s bachelor getaway to Mexico, seeking a fresh start to 1965.  The closest he gets is San Pedro, where he stops overnight to visit Anna Draper, a meeting that does clear his head, by showing him the cliff of mortality we all teeter on. 

As she makes clear in both words and actions, Anna loves and accepts the man that she knows only as his true self, Dick Whitman. And ironically, when Don becomes a Dick, he’s a much more likable guy. It’s always both a relief and a revelation to witness the utterly relaxed version of a character we normally see as tense, driven and increasingly unhappy. Even his drinking with Anna seems celebratory rather than the frantic anesthetizing it is in New York, and his sharing of a joint signals his openness to the new, more casual freedoms so distant from his corporate three-martini self.

What is it like taking off your suit and returning to the wild? ~ Steph to Don

Don-Dick’s duality is at the heart of the series, a metaphor for the split occurring in American life:  The country is literally starting to come apart at the seams, and divisions between young and old, establishment and rebel, black and white, men and women, gay and straight are both explicitly portrayed and hinted at in the subtext of this and many other episodes.  Here the split is evoked in the juxtaposition of sunny California with the dark news of Anna’s condition, a dive off a cliff into mortality rather than a refreshing swim.  The news is broken to Dick by Anna’s niece, Stephanie, a Poli Sci major at Cal (Berkeley) who says without any apparent irony that she’s not really interested in politics, and has avoided the sit-ins because she feels “somebody has to go to class,” declaring that “I just don’t understand who’s in charge.” Dick’s retort for this (“You’re in charge. Trust me, I work in advertising.”) shows an awareness of the youth market that we haven’t quite witnessed from him before (Pete being the advocate of that new demographic) and suggests far more readiness to cede the world to a new generation than people like him felt in 1964. (Anna’s “Young people are going to save us,” seems similarly pat, even for the ever-sunny and increasingly hip pot-smoking dame who essentially urges Dick “if it feels good, do it” in expressing her desire to see him happy.) 

When Steph rejects the power that Dick lays at her generation’s feet, Dick shrugs and tells her the answer is to stop buying things.  “Don’t think that’s not possible,” Steph retorts – a preview of the hippie rejection of materialism soon to be widespread among her fellow Baby Boomers (alas, for all too short a time). Steph seems a perfect mid-60’s character, half-awake halfway through the decade that will change a generation and a country (the latter profoundly, while the former will end up more like their parents than they ever believed possible in their youth).  “I don’t know where things go,” she avers after dumping Anna’s clean laundry on her bed, to which her exasperated mother responds, “You can tell by looking.”  Yes, and you don’t need a weather man to tell which way the wind blows, but you do have to open your senses and look, feel or listen. Steph shows her own closed-mindedness by disdaining her roommate becoming a Jesus freak who embraces the Bible rather than her psych textbook (the sacred text of the culture at that time) and who wants to spread the “good news.”  As the first bonafide 1960’s college student (at Berkeley, no less) the show has delved into, she evades stereotypes, being less counter-cultural than mock-cultural, putting down the music of Dick and Anna’s youth as surely as she does her classmates’ preoccupations. She deems a ride home from Dick as “probably safer” than her usual mode of hitchhiking, only to have New York Don resurface and try to seduce her, an attempt broken by the shattering two-part news that Steph delivers:  that Anna is dying of cancer, and hasn’t been told.  Dick eloquently responds, “Cancer. Shit.” -- which nicely covers both halves of that revelation.

I woke up in a panic because I thought I might have missed you. ~ Anna

Yes, kids, it used to be common that people weren’t told they had cancer or were dying. Having Anna’s sister, Patty, withhold this news at the doctor’s urging (because it will only distress Anna, after all) is an entirely realistic scenario for that era. Telling people the truth of their medical condition was thought to be unspeakably cruel, and not conducive to a peaceful death. (Because after all, as Dick points out, it’s better just to let someone wake up in agony one day and wonder what the hell is going on.)  But Dick’s attempt to take charge and provide Anna with both the truth of her condition and better medical care hits a stonewall in her sister Patty, who cuts him down by asserting that, “You have no say in the affairs of this family. You’re just a man in a room with a checkbook.” A perfect summary not just of his dual life with Betty and with Anna, but of the responsible yet powerless role that American men have all too often been burdened with, even today.  The man his ex-father-in-law Gene had asserted couldn’t be trusted “because he has no people” is once again orphaned by those words, devastatingly cut off from the one person in his life who has loved him unconditionally. The pain of that wound is evident when a few moments later he actually defends Patty to Anna (who says she wouldn’t have chosen to be related to her) by saying that not everyone has family, essentially shaming Anna into appreciating her good fortune.

What do you want? ~ Don

Half of what you have. ~ Anna  

Feeling he has no right to tell her the truth, he leaves Anna, clearly knowing he will never see her again, but playing along with the charade that he will bring his kids to visit her in a few months.  The meaning of their final exchange (“Bye, Dick.”  “Bye, Anna.”) becomes clear as the shot of his grief-stricken face taking one last look at her dissolves into a similar image accompanied by the humming of a jet plane and the sound of his being addressed as “Mr. Draper” by a flight attendant. Without Anna, Dick Whitman is now truly dead. The one person who knew not just his real legal identity (something Betty does now, too) but his true self -- and accepted that self – is passing from his life.  He’s stuck being Don Draper now, and must make the best of it.

And so he does, in an unexpected fashion, forming common cause with Lane Pryce, who he finds holed up at the office when he flees there himself after aborting his Acapulco jaunt. Lane’s perhaps the only person having a worse holiday than Don, having been told by his wife that she will not be returning to America, thus presumably ending their marriage. Actually Lane seems unclear on that point and Don declines to advise him, saying he’s learned it’s not a wise idea, thus obliquely acknowledging his responsibility for encouraging Roger to throw over his marriage. But this refusal does nothing to deter our new Odd Couple from bonding so thoroughly that a comedian at a nightclub assumes they’re a long-term gay couple and compares them to George and Martha from “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf” (a comparison that could consume an entire thesis, but I’ll merely quote Lane: “We’re not homosexuals, we’re divorced!” – a correction which is matched by the comedian’s oblique insult upon realizing the truth: “You’re not queers; you’re rich!”)

I suppose I’m a bit curious myself. ~ Lane to Janine, lady of that evening  

Starting with a bottle of something fine that Lane’s genteel drunk of a father has sent for his birthday (which Don is amazed to find “has no bite,” just as their relationship soon won’t), they work their way through an ocean of alcohol, roar through a Godzilla movie, make a merkin out a steak and get laid by a couple of hookers in matching evening gowns. Lane seems quite dazed to be taken into Don’s ad man world of excess and pleasure (not to mention that apartment that one of the hookers deems “very manly,”) but enjoys himself so thoroughly that he even gives Don a bonus of $5 when reimbursing him for the hooker.

Breast? Thigh? ~ Joan

One of each?  ~ Lane


Lane and Don admit fault in prejudging and rejecting each other, and by doing so, start a relationship of friendly equals who can both carouse drunkenly and work soberly together.  But Lane falls victim to a more damaging misperception when his secretary mixes up the messages for apology bouquets sent to his wife and Joan, upsetting the latter with what she thinks is a denigrating and overly familiar message, while giving his wife the impression that he is indeed overly familiar with Joan, thereby hastening along the end of his marriage (as well as the end of his “egregious” secretary, who Joan terminates on the spot).  But Joan has also misjudged Lane, trying to tempt him into giving her time off with a combo platter of honeyed tones and fried chicken, only to have Lane quickly see through her manipulation and fume, “I know all men are dizzy and powerless to refuse you, but consider me the incorruptible exception!” (It will be up to Don to supply that breast and thigh, thus proving Lane corruptible by men.)

 

I saw something once and I’m telling you, it knocked me sideways. ~ Anna  

Joan’s collision (rather than collusion) with Lane is a nearly unprecedented failure on her part in handling people. But it’s a mere warm-up for the real revelation, when she discovers that her husband is both a competent doctor and a man that she doesn’t want traipsing off to Vietnam. (As much as viewers of the show may devoutly wish it.)  At the start of the episode, her commitment to her marriage is demonstrated by her visit to the gynecologist to make sure that (despite two earlier illegal abortions), she is able to have children.  Her doctor’s question of why a woman of her age would have waited two years is met by an oblique, “We have a plan,” but it seems likely Joan is using the royal “we,” and working on a plot behind Greg’s back based on the premise that married men with children weren’t sent to Vietnam.

Nevertheless, her marriage seems tense and strained, with Greg urging her to just ditch work so they can have time off together, even if it does get her fired, and Joan clearly wanting to protect her career as well as her options. When she slices her hand open while preparing him a “Hawaii at Home” New Year’s meal, she’s hilariously reluctant to have him treat her, insisting they should head to the hospital (where the real doctors are), only to be shocked as he calmly stitches her up while expertly distracting her with childish tricks and dirty jokes, explaining that what he’s doing is as routine for him as filing papers is for her (“I don’t do that any more. I tell other people to do it,” she responds in classic Joan-in-charge fashion.)  As the realization of her husband’s skill and even kindness washes over her, she bursts into tears, the ones that Lane had earlier sexistly accused her of shedding (“Don’t go and cry about it.”) even as she stood dry-eyed and resolute before him. The usually obtuse Greg seems to understand, reassuring her that “I can’t fix anything else, but I can fix this.” Moving from suspicion and even contempt, Joan for once lets herself be the one cared for, surrendering control and revealing her attachment to this deeply flawed man.

It’s so encouraging to see someone happily married around here. ~ Peggy to Joan

 


If I’d rolled over on this, I’d have to smoke the dress. ~ Anna finding a joint on the sofa.

In an episode full of revelations, turnabouts and new alliances, Anna’s surrealist joke about her joint becoming a dress parallels Greg’s transformation from bumbling rapist to kind and competent doctor, and Lane’s from sober accountant to wild party boy, and Don’s from rogue seducer of young girls to caring protector of Anna, and Joan’s from confident mistress-of-the-universe to vulnerable wife.  This shifting perspective is reflected in Don’s account to Anna of what it was like to finally reveal his real identity to Betty, who he says “never wanted to look at me again” as soon as she saw who he really was. Despite saying he deserved her rejection, he argues that, “I kept thinking how small it was compared to how long it went on.” – an inversion clearly in conflict with how Betty experienced it, which was as a bigger deception the longer it went on.  As college girl Stephanie says when describing what it must be like to go on the kind of dates that Don does as a divorced guy, “Nobody knows what’s wrong with themselves and everyone else can see it right away.” 

Don:  I think it sounds like she’s inviting us to a to a very beautiful place….

Steph: Have you ever been there?
 
Don:  No, but every time I hear this song, I want to go. 

Despite the refreshing lack of pretense he always exhibits in California episodes such as this one, Don still lacks a fundamental self-awareness and is playing the survival game that’s brought him this far.  In her love-is-blind way, Anna tries to speak to this, telling him, “You’ll be fine.  You’ll make the best of it, you always do.”  Which makes you realize she doesn’t watch the show, because we often see Don make the worst of things, at least in his personal life. But Anna sees only Dick, not the Don Draper show that plays out in New York.  He’d be better off following her advice when he haphazardly tries to repaint her living room in a rush of regret and grief, only to stop after completing a small slapdash portion, symbolic of his attempts to paint over his feelings as well as the messy parts of relationships, “You just going to paint that corner?” Anna asks before chiding, “A patch of new paint is as bad as a stain.”  Don has tried to paint over the stain of his illegitimacy and poverty but the job is sorely incomplete, and only calls attention to the lack of mature development of his character. “A self-made man,” Stephanie calls him, not knowing the deep truth of that label, as the relentless process of making and remaking himself keeps unfolding.

 

Lane:  I made a discovery as I slowly pulled back from the records.

Don:  I’m not sure I can handle any more bad news.

Lane:  Although things are precarious financially…it’s been a magnificent year.

 

At the episode’s end, Joan starts the financial meeting for the new year by asking, “All right, gentleman, shall we begin 1965?” and Don’s face tells us that he’s not sure, perhaps wondering whether he’s ready to face more of the kind of change that each year of the decade has brought so far.  Earlier, Anna has spoken of  the profound effect that seeing UFO's has had on her, but Don's not so keen on seeing beyond what he already knows and believes exists.  As a man that keeps hiding in plain sight, he still doesn't understand the power of simply opening your eyes, but the 1960's had a way of forcing them open in individuals as well as the collective vision of an entire society.  Having been truly seen and yet still loved by Anna, perhaps he will eventually take from her loss the desire to reveal  himself to others, letting all that everyone thought was true about Don Draper be revealed for the flimsy fiction that it's been.

 

 If I don’t see you, Happy New Year.  ~ Lane to Don

 

 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
very insightful as always.

I loved how Don picked up on the theme from the researcher last week when he asked Lane "Are you doing what you want to, or what is expected of you?"

I think that question summarizes nicely the "freedom" revolution of the sixties, but is equally relevant in 2010, when so many of us think we are doing what we want, but end up doing the expected.
This is bad -- due to the suffocating spate 0f commercials last week, I'm waiting to watch the show on demand; but I still read your commentary. Now I know everything in advance ... but at least I'll be sharper when I'm actually watching; and braced for what seems to be a more and more common disappointment: NO ADVERTISING WORK ON THE SHOW ABOUT AD MEN. Maybe 1965 will change that. I sure hope so.
Great analysis, but I'm not really enjoying the show.

However the office furniture is cool, with the mid century modern.

I think I have had too much of the 60's -- and we shall see if they can add something to the usual analysis.
Ha! I am the opposite of Mr Axelrod - I used to DVR and watch it on Monday, but now I watch it on Sunday night so I can read your recaps freely on Monday morning!
Hopefully, this will start coming together. So far it's been very disjointed but we are catching glimpses into Draper's character that are interesting.
We are about to see lots of change I do believe. This was a transition episode and civil rights protests, riots of the summer are soon ahead. Protests within as well, no doubt. And the men's hats should go. They were gone soon afer JFK's assassination, if I remember correctly. Maybe Mad Men kept them going awhile longer.

Great, as usual.
The gentle grace Don displayed last night...his love for Anna, was moving. I just wrote last week about how I knew he was a good man, but just had a funny way of showing it sometimes. I guess he heard me :)
I so enjoy your commentary. Sometimes I wonder if the writing really is as brilliant as your commentary makes it look!
A great summary Nelle, although I was disappointed in this episode. It seemed to slip into soap-opera territory with the muted personal revelations and the impossibly supportive and optimistic Anna.

I still love the show though, and hope it broadens the scope next episode.
I wasn't terribly fond of this episode, but I think, as you and others have pointed out, it was a transitional episode alluding to changes about to take place, both in Don's life and society as a whole. Your insightful analysis helps me appreciate it more. On a minor subject, like Lea, I also wondered when Don will ditch the hat. My own father stopped wearing hats in the early '60's.
I've got a Texas sized belt buckle!!! Yeehaw!

I enjoyed how Lane displayed the classic drunk Englishman, with Harris seemingly channeling the laconic sarcasm of the classic drunken antics of British actors of the 60's, including his own father as well as Peter O'Toole, Richard Burton - etc. While totally sozzled, they look totally put together, but they say/do the most inappropriate thing at weird times. Laughing at Gamera was funny. When they were talking about seeing a movie, I wondered if they would have the obligatory empty 'not gay' seat between them at the theater, as oftentimes guy friends do - or rather just a pair of guys - when they see a movie together, and they totally did. Which also made it funnier to me when the comic tried to make fun of them as gay.
I feel the show is just paddling around the shallow end this season. Insightful review, and you may be giving more credit to the writers than they deserve. I wish they could read the recap. Somehow, I think they'd be surprised!
Nelle, as I was on my way to reading your post, I saw the tagline for Heather's review, which said something like, "Dick Whitman goes to see his only friend, and Don Draper abandons her." I haven't read the review yet, but I spent a fair amount of time last night, wondering if Dick/Don's inability to tell Anna about her illness or to stay longer was an act of cowardice. I finally decided that it wasn't. Despite the odious practice of not telling people they were terminally ill, (and Don's objection to it) I decided that Dick/Don did the right thing. Anna's family was with her, and no matter how much they cared for each other, Dick Whitman was a peripheral part of her life, and Don realized that.

I see all of your points, and your analysis is amazingly complete as always, but despite all the emotion in this episode, I was left a little cold by it, and I'm not sure why. I think I found all the "change is gonna come" stuff a little ham-handed, and I guess now that Anna is dying, I wish there had been a little more development so that we'd know why she and Dick/Don clicked the way they did. She just seems a little too good to be true. I mean we know Dick needed a friend, and he was grateful that she didn't blow his cover, but aside from his monetary generosity, why did Anna care so much for him? I suppose we're supposed to understand that they were two lonely people, who happened to meet at just the right time in their lives.

And I don't know what I thought of the Joan and Greg final scene either. It did appear tender, but was Joan crying because she didn't want to lose him or crying because she'd made bad choices?

I was a little surprised that her gynecologist had performed one of her "procedures." Maybe that was more common than I knew, but as a teenager in 1965, it was conventional wisdom that most doctors (unless they actually made a living from doing abortions) would never risk their livelyhood, liscense and a possible prison term -- but maybe I was too young to know about that stuff.

Usually, I love all the 60's references in Mad Men, and I'm staggered by the knowledge that the writers (who are about 20 years younger than me) have -- for instance in Season 2, Smitty presents Don with a copy of the Port Huron Statement, the manifesto that started SDS -- but in this episode, the references just didn't seem as graceful.

Or maybe I'm in a bad mood. I'll have to watch it again.
I suppose I remain in the minute minority that thinks Weiner is taking the show to new heights this season.

Last season ended with a big break at work and at home. Between seasons, many significant changes have taken place in America: LBJ/Goldwater, Beatles, Civil Rights legislation, Medicare/Medicaid and so on - all in the wake of the JFK assassination.

The first three shows, placed during the holiday season (a time of reflection and closure), are all about reflection and closure. Closure of the old way and sitting in anticipation of the new. This has been symbolized in several ways, but none more explicitly than Anna's death. The most subtle was last night's folk singing "new Bob Dylan". Hell's bells, Bob Dylan is about to be the "New Bob Dylan" when he goes electric at the Newport Folk Festival in July 1965. Another explicit example is at the end of the first show. Don literally threw out the old when he ran off the two-piece bathing suit company executives.

Nope, Weiner has totally reconfigured this show without betraying it. A lot of key players are gone. (Ieven doubt that Betty will be as large a character in the future.) Like a chessmaster, Weiner has put all his pieces in place and is ready to pounce.

I also give Weiner props for making the watching of the breaks, closures and reflections interesting. Some might find this time of self-reflection boring, but I do not. I feel as though he has opened windows into all these characters and given me the opportunity to know them better as individuals. For instance, Don is much more complex than the handsome, successful busnessman with a beautiful wife, a series of mistresses and a hidden past that we first met. Joan and Lane have much more depth. I am sure Roger and Peggy are next.

This ain't your father's Mad Men anymore.
I, for one, just want to support the position that I think this season so far is fantastic, the writing superb, story line brilliant and the high production values maintained. Without going much into the wonderful subtext the writing offers - things like Adage Reporter having a artificial leg as a result of Korean, just as Dick Whitman created an artificial life - both being propped up as a result of war wounds. Or the visual information in the scene with the Adage interview, Don is shot more Camera LEFT - where as in the Wall Street Journal interview - the angle is more Camera RIGHT.
There are a plethora of subtexts in both picture and word throughout the series as these wonderful analysis and commentaries attest, which make this series so enjoyable and both froth and substance. The show can be watched for that or for just it's period piece accuracy or both or even pure nostalgia.
The artistry in propping, clothing and camera work blends and lends so much underlying support to the project, one wants to use words like "masterpiece." In seasons past, they used many more broader camera angles, many more scenes that created a great visual tableau of time and place, and characters - the wonderful horse riding scenes with Betty showing her impetuousness and immaturity, Dick Whiman's scratch dirt farm, the power displayed by the entire office floor shots of the original Sterling Cooper.
This season as they get deeper into the reestablished main characters, the shots are much tighter, there are less fade ins and fade outs, more tight shots to see the true nature of the characters. There is one "jump cut" in the opening interview with Don Draper, that is so jarring, shocking both character and audience back after that question that as deep as a chasm "Who is Don Draper," that I haven't yet decided if it is just coincidence or brilliance
The scene between the secretary and Don "the morning after" took such patience and detail in direction, camera angle, set production, lighting, continuity, that visually it comes off flawless letting the emotional content flow directly to viewer.
In "Good News" the incredible work by Jon Ham in his relationship with Anna is developed in a large part through tighter but not too tight of a shot -that vein in Whitman's forehead as his emotions want to burst, this embrace may be his last with Anna - is absolutely brilliant not only from Mr. Ham bring that to the scene, but it not being cut out in editing.
Let me not leave out Christine Hendricks incredible piece of work of "coming apart" as she was being "stitched up," or Lanes wonderful British spot on drunken display of putting the meat where the meat really is.
And lastly, as some one raised on the TV culture of the time, having gone to college in the 60's, there are little things such which I take as visual "jokes" such as the visual reference to - "Let Hertz put You in The Drivers Seat" the open red convertible Chevy Impala - where Don Draper is driving the same car the same cross screen angle as the original ad. To me these are just little Easter Eggs through what to me is the best thing TV has ever seen.
Hey everyone, thanks for your insightful and appreciative comments!

It's interesting that people are splitting between loving this season and being left cold by it. I felt the latter during the first 2 episodes but warmed up last night. I didn't think this episode lived up to the brilliance of the first 3 seasons, but it felt like we were swimming our way back towards it. As a meta comment, I do think that like all shows, there are certain "tricks" that MM pulls that seem original at first and then can become a pattern that is too predictable and loses its effectiveness. Like Don's knack for coming up with ad campaigns off the top of his head, anything repeated too often becomes an implausible self-parody. I hope MM stays well clear of that particular cliff.

Brian, agree that Don was parroting the researcher, although it was clear that that particular question resonated with him more than most things he hears (he seems fairly immune to input from other people, don't you think?). So I think it was meant to be something he actually internalized and found useful to share, not just a handy thing to say.

Steven, I agree with you. (I also think the short shrift they are giving historical developments so far this season is hurting the show.) I think the problem may be that it's easier to write standard TV drama scripts than to come up with great fictitious ad campaigns. Creating truly memorable advertising is a skill that I think is vastly under-rated -- akin to writing brilliant haiku but with a laser focus. You can only buy us off with "the agency is struggling and has few clients" for so long. They need to put the business back into the show, soon.

Nick, many people have been known to overdose on the 60's. Don't let it happen to you! Just tune out and turn off if you need to, buddy.

Lea, I agree the hats should be gone. And I do hope we see more historical material soon. They seem to just be skittering on the surface of it so far this season, after such a visceral immersion.

Bluestocking, I also thought we saw a tender side of Don, almost more so than even with his children.

Voicegal, I believe that writers often put things into their work that they're not aware of -- I have seen this happen when giving feedback on writing to people as well as receiving it. As I've said to other writers, "you don't know how brilliant you are." It's like our dreams -- much slips in there that we wouldn't or perhaps couldn't create consciously.

Kelly, Walter and Procopius, thanks!

Reid, I'm with you on Anna. I've always liked her character but I thought in this episode she lost much of that sly, plain speaking edge she's had and became way too touchy-feely positive on all fronts. It seemed especially unlikely given she must be having more pain and discomfort than was apparent.

Wade, good catch on the distinction of how Englishmen get drunk, especially in that era. (when it comes loose, it all goes) I also confess I thought that was Godzilla, not Gamera. my bad.

Gabby, see my comment up top! lots of mixed feelings about this season so far.

Stellaa, that's a great way to put it. As I noted above, I was having trouble with Anna in this episode. She did seem far too good to be true. Your comment makes me think that what we're seeing is Don's/Dick's POV of who she is. If we could see those same scenes from her POV, I wonder if they'd play differently??

Adele, I read Heather's piece this AM, long after I wrote mine. I thought hers was great, and that she had many valid points. I do think that she is not fully taking in the code of the time about not telling people they were ill or dying, as well as the impact that you and I both note of how Don is put in his place by Patty. He truly isn't family, and has no say in the matter. Given that fact, it would have been an act of great hubris to tell Anna her condition, and he could have just as easily been flogged for his ego if he'd done so. I think this is one of those historical/cultural divides where if you didn't live in the era, it's hard to understand why someone wouldn't just tell a friend, "Hey, you have cancer and you're dying." But for Don/Dick to do so would have been an enormous violation in several ways (and anachronistic in dramatic terms for the show). I also think that it's another point where we can reflect on how much communication has changed in 40 years. These days, keeping anything to yourself is the oddity (and even a cause for suspicion) whereas then it was precisely the opposite -- discretion and even outright secrecy (as here) were the norm, and saying what was true or real was a revolutionary act - - one of the biggest revolutions of the 60's, in fact.

As for Joan's abortion, I thought it was ambiguous if this doc had performed one or whether she'd just told him about it. And while elective abortion wasn't legal, people did find ways around it, the usual one being a D&C to correct "bleeding problems." It would be well within Joan's powers (given what we know about her) to find and cultivate a gynecologist who would do that for her, especially only once. (It was fairly commonly done for well-off and married women by sympathetic docs.)

Tennessee, you are right that the characters are far richer than at the start of the series. It's good to be reminded of that (when most of us are comparing the start of this season to last season). I wouldn't call this season "brilliant" by any means (the way I would past seasons) but we're all probably being rather harsh on a show that has raised our expectations to considerable heights by its quality. I loved the tag line on your comment!

Shuttersny, welcome to the blog and I wonder if your ID is a clue to your profession, given the visual observations you offer?? I thought those were fascinating, and they brought in an angle that I often neglect, since I'm a word person who tends to focus on dialogue, story and character. I do always notice and appreciate the fantastic visual style of the show (which seems if anything even more meticulous than the writing) but I don't always translate the images into meaning as you do so well here. You could write compelling commentary just on the visuals of each episode! And I'm with you on the delicacy and complexity of Jon Hamm's and Christina Hendricks' acting in this episode -- I thought they were both great.
I also meant to address Adele's point about wondering why Anna cares so much for Don - - I agree it's not entirely clear. It also just occurred to me that Patty is the supposedly more attractive sister that her hubby Don Draper actually wanted to marry but ended up settling for her when her sister married someone else. (Per the tale Anna tells Dick/Don in an earlier season when they first meet.) Too bad the real Don Draper didn't live long enough to appreciate what he lucked out and got!
Reading this makes me re-think some of the show and my initial response. Personally I found this episode really lacking. Guess I had New Year's expectations of my own. Joan's husband seemed esp. creepy and I was not trusting his handi-work there on her hand. Boy, I feel he would he love to sabotage her.

The ending flat-lined for me.
Maybe 1965 will bring something more exciting ...Thanks for all the work you put into this.
Beautiful job as always!

I am sorry they are killing Anna off--not least because I am not sure we have ever seen *why* she cares so much for Don/Dick--I mean, I know why they introduced her, with her unconditional love, but I am not sure they proved why that it so.

Am I correct in believing that Anna does not know the real story behind the real Don Draper's death (Dick's panic. the match, etc?)? If so, does she really know "all about" Don? Hasn't he in fact kept a huge secret from her too? I suppose it could be to spare her the pain of that absurd death of a man just about to get out of Korea, but still....

I suppose too we are to see that Don is capable of loving a woman non sexually/exploitatively, but I am troubled that that woman had to be one with polio and then cancer--as if she had to be "damaged," i.e., "less sexual"??) before Don's love could be one where he saw her as person, not a conquest. That seems to me a real misstep on the writers' part (not to mention some real shallowness on their part) if this relationship is supposed to show's Don's nobler side. Ick. nd what was that with Anna seeming to ffer up her niece to Don/Dick (despite hands at 2 and 6 crack)? Double Ick.

I think they really stumbled with a potentially interesting storyline and merely used Anna to, as you put, finally put Dick Whitman to death.
Wonderful recap - as always!
Another great analysis, Nelle. Thanks! Anna's so maternal towards Don/Dick and he responds to it with an authenticity and lack of calculation we don't usually see from him. As I recall, Dick Whitman loved his biological mom, downtrodden as she was. Only Anna and his daughter love him unconditionally. When Don tells Stephanie that she's "in charge," he could be referring to her as a woman as well as a part of the youth revolution. Don's keenly aware of women's power as consumers but it becomes another way of objectifying them and cutting himself off from a truly reciprocal sexual relationship. This episode was also about loneliness; Anna's Christmas tree looked so forlorn. Nothing is more isolating than going through a personal crisis during the holiday season with all its forced cheer. Don escapes to Acapulco and Joan recreates Hawaii in her kitchen. I agree that it was touching to see Joan finally allow herself to be taken care of, even if it's by her lout of a husband. As for the "procedures" she's had, doctors did do abortions in their offices on occasion and wrote them up as something else. They had a lot of discretion. It's fitting that in the last scene of the episode, Joan has pulled herself together and is at the head of the table (isn't that were Cooper should be sitting?) Joan is no feminist, but The Times Are A Changin'
I've talked to a couple of friends about this episode and thought some more about it. Last year, practially every episode seemed to contain some momentous event; this year, (at least so far) the big events (the Drapers' Divorce, the dissolution of Sterling Cooper and the establishment of the new agency) have already happened, so the stories are much more personal.

Even with all the action last year, I don't remember being swept away until Episode 3, and then my love for the season grew with each succeeding episode.

I agree with Tennessee Catfish; Matthew Weiner does not take the easy road, and it's early yet; anything can happen.

I still think Anna's niece, Stephanie was a very roughly sketched representative of youth culture, and perhaps that's why I wasn't blown away by the tie-in to then current events. And it just occurred to me that the show opened this week, with Anna reading the tarot cards and turning over The Mother of the World. I guess that's how Weiner sees her vis a vis Dick/Don.

BTW, Joan's gyne did perform a "procedure" for her; he says something like, "You mean you've had another other than the one I did?" That whole discussion made me think that Joan wasn't always as together as she is now. I could understand our Joanie having had an abortion in college, when birth control wasn't readily available, but the 2nd one was much more recent, since it was performed by the gyne she's been going to. Seems like a capable woman like Joan would have managed with a diaphragm, even in the pre-Pill days. I wonder if this is going to be a story line.
Excellent insight - I just realized you changed your name, and had been looking for your posts - I'm glad I found it!
Excellent episode and I am as ever completely bowled over by John Hamm. it's not simply that he makes the broken shards of Don/Dick fit together it's that he somehow keeps us from hating this reckeless and often bordrline-dnagerous man. With Anna he is of course at his best. None of the spiky defensiveness. Even when he comes on to Stephanie it's a lot nicer than when he nailed his secretary -- and acted the next day as if it never happened. Hamm is on the fast-track to be THE great American actor of his generation. Wait until you see him in "Howl" later this year. He plays Lawrence Ferlinghetti's lawyer and all his scenes are courtroom recreations. But he has such crisp direct authority.

Jared Harris continues to be my favorite eccentric actor of his generation. My fave of his performances remains Amanda Peet's gay pal in "Igby Goes Down" who has my favorite line in that movie. When a friend loses a downtwon club drag show he says "I told him Lorna Luft was too obscure -- they'll just think you're doing a bad Liza."

And speaking of eccentric actors, Vincent Kartheizer, alas, didn't figure in this episode, but he's apparently central for next week.

Meetings of the Vincent Kartheizer Fan Club are scheduled as usual at all hours in Dennis Cooper's blog.

Back to MM: Joan remains my favorite character. This is the first time I've really liked her husband But as he's going to 'Nam, don't get too fond of him.
This was my favorite episode in Season 4 so far. As for the niece from Cal making a return appearance, I'm not so sure. The theme of the year so far is Don striking out with women because he isn't taking care of himself.

With as many characters as have been sliced away from the cast with the creation of the new agency, and the guys I miss most are Sal, Ken and Paul, it was nice to see an episode featuring three underused characters, Dr. Harris, Anna Draper and Lane Pryce. It's heartbreaking to see Anna go, since she's the only person on earth who actually knows Dick Whitman, but in terms of dramatic structure, it makes sense. Don Draper made the fearful leap into the dark at the end of Season 3, and if there will ever be a safe haven for him again, it will be tied to his future, not to his past.

Anachronisms are rare on the show, but unfortunately, "Gamera" is a doozy. It was released in Japan in November 1965 and in the U.S. in December 1966. There's no way Lane and Don could have seen this film on New Year's Day 1965.
Don't know if anyone else has observed that Don's a real prick for not telling Anna about the cancer. That would make him responsible for sticking around to help her, which he would never be willing to do.
Terrific summary/analysis! I love this show!

Did you know that your piece has a link from Basket of Kisses? (http://www.lippsisters.com/)

Pretty Cool!
(oops - my second attempt to post)

Poor forgotten Glen. Doesn't anyone care about him? Nobody's mentioned his rampage or his new role as Sally's protector/truth-teller. He's Betty's other ex and her ignoring him when they crossed paths was cruel. She's found someone else to tell her troubles to and Glen must feel terribly rejected by her (and her new man). Glen may not be finished with Betty. Now that he's becoming aware of to what extent he's surrounded by self-serving dishonest adults, he's cynical and vulnerable (like Don as a boy), but unlike Don he fights while don disappears. I hope we see more of Glen this season.

Thank you Nelle, I love your commentary.
I’m late to the party with this one … I’m throwing my voice in with the “loving it” crowd re: Season 4. People have been bitching about the show since the start of Season 2 so I just shut out the naysayers. Mad Men is one of a small handful of shows that I have faithfully watched in the past 30+ years so perhaps my expectations are different. It’s a well plotted show, but I like it best as an examination of characters at a point in time.

I actually loved eps 1 & 2 but found episode 3 kicked everything up a several notches. A very rich episode indeed. While it was wrenching on one hand to see Dick/Don tell Anna that he had to leave, he was truly doing the right thing within the context of the time and situation, and for a rare change, taking the needs and feelings of others into consideration. Oh, how I would love to see the best characteristics of Dick & Don merge into a whole entity of a person.

Don's recycling of Anna’s line about “smoking the dress” to a baffled Lane provided me with one of the best laugh’s I had in the series.

Brilliant overview, as always.
P.S. Jon Hamm hit it out of the park during this episode.