Skewz.com

Getting All Sides of the Story

skewz

skewz
Location
San Francisco, California, USA
Birthday
January 01
Company
skewz.com
Bio
The co-founders of skewz.com. Skewz.com is a site where you can reveal media bias and at the same time get all sides of the story.

Skewz's Links

New list
Editor’s Pick
JULY 31, 2008 11:00AM

The Press Will Always Eat Its Young

Rate: 2 Flag

The biggest narrative during Barack Obama's world tour was that he was getting too much press attention and that the liberal media was biased toward an Obama coronation. 

But being able to pull nearly 300,000 people for a speech by someone who isn't even president yet, IS news.   However, each breath covering Obama's itinerary (or other mundane detail that didn't need to be covered) was given with the self-effacing context that maybe the media was paying too much attention to all of this. The subtext was always: "maybe we shouldn't be covering this or at least we should question whether we should be covering this...oh, <hand wrining>, what to do?, what to do?"

When Obama did indeed draw nearly 300,000 people in Germany the discussion rarely went to what does this draw mean and what does his overseas popularity suggest.  Instead the conversation was always whether the coverage was over the top.  Given that consistent backdrop, who is really getting their message across.  The McCain campaign has to be credited for an impressive sales campaign in pushing the media into such a neurotic tail spin of insecurity.  That sales effort out shown Obama's ability to draw over a quarter of a million people in a country where he's essentially a random foreign politician with aspirations for higher office.   Further, the press discussion drifted to the potential negatives of such appeal in a foreign land. Again, an excellent sales job by the McCain campaign.  

But in the end, the nature and character of the coverage of Obama's world tour is a reflection of the natural media propensities.  The press will make you to create a story and then it will break you to create a second story.  It can sold to hype things up (a bit more difficult), and then it can be sold again to destroy its creation (a lot easier, see: http://www.skewz.com/link/link_details/dana-milbank-president-obama-continues-hectic-victory-tour-washingtonpost-com).  Eating your young is a lot easier and cheaper than investing in creating something new and insightful.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Speaking as someone who has spent 20-odd years as one sort of a journalist, or the other ... I agree that the media mostly eats its young, but maybe in a different way than that which you suggest.

Reporters are ever fewer, ever younger and less experienced. Experience of the sort that lends itself to "new and insightful" is considered too expensive, at least in the print media.

I'm not bitter, the trend doesn't really affect me any more. But my visits to newsrooms always confirm that what I first noticed in the '80s and '90s is getting strung out in an agonizing death spiral.

Most of the people who would be great journalists if they made it their lives' work are out of the field by their 30s, in my opinion. What's left? Great kids, mediocrities and burnouts ...
Whether Obama's rhetorical power is a good thing (he could keep the attention of a quarter million people in the streets and parks of a major foreign city), or a bad thing (he's a demagogue; he appeals to "citizens of the world"; so he is "arrogant" and may have "Marxist leanings"), there's no doubt that John McCain would not draw as large an audience overseas. Nor could he hold their attention for anywhere near the time Obama did. In the best sense, what Obama showed was talent. Few people operating today on the public stage can do what he did. It's an ancient and overlooked art form.
McCain is a poor big-event speaker; so he has to attack one of Obama's obvious gifts, and strengths.
McCain, jealous at some level and knowing he can't match Obama in this way, must demean him.
McCain is taking on Bush media advisers with Rovian methods; so Obama will be softened up all summer long.
But it may be Obama's as good a debater in the hothouse of a television studio as he is an open-air speaker in a city like Berlin.
McCain could find himself undressed completely by the time those fall debates are over, regardless of the attacks on Obama.
Could be, it it works on the merits.
Still, fear and the attempted destruction of the "arrogant" young man from Chicago may win in the end.
"Don't underestimate ... "
Jeff Shult,

Dead on. I worked in news in the 80s and 90s, experienced great heartache at the trends I saw and felt; and got out.

What passes for news today is a result of the vetting and bloodletting, and dumbing-down, from that time.

The "powers that be" have been taking advantage of this all along.

And here we are ...
Increasingly, it seems that McCain is basing his whole campaign strategy on jealousy. It reminds me (and not in a favorable way) of how kids at my middle school will attack someone who shows more talent than they do. Given their own lack of talent, the only way they can compete is to pull the other guy down to their level. And, as a result, mediocrity rules the day. I guess you could apply this to the press as well. Anyone who dares to excel is branded "elitist" or "arrogant". "Heaven forbid someone should be more capable than me" is the refrain.

I would actually prefer having someone more capable than me in the White House, wouldn't you?

How very depressing for us all.
I think it is great and it gives young Black children (especially males) something to aspire to. I pray that Mr. Obama is successful in the race because if he does become president, young Black children will truly believe that they can become the president one day.

I think all this talk about him being arrogant is hogwash. I often wonder if he was a white man, would he be considered arrogant. I don't know.
Jeff--I'm guessing we're in the same age bracket (extremely late forties) and I got to tell you---your point is dead on right not just for journalism---but across a whole lot of proessions. I know people in sales, management, I write and deliver management and talent development programs---and it's the same thing. The dollar value of experience simply isn't there! I said this to a friend the other day and he said "No, it's always been this way. We've just never been this age!"
Sierra-- that's a really interesting question. Maybe the 1 (and I'm really stretching here---not sure I can ever spit this out because it's so distasteful) maybe the 1 lasting legacy of Bush is that he proved that it is better to have someone more capable than ME in the White House???? He proved the danger of sinking to the lowest commoan denominator---so maybe now we wont??? (he says hopefully)
I've read very little from the U.S. press about what the actual attendees among the 300,000 thought of Obama, why them came out to see him, and whether they think the U.S. gives him so much coverage that it is creating an unfair bias, a sense of pushing Obama down the world's throat.

My sense is, the U.S. press doesn't ask this b/c they know the answer will kill the 'are we covering him too much?' story....