Out of My Mind

The Musings of a Woman Who Thinks Too Much

Nelle Engoron

Nelle Engoron
Location
California,
Birthday
May 01
Bio
My Season 5 "Mad Men" commentary is on Salon.com rather than here (see my last blog post). *****My e-book, "Mad Men Unmasked: Decoding Season 4," is now available on Amazon! ***** I'm a writer/editor/consultant who lives in the SF Bay Area. I write about all kinds of things, but am particularly intrigued by movies, relationships, gender issues and "Mad Men." (Scroll down the left sidebar for links to what I've published elsewhere as well as a selection of my blog posts.) I'm writing a novel about religious and romantic obsession and have completed a memoir, "Seeking," about my (successful) quest for love, which included personal ad dates with 200 men. Email me at "Nelle@NelleEngorondotcom" Amazon author page at: amazon.com/author/nelleengoron

Nelle Engoron's Links

Books I've written
Articles of Mine on Other Sites
Movies, Movies, Movies
Mad Men Commentary
Musings, Memoir & Humor (on many topics)
Editor’s Pick
SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 6:42AM

Hands and Knees: Mad Men, Season 4, Episode 10 (Commentary)

Rate: 23 Flag

 

pandt

 

 

Stop it, kill it, at least find out how far it’s gone. ~ Don to Pete

“Cheer up. When God closes a door, he opens a dress,” goes a classic Rogerism from an earlier season of Mad Men.  In the episode “Hands and Knees,” God (aka Matthew Weiner) slams doors shut right and left, but opening a dress won’t help this time – in fact, Roger’s gotten Joan in trouble by doing that. He arranges for her to end the pregnancy safely and discreetly -- just one of several terminations in the episode, and the secrecy in which they are held may kill not just careers but the entire SCDP agency.

It turns out much has been gestating in the SCDP world:  Trudy’s as big as a Macy’s Thanksgiving Day parade float, Joan’s several weeks gone, Lane’s grown into a Playboy and picked up a bunny girlfriend, while Pete wins the prize for longest pregnancy, having taken 3 years to grow North American Aviation (NAA) “from cocktails to a $4 million account.” NAA is growing Minuteman missiles, which I suspect is what has gotten both Lane and Roger into the trouble they find themselves in.

Actually, it’s Lane’s father who knocks him up (per the British slang), showing up in place of Lane’s son Nigel, greeting the star-spangled gift that Lane flourishes with a foreboding lack of appreciation for all things American. He’s also unimpressed by Lane’s keyholder status at the Playboy club (although Don finds it quite amusing, seeming like a proud papa for setting Lane on this new path). Robert Pryce seems a stereotypical Brit – extravagantly polite in public and a sadist in private. Furious upon hearing Lane’s intention to start a new life in America with his “chocolate Bunny” of a girlfriend, Toni, he knocks Lane around and demands he stop living a double life: “Put your home in order, either there or here. You’ll not live in-between.”  (Words that could apply to any number of Mad Men characters, as we know.) Putting a cheery public face on his subjugation, Lane tells the partners that he’ll be going home to London to “tend to his family” for a few weeks.

Joan tends to her own family matter with the graceful stoicism that we’re so familiar with from this overcompensating paragon of control. Gone is the hysteria of the mugged Joan and in her place is a woman who not only comforts the mother of a teenager who’s having an abortion just before she has her own, but who soothes the frayed nerves of Roger, the man who knocked her up and is now dithering about whether it should “mean something” (sounding like a teenage girl babbling at a slumber party) and complaining that he feels “awful” while the woman who had her innards scraped out the day before says she feels fine – and looks impeccable as usual. (Perhaps because she didn’t go through it? Color me suspicious.)  But Roger’s finest hour must be when he suggests that Joan follow the time-honored route of lying to her soldier husband when he comes home so he’ll think the baby is his – or hoping that he dies.  “Greg dying is not a solution to this,” Joan calmly responds. Oh Joanie, you may convince Roger, but you’ll never get us to agree with that. On this point I'm with Roger:  “I’m only thinking of what’s best for you.”

But Joan’s isn’t the worst news that Roger gets this week. At the end of what seems a routine drunken lunch, Lee Garner Jr. coolly informs him that Lucky Strike is moving all their ad business to BBDO after 30 years with SC(DP). With Lee Sr. is incapacitated, the board has taken control and Lee swears he’s merely the hatchet man, lamely trying to soften the blow by picking up the check for the first time. Like a woman who gets jewelry unexpectedly, Roger knows what that means even before the words are spoken.  Accusing Lee of trying to kill him (literally, we find out, when he takes a nitroglycerin tab the minute lunch is over), Roger bluntly tells Lee that he’s killed the agency and begs him for a chance to win the business back.  Lee informs him it’s pointless since the board is operating in a strict corporate mode, signaling the death knell for the good ole boys style of business that Roger is used to. Lee is unsympathetic to Roger’s misery (“You inherited this account,” he reminds him – the pot calling the kettle black) but finally accedes to his pleas to give him 30 days to “get our affairs in order” (given how many there have been, you’d think that wouldn’t be nearly time enough) while they both keep the termination secret.

There will be fewer black bars, moving forward. ~ NAA client

That secrecy may ensure the death of the agency, because not knowing they’ve lost the keystone Lucky Strike account, Don and Pete make the decision to jettison NAA. Actually Don makes the decision, while Pete has to take the Minuteman missile where it hurts and pretend to have lost the account by a careless oversight that insulted the client. Knowing what else they’ve lost, Roger nearly blows out his heart again, even uncorking the F word (for I believe the first time on the show) to describe how badly Pete’s screwed the agency. And funny he should use that word, as this episode brought to mind a saying I have: “Don’t f*** with the feds.”

With a stunning lack of foresight, Don’s gotten three years into the process of wooing a major defense contractor without considering that at some point, the government might want to check out SCDP.  Even the comically redacted documents that NAA shows the agency (in which nary an “and” or a “but” is left showing) fails to clue him into what’s coming, suggesting he’s not the best person to create advertising about defense systems. (Perhaps that’s why he asks NAA clients, “How would you feel about avoiding the idea of defense altogether?”)

Harry helpfully suggests that advertising means never having to use the word “bomb," but a bombshell is precisely what’s coming Don’s way.  Somewhere in that pile of papers that he admits he signs without reading, he’s agreed to a security clearance, and two feds show up at Betty’s door to question her about her ex. Asking if he’s a man of integrity, loyal (yes, to a brand of cigarettes, I would have liked to hear her answer), and the capper, “Do you have any reason to believe Mr. Draper isn’t who he says he is?” Betty’s predictable double-take (“What was that?”) draws an equally predictable comic rejoinder from the G-man: “It’s a standard question; I know it sounds funny.”  Yes sir, we get the joke.

Assuming Don merely failed to warn her of the interview, a furious Betty calls to complain that “They need to know all about you and I’ve been through hell.” For once it’s Don’s turn to blanch at a revelation, upon hearing that the government is asking about “your military service, your politics, your loyalty, your name.”  (He’s clear on one out of four, by my count.)  Catching her paranoia at talking on the phone, Don assumes a coded politeness that Betty (who knows all about that style of speech) picks up on immediately, assuring him that she’s covered for him, which draws a rare and sincere appreciation from Don. You have to give it to Betty – she had a chance to nail Don, and she takes a pass.

But Betty’s silence isn’t enough, as Don well knows. Turning to one of the only other people who knows his secret, he asks Pete to use a government contact he has to find out what the feds know.  When it turns out Don’s been “flagged,” (an apt term for someone whose patriotism is being investigated), he demands that Pete dump the account. Pete’s understandably furious at this idea, even though he’s earlier rejected Don’s offer to disappear instead. While Don assures him that the agency can survive without him, Pete knows that’s not true.  Faced with losing the biggest account he’s ever landed or losing his partnership in a firm that would go belly up, Pete chooses the lesser of evils, and stoically endures Roger’s vicious attack as a result. Privately, he rails at Don (saying he doesn’t want to “live with your shit over my head,”) as well as complaining to Trudy, who he tries to shield from the ugly facts while muttering about people who drag their lies through life, destroying everything they touch, while “the honest people” have to pick up the pieces. In this, Pete’s deceiving himself, of course, since he engages in dishonesty all the time for business as well as with family.

Despite Pete’s accusation that he has a cavalier attitude towards the truth, Don’s deception is actually making him sick. Or perhaps it’s simply the fear of being caught that’s making him feverish and shaky, ultimately provoking a panic attack that had me looking for the cold cuts. Trying to help (even though he snaps that she’s “not a real doctor”), Faye assures him that he’s not having a heart attack (that’s Roger’s job, after all) since he’s not in any pain (what about that psychic pain, Ms. Psychologist?). At first recoiling from her touch, Don eventually calms down enough to admit he’s exhausted from running and lying and tells her the truth of his identity, and without any of the fraught intensity of his confession to Betty. Unlike Betty, Faye doesn’t reject him but instead calmly suggests that he could get legal help and would probably be treated leniently since he was “just a kid” in Korea (contrast this with Mr. Honesty Pete Campbell, who chalked it up to old news that could probably be swept under the rug, provoking Don’s snarled response that there’s no statute of limitations on desertion – an interesting comment from a man who’s threatened to desert his family and his job on numerous occasions).

But Faye’s helpfulness and understanding may backfire on her. After his confession, Don says he shouldn’t have told her and becomes noticeably cooler, putting off their next date, and not only not firing Megan for putting his life at risk, but looking at her longingly through the open door of his office. Is it impossible for him to imagine a woman loving him romantically as his real self? (Not just platonically as Anna did.) Or is he ashamed of the extreme vulnerability that he showed Faye, ending up on his hands and knees, spilling his guts literally as well as figuratively?

He’s not the only one who finds himself in that posture, as Roger has to beg Lee Jr. for that 30 day grace period, Pete has to abase himself in front of the partners as he takes the hit for Don, and Lane ends up in “Please sir, may I have another” boarding school territory with his sadistic father. While Lane and Joan both fail their rabbit tests, Joan maintains her dignity both privately and publicly despite her travails (which we’re tantalized into believing may include a 15 year old daughter given up for adoption, or is that just how long ago her first abortion was?). Her secrets seem the most deeply hidden of all the show’s characters, and yet the least likely to hurt anyone besides herself. By contrast, Roger and Don engage in a Gift of the Magi sort of secrecy, making fateful decisions about the business without informing each other, thereby creating a mutually assured destruction that would do NAA’s Minuteman missiles proud.

Pregnancies, accounts and relationships are all terminated while destructive secrets and lies are perpetuated, but will this really spell the end of SCDP?  Or is there in Trudy’s symbolic belly a rough savior slouching towards Manhattan?

 

I’m not worried, not in the slightest. ~ Don

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Great commentary as usual. I like seeing 'bad' characters (supposedly) like Pete and Betty, stepping up and doing the brave and decent thing ... even if their selfish interests lie right below the surface. In Betty's case, I just admire her quick thinking. She takes a risk covering for Don; but ratting him out would be certain disaster.
I have to say, though ... I'm a little confused about Don's legal status. Two guys were involved in an enemy action in Korea; one of them died and the other was wounded and discharged. There was nothing fraudulent about Don's injuries, or the end of his service. How is that 'desertion'? Even the change of identity seems like a victimless crime since the 'victim' got a new friend and a solvent life-style out of the con-job. Maybe this is something Faye will figure out, in due time. Don does seem very impractical about things, even the consequences of working for the government,but he's an artist ...and it's time for him to deliver the goods. Pete, too. The only way out of this muddle is new clients and brilliant campaigns ... and the key may be this week's most significant missing person: Peggy.
To me, the main theme of the night's episode was how the characters put on and deal with false fronts, false faces, and how some come clean: Don's desire to finally shed his false face ("I'm tired of running."), Faye pretending to just be doing business with Don, Pete pretending to lose the account for Don, Lane playing Playboy while neglecting the needs of his family in England, Roger and Joan keeping the affair and its results behind closed doors, Roger keeping up appearances after being dumped by Lucky Strike, etc.; then Betts declaring honesty with what's-his-name, Don fessing up to Faye, etc. Thus, to me, the last shot was not Don pining for Megan all of a sudden, but Don watching Megan putting her lipstick--I believe the parlance was "putting on her face," yes?

All the while, some fascinating moments of changing sexual mores and politics of the time. What I found interesting was the ironic nod at Playboy's role in breaking down racial barriers, at least in the way Hefner refused to let skin color keep a cute butt and cleavage from serving drinks, in celebrating the swinging lifestyle, all while further objectifying and constraining women in a whole new servitude. That Lane was rebuked (so violently) as merely playing while his real responsibilities awaited action, even if it meant properly divorcing his wife seemed both a sad glimpse of his own servitude to his ghastly father and a cracking wake up call.

The episode seemed to be a stark punch to gut for Don and the firm, and just when all was starting to go so well. Don was coming along in a healthier relationship, he had resourced his mojo at work, apparently even found the right "ticket" for bridging the gap with Sally, then BOOM, his old lie comes back to threaten everything. Will he finally transcend his old mistake, forge a new bond with his core self, and guide the firm into the new world? Will losing Lucky Strike be an opportunity in disguise or the end of the world?

Formally, the episode felt less contained, less complete--I guess that's the nature of explosions?

I don't know, I liked it overall, and I didn't feel disappointed by anyone. Most of the characters seemed to be trying their best, though I was surprised at how easily Lane was beaten by his father. Pete showed an incredible amount of restraint--where did that come from? Crisis is bringing out the best in Roger.

I liked your comment regarding the demise of Roger's way of doing business. Sad when he was hitting the Rolodex only to find his old stewards of business dead. His way is truly dying! But he seems so smart at some basic level, and he really does care for Joan--I want him to survive.

I don't know about what you seem to regard as foolishness in these characters. I guess I am more vested in their success--I want them to learn, grow and succeed.

OK. I'm tired. Night.
My fave line was Joan saying "Life goes on", as indeed it does. No doubt Weiner will pull out another sort of rabbit from a hat - a plot twist like the fortuitous defection at the end of Season 3. Such is the nature of drama - it would be boring if things went smoothly, we crave conflict. We tune in to see what tricks the master has up his sleeve, but the strings are starting to show for Mad men as much as for Don Draper. Good thing Weiner continues to write great dialogue for fascinating characters.

Also, any episode without Peggy is just not quite complete, IMHO.

And what does Don's last linger stare at young Meaghan mean for Faye's future?
Nelle: Thanks for sharing your insights -- they're as perceptive as ever.

Re: the F word, I can confirm that it has been uttered on MAD MEN previously -- on the pilot, no less. In one early scene -- the one in which Don tells a sucking-up Pete, "Let's take it a little slower. I don't want to wake up pregnant" -- Pete told Don “F**k you” under his breath as Don walked away. Admittedly it’s hard to hear on the soundtrack, but it’s spelled out clearly in the DVD's subtitles if you switch 'em on. :-)

I’m pretty sure the F-bomb has been uttered a time or two since then, though I don’t recall the specific instances at the moment.

D.
Great insights as always! I agree with you that Joan may not have gone through with the abortion, since we only saw her in the waiting room. She knows this may be her last chance at motherhood, with her husband shipped off and her biological clock ticking. Roger has shown his true colors, saying, "Maybe I'm in love with you" while Joan sits there wounded, listening to him hedge where before he was implying that he did love her. I think Joan has a surprise up her sleeve - she's just not going to involve Roger. But then again, she needs her job, and Roger has made it clear that the baby is "not his," so she wouldn't get financial support from him.
"“Greg dying is not a solution to this,” Joan calmly responds. Oh Joanie, you may convince Roger, but you’ll never get us to agree with that. On this point I'm with Roger: “I’m only thinking of what’s best for you.”"

Wow, that is stone cold! I'm amazed by the moralizing about Greg while Joan's scorched earth (albeit delivered smooth as silk) policy to getting through life is left completely unexamined. Adultry and abortions, marrying a loser because he's a Doctor in spite of the humiliation she suffered in Roger's office. I understand people love a survivor and I'm not immune to Joan's charms but come on, why does she get a free pass?

The one complaint I have about the impressive analysis and commentary here is the constant expectation that fealty to Woman's studies style PC'ness should dictate the female characters behavior instead of the complicated and character driven motivations the show delivers.

You may want to interpret all the female characters behavior as that of atavistic, archetypes of the coming feminism but I think the show is going for something more organic, natural and realistic in driving the characters decisions and Weiner not going for the easy way to make these woman heroes.
Good Morning Nelle and all Maddicts:
I too was very curious as to whether or not Joan went through with the procedure.
And will we ever know if she had a child (or her first abortion) 20 years earlier, or was merely being kind to the suffering mom in the waiting room?
Re: Faye Miller -- can the ultimate "hell hath no fury" scene be far behind? Also- will done turn to Bert Cooper 9seriously under-used this season) for help in merging his two personas?
And will this season end with one or more of the SCDP partners heading down an elevator at 5:27 pm on November 9, 1965, and be stuck -as we will be- for 9 months until MM resumes next Summer?
The question above should have read:
Will DON turn to Bert Cooper (seriously under-used this season) for help in merging his two personas?
This was a dynamite episode...high drama, high stakes. There was much sadness displayed...Lane's sadistic father, Joan having her umteenth abortion (which is why she couldn't go to her doctor), and Roger losing two babies: Joan's, and his 30-yr relationship with Lucky Strike. But the saddest thing of all was the dynamic between Don and Faye. It broke my heart to see him pulling away from Faye after he told her everything and she, an adult, accepted all of it...even his quivering, weak-kneed panic attack. If most men of the era were like Don --unable to deal with a woman as their professional and intellectual equal--then Faye may continue to be unlucky in love.
Hi Nelle. Nice long post about MM. Thank you. I was impressed with the acting in this episode. Don Draper really looked anxious and wane which must be difficult for an actor who looks like a hunk to play. He has had many other roles in tv series and movies lately so I can see that MM is just a jumping off place for him.

The whole place almost fell apart this episode. So many deep troubled situations that could spell the end of the agency. I bet it all survives tho and either gets resolved or just shoved back into the dark. There were so many secrets in those times. Now days things are so much more open and information is flowing but back then it was easy to hide affairs and trouble.

I definitely think Joan went thru with the abortion. She did it with her usual style and was back at work the next day. I just know that jerk of a husband of hers is going to die and she will end up with Roger or maybe she can even do better that him. Her body is really amazing. Those bras were awesome in that era.

I think it is significant that Don's ex wife told her politician husband about the whole identity mess. Maybe that will come to something. Oh I love this series. So well written, acted and conceived.
The final trilogy begins with the executives at SCDP on their “Hands and Knees” faced with the lies in their identities. Truth is the only way out.

Don must come out as Dick, or SCDP loses the account that will save the company. If SCDP dies, so does Dick’s identity as Don. Roger faces a similar dilemma. He must face the fact that he is lesser man than Pete because Pete lands big new clients. Roger has inherited his. Lane must decide whether he will really start his new life as a 60s American, or will he live under the boot heel of his father (personifying the original “The System” system – Great Britain). Will Bert now finally earn his name on the door and maybe even a office of his own? Peggy, Don’s newly minted “right hand man” is hidden off screen.

This trilogy also transitions from character studies of Don and Peggy (augmented with a wider look of gender roles in 1965) toward symbols of broader social issues that are soon to arise in the last half of the Sixties: Beatles, Playboy Club, interracial dating and the military industrial complex. Mad men will soon deliver the goods on what we have been waiting for. We have had nearly four seasons of looking at things as they were. Soon, we will see how things changed.
There was nothing fraudulent about Don's injuries, or the end of his service. How is that 'desertion'?
The real Don Draper was just months away from completing his service commitment when he was killed. Dick Whitmas was not. Had Dick not traded dogtags with Don, he would have returned to active duty upon his recovery, serving at least another year.

On a shallow note, how cute was Sally screaming about the Beatles?
In hindsight, it's hard to believe that Don was so blindsided by the fact that of course there would be background checks done by any defense contractors, but last night, I found myself wondering how I never saw it coming either. I guess that's part of Weiner's genius or my own obtuseness -- not sure which.

I have no idea what's in store for Don; part of me thinks that a person, whose entire existence is based on a lie, won't come to a good end, but another part of me remembers Bert Cooper saying that many of our founding fathers had lives based on bigger lies.

I've just about given up trying to predict outcomes on Mad Men, because I realize how often I've been wrong in the past. Weiner's not one for neat packages. I'm now beginning to doubt that Greg will die in Vietnam; that's just too neat. I do wonder if Joan went through with the abortion, but was she really pregnant? Again, getting knocked up after the post mugging sex may be just a little too neat in Weiner world. And even though Joan has been written very sympathetically since the rape in Don's office, I kind of agree with Chuck -- she's been far from a saint. Last night, when we met Lane's Chocolate Bunny, I was struck by her resemblance to Kinsey's girlfriend of Season 2, and I remembered how insulting Joan was to her.

Poor Lane -- his childhood must have been positively Dickensian. I wonder if Jared Harris will be leaving the show this season, or there is more in store for him. Basically, he seems to be going back to "attend to family business" to avoid having his hand crushed under his father's "boot."

In keeping with my "no neat packages" theory, I'm not sure that Don was looking lustfully at Meagan; it might have been just wistful, after all she has youth and superficially, at least, a lack of secrets. And I wasn't completely sure that Don was pulling away from Faye; maybe he just needed a night alone to digest all that had happened.

Early in the season, I talked about the duality of nature -- "grace and rude will." I keep hoping that this season will end with a little more grace on everyone's part, but only Weiner knows.

Thanks as always for your recap. I'm trying to figure out why I don't want to re-watch this episode -- it's the first time that's happened for me.
Thanks Nelle, and KarmicRelief for Maddicts; now we know who we are. Lucky Strike makes future turmoil - they're filterless, fer crissakes. My two cents is that Peggy waits in the wings as the deus ex machina swooping in with a major new account won by her keen understanding of the times. The old school fffades away. After all, Madison Avenue led the way as we trooped to the stores to buy our bell-bottoms, with-it cigs and unscented whatevers.
Just stopping by to say howdy, and catch a few spoilers til I get the dvd. How do you do this? Do you watch and then stay up all night writing? You should teach a course in this. It would be so waitlisted.
Glad to see the show back on track after last week's missteps. And a penetrating analysis from you too Nelle.

The 60s made a gaudy appearance with Beatles tickets and the Playboy Club. I'd almost forgotten about them, the clubs that is. And the secrets are getting harder to contain. Don's crisis reminded of that Tangled Up In Blue line - "But all the while I was alone, the past was close behind." Joan's - who knows where that's going and good catch Nelle on the ambiguity of whether she actually had the abortion. Then there's Lucky Roger. Sharks in the water around SCDP.

Just a random thought. When Lane sent his bunny on ahead, i wonder what reception an unaccompanied young black woman might have received arriving at a swanky restaurant to claim a reservation?

And were you being sly about Don's and Roger's mutually assured destruction, often known by its acronym MAD? Great episode and terrific post.
Great insights as usual, Nelle. Thanks.
I admit I spent most of this episode online, watching, but not as fully invested as usual. I found Lane's chocolate bunny sweet tooth a bit much. And although cruel and controlling, I agree with Lane's daddy that he really should get his primary house in order before starting anything new. I didn't get the impression ( I could have missed it) that daddy cared one way or another about the race of Lane's new lady love, only that he needed to stop half stepping and finish what he's started. As for Joanie, even for the times, abortions as a form of birth control, well, that's extreme. Also, I'm afraid I'm becoming a Peggy groupie. An episode without Peggy for me is like Sixty Minutes without Mike Wallace for my mom, it's just not the same. I need my Peggy!
Laurel 1962:
It's unclear if Don/Dick is using his own birthday?
Remember he said (when looking at the form Megan filled out for him) that the "dates don't match" and that he'd be much older. Evidently Dick Whitman's takeover of Don's life and history was sloppy, and certain details were not carefully aligned.
Dick Whitman was born in 1925. The real Don Draper may have been 7-10 years older.
I'm shocked at the lack of comments on the pink baby-doll pajamas! I did a spit take when Trudy came on screen. They were LOL incredible.

I don't agree with some of the commenters that Betty told her new husband about Don's problem. She told him about the visit but changed the visitors to FBI instead of DOD and I'm still not clear whether he knows about the Don/Dick situation.

I agree with zannell that Joan "took care of business" with her usual impecible efficiency. But I wonder why did she tell Roger? Was she expecting some other response? Did she want a different response? She's right that she didn't need him so why tell him?

I'm speculating that a mystery client will suddenly show up and save the firm at the 11th hour. This is getting exciting.
@laure1
"...Presumably Don is using a real SSI number, and is paying taxes as Don Draper. I don't think the military would be remotely interested in him. A "Don Draper" served in Korea, and finished his tour of duty, and was sent home, where he went on to have a career as a car salesman and then fur salesman, before turning to advertising.

There is no big deal there. The feds wouldn't be investigating the disappearance of Dick Whitman, because Dick Whitman is dead and buried...."


There would be if the real Draper had belonged, in his youth, to a "subversive" organisation--as many young people did, in the mid to late 30's and early forties (active spying aside, see Whittaker Chambers). Draper was, I believe, 26 (older than Dick Whitman) when he was killed in 1950's Korea, which would have made him a college freshman of 17 or 18, in 1941, the bulk of which unfolded before Pearl Harbor. It wouldn't be hard to imagine the real Don getting involved with a left-leaning, fascist hating organisation during that time. Perhaps that's why Don/Dick has been flagged.

Also, on a more practical level---are there any friends and relatives (other than Anna) that we don't know about? Those investigations are rather thorough--very thorough (I went through one for a top-secret clearance) and Don/Dick knows--albeit, belatedly--this.
@read willet

"...And although cruel and controlling, I agree with Lane's daddy that he really should get his primary house in order before starting anything new. I didn't get the impression ( I could have missed it) that daddy cared one way or another about the race of Lane's new lady love, only that he needed to stop half stepping and finish what he's started...."

Agreed
The Fixer. Where is Michael Clayton when you need him?

Don has to trust some one to bail him out of this. Henry? He wouldn't want the scandal, has major league connections, and is something of a fixer himself. Plus he is living in Don's house on Don's dime.

Faye? Her father 'knows people' but probably the wrong kind of people. But probably not the wrong kind of lawyers. How connected is connected?

The Client? Too late for that, but North American was filled with ex generals closely connected to the Pentagon.

Don Himself? For God's sake -- what a story. It happened over a decade ago, amnesia is a good defense. The fact he did it on purpose would be hard to prove. Write a book, make a movie -- Paul Muni -- I Was A Prisoner on a Chain Gang. The television series, The Fugitive was a major hit show.

Don's lawyer? It isn't like there are dead babies. The military had bigger problems than mistakes with Korean War vets.

Or, Don can simply keep going. Unfortunately, they will probably drag this out for the remainder of the series.
It would be very significant in a background check that Dick Whitman took Don Draper's life. This is not the same as taking on an alias. Dick Whitman did desert and that was a very big offence at that time in the military. He also was representing himself as an officer…another very big issue with the military. This is the post war (WWII) era and consequences for doing these things were grave. This is not over!
"I think it is significant that Don's ex wife told her politician husband about the whole identity mess."

No, she did not. All she did was tell him that she'd been visited by some G-men (or some sort of men), asking questions about Don's history. She definitely did not share with Henry any of Don's secret history. And then she told Henry that she didn't want them to have secrets from each other!
Oh, concerning Don and the G-men...The statements on the form for the background check were not true, and even in the 1960's lying to the feds was a big deal.
Wow what an episode!

Poor Lane. His father is Total Monster Supreme in a series whose subtitle should be "Men Behaving REALLY Badly -- And The Women Who Put Up With Them."

Joan indeed has grace -- again. She was very nice to the woman in the abortionist's office -- even lying by claiming she has a 15 year-old daughter.

Don's anxiety attack shows once again (as if we needed reminding) what a Fuck Great Actor John Hamm is.

As for his character, no sooner was I thinking "Faye's a treasure, Don -- don't fuck this one up." when he starts giving Megan the Eye.

Losing "Lucky Strike" is a real blow to the company, though they won't learn of it for awhile. Does this mean they can hire Sal back?
A moot point if the company goes south as a result of Lucky taking a powder.

Things were so dire I was expecting those Beatles tickets wouldn't come through for Sally. But they did.
Just had a flash of insight (perhaps?) ... after reading the comments about Don's military desertion/identity switch dilemma that has been building up this past episode (an understatement!), and the tightening of the proverbial screws at SCDP after Don/Pete's disastrous decision to jettison a $4 M account at the same time that Lucky Strike has cut them loose.

My theory: What if the gov't and military do find out about Don and it turns out that Don's punishment for this deceit is sending him to Vietnam to complete a year's tour of duty?? What if that's the twist Weiner is slyly hiding for the end of season?

I could see this working on so many levels - it takes Don full-circle to where he started his life as "Don Draper" and maybe coming to terms with his past, his lies, and the truth about himself. He might even decide to do this (if given a choice) as a way to negotiate with National Aviation, as a sacrifice to save SCDP after screwing them so royally with trying to selfishly save himself at the expense of the firm and its employees.

After serving in Vietnam he would finally feel he has "earned" his place in life and can move forward with a clear (or clearer) conscience. The question of course is (knowing the horrors of that war), does he even come back a whole man? Or half a man (i.e. wounded)? What does SCDP do in the meantime, in his absence? Does someone else rise to take his place (i.e. Peggy or Pete), either temporarily or permanently? Will he have to fight his way back in to the firm at that point?
If crises can reduce the proud to beggars, can it raise the humble to triumph? What accounts for the incessant shifts of power that drive a culture into metamorphosis? What is the clandestine web of understandings that creates a hierarchy, that creates relationships, and how does disclosure of the truth change everything? Swimming in a sea of lies, where does anxiety creep in to the soul, and how does one seek release from that?

All these questions occurred to me as I watched “Hands and Knees”, and though I think they are relevant to all the major storylines in this episode, I only want to address Don’s arc here.

If one swims in a sea of lies, then the greatest fear, but also greatest relief, is of being found out. The truth is dangerous precisely because it creates deviations from the way we want people to perceive us; but if we are willing to accept a new identity, then the full recognition of the truth by all is the only real cure for the psychological burden of secrets.

Don’s panic attack is a painful and harrowing loss of control in a man whose fetish for mastery makes him at times seem invulnerable. The severity of his reaction arose from the perception that his entire self was about to be obliterated; not physically, but in every other part that counts. Weiner’s principal thematic concern throughout Mad Men is undoubtedly identity, and what Don dreads here is the death of just that. He’s been inching with increasing comfort towards openness but this episode sharply reminds us that his personal growth is not enough to excuse him in the impersonal eyes of society. The government, the super secret agency which allows America’s Dons to do business, hypocritically doesn’t take kindly to being deceived. (They're very happy, for example, to leave the word "bomb" out of any discussions of what they do, but incensed if someone fills out a form wrong).

Pete wryly remarks that “people do care”, an ironic personal vindication for him since he was shot down in his attempt to black mail Don by Cooper, who asked him, ‘who cares?” Well in the free market, if you’re making money, nobody cares. But not every facet of our existence is determined by the market. There is a resilient strain of belief in our culture that one must be consistent with one’s past, and that one must be absolutely honest about origins and identity. Don is to be held to those formalities and likely dishonored, though the people around him that respect him do so not misguidedly. What matters about a person other than “the room they are currently in”? Not much, other than the fact that we are loathe to trust those who keep from us the truth. Though we may be so eager to shed the unwanted parts of ourselves, it is quite difficult to earn trust, and thus closeness, and thus contentment, if our method of shedding those parts is to simply misdirect others.

Don is groping towards this insight but unable to fully embrace it. Coming correct with the truth to Faye is a big step, but his wistful glance at the end towards his secretary reminds us that Don’s method of reducing his anxiety normally involves the pursuit of novelty and hedonism. He wants her badly because he knows to possess her would sweep away his fears and replace them with pure joy in the crucial moments we call now. Such a dilemma: to know that what’s in front of you could take away all your problems, only to create even more down the road. He’s stuck between short-term and long-term thinking.

The reminder of the Beatles craze evokes this same tension as it unfolds in society. The lies of the past are too much; the young are not going to play that game any more. They are going to chase down their desires, and damned be those who stand in their way. There’s no better methods ever devised by a culture to forget a set of problems than sex, drugs, and rock n roll. But is it a real solution to emotional problems to decide that no pleasure is off the table?

Note that Sally is very cold to Don before he presents his gift: she is reluctant to talk to him and then initially gives him the silent treatment - understandable given last week’s blowup. What is especially interesting is that Don instantly wins her back wholeheartedly with the Beatles tickets. The youthful and rebellious sexual charisma of the Beatles is being presented as a stand-in for Don’s love, at the same time as it is a power, (the power to allow freedom), that he wields to keep her loyal. It is the delivery of pure ecstasy; the radical novelty of the Beatles is a “calamine lotion” that Don relies on to sooth over the aches and pains in Sally’s life. As usual, the market comes up with something out of the blue to distract everyone from the real problems that are likely to persist - but damn if it doesn’t feel good to indulge.

The ending of this episode is crucial. Faye and Don have certainly taken positive steps in their relationship, but Don is at a point where he is unsure about what he really wants. Her exit from his office directly parallels Joan’s from Roger’s at the episode’s start, in which they pause at the door to feign a professional conversation to cover over the fact of their personal relationship. Doors popping up symbolically throughout this season, I think it significant that such theatrics take place at the divide between personal space and the wider office. The point is that Don is still ambivalent about living out in the open, and his failure to reconcile the truth of his life with his work persona will continue to plague him.

Note also the purpose of Megan in this episode. She is an ambivalent, angelic symbol of the redemptive transformation about to explode on the cultural consciousness. Last week, she said to Sally that “It will be OK”, to which Sally answered, “No it won’t”. This week she says to Don, after handing him the Beatles tickets, “You see? Everything worked out” Don says yes, but his face says otherwise: we know that the company is on the brink of collapse, that lies still permeate Don’s relationships. As he lays the tickets on his desk, the Beatles song “Do You Want To Know A Secret?” bubbles up as he looks with curious wistfulness as Megan prepares her face to hit the town. What secret does he want to tell her? To tell the world?

Crises were dominant in this episode, and Don’s behavior could be aptly described as Meditations in an Emergency. I think if Don were to tell the world his real secret, it would mimic parts of that pensively candid book:

I am always looking away.
Or again at something after it has given me up. It makes me
Don had *not* been flagged. That's what Pete told Don (as confirmed by the subtitles), which is why Don sighed in relief. By turning down the NAA account, Don halted the background check, eliminating the near-certainty that someone who knew Don's real identity would blow his cover. Remember, we know who Don has told -- but we don't know who *they've* told. (And neither does Don, which is why he had every reason to be puking his guts out about that uncertainty.) And Don doesn't know who the DOD might contact who actually did know the real Draper.

Speaking of secrets, there's one hanging out there that no one seems to have mentioned. Don knows the slimy, amoral Lee Jr. is gay. Roger doesn't know that, and since he hasn't told anyone Lucky Strike is out -- and losing their account *will* kill the company, since SCDP has been billing them for overhead -- Don has no reason to bring it up yet. If Don's backed into a corner, it will be interesting to see what he does with that information. But I think Lee Jr.'s debasement of Sal is going to snap back right in his smug, a-hole face. He really didn't think this through, did he?
(sorry, cut off)

I am always looking away.
Or again at something after it has given me up. It makes me
Hmmm, I seem to be having trouble posting these quotes.
Let me try again:

I am always looking away.
Or again at something after it has given me up. It makes me
restless and that makes me unhappy, but I cannot keep them still.

I've tried love, but that holds you in the
bosom of another and I'm always springing forth from it like
the lotus - the ecstasy of always bursting forth

It is easy to be beautiful; it is difficult to appear so. I
admire you, beloved, for the trap you've set. It's like a final chapter no one reads because the plot is over

- Frank O'Hara, excerpts from Meditations in an Emergency
Count me among those who think Joan did NOT go through w/the abortion. What would this have been - her third?

Like someone else here has stated (and beat me to it!), that little waiting room scene was all about Joan's ticking bio-clock. It's not about her having a 15 year old somewhere; it's about Joan wondering if she will soon be "too old" to conceive another child.

Remember - this was the mid-60s and as women went over that hump of age 25 onward to 30 (and beyond) they were considered pushing it for a "first" child (though we know of Joan's previous abortions). Hell, they were pushing it for any child after age 30!

In the 60s, I recall a neighbor's mom who had a baby at age 39 (married, her fourth) and it was considered a "change of life baby." I overheard her tell my mother that she "didn't think" she and her husband could still have kids at that age!

Anyway, back to Joan, she was affected by the young girl heading into the doctor's office for the procedure, she remembered what Roger had said about telling Greg it was his child, and that's why we have that nice shot of Joan booking it back home on the bus. This entire arc was built for this purpose: Joan is going to have a baby, and Roger is the father.

Greg, for me, is such a weak link in this series. There is simply no chemistry between Joan and Greg (the actors, that is), and we're always led to believe that Greg will go to Vietnam and die there. His character and storyline are nearly non-existent. But if he served as Joan's Last Chance for Married Life, so will this baby serve as Joan's Last Chance at Motherhood. But frankly, I wish they would kill off the character as expected.

One more thing. I've pretty much had it with puking scenes in films. At least we didn't see Don unload the contents of his stomach on camera, unlike mainstream films or even cartoons. And, it was integral to the scene and to the character, unlike...well, you get the point.
Great recap and interesting comments so far.

As was just noted, the DOD agents had yet to put a red flag on Don, according to Pete's source. Pete said something that sounded like "YOU HAVn BEEN FLAGGED" I had to consult the closed captions, too. Wonder if the ambiguity was deliberate? It fit with Don's ambiguous slumping sigh of a reaction.

I think the Lucky Strike heir (pot who calls kettle black Lee Garner Jr) is safe from being blackmailed by anyone from the ad agency over his groping of Sal. There were no witnesses, and it isn't something a businessman would threaten a client with.

Lane's dad is a thug. Definitely Old School, eh?
I don't think it will be Lee Jr.'s groping of Sal in itself that makes him vulnerable. It's the fact that he's gay. And reckless about it. It would be easy for Don (or Roger, who surely harbors a seething hatred for Lee Jr.) to lure him into, as they would have said in 1965, a compromising situation.

The very fact that I think this is what's going to happen makes it far less likely. I can never guess where this show is going, and that's one of its extreme pleasures. But Weiner *has* said Sal is going to return, though I'd much rather he didn't telegraph any information about future episodes.
Another thing I believe is over: Joan's marriage. If she were going to stay with this man, I think she might have had the baby and simply not told Roger. I'm looking forward to this guy coming home in a casket, or being the victim of a lot of pent up anger when Joan finally reaches her limit. Makes me think that speech a couple of weeks back about not caring about the men coming home from dead from the war was not just about the boys in the office.
"It isn't something a businessman would threaten a client with."

Except that he's not a client. And SCDP is teetering on the edge. So if they can't find a way to bring Lucky Strike back, they won't be businessmen either.

And I wanted to clarify that I don't think Don or Roger will use themselves as bait for Lee Jr. (Ewwww.) But there could be many ways to set him up and blackmail him.
Hey all, glad you're having such a great discussion! Didn't get a chance to get back online and respond until now.

Catch-all comments for points several people raised: As others have clarified, it IS a huge deal that Dick Whitman deserted the Army before he was officially discharged. The military sends you to Leavenworth for that. (As I recently told a 20something who thought it might be a job option he could ditch if he didn't like it, you don't get to just leave the military when you feel like it!) He's also committed fraud by assuming another man's identity, and that would be a separate civilian criminal case. So he's in double trouble and is right to feel panicked when the feds start checking into him. Also, I heard the guy tell Betty he was a "special agent" (which is an FBI term for their field agents) and then introduce the guy with him as being from DoD -- so I think we have one of each (which makes sense for this kind of thing), but both are Feds. I noticed that the MM characters used varied descriptions for the guys -- as being FBI or DoD. Finally I watched twice and was sure Pete told Don he had been flagged, but I didn't check the captioning but trusted my ear (as a side note, I do find the captioning is very occasionally wrong. but not often). Either way, it makes sense that Don wanted to abort the process before it went any further. OK, on to specific responses:

Steven, I agree that it's good when the characters are multi-dimensional and do things we might not expect. I was especially glad to see Betty acting happy (when Don called about the Beatles tix) and then helping Don -- although you and others are right that it would have been a big risk to her (and to Henry by association) if the truth had come out, so it was selfish on her part, too.

Illovox, I think the "false front" is a good observation. It's certainly been a recurring theme of the series and highlighted in several episodes. The degree to which that was true of even ordinary people (not just Draperesque imposters) is to me one of the cultural points that the show makes about the era. Lots of hiddenness vs. today. I like your point about Megan at the end -- that seems a very likely double meaning to the shot (I still think Don's also sizing Megan up as a potential wifey). And I meant to mention Roger's Rolodex scene, so I'm glad you brought it up -- it's funny (esp as he begins looking for his next target the minute he hears this one is dead, while continuing to commiserate with the wife) but also a very nice symbol of the "old way" of doing things, and that all he has to offer are literal dead ends.

Brian, I was going to use "Life goes on" for the final tagline to this post but it seemed a bit too on the nose. I find Joan often says or implies a similar sentiment. She is a survivor - of what we're not sure yet, but we do know that about her. And I missed Peggy, too.

Dante, thanks for the "F" inventory. I wasn't sure but it really hit me as unusual when Roger came out with it and only more so since AMC bleeped it out!

Jill, Roger was really an ass about the baby. I think he showed his true colors. If he was really in love with her, he would have seized the moment to at least offer to be with her if that's what she wanted. I think he equivocated himself right out of her life.

Chuck, I'm not alone in heartily disliking Greg. It's funny how seeing a guy rape his fiancee will turn you against him. Call me unforgiving, but there it is. As for Joan's staying with him - - I've also criticized her for that.

Shelley, I think it's very likely they'll do the blackout - it was a huge event and I'm betting it figures in the season finale or the episode before that. At least we know Joan won't get pregnant during it (as many women supposedly did)! And I agree -- more Bert, please!!

Bluestocking, Joan has told her doc that she's had 2 abortions. I think the main reason she can't go to him is she's told him that she and Greg are trying to get pregnant. To come to him now would make it clear that the baby's not Greg's. She doesn't want her regular doc to know that kind of thing about her.

Zanelle, I can see Joan having an abortion (especially a safe one as she had) and going back to work the next day but I also think it's very likely she didn't go through with it.

Tennessee, good observations about how Pete is stronger than Roger and also about the class system in Britain. I agree about the issues you highlight that are on the rise, especially the military industrial complex. I hope they don't lose the latter as a storyline entirely, since it's such a potent and important one.

Crunchy, I didn't talk about Sally and the Beatles because it seemed a small counterpoint to the main issues in the episode, but I also thought it was very cute that she gave the full Beatles fan girl scream. it was very authentic!

Adele, I don't think there's any doubt Joan's pregnant. She knows the signs and the doc Roger takes her to presumably confirms it before he does the referral. I did think the pregnancy was a bit pat (and I suspected it would happen when I saw that sex scene with her and Roger) but even MM sometimes is predictable (and so is life, for that matter). It is interesting that you didn't want to re-watch it. I haven't found the last 2 episodes as compelling as they usually are, either. Hope there's a strong finish coming in the last few eps....

Damon, I could absolutely see Peggy as the hero. And I loved your 60's style lyric-comments!

Suzanne, I do stay up all night writing. Usually till 4:30 or 5!

Abra, well of course I was being sly! And I think that's a great observation about Lane sending Toni ahead -- I thought that was rather odd, myself. Although maybe he just meant for her to wait outside for him.

Laure, it always seemed a bit odd to me that there was no mention of the real Don's parents or family either - after all, Anna's not a blood relative. And no guilt on Don/Dick's part about grief of his parents. Seems rather tidily avoided, plot-wise.

Readwillet, I think Lane's father was more bothered by other stuff than Toni's race, too. Mostly I think he wanted to get Lane back under his control, and was really pissed when Lane said, "I've moved on." Uh-hunh. You don't say that to this guy. And as I said above, I missed Peggy, too!

Seajane, I burst out laughing when Trudy came out, too. She looked like a Hostess snowball (isn't that what they call those pink confections?). As for Joan telling Roger, I think she wanted to see what he'd say but also needed a referral to another doc who would help her since she couldn't go to her own (per comment above).

Rocky, good point that the real Don might have done things that would be problematic. But see my first comment for why there's trouble for this Don even if he didn't!

Nick, I also wondered if Faye would use her father's connections to help Don. Might still happen, although I don't know how far the Mafia reached into the FBI and DoD, esp in regard to national security issues. As for it not being "dead babies" - they aren't at that point in Vietnam yet. And it would have been considered a very big deal in 1965 to have done what he did.

FWJ, thanks for being one of the folks to clarify that very point!

Fairharbor, excellent point that Betty is being deceptive while saying she doesn't want secrets -- in itself, a lie!

David, I also think Don's a fool if he dumps Faye for Megan. Faye has her flaws, but she seems on Don's level. Megan seems too child-like to me -- a brunette Betty/Bethany.

Scheherezade, I never heard of the military sending people to war so many years after desertion! Seems highly unlikely to me -- prison would be the punishment instead. I also don't think MM would go in that direction, plotwise. But we'll see...!

Ryan, great insights as always and thanks especially for the quotes from O'Hara! I've never read that book.

John, re Lee Jr -- I think Roger was alluding to his being gay when he said he'd lied for him many times. But I doubt they have evidence against him, and that's what it would take to blackmail such a rich and powerful guy. And remember, Lee's father is incapacitated, so it's not like they can threaten to tell Daddy and humiliate him - -and that's assuming Daddy would believe the ad men vs. his own son, who would deny all. I don't think they have a move there.

Sharfor, I was a kid in that era and my parents married late for that age -- they were 32 and 34. My mother had me at 43. And yes, it was unusual, although not unheard of, for women to have kids in their 40's. (I was also called a change of life baby.) It was less biological than social -- people married so much younger and so had their kids earlier. We know Joan's in her early 30's, and you're right that that would seem a lot older then than now.

Glen, I'm really going to have to check this flagged quote since you and others heard it differently!
Great episode. Thanks for the wrap up. It crossed my mind about Joan too. She looked like she'd just come from getting a facial, not an abortion.

I'm probably being shallow here but everything else aside, I loved little Sally's scream when Daddy Don promises to take her to the Beatle's concert. He better make the date!

At least as a result Don's recent identity crisis complication, we got to see him get out of that constricting corporate costume and into a brando-style white t-shirt. (Being shallow again, I know).

I don't think it's gonna be the end of SCDP -- otherwise we'd have no show -- but the times-they-are-changin' for sure.
Jared Harris has created such a complex, endearing and credible character that the violent scene with his father was especially disturbing to watch. Everyone suffered in this episode except Sally, who (finally) got a special day with her Dad AND John, Paul, George and Ringo!

Nelle & co are explore the show's juicy symbolism with insight, but sometimes a cigar is just a cigar and Heather makes some valid points. The more the merrier, I say.

For me, the episode was stressful to watch and actually gave me bad dreams. I hope they lighten it up a bit, cause I'm still gonna watch it!
I don't think Lane and his girlfriend are getting enough time. I so very much loved how ordinary they were. It made a bigger impact than Kinsey and his girlfriend (oh look everybody, look how non-racist I am. I'm dating a black girl and we're going to Selma).

He was living his life as though every action is some sort of political statement. Granted a lot of decisions are. Most aren't. Most people are just living day to day. Lane isn't dating Toni to make a political statement. He's dating her because she looks pretty good in a bunny suit and seems very well-spoken and thoughtful (like any other girl).

Peggy is the same way. She's not working at SCDP expressly for gender equality. She's working to get paid. And that's what's important. She's like every other woman in that time (and now). And Lane is doing more to improve race relations by just being boring than Kinsey was doing (he was so out-of place there not that voter drives were unimportant just pretty sure he was dead weight on that trip).
I forgot a part of my thought. They (Peggy and Lane & Toni) made such a statement by just being that they didn't need to say "hey look at me. Look how interesting and unique I am." Lane treated his girlfriend like his girlfriend and not some symbol or trophy that needed to be recognized as such.
I must disagree with the various interpretations of Megan. Commenters repreatedly have tried pigeonhole either Sally or Peggy as the symbol of "The Sixties". Sally is too young. She will be 12 during the Summer of Love. Peggy is too old. She will be in her late twenties by then. the hippie era really didn't manifest until a year or two later than that.

Megan seems to be the It Girl of the Mod Era. It is fascinating how much her character resonates with our book club given the relatively small amount of screen time and the relative unimportance of her character to the plot or even character development. Yet, I confess that I see her as a rising character also.

The final shot of her framed by a doorway (so many doors in this season) is not one of being the object of Don's lust. First of all, he really is a good fit with Faye, and he knows it. Second, he has not made any kind of advance toward. I would further argue that this is just not his MO. Save for the mistake with Alison, Don just doesn't mess with the hired help. That would be a wekaness (and was with Alison).

No, when Don is looking at Megan, he is looking at the future, and the future is NOW. As I wrote earlier, unitl now this season has been about letting go of the past. Throughout the season, commenters have been complaining about a lack of focus on the coming Sixties, and for good reason. My hunch is that Weiner has teased us to the end only to wallop us all at once with the future that has just been out of reach from us and the charactors.

So at the end, we watch don mired in his past and The Past. Just on the other side of the door is Megan; beautiful, young Megan; with her stylish 1965 clothes and hair; powdering her nose and painting her lips for a night out; so near yet unaccessible; not facing Don or showing her back but in profile and smewhat backlit.

The question is, "Can Don escape the past and go through the door into The Sixties?" Well, of course he can, and of course he will. But damned if I know how. It will be fun watching though.
Tennessee,

I'm a fan of your comments always, and here's no different. I'm not sure I'm convinced we're in disagreement though. I also think that it is unlikely Don will make an advance towards Megan, but I think that moment in which he sees her is full of tension because there is a very real part of him that desires what she represents.

For me, the scene draws a parallel to the children's Maypole pageant in the 2nd episode of season 3, in which Don first sees the ravishing beauty of his child's teacher and becomes lost in reverie. The difference is that this time I think he will be able to hold back the compulsion to seduce her, precisely because his truthful relationship with Faye will anchor him.

I would also agree with you that in that moment there's a feeling of the past being left behind and a latent choice of accepting the inevitable future being made. There's a radical freshness and beauty to it, exemplified by Megan, that is infinitely alluring to a mindset like Don's whose life "only goes in one direction: forwards".

That aspect of radical iconoclasm is one of the most intriguing aspects of the show for me. Mad Men demonstrates new culture being produced, not simply old forms being rehashed, (backing up to see the forest, it is also an example of radical cultural expression in our own times). It seems to me the be one of the greatest qualities our culture has: the willingness to abandon traditions in favor of creativity; the boldness to follow one's impulses and desires in a never-ending process of creative destruction.
Great discussion here but I wanted to add a comment about Pete's ascendancy. Earlier he'd stared down his FIL to get the whole account. Now Don is beholden to him, even sticking up for him when Roger berates him.

So both Don & Roger are vulnerable, Lane doesn't bring in accounts and what the hell is Bert doing with his time? I can't imagine Pete just rolling from success to success so it'll be interesting to see how Don (probably) bounces back. And does Roger have any gas in the tank? He's got one month to save himself and maybe SCDP too.
I'm late to the table here, but also want to echo my suspicions re: Joan having her abortion. I just wasn't convinced but I guess the last few episodes will be telling.

As for Betty and the Feds, I agree that it's in her best interests not to say anything to them or Henry. However, Betty's life is now complicit with Don's secret. She may have divorced Don/Dick but she's now unwittingly married to his secret, joining him in that particular closet, as it were. And since Don has been flagged, who's to say that anyone is going to be able to pull that particular plug, even if Pete dumps the account. This could also come back to bite Betts.

Finally, I was so relieved that those Beatles tickets arrived. I couldn't bear to see poor Sally crapped on yet again.
Nelle, for the record, I'm over 60 and was a teenager during the time Mad Men is taking place. It was unusual - and generally gossiped about - for women to have any children over the age of 30, not that they didn't, of course. To have a child over 40 - well, as a "change of life baby" I'm sure your folks heard it all. :)

Joan's still pregnant. Otherwise, no need for any of those scenes with her this week. She looked as if nothing had happened because nothing had happened - other than her realization that she wanted to keep this child no matter what the outcome.

Roger, most likely, is incidental to her decision. Also, I do wonder from time to time if Slattery will be around for the entire series - if they kill off his character, Mad Men could take a few interesting turns.
As a P.S., I'd like to add that it was interesting to see the tables turned on both Roger and Don, with the former having to endure a tongue lashing from the doctor and both having to beg, from Lee and Pete respectively.
Tennessee and Ryan, I'm completely with you on the Megan thing. I said that I thought Don's glance was wistful, rather than lustful. Not that he wouldn't find her attractive (who wouldn't?), but at that moment, I think he saw in her youth and beauty and an unencumbered future -- an unencumbered future, which at her age, he never had.

We all get so involved in discussing The Deeper Meaning that I often forget about giving acting props -- Jon Hamm was as good last night as he's ever been, as was Christina Hendricks. Christina said so much with just her eyes. And I hope Jared Harris' leave of absence isn't permanent. I love to see him in every episode.

And Nelle, after all the comments, I think I'm ready to watch "Hands and Knees" again. I found the episode extremely uncomfortable, but not uncompelling.

For the record, when I was sixteen, I had a chance to see the Beatles at Comiskey Park in Chicago AND attend their press conference (a friend's uncle headed up the booking agency that brought them into Chicago). Instead I opted for a folk concert, which was taking place the same night. I really wanted to see Phil Ochs and Judy Collins. I think I had a better time at the folk concert, being a serious teenager, but I've always regretted not being a part of history.
Would be really ironic if the Japanese end up rescuing Roger and the company via the Honda account. I didn't notice if someone already said that. (I might have been too busy shopping for t-shirts via the spam posts--just the place you want to turn for all shopping needs.)
Enjoyed the entertainment aspect of this episode and the storyline momentum. Madmen, however, is built on its ability to have its audience suspend rational thinking as a result of its superior writing and character development. The dynamics of this episode forced the rational mind to come into play and revealed some weaknesses. Would Don, with his poor education and very rustic upbringing, really have been able to morph into this suave, almost preppy corporate titan with a few years in Manhattan and a job at a fur store? The DoD panic forces us to question the plausibility of his story and therefore the premise of this series.

The women also bear closer scrutiny. Joan is meant to be appealing and admirable because of her strength and dignity at such a difficult historical juncture for women. However, here we see her as she really is. An aging adultress, totally reliant and defined by her relationship with men. She must be making a decent salary, why would she not go to school at night to kill all of that free time she has now that Greg is gone? Why would she not travel? Where are her girlfriends? Why should we admire her? She sacrifices herself for idiotic men hoping they will do the right thing with her. She is pathetic.

Faye is a supposedly brilliant social strategist and predictor of human behavior and yet she totally capitulates to a barely concealed sociopath because he is hot? As if! To top it all off, he has been totally giving her the brushoff since he slept with her and she keeps coming back for more. He will ditch her for the younger and more beautiful Megan, because that is what guys like Don do, and she will lose it. Predictable.

Megan can afford to be dumb and compliant. As an early twenty-something beauty she will get whatever she wants from everybody. She will be as cooed at as a newborn baby. What is there to make her bitter or calculating or impatient? We all remember Betty at the start of the series?? She will be completely unarmed to face what is coming her way after thirty unfortunately and we all know where that ends. Her youthful benevolence and innocence to those of us who know this should be sad and frustrating rather than cute.

The much maligned Betty deserves a second look. What would really have happened if she had stayed with Don? She would drink herself into a stupor every day with Bobby and Sally watching the whole time. Eventually they would have discovered their father to be a hideous philanderer and would have come to despise him as well. The kids may not be loved properly but they are maintained, educated, fed and have some structure in which to develop into somewhat functional human beings thanks to Betty's decision to get away from Don. Her decision to marry the equally pathetic Henry was really the only option she had in her eyes. Our rational side knows this but may not like it. This episode proves that while she may be emotional, petulant, bitter and impatient, she is not a sociopath like her ex.

Trudy is meant to be annoying I think and her nightie proved it!

Otherwise, a great springboard for what is to come in the next episode.
Watched late last night and immediately sought out your analysis and comments following. Missed Peggy, thought Jon Hamm was breathtaking last night, his face as he lay in bed after his anxiety attack a perfect kabuki mask of misery. (check it out..he must have consciously contorted his face because it was too perfect).

Faye's a goner. She too eagerly jumped right into Fixit Mom. (we all know how that goes.) Deathblow to their almost relationship. Hello Meagan which doesn't thrill me. I don't want to witness this again, another dalliance with a secretary who ends up with a pink slip in her pay envelope.

Sally would be happy though, so maybe this one might be a keeper should Don remain Don the womanizer. Meagan is too eager to please, too much like Bets probably was when they first married.

Joan and Roger are a tragic love story. I will hate it if they continue being star crossed and tragic. I'm too much the modern romantic. I want them to grab one another and run. We've seen Roger with two women other than his first wife. He picked the wrong one. He and Joan were perfect. And sadly, they still are.

Is Joan still pregnant? Probably not but if she is, that wouldn't surprise me. Today we want to see a woman take control. Years ago though, the only control we could wrestle for ourselves was to earn a really good living and use the money to further our enjoyment of life. Advancement was determined by whatever ceiling was in place and our ability and/or desire to ram through it.

Ideally, the solution for me would be the scuttle Roger and pregnant Joan and he run off to Never Never Land and set up another office for the agency. Maybe in CA. These things happen.

Somehow though, Joan is too neat, too much the chief managing tidy-er up-er...I can't visualize her in maternity clothes next season, the producers padding her body. It's too much a part of the plot, that formidable form in body hugging knits presenting itself in someone's office.

I thought the entire episode was sad. I don't think they're going to scuttle the agency. The players are too hungry and way too strong. Theyre THISCLOSE to landing the big big big account. I feel it. But if they don't, as always, support staff heads will fly and they may have to move downtown (but as I recall that didn't happen until the late 80s...the downtown/village agency thing). Maybe the Hollywood guy will bring in a big surprise. His presence has been scarce but they're letting us know he's a player in CA. Well no matter, this show isn't going anywhere. They're just hitting their stride and whatevers coming, its going to be a hell of a ride, that's for sure.
thank the heavens for TIVO. now after reading all these comments I can go back and watch it again.
While I really like reading the comments here, I mostly come to shop for accessories.

Ryan and Adele, I agree with your comments about Megan. I forgot to state that as with most characters in this show, she probably is working symbolically on two, three or more levels at once.
I took an Amtrak train from Detroit to Chicago to see the Beatles in 1966. It was the most exciting day of my life up to that time. You just can't imagine what it was like -- a couple train cars of young girls anxiously anticipating this concert 2 hours there and a 2 hour trip back of pure heaven. Sally is a lucky girl!

Of course 2 years later I took the same train to demonstrate at the Democratic convention . . .
@ seajane --My dad worked at a DoD contractor (Savannah River Nuclear Research Laboratory and Weapons Plant) in a small town from the early fifties until the 90s. The FBI did the background checks. We'd get visits about friends and neighbors who had applied for jobs at the Lab/Site.
JulyJames...seriously? That bad? The characters are that odious?

Ryan, I like the notion of Megan as "unfetteredness." Very good catch. After all the fetters Don had to swing through, and there she was, first calmly and willingly offering to be fired, because, after all, whatever awaits her after 8 has got to be the other way out the missing mouse had found, and secondly, prepping for the something more exciting than work awaiting her after 8! Remember also, this is the girl who is a natural beauty, whose mother taught her not to use soap or make-up in her beauty regimen, and there she was, putting on a face, not for work but for what came next!
I wanted to continue the conversation from last week, and my last contribution seems to have gone unexamined (is there a shelf life to these gatherings?), so I thought I'd recapitulate it all here, because I really hope not to be the last word on several of those subjects, and secondly I really like the poking at the nature and mechanics of art the discussion from all the way back then seems to be triangulating. (;)). So, with a deep breath...

"Illovox, I'm going to respond to your point (and in doing so, I apologize for not responding to others at this time) because your response that MM can't represent all types is not unique to you.

"Of course not. But that response is itself illogical (I'll use that term since you use it towards me) -- you're saying that because a work of art can't represent all types of women, men, secretaries, housewives, gays, etc that the types it does represent are meaningless except in terms of enjoying the particular story/narrative/plot."

So, you are saying that the characters of Mad Men or any story can represent all the characters you want them to represent. Only possible if you project your desires and needs upon them, which is the natural relationship of any art to its audience, but the problem in your review that I (and others) point to is that you are disappointed by what you find as you engage in that projection. You take issue with the writers for this disappointment, and I feel that it is illogical to do so, that in fact the cause of this disappointment is in the ill-chosen projection or schema you are trying to fit over the work. I made a good case for that notion, by selecting scenes and elements that contradict your assertions, and I point out that there are little to no events or moments in the work to support your assertions. Pretty logical to me. Now, instead of showing me support for your theses, you launch an anthemic philisophical position regarding what you think art can or can not do. Admirable, but disconnected from the argument at hand.

"I'm arguing that they do in fact have meaning, and that every artist makes choices in what they represent in their art, and that those choices affect us on many levels as consumers of that art --which is their very intent. But it's not exactly uncommon for that effect to be other than the artist intended."

Of course, completely common, because as viewers we bring our desires and preconceptions and hopes to the table. A good review discloses those and moves forward. Normally, in very subtle ways, you do that, but not this last week. This last post, you make assertions without supporting evidence and you express frustrations without taking your own expectations into account, then you blame the artists of the work for your feeling of disappointment.

"Perhaps this reflects a difference in how we see something like MM -- I do see it as art, and I believe art has enormous impact on people. Actually I think even mindless entertainment often does, too. (I also think the choices we make in how we communicate and act as individuals have stronger effects on others than many people do.)"

A difference as evidenced by what, and how would you know how I view art or communication or the effects of either, and why in the world would you assume my definitions are anything but dynamic? This last statement is, parden the vernacular, snooty, as in "I am justified in not having to support my arguments because of this foundational way I view things, which, by the way, is likely better than the way you view them because I am right and you are not, but I will not actually support my arguments."

"I'm not arguing that MM has to represent everything. I'm arguing that what it chooses to represent has an effect on the viewer."

But that is not the problem I point out. The problem is not that you want it to represent everything, but that you want it to reflect what you want.

"The creators of MM have stated that they wish to do precisely that, and they've been clear about wanting to represent a historical period with as much accuracy as possible, especially the experiences of women. If some people (like me) feel they are falling short of their stated intention, why is it a problem to state that? I'm not the one who has imposed that intention on them -- they have taken it on themselves."

You haven't made a good case that they fell short of any of that this week. You just expressed your own stereotypes and your disappointment that Mad Men failed to model those stereotypes.

"to Illovox:
“It is not a story of all America but a specific set of stories about some white folks in America and the world they saw, the actions they did, and the desires and issues they encountered. …We see of the black person or the Jew what these people see, and that is on purpose.”

"I had a blizzard of thoughts when I read this, and sinking emotions. Do we know that this was “on purpose,” or just a mistake?"

We know it is on purpose because Wiener et al have clearly stated such intentions and perameters in several commentaries. That such a self-imposed limitation leaves you disappointed is not a failing of the intention, nor, arguably, of the work itself. Clearly millions of viewers and the Emmy committees agree.

"If the writers are trying to create a drama that will engage all of us in 2010, I’d argue it was…a mistake. In fact, a flaw."

But they are not trying to engage "all" of us, only those of us who are engaged by what they are doing. To see work that expresses what you want to see, either write your own stories with those characters or seek other work. Certainly that all we see of minor characters is limited is also a function of their being minor characters. For example, we know as little of Megan's life as of the Elevator Mans life in the earlier episodes. The same is true in life--we can not know all people fully--there just is not enough time in the world to fulfill such an expectation. That is not a failing, bigotry, or even "sad," it's just the nature of life.

"To me, it is frightening to think that we would be asked as viewers in 2010 to see everything through the eyes of the privileged white folks in 1965 (privileged relative to black people, Jews, etc.) on the cast."

Well, then I guess you are to be frightened, but not because they are asking you to see "everything." The show, and indedd, any work, does not ask you to see everything, just what is presented. The rest you bring.

"It disturbs me to think that your meaning is that this is why it makes sense to present stick figure versions of black people and Jews, because that’s how the white folks saw them in those days."

Now you're putting words in my mouth. Firstly, there is a difference between "stick" figures and minor characters. Works of drama have them, such is a fact of life--to rail against the limitation of minor characters is to pen "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead." Stoppard brought a sense of humor to the effort and he doesn't make disparaging remarks about Shakespeare in the process, so please, don't call me names for pointing out the obvious. Im pretty sure that as the primary characters experience more of the world than their sheltered limitations can hold, the more we will see ethnic characters emerge with more body and time.

"Part of me agrees with some part of this, the part of me that knows that each viewer chooses whom they identify with. But some of us are going to naturally identify with the characters that are black people and Jews, the moment that character comes on the screen. I’m guessing that some of the old John Wayne westerns were showing women as John Wayne viewed them, but guess what? Everyone else during that era viewed them that way as well. Now, in 2010, I think I expect a retro drama depicting the stresses and strains of a much earlier era (the era in which I came of age) to depict the complexity of that era. Because the fact is, all the people from black to white to Jew and beyond were complex then, and all of them are complex now."

All this goes without saying, I think. That real people are complex is true, and I don't need a reminder, thank you, but the show has less than 60 minutes a week to tell its story. It centeres on Don and his supporting cast at the agency and at home. If you want to see a show of ethnic characters in the same time and space, create the show and pitch it to AMC. I would watch it. I want a story about Jews...I read "Kavalier and Clay" and I want more, so I start writing my own...that's the way of the world. Time is limited. Can only do so much. Ask any cancer patient. Oh wait, I'm a cancer patient. Ask me... ;)

"If the writers want us to see and feel the “reality” of the white folks, good acting between believable, dramatic characters is the way to do it."

And I feel that's exactly what they are doing. Please prove otherwise.

"I’d much rather believe that the writers of this episode simply made a mistake in drawing the character of Sally’s “nanny” in earlier episodes, and of the black mugger as they did, and even in deciding the mugger would be black. To believe the writers of MM want to show us a cartoon figure each time they introduce a black or a Jew among the white people is disappointing, at best.

"Teyuna"

You're choosing to believe that, and it seems, based on poor evidence, or at least, you have not made a good case to me that they made a mistake or failed in any way.

I like these characters, and no less because I know there are also blacks and Jews and other women and other men whose stories are not being told in this show. I just wish there more writers of the caliber that jot this one down, covering all those other folks we see too little of on the screen, but then I tune to BET and see what I can find. And if I can't find it on TV, I remember I can walk to the neighborhood pub and strike up a conversation with whoever I might want to and hear another story right there. That's life in these United States, no?
I loved the commentary but can't believe the comments, the intensity and the length! Wow.
Weiner will have to tip toe around ID theft and impersonating an officer during war time. Justice would be swift. Just the fact that the agency is dropping their potentially largest account would be a red flag for any FBI agent worth his salt.

I was disappointed that he told Faye his secret. I think he should have groveled more to Betty for protection and her expressing concerns about aiding and abetting a federal crime. But then again proud Betty is naive about many things and just the thought of scandal trumps reality.

It was nice seeing Betty's joy at Sally's reaction to the tickets and her insistence Sally show gratitude. If anything, Betty does have class.

Once Lindsay loses the election, Henry will be pounding the pavement. What will Betz do then? She married the man for reasons of financial security and status but respects him as much as the man she had a one night stand with. (Guess that wasn't too classy...)

I'm kind of relieved Lucky Stike dumped them - that guy gave me the creeps. Doing anything for money sometimes ends up with nothing to show for except disgrace. Roger lacks character and for him to beg this clown for anything on 'hands and knees' is befitting.
Sad that Joan cares about him but at the same time knows him compeletely, rarely surprised by anything he's done or will do.

I kind of wonder about the abortion ever having taken place. Two secret abortions by leading characters? But then again how secret would it be once Joan started showing? Nah - she aborted the 'love child'.

Love the show - every episode.
In response to Illovox comment:

First of all, thanks for such a thoughtful precient comment. The quality of Nelle's commentary, comments such as yours and my post-show discussion with my daughter increase my MM experience by an order-of-magnitude or two.

As a part-time hobbyist painter, I am continually amused by the reaction of people to what I have created. To steal a phrase, I am modest about my skills because I have so much to be modest about. I paint because I enjoy doing it. If some one else likes or loves my creation, I am amused. If people do not like it, I am not surprised. So I am not emotional about the reaction of others to my art, only intellectually curious.

The interaction between the artist and his audience is fascinating. I have painted some things that even my best friends and family tell me sucks, only to have someone else fall in love with it and buy it. there are paintings I do not like that most people love, and vice versa.

The one thing that we can all agree on is that the intensity of the emotions in reaction to the previous episode is proof positive that MM is art. True art, especially performing art, forces an emotional and intellectual response. MM does this every week.

Illovox rightly points out that all artistic media are inherently limited. I must choose wood, paper or canvass; the size canvass; oil, acryllic or water color; the subject, the style (impresionism, abstract, etc.); color; and on and on. Performing arts are different one major respect. The artist asks the viewer to invest a great deal of time, emotion and hopefully intellect into his art. I only ask for the viewer to glance at my art. Then, he can stay as long as he wishes.

After nearly four years and four seasons, I would feel utterly betrayed if the cast and crew allowed MM to devolve into just another TV show and become something less than art. Specifically to MM, I would feel betrayed if the characters were not true to themselves or if the sorry was not true to the times.

I simply do not think Weiner, the cast and crew have done this, including the previous episode.

The recent dust up seems to center on the issue of the portrayal of women in this episode. I was a single father who raised a daughter, now 25. As I stated earlier, we discuss this show every Sunday night into the wee hours. It has been a godsend for us because enables us to have very thoughtful discussions about roles in the workplace and gender roles, and the changes of the past50 years. I cannot think of any other show or movie that presents a wider range of women the situations they inhabit.

I just hope that MM lasts for another 40 years, so I can have it as a vehicle for Sunday night talks with my daughter.
Jarred (Lane) Harris was just picked to play Prof. Moriarity in the next Robert Downey Jr. Sherlock Holmes movie, so his leaving could be connected with that.

I think some people are so used to Joan's stone faced demeanor that they're fooled that she could have a THIRD ABORTION and be so passive and everything-is-normal 1 day later!! That is a traumatic, life altering experience, and not even Joan could experience that on top of her loss (she hopes temporarily) of her husband, the mugging, her history with Roger, etc. and be so blase`, which is why I think she kept the baby.

One way I watch this series is observing how Dick Whitman created the persona of DON DRAPER in a way comparable to Clark Kent, farmer's boy, becoming Superman in Metropolis. Dick's 2nd identity is a mixture of a few facts with his fantasy of what a man of his time would feel is the ideal life. Each year, though, a layer of the fantasy is peeled away, and he's forced to become more Dick and less DON. Anna was his 'Ma Kent,' the woman who loved him unconditionally. Betty was like the early Lois Lane, in love with the Superman (he was too scared to even think of introducing her to Dick/Clark). His worst dream comes true, Betty learns the truth and goes for her next Superman, and now, what? Can he trust anyone new with the secret? On some level having Faye see him as Dick makes him relive the trauma of Betty finding out all over again, so emotionally he has to bail first!

I believe he'll end up with Megan, but what does she mean to him? Besides her growing importance in everything that effects his life, I wonder if the choice of the Beatle's song at the end hints at more than just the obvious other plots in this episode?
I promised myself I wouldn't write about last week. I'll just say I was peer pressured into it.

I absolutely love all the women on Mad Men. Exactly as they are written. They are facing the same decisions I do as a 25 year old woman in 2010. So these are universal questions.

Betty - she was conditioned from day 1 to be a trophy wife. If we took a time lapsed video of her life, every second would be filled with men stating how beautiful she is. Never once stating she is smart or nice. She was conditioned to keep looking good and to know enough about the world at large to be charming to her husband's associates. And that's ok.

Faye - she decided to have a demanding career and to not have children. Do not let us delude ourselves for a moment into believing that society at large would be ok with these decisions. Even today people are asking me (and my female friends) when we are going to have kids (I'm not even engaged) and that you're not a real woman if you don't have kids. The flip side to that is that I know I would not be able to have kids if I stay in my job. Last night I worked until 10:30 at the office. That would be neglectful. But Faye made that decision and refuses to step away from it. That take balls.

Peggy - still deciding which makes her facinating. Will she? Won't she? I hope (giddily) that she tries to have kids and a career. But she's still fumbling. As am I, and I don't have nearly the pressure she did to opt out of a career.

Joan - she is heart breaking. She is probably the smartest girl in the room. She knows she could have been Roger/Don/pick your successful male architype. But she can't. Because she's a woman. What makes it worse is that she gave up her youth in some sort of idealistic craze to gain power. So now she's 30 and just married. No kids. She failed as a woman. And knows it. That's why she married rapist-doctor. (Oh you married a doctor. How impressive).

I am thankful (daily) for the women these women represent. I am not bashing them. Just stating that they are making the best of bad outcomes in a world that won't let them "be." They allowed me to be. I may question my career decision (so when did it become a good idea to work 8am to 10pm) but at least it was my decision.

Ok. I'll tuck the soapbox under my cubicle desk if anyone else wants it.
Hi Georgia:
FYI: Joan's character WAS 30 in 1960 (she was outed on the company bulletin board), hence the pressure to marry that creep Greg, she is now 35 (in 1965).
Megan would be about 23 (remember the time Dr Faye wanted to gather all of the secretaries under 25 for that focus group?)
Sally Draper is appx 11 (born in 1954) And Peggy is 26.
Illovox, are you kidding me? Yes, this episode was not pleasant to women. Joan was screwed over by Roger, Faye was screwed over by Don, Trudy was lied to by Pete, Betty was pressured to lie and put herself into potential jeopardy in the future, Sally was almost lied too. Megan is another escape for Don. Another fantasy to distract him from this tenuous nature of the life he is living. If you want to call that a place of calm etc go ahead. Same bananas as escape.
Nelle, something you wrote caused me to think again, and watch again.

"But Faye’s helpfulness and understanding may backfire on her. After his confession, Don says he shouldn’t have told her and becomes noticeably cooler, putting off their next date, and not only not firing Megan for putting his life at risk, but looking at her longingly through the open door of his office."

OK, Megan did offer to be fired, but that would be an extreme and very questionable reaction on Don's part, and draw attention just where he didn't want it.

His reaction to having told Faye is entirely understandable. He puts himself and the firm in danger every time he lets someone else know his secret. There's no good way to open that box; even if he avoided jail time he would be exposed as a fraud, and the company would be scandalized. But I think the look he gave Faye at the end was one of connection, not rejection.

As for the last shot, and the Beatles song that played it out, there is an alternate interpretation. Megan asks if he needs her any more, he says no, she leaves but stands right outside his open door, putting on her lipstick, as the cue echoes, "Listen, do you want to know a secret... I'm in love with you." True, Don's a huge slut, but maybe Megan's in love with him, and he just realizes it then?
"Illovox, are you kidding me? Yes, this episode was not pleasant to women. "

The "episode" was not pleasant to women? The episode then had a motivation to do bad things to women? If that were the case, then why does the show go to such great lengths to spend time with them and show us their travails and frustrations? I think it's pretty clear that the show and thus the "episode" is fairly sympathetic to women, and bald-faced about showing what they endured in the '60's. Given that over 50% of the show's staff are women, are you also suggesting that they loath their own sex too?

"Joan was screwed over by Roger..." In what way? Roger can't read her mind, and she's hardly forthcoming in stating her needs because she believes that to do so is somehow beneath her. He's clearly being considerate, trying to to what's best for both of them, and had she simply said "I want to keep our baby," what might Roger have said or done? We don't know because it didn't happen. She initiated the sexual encounter, she said, "Don't stop," when he hesitated, and yet, as you berate Roger for only wondering if he loves her, we leave her unscathed for never once mentioning how she actually feels about him. A heck of a double standard of expectation. What should Roger have done differently?

"Faye was screwed over by Don..."

In what way, exactly? You clearly have some pre-conceptions regarding what Don should be doing with Faye, and somehow in "screwing" her "over," he has limited her in some grave way. What is that?

"Trudy was lied to by Pete..." Old news, and he has been treating her like a princess for years now. Additionally, we zip about her, so who knows what secrets she bears? Lastly, it's not like she exactly an equal partner...she does not work at all.

"Betty was pressured to lie and put herself into potential jeopardy in the future..." She was pressured? By whom? She didn't have a choice? And I seem to remember her boinking some stranger in a bar--puts her on pretty equal moral ground with Don, no?

"Sally was almost lied too..."

This is where your argument shows its seams, in that you erven blame men for things they didn't do. If she was "almost" lied to, that means she was not lied to, and yet, you accuse some man of being bad to her for not lying to her. What gives?

"Megan is another escape for Don. Another fantasy to distract him from this tenuous nature of the life he is living." Prove it. We've seen nothing to determine this notion.

"If you want to call that a place of calm etc go ahead." Why would I identify Don's feelings as Megan's feelings? Megan acted calmly, therefore it's reasonable to call Megan calm.

"Same bananas as escape."

Have no idea what this sentence means.