Waldorf Stories: Mad Men, Season 4, Episode 6 (Commentary)

Aspiration’s as good as perspiration. ~ Danny
That’s not how it goes. ~ Don
There are several ways to succeed in life: You can know the right people, you can know the right things, or you can know the right things about the right people. In “Waldorf Stories,” we see examples of each: Roger and his hapless cousin-in-law, Danny, owe their careers to who they know, Peggy and Don owe theirs to what they know, and they also are canny enough to use what they know about others.
Applying for a job at SCDP, Danny confuses the old saying of Edison’s that success is 2% inspiration and 98% perspiration, because he’s clearly never had to work for anything in his life, and instead fills his portfolio with aspirational ads that he wishes he’d thought of. He admits that all he has in his favor is Roger and his ideas, which are actually only one idea, in which every product is the cure for the common something. Witless as he is, Danny is on to something, because it turns out that stealing is the cure for the common drunk.
It’s the opposite of what you expect -- that’s what I’m interested in. ~ Danny
Don reaches new heights in this episode – of both success and drunkenness – as he wins his first Clio award (for Glo-Coat), as well as indulging in a case of Gloat-Coat, when he makes fun of a drunken Duck Phillips who humiliates himself so badly that he has to be escorted out of the Clio ceremony at the Waldorf. “I feel like I’ve already won,” Don snorts to Roger, unaware that he’s about to show that while Duck can be a dick, Dick can also be a Duck (who his former British bosses said “never could hold his liquor”).
What do you say we put a cherry on this thing? ~ Don
High on more than his award victory, Don insists on pitching to a client, Life cereal, despite being so inebriated he can barely enunciate the copy, a shocking contrast to the crisp, persuasive pitches we’ve heard so many times. Danny may be “Roger’s idiot” who doesn’t know his irony from his idiom, but having made fun of Danny for putting other people’s ads in his portfolio, Don goes him one better and ends up pitching a version of Danny’s single slogan, “Life: the cure for the common breakfast cereal” when his original slogan is rejected by the client as “kind of smart for regular folks.” Acting kind of dumb for a special guy, Don reels off a series of terrible slogans before Danny’s bowls the clients over. Only Peggy realizes what Don's done, but he refuses to hear her concern and instead lectures her about getting another campaign (for Vick’s cough drops) done over the weekend, sentencing her to a form of jail that makes that one in the Glo-Coat commercial look as juvenile as the kids inside it.
Her cell-mate is the new art director, Stan Rizzo, who’s a walking encyclopedia of clichéd sexist comments, packing so many into a single sentence that I got the feeling the Mad Men creatives have been saving them up and were afraid the show would end before they got them all off the whiteboard in the writers’ room. He taunts Peggy for not being a real girl, saying she’s neither attractive nor sexy, either has or should have hang-ups about her body, must be on the rag, wants her to take dictation for him rather than listen to her ideas, sneers at the idea that Don would even consider having sex with her, compares her to a hunting dog…well, I could go on, but my fingers got numb trying to get all of them down. OK, so some of us have criticized the show for softening the impact of sexism in that era, including by making the regular male characters too appealing and thus blunting the impact of their actions, but Stan seems a bit of an extreme redress. Except that if you worked in the era before sexual harassment laws existed, you would have known guys like Stan, out of whose mouths came a barrage of insulting comments that had to be heard to be believed.
This again, really? ~ Peggy to Stan
Don scolds Peggy about learning to work with Stan, but a weekend in a hotel gets them in synch, although not in the way hotels usually work on men and women in this show. Disgusted as she is with this “pig” who abuses her, Peggy uses what she’s learned about Stan to call his bluff – or rather his buff. After non-stop talk about how he’d love to be a nudist and use that liberating freedom to be more creative and is only held back by the prudishness of people like Peggy (who he compares to the Pope), he’s stunned when Peggy strips down and dares him to join her. Embarrassed by the raging Rizzo that is revealed, he’s horrified that Peggy might think it’s in response to her. Cool as the cucumber that his member resembles, Peggy plays along, saying she thought the sight of her naked body would make it go away, but since it hasn’t, perhaps she should dip it in ink and write with it so they can get some work done on their cough drop campaign.
It’s not long before Stan admits defeat (in the form of telling Peggy she won the smug bitch contest) and hastily retreats to a cold shower. Having literally beaten the pants off Stan, Peggy glows with satisfaction, but saves the final blow for the office on Monday, when Stan tells Joey that their storyboarded campaign is all his idea. “That’s true. I only changed one little thing,” she says, holding her fingers a few inches apart.
Like all advertising pros, Peggy’s learned the power of sex, not by having it with the man she needs to win over, but by using the fear he has of her that fuels his hostility and meeting it not with the fear he expects to evoke in response, but with a calm fearlessness that renders him impotent in the power struggle. Stan behaves as if he knows everything about Peggy, while she correctly points out that he knows nothing. His sexist perceptions have caused him to dismiss her literally without a thought, while she has sized him up and then used her insights to gain the upper hand.
It’s a relief to see someone worse than me and really know it. ~ Peggy
Feeling confident after her deft handling of Stan, Peggy confronts Don about his drunken mistake in stealing Danny’s campaign, insisting that he has to deal with it right away. Reversing the tenor of their earlier conversation, she talks to him like a boss to an errant employee, one who has no idea how he’s screwed up, because he has no memory of what he did. It’s always refreshing when Peggy stands up to Don, and interestingly, he always seems to benefit when she does. But this time he’s drunk himself into a corner. His offer to buy Danny’s slogan is rejected because Danny doesn’t need money and instead wants a job in his dream profession, so Don’s forced to hire him (although you just know he’s going to foist him onto Peggy).
You can catch more flies with honey…. ~ Joan
Oh great -- actual flies. ~ Pete (as Cosgrove approaches)
In another reversal of power, Pete learns that Ken Cosgrove is being hired into SCDP for the clients he can bring. Pete’s both afraid and angry at this news and refuses to go along until Lane sweet-talks him by saying his position is secure since Roger’s a child, adding that contrary to Pete's belief otherwise, he likes and accepts him (listening to his silky-smooth assurances, I began to think that Lane is wasted stuck in the backroom crunching numbers and should be put on Accounts working with clients). Mollified by Lane, he meets with Ken and shows him whose Peter is bigger by making it clear that Cosgrove comes after Campbell not only in the alphabet but in the pecking order in the office, an assertion of power which elicits a small, humiliated nod from Ken before Pete indulges in his own Gloat-Coat moment of lording it over his old adversary.
I was thinking about nostalgia. How you remember something in the past and it feels good, but it’s a little bit painful. And life -- that’s a scary word at any age. ~ Don
But in the end, this episode could be called “the rise and fall of Don Draper” (a theme that Gene seems to have anticipated with that bedtime reading with Sally last season). The fall begins disguised as a moment of professional victory, which Don senses is hollow before it even arrives, telling Peggy that after you finish something, “you find out everyone loves it right around the time it feels like someone else did it.” Of course, “someone else” has done everything in his adult life: Don Draper died to make his professional life possible, Dick Whitman died for his sins, and all that’s followed has been done by a persona he’s assumed. Don/Dick has yet to feel loved for who he really is, and not a façade he’s hiding behind.
Who claps for themselves? ~ Stan
After literally screwing up his Life, in cereal/serial form, Don descends into a drunken celebration that is meant to encompass Roger but instead leaves him morose at the bar, complaining to Joan that Don seems awfully pleased with himself and that while he’s as much a part of the success as Don is, they don’t give out awards for what he does. “And what is that?” Joan asks in her honeyed dagger tone. “Finding guys like him,” Roger replies.
Roger, who can’t seem to get out of his childhood while writing his memoirs and who laments that Hardy was always mean to Laurel, has a similar childish rivalry with Don, his surrogate brother/son who surpassed him long ago. Just how that happened is revealed in perhaps the most fascinating storyline of the episode, in which we learn how Don Draper got into advertising – and Sterling Cooper -- as well as how long Roger and Joan were an item.
Caroline, Get in here, I think I finally got a work story. ~ Roger
In flashbacks, we find out that Roger met Don when he bought Joan a fur early in their affair at the furrier’s Don worked for. When Don tries to use the opportune meeting to land a job, Roger’s utterly disdainful of his sample ads and sees through his claim to run into Roger by accident to get his ear. Caught, Don asks, “Haven’t you ever tried to get a break?” The blank expression on Roger’s face tells us what we already know: that Roger hasn’t ever had to work for anything in his life, much less fight for it the way Don has. Don says he wants to do what Roger does, leaving Roger to echo Joan’s question, ”What do you think I do?” Don’s answer reveals how much he already understands, defining Roger not by any work he does but by his status, “I think you’re a very important man in a very important agency.”
Having talked Roger into having a drink (not the greatest feat in the world), Don keeps him talking for hours, although we only see the end of the discussion, by which point a drunken Roger is quoting his mother to Don (as he did at the Derby Day party last season in a similar vein), “Be careful what you wish for, because you’ll get it and then people get jealous and try to take it away from you.” Speaking presciently for them both, Roger says he can’t possibly hire Don because he’s revealed too much of himself, dismissing Don’s reassurance that he’s discreet by saying that very statement means you’re not. After literally calling himself a taxi (“je suis un taxi”), Roger pours himself out the door of the restaurant thinking he’s leaving Don Draper behind forever.
Imagine his surprise (and ours) when Don appears in the Sterling-Cooper lobby the next morning, bright-eyed and bushy-tailed (perhaps in part because he was notably sober the day before at their meeting), claiming Roger has hired him. Roger looks dubious but obviously has no memory of their conversation and so must take Don’s word for it, word that we’d mistrust anyway, but know is as fraudulent as his identity when we see his eyes slide sideways towards Roger as the elevator rises, along with his career.
We’re top of the heap. ~ Clio winner
The heap of what? ~ Roger
But sadly, up is no longer the direction of Don’s life, and the type of alcoholic blackout that gave him his advertising career now threatens it. Having taken home one willing female (a jingle writer who knows how to hum while giving a jingling hummer), Don wakes up with an entirely different one a full day later, with no memory of how she got there, what happened in the ensuing 24+ hours or why she’s calling him “Dick” (does he give out his real name when dead drunk or is it a value judgment?). Luckily for him, she comes with a label (on her waitress uniform) so he knows to call her Doris before hustling her out the door. Having been awakened from his blackout by a Betty who is furious that he’s slept through his date to take the kids, Don’s in no mood to become fully awake to any of his responsibilities, and instead takes some hair of the dog and passes out on the sofa, fading once again from light to dark.
Consequences come the next day in the office when he must not only hire the worthless Danny but claim the Clio he left behind in the bar from Roger, who won’t give it back unless Don says he couldn’t have done it without him. “Did I not say that?” Don responds. “I was wrong. Thank you.” Roger doesn’t seem to notice that Don evades the question, admitting fault (and for what, he doesn’t say) and thanking him, but never agreeing that he wouldn’t be a success without Roger, something that both Don and we viewers know would be an outright lie. Don was driven to succeed and would have found another mentor and opportunity if Sterling hadn't turned out to be golden.
Why don’t you write down my ideas? ~ Peggy
Aspirations are meaningless without perspiration for people like Don (and Peggy), a fact of life that’s lost on someone like Roger, who never had to break a sweat to get his name on the door, much less a foot in it. While Don stole his way in, Peggy has never crossed that ethical line, always working her way up. Now as Don is sinking lower and lower, she is rising, learning to use not just her talent for words, but her insight into other people to navigate a business world still hostile towards women. While Don’s getting drunk out of his mind, she says “No, thank you, I have work to do,” when offered a drink in honor Don’s Clio, which she feels should be partly hers, since she “had a lot to do with” Glo-Coat, although Don has taken all the glory for himself, literally not even looking her way when the news of his nomination came. Her anger over being once again overlooked and taken for granted by Don seems sure to come boiling out before too long.
Make it simple but significant. ~ Don
“Did you see the part where I won?” a celebratory Don brags to Faye Miller while in the next breath saying that awards mean nothing, as they don’t make your work better. “That’s very healthy,” Faye responds, adding, “Award or no award, you’re still Don Draper.”
“Whatever that means,” Don retorts in one of those throwaway allusions to his identity problems that the series is larded with. Smoothly turning down the pass he makes at her, Faye gently tells him, “I think you’re confusing a lot of things at once right now,” without having any idea how right she is. Acutely aware of other people’s behavior and how to use it, he’s nevertheless always been largely blind to himself, a blindness that has become literal. He’s gone from blacking out his real identity to the world to blacking out from the world itself. Whether he can come to consciousness in every sense of that word remains the abiding question of the series.
Little kid, big bowl, big spoon…That’s all I have. ~ Don


Salon.com
Comments
Thanks for another brilliant exegesis. Remember in the brginning of True Romance when Alabama says after a movie she likes to get a piece of pie and talk about it? That's what your blog posts feel like. All we're missing is the cherry cobbler.
Where you disappointed as I was not to see Peggy & Stan's Vick's ad?
Danny might have gotten the interview by who he knows, but I suggest he got the job because of what he knows - that there's a place in advertising for something which is not too clever, will never win awards, but speaks to the middle. If Danny can keep the vibe up, he'll have a long undistinguished career.
Do we think Don has FINALLY hit bottom? Every week, I say that...
If last week’s episode was largely about shame, this week’s is largely about pride and the fall that follows. Where shame leads to submission, pride leads to dominance. And whereas shame can create the will to succeed by withholding acceptance, pride can establish a social complacency that leads to mediocrity.
Don’s most brilliant creative success - to remake himself as Don Draper - was motivated by his desire to escape the confines of his base origins, a life he couldn’t view with pride.
Yet once he unequivocally reaches a state of honored acceptance, symbolized by the golden goddess statue that serves as his Clio award, he no longer displays the same drive to be great. At the apex of his career Don slides into mediocrity, plagiarism, and a pettiness in treating those whose work prop him up.
And it is not just his work that suffers as a result of his pride. Blacking out for days with a series of women, exuberantly drunk and unrefined, neglecting obligations to his family, Don cuts lose of responsibility and decorum. In a very telling moment, we learn that he’s identified himself as Dick to the girl with whom he wakes up. Evidently his career accolades has given his psyche license to revert to its original identity. It’s as though his great success at work and lack of family connection has in fact killed the need for the constant artifice of Don Draper.
We’ve seen Don identify himself as Dick to Anna, but never to anyone in his New York life. What happened to make him drop his guard after so many years of meticulous self-maintenance? Something snaps in him when he wins that Clio: he appears to be genuinely happy, ebullient in a way we’ve never seen him. The award allows him to finally unclench a bit from the tyranny of being Don.
But Don’s been honored before - he’s been acknowledged master of the universe for some time. Why the transition now? What is significant about that Clio award? There seems to me to be a few important aspects of that award that set it apart from other honors Don has received.
Firstly, it is an award for original work Don did to crucially establish his new venture, so he can think of it in a way as a solo accomplishment, not a task within the bureaucracy of a larger corporation (even though he received help on it).
Secondly, the content of the commercial in question reflects Don’s understanding of himself. The commercial depicts a play on Western film conventions (tropes of a psychology of national expansion and individualism), where a little boy pretending to be a cowboy appears confined to jail. As the viewer’s perspective changes, the bars of the jail cell are revealed to be an upside down chair: there’s no real prison, only an imagined prison borne out of the everyday objects of domestic life. Whether conscious of it or not, Don has created a fairly accurate metaphorical representation of himself. Like that boy, he feels that there is something to escape from, something which confines his cowboy sensibilities, when in fact that feeling is a construction of an imagination that distorts reality. His award for what’s really a masked self-projection could be perceived by Don as a kind of deeper validation of his true self.
Lastly, Weiner emphasizes that the award is given out at the Waldorf-Astoria. The Waldorf is one of Manhattan’s oldest and most famous power arenas, a place that served as a social center for American aristocracy since the end of the 19th century. It was also owned by this point in time by Conrad Hilton. Don’s detached existence was symbolized so brilliantly last season by the hotel, a place people pretend is home for a while before skipping elsewhere, and an institution that Hilton was attempting to spread all over the world with Don’s help. At the end of last season Don’s creative prowess was found wanting by the father figure of Hilton; Don being validated and praised at Hilton’s main headquarters seems to mitigate that rejection. He has officially arrived into the buxom of American success and done it with a work of expression that reflects his true identity. For all these reasons, Don experiences a fundamental psychic shift when he receives that award. It’s as if the purpose of the Don Draper identity were to escape shame and win absolute societal validation, and having received that, Don now feels freer to dispense with his constrictive, controlled mannerisms.
But when the mind transforms its relationship to the world from one of shame to one of pride, there is less to prove and therefore less to perform. Don’s relaxation of his old regime means that mystique deteriorates into the tactics of an aggressive salesman. His drunken behavior during the pitch meeting is so cocky and clunky that he comes off as embarrassing, the last adjective we’d think a Don Draper pitch could be described with. He begins to rehash himself, giving the speech about nostalgia that he moved grown men to tears with back at the end of season one; but this time he garbles it. That nostalgia speech is an iconic Don Draper moment, perhaps the single most famous scene from the series and the epitome of Don Draper’s creative genius. The contrast between that legendary eloquence and the bumbling lines on display here is heart breaking - what genius has been misplaced, perhaps lost?
His main pitch rejected, Don has so let success go to his head that he considers it unnecessary to put in more than a few more minutes thought to close the deal. So confident he expects inspiration to flow through him effortlessly, he instead searches about for weak cliches before unconsciously plagiarizing someone he’d earlier dismissed as a hack. That the plagiarized slogan carries the day suggests that Don’s continuing success is now more due to his reputation and position than to the quality of his work.
And what of that slogan? “The cure for the common...” has become a familiar and effective advertising slogan, and the fact that Don is initially dismissive of it is probably a symptom of his haughtiness. In fact, the slogan seems in line with Don’s kind of “significant yet simple” rhetoric, and its metaphorical implications seem to jive with Don’s worldview as well. In the very first episode Don defines happiness as “the smell of a new car” - essentially as novelty. That is not far off from the idea of society as a disease which is “cured” by the invention of new products. Don’s dismissive behavior shows how reluctant he is to pass the baton. He views the aspiring copywriter as a no-talent punk and therefore devoid of any possibly good ideas.
This is similar to how Roger brushes aside Don’s initial attempts at validation, telling him that he needs “a good fur man”. Roger was unable to recognize Don’s talent because he viewed him with condescension. Via this telling flashback, Don is compared both with the aspiring SCDP applicant and with Roger. The young Don is compared with the applicant, who is summarily dismissed as insignificant despite displaying some raw talent and gumption. But present Don is also compared to past Roger, both acting as the entrenched and arrogant rejector of hungry new talent. The lasting implication is that Don is becoming a dinosaur like Roger, someone living off previous accomplishments and deluding themselves about the value of their contributions. We see this in Don when he tries to unsuccessfully rehash his nostalgia speech and plagiarizes the aspiring copywriter. We see this in Roger when he asks for Don’s gratitude for having helped recognize his talent and bring him to where he is today. Don diplomatically pays his respects to Roger, but the truth is that Roger didn’t recognize talent in Don at all; Don essentially hired himself over Roger’s reluctance through an alcohol induced memory loophole.
So the real upcoming talent lies in the unrecognized at the bottom struggling for power, whereas the prideful who already possess power pretend to still be the primary engines of creation when in fact they are not. Not only do they take for granted their own superiority, but they are actively opposed to sharing honors, as we see in the example of Peggy receiving no recognition for her work.
Though she’s not wrested real respect from Don yet, Peggy’s interaction with Rizzo shows that she is not going to accept a diminished position. Peggy bursts through his air of condescension to demonstrate the hollowness of his sexual liberation ideas: he cannot even begin to work with sensual thoughts swirling about his head, thus proving total sexual liberation to be irreconcilable with modern work roles. He’d have her believe that he’s liberated and she’s manipulated by society’s mores, but she’s the one in control of her mind, not him.
As Waldorf Stories makes clear, the irony of success is that with it comes pride, and with pride comes the entrenchment of entitled mediocrity. The engines of cultural growth, the people that originate rather than repeat meaning, are the hungry at the bottom thrashing against the confines of a hierarchy hostile to their advancement. In this hierarchy, the powerful appropriate other’s contributions as their own and distribute tokens of pride and shame in a manner which reinforces their status of positional, rather than rational, authority. But authority cannot remain static: the Roger’s of the world must eventually give way to the pushiness of the Don’s, and in due time the Don’s of the world end up becoming the Roger’s.
Your perspective is always fascinating, Nelle, I just wish you would wait until I catch up!
I would like to respectfully disagree with dorinda & agree with fran--I love all the discussion on here and the analysis from different perspectives.
I am sticking with my thesis of this season being a series of trilogies. The first three episodes were about divorced Don and the holidays. Many complained of the plodding aspect of these character studies, but we now see that Don’s reaction to his divorce will be the prime mover of this story line and everything that happens at SCDP this season. Again, I offer kudos to Weiner for making character development a part of this series.
The second trilogy sets a second study in motion -women in the 60s and in SCDP. The fourth episode used the metaphor of a focus group of women in their 20s confronting their self-mages as a function of the desires of men. The fifth episode was the shame of feminine sexuality. In both of these episodes, the light shines brightly on women, but there are equally significant male story lines in the background that are reflective that of the women. Remember the look between Peggy and Pete in the lobby.
This episode synthesizes both trilogies, but in this one the male story line is in the spotlight. The story line for the women ties up this trilogy. Specifically, the women at SCDP are as important and necessary as the men are. We see Roger, then Don, hold Joan’s hand for strength and comfort at the awards. The centerpiece is Peggy confronting male chauvinism, nude-to-nude. She literally stares down his penis and gets what she needs at work. I take it as an example of brilliant storytelling that Weiner is able to highlight the women in the fourth and fifth episode and then shove them in the background in the sixth – even though the competing male and female story lines are equally strong in all three episodes.
There is no way to know what will be the focus of the next trilogy, but there are hints. Again, Weiner has used character development over the first six episodes to set the stage. The generational divide looks to be played out between the old guard (represented by Bert, Roger and Lane) and the young Turks (represented by Pete, Harry and Cosgrove). Do stands astride the generational divide, a wounded leader.
I found it interesting that you pointed out that Joan and Roger's relationship had been going on for a longer time than the viewers of MM knew. I think you're right about that, but when I was watching last night, my first thought was that Weiner and company weren't paying close attention to what they'd already written. In season 2, when we found out about Joan and Roger, there was a scene at a hotel, where Roger said to Joan, something like, "Do I have to tell you how great this past year has been?" That led me to believe that their affair had only been going on for about a year.
And speaking of time, I think I figured out that if Joan had been working for Sterling Cooper for 9 and 1/2 years, as we were told in Season 3 in the fall of 1963, then Don must have begun working there in 1954 or '55. I thought the poster of Betty in the fur shop was a nice touch.
One of my favorite moments occurred during Don's drunken pitch to the Life cereal people. He slurs, "I was thinking of nostalgia . . ." taking us back to one of his greatest pitches ever, the use of nostalgia to sell the Kodak slide projector in Season 1, which he rechristened The Carousel. In one of the ironic juxtapositions that Weiner & Co. are so good at, we recall Don at the apex of his abilities and then see him at his worst, unconciously stealing an idea from Roger's schlemiel-ish nephew-in-law. Last night I found myself hoping that this neat little reminder of what Don was like at the peak of his powers will also dawn on him and end this very long lost weekend.
And that Peggy -- the girl's got spunk.
And though Don would say that awards don't improve your work, I was still much gratified to see that MM won another Emmy for Best Drama. That Emmy should buy us at least another couple of more seasons.
Brian B. - To hit rock bottom you have to realize you've hit it.
I don't think Don has hit rock bottom because he hasn't had that realization. Like forgiveness. You cannot properly apologize until you repent (realize XX was wrong, why it was wrong, vow to never do it again). He can't "hit rock bottom" until he feels the floor.
But on that note, I can't wait to see what happens when he does and how he crawls out of it.
The women were epic this episode. Both Peggy and Joan used their knowledge of the men around them to everyone's benefit. Rizzio refused to work until Peggy was liberated. But like Nelle said, she called his buff (love that). Joan knows more about Roger than he does and gently guides him away from self-destructing at the hands of alcohol.
Finally, the men were excellent as well. Don reminded me of an unbalanced washing machine. Usually he is very put together and able to be brillant. But he was too over-exubriant this episode and it looked like he was knocking against the sides of his persona much like an unbalanced washing machine. I honestly expected him to run into a wall (physically) during those scenes. But it was perfect in showing how he went from very put together to flying out of control.
Brian, I agree that there is a hungry kid lurking behind almost everything Don does, and that's why I ended with that quote -- I thought it was a wonderful, suggestive image. On the surface, he has so much ("everything" as Peggy sees it, before his marriage ends) and yet he's just a little kid trying to fill up from that bowl and never succeeding. As for the ad, we did see it in storyboard form - it was so unmemorable, I can't remember it! I think you have a great insight about Danny -- there's a huge market for mediocrity and Danny looks like he can just about corner it. As for the hand holding, I thought it was an interesting way not just to show how important Joan is to the agency but how vulnerable these men are underneath -- they may look like masters of the universe, but they actually need reassurance and nurturing, especially from women. Joan gives that, although in a very tough love way (as she does with Roger at the bar later).
Ryan, I said it last week and I said it again: you have a lot of great insights into the show (too many for me to respond to without a verrry long comment!) -- more than enough to make for a fascinating blog of your own about the show. I encourage you to do it -- you'd be great at it!
Gabby and Dorinda and Fran and Cloudzie, thanks!
Caroline, I wish I had more time, too! I always feel like these are very "on the fly" impressions, being written right after the show airs, and that I could use a few days reflection on it to come up with better, more fully developed insights.
Zanelle, I agree that the women are getting stronger in seemingly every episode, and that's thrilling. What's interesting but sad is that it's paired with the men getting weaker. It was one of the main arguments against feminism (well, still is, for those who argue against it) -- that it's about diminishing men. But in fact, real feminism is simply humanism, and about wanting everyone to be their best and fullest selves. Feminism can and clearly has benefited men, too, if we look at how things have changed in our culture since the MM days.
Tennessee, I think there's merit to your trilogy theory (and it certainly sounds like the way Matthew Weiner might map out a season, from what I have gleaned of his meticulous planning). And I think you're right that we're about to see a pointed face-off between the generations - that would be in keeping with the historical times and the themes of the series. But I disagree that women are in the background in this episode! Peggy's storyline is a prominent part of it, and I think it's meant to be a turning point for her character.
Adele, I get very punny in the wee hours and always worry I'm going too far so thanks for appreciating it. As for the timing of Joan, Don and Roger -- I think it's unclear from this episode whether Joan works at SC when she's starting the affair with Roger. It's entirely possible that he hired her into the firm after meeting her in another context and starting the relationship. Both you and Ryan caught that Don was plagiarizing from his greatest hits -- I had that same echo in my mind but didn't quite get it into words. Frankly, I was cringing so much on his behalf during that scene that it was all I could do keep watching and listening. People embarrassing themselves are always the hardest scenes for me to watch in movies and TV!
When I went back to add this thought, as I always do, I read all the latest comments that have appeared. I agree with the reader, who said that this is like a book club or a salon. You lead the discussion; almost everyone has something interesting to add, and the only thing that's missing is the wine and some snacks.
Nelle thanks for your graciousness and support. You set a great tone of ego-less discussion and your wit and love of the show clearly shines out. If you'd prefer I'd be happy next week to post my comments under a different forum and link to it here.
Here's to everybody for liking Mad Men.
To me, this is cautionary. Those who clap for themselves (Roger, and increasingly Don) are victims of complacency, delusion and descent. It is as if clapping for oneself - either too loudly, too long, or too often - or taking in the claps of others (as at the Clios) is a defense to avoid the truth about one's work and one's self, a way to drown the truth in the noise so to speak. It is no coincedence that this award, the phsyical and external symbol of praise (and clapping) comes just when we see Don at his heretofore lowest and Roger at his most insincere and deluded (thinking he is the reason for Don's success and feeling entitled to recognition for it). Weiner answers his own question: these are the people who clap for themselves and this is why they do it - and in doing so, implicitly adds the caveat: let us learn a lesson lest we become like them.
Also, curious as to thoughts on the hand-holding under the table between Don and Joan??
Love the way Peggy handled that creep.
When Don came onto Fay Miller, she had one of the best insights in the show. And "Judas Priest," I'm even finding Pete Campbell is developing some backbone. Thanks for this Nelle. Always enjoyable.
Amusing parallel of how Roger's drunkenness led to Don's job while Don's led to Danny's.
And who was it that first approached Cosgrove? Maybe I missed something (haven't looked at the comments yet) but surely Lane couldn't have taken that initiative.
I'm still expecting something more from Roger. He senses that too much of the firm's activity is gradually sidelining him but I expect his ego will insist on some big push.
And Faye seems to be biding her time with Don. I think she's interested but senses that Don is still too much in transition from the divorce and new firm pressures to make a reliable romantic partner.
Great post as always Nelle. Thanks so much for your work.
Only thing is, in the first season I always thought they implied that Don had worked at several other agencies before Sterling Cooper. Didn't someone comment that he had slept his way through all the other agencies? Or was that just professional courtesy?
Do you suppose it was coincidence that the Clio Awards were given out the same night as the Emmys?
Congrats to Matt Weiner and their wins, and don't feel bad, Jon and John - you lost to the fantastic Bryan Cranston and Aaaron Paul, of my other "best show" ("Breaking Bad")
It was fascinating and hilarious to find out how Don came into Roger's picture all those years ago as well as finding out more about Roger & Joan's past relationship. One can see how Joan has matured and come into her own over the years whereas Roger is stuck. There's still a lot of interesting gaps in MM's backstory.
Meanwhile the Peggy /Stan scenes seemed really forced, probably because Stan is just a cartoon character brought in to be a foil to show off Peggy's development rather than a real, believable character. It seemed a little too neat, that after having his bluff called, he would just become a compliant little worker bee, but having made their character development point for Peggy in a sort of broadside farce, they seemed content not to worry if the aftermath made any sense or not.
Meanwhile -- almost unnoticed -- the Roger story line packed the most punch. We see how self delusional Roger is, and how clinging to a mythologized version of his discovery of Don Draper is the only thing keeping him from sliding down the precipice of late middle age into despair. Slattery continues to act the different stages of drunkenness seamlessly. The writers would do well if all the stories could be told as subtly as the Roger story has been this season.
Readwillet, thanks! And all Peggys are good, no? (following our Lipton convo)
Ryan, thanks!
Adele, I miss Connie, too. He was a great character, beautifully played by the actor, and I loved that storyline, which added so much to our understanding of Don.
Roxy, I think that's a great insight about the "who claps for themselves" line. I thought it was really interesting (which is why I quoted it) but I didn't explore it much. It is a real question in this series, and also at the time in society that MM portrays (when it became more acceptable to think well of yourself and show it).
David, I found what Peggy did very satisfying but I also thought (although didn't write this) that it felt a bit like the deli scene in When Harry Met Sally: a great idea that isn't really believable for that character . I think Peggy's wonderful, but I just can't quite believe she'd go that far -- at least not yet (give her another year, especially with that "downtown" crowd and I'll believe it).
Scarlett, yes, Pete seems to be growing a tiny little spine. I hope some morals come with it.
Rita, I'm betting some furmaker now wants Christina Hendricks as their new model. She's probably against real fur, though.
Burchdoctor, thanks!
Well-viewed, that's a good point. Don's tough love with Peggy has indeed strengthened her, as well as made her work harder and more creatively. And I think that although she's been as equally hurt by him, some part of her knows that. I loved her line to Stan, "Have you been yelled at by Don yet?" She knows the rites of passage in the Creative Dept!
Abra, I don't think we know about Cosgrove. He told Pete at the lunch with Harry that he wasn't happy and would prefer to be under Don's thumb than where he is. But obviously Pete wouldn't have passed that on as he didn't want Ken back (until he felt sure he could control him, at which point it becomes very satisfying!). So I'm thinking Harry was the conduit of info. I too wonder if Roger will get in the game. He seemed to get enlivened by the start up at end of last season but he seems back to lazy old drunken Rog now. As for Faye, I really don't get that she's interested in Don. I see her as way way too smart to get involved with him. But we'll see -- it seems like they're setting up a situation for them to get involved in some way, even if it's more on her terms than Don's for once. I kinda hope not -- it would be nice for Don to have more and more women around him who are immune to his sexual charms -- so far it's only Peggy.
Kay, your "professional courtesy" line made me laugh out loud. No, I don't think we were ever told Don worked at another agency. He had previously mentioned that he did ad work for the furrier and also said that boss was his mentor who taught him about how to sell things to people (which suggests Roger taught him little!).
Denise, thanks!!
Various, I tend to see Joan as eternal woman, ageless and unchanging, except they've definitely softened the character a lot since the first season when she was a lot harder (especially in talking to Peggy). I'd love to see her get more of a storyline this season, including more about what she does at work, which is still vague.
Lisa and Lea, thanks!
JJKendall, I agree with you that Roger is sublimely played by Slattery and that in some ways they do the most subtle things with his character (both the writers and Slattery). It's a great portrait of what a functioning alcoholic looks like. I also agree that the drunk scenes with Don were a little heavy-handed. (And...I always feel that the amount of alcohol that they're consuming seems beyond human ability -- how can they still be standing, walking and having sex after ingesting that much??) They usually do better with Don when he's drinking, making it more subtle, but I guess they wanted to make clear that he was so ripped he wasn't able to pull of the act that is Don (so it's not Hamm's bad acting, it's Don's). And as I just noted above, I didn't find Peg's striptease quite believable for her character. It was definitely on the line of plausibility.
Don's "lost weekend" really bothered me for some reason. I mean, it's always been obvious that he's an alcoholic, but this was a pretty steep descent. I was torn between loathing and pity. (And I wonder if this is a way for Betty and the kids to be written out of the show, if Don's drinking leads to revoking the joint custody arrangement.)
I was really impressed with Hamm's acting in the flashbacks. His facial expressions, body language and voice were all that of a different person, Don Draper before he really became Don Draper.