"The Time Has Come," The Walrus Said,

("To Speak of Many Things.....")
JUNE 6, 2012 3:17PM

The War We're All Involved In Every Moment

Rate: 6 Flag

 

This post was inspired by a great post by ZANELLE

              There is, at present, in North America and elsewhere, a huge and very important battle going on. The battle is going to decide who rules everything. It is between "the people" and economic interests.

The only political "power" that the people have is in being able to vote those, who seek elective positions in government, into office. Unfortunately we can only vote them 'out' by voting another set of them 'in'.

The power that economic interests have is wealth. They use that wealth to buy off those we elect and get laws passed that gives them more and more control of our society. Their interests are economic. Their aim is purely profit. To them, people are only cogs in the corporate, money-making machinery.

In the end it comes down to whether our social system (our society) runs things for the benefit of its members, us, or whether our economic system runs things for the benefit of the wealthy and puts profit ahead of every human social need.

We live under those two systems; social and economic. In recent decades we have allowed the economic to invade the social sphere and warp our social system into being a mere supporter of the economic system. This is the tail wagging the dog.

We need to establish the social system as the dominant one and that social system must control and regulate the economic one so that its purpose is not "profit" for only a few - the wealthy - but for everyone in our society. The economic system is a tool that should be used to enhance the lives of all members of society. It should not be the master. We can see, right now, all around us, the results of the economic system slipping away from social control and, in fact, even coming to control the social system in many important areas.

We definitely need a healthy economic system but that system must be oriented to serve all of "the people" instead of just that few elite at the top.

This does NOT mean that we have to do away with our great capitalist system, just that we must get it under control and keep it under control so that it serves our citizens as any good tool serves its user.

 

Author tags:

war, society, politics

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
You seem to be fixated on the notion that businesses will do everything in their power to achieve short-term profits at the expense of qualify-of-life issues with their employees. However, I don't think that there would be too much argument over the fact that employee turnover, especially at the technical and executive levels, is extremely expensive and ultimately erodes a firm's profitability.

Therefore, wouldn't it make sense for companies to keep their employees happy?

I think this is happening at most companies where skilled and technical workers are employed. Low-/no-skilled manufacturing and service industries might not buy-in to the business model of keeping employees happy, but that really shouldn't be a priority for a world-leading country, should it?
Joisey,
Thanks for commenting, but....

Whose blog did you comment on?

I said nothing at all about any of the things you mention.
Passages like ...

"The battle is going on ... between 'the people' and economic interests"

"(The) wealth(ly's) ... aim is purely profit. To them, people are only cogs in the corporate, money-making machinery."

"In the end it comes down to whether ... our economic system runs things for the benefit of the wealthy and puts profit ahead of every human social need."

makes my above comment is appropriate if a reader equates "the wealthy" with business owners/executives. If not, then are you speaking about those wealthy individuals who do not lead/control companies?

How many of these Blue Blood/Old-Money people could possibly exist?
Joisey,
I am missing your point. What are you trying to say? You've quoted some of what I wrote and also taken a few words out of context in a way that deliberately tries to make it appear that I've said something I did not say.
What is your purpose in doing that? Where do you want to go with this? Are you disputing my facts? Are you disputing my opinions? What facts would you like to present to offset mine? What opinions do you want to express?
Joisey - it only takes one if he has ALL of the money. It isn't about how many there are, it is about how much money and power they have.
OK Joisey,
That's enough of you trying to take this blog in some weird direction. You're done here.
Bring back Tommy Douglas and the principles of the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation. They made it work in a poverty-ridden Saskatchewan (AND introduced universal health care there).
I know that there is supposed to be a recession, or the beginning or end of one, but I just don't see it in the way people act. Every kid has a cellphone and$100 shoes. The stores are packed with people buying big screen TV's and game boxes and driving big SUV gas guzzlers. If this is us being poor, I can't wait until we peak again.
Bo,
I don't know much about the CCF but I was involved with its successor, the NDP for a while. Although the NDP is nominally socialist I'd probably just call them Liberals Lite.

scanner,
They've been encouraged to change the amount they buy on credit from $7 out of every $10 spent to $8 and even $9 out of every $10 spent, spent on credit. The banks will get even richer since I suspect that only about one person in a thousand pays off his/her credit cards in full every month. If you include the interest people pay on credit card debt as part of their "spending" then many people are actually spending as much as $13 for every $10 they earn!!

Great system, eh?
If people organize, there are other ways they can have power other than voting. In fact, voting is one of the least effective ways to exercise power. As a New Zealand doctor, I belonged to a union that used the threat of a strike to make hospitals safer for patients. I have also participated in boycotts and direct actions that have forced multinational corporations to pay farm workers more, to discontinue the use of sweatshop labor and (here in NZ) to discontinue using GMO ingredients in fast food. In the 1990s I was part of an international divestment campaign that played a major role in the fall of the apartheid government.
Dr. B.,
You are absolutely right. Many people aren't aware of the power they can exercise in the course of their daily lives and with their support of organizations which they see as doing or being good.

I should have made it clear that I was speaking of political power in those places where voting is used to select the members of government.
.
May I suggest that Dr Bramhall, whose comment I respect, and you, Sky, whose sentiments I understand, visit the scene of the recent "re-election" of the Wisconsin governor. There you'll find impassioned grassroots effort -- 1 million signers of a petition to rid the state of this extreme and anti-labor governor --- to absolutely little avail. Why? Go read. It confirms our worst suspicions.
"The tail wagging the dog."
The perfect analogy.
Very nicely and clearly stated.
Rated
Sadly, the wagging tail gets longer as the dog continues to grow. Maybe we should change the dog food, or put it on a diet.