THOUGHTS IN THE NIGHT
There are thoughts that no man should ever think; should ever feel the need to think. They are thoughts that make him ashamed to be of that race of beings called “Man.” Tonight I have been thinking those thoughts.
I, like you, know a little of our human history. Not a great deal. Not a lot of details; just a broad overview. I see that man has learned that co-operation among us is a good thing. I see that war is a bad thing. I see that we are all equally human yet we keep on trying to set up social orders where some few are raised up high over the majority of their fellows. I see that, over thousands of years, every system we have put in place that follows this pattern of some over others, has brought us grief. It has also brought us war and hunger; not peace and plenty. It has brought us the exact opposite of what we set up a society for!
I cannot think that this thought has not also occurred to you. To my eyes this pattern resembles a pyramid. An elite few, at the apex, rules over all those below them. To facilitate this rule, they ‘authorize’ those in the next layer down to also consider themselves ‘above’ the majority. That layer has the dual job of supporting those at the apex and controlling, ordering, and organizing those of the layers below them. There are many layers in this pyramid. All of humankind resides within one or another of those layers. All of humankind supports those above them, from whom they derive their own personal power and sustenance. All of humankind prides itself as ‘better’ than those below them in the pyramid.
Only those at the apex of the pyramid are happily satisfied with where they are in the order of our societies. All others want to move up to higher layers. Ideally we’d all like to make it to the apex; the very top of the pyramid; so we could rule without being ruled, in our turn, by others above us.
To this date in our history we have almost never organized any human society in any other way. To this date we have also never organized one that works well for us and all the people who share this small planet with us. Heck, we haven’t even organized one that works well for as little as half of us.
The great American experiment with ‘self-rule’ had the glorious concept of a society of equals as its initial precept. That didn’t work out too well, if we judge by the way it is today. The concept was a good one. Where we failed was in the execution. We set up another darned pyramid of power. We thought that by ‘electing’ those who govern us, we’d have sufficient control over them to limit their actions to those beneficial to us and to our society. We were wrong.
Those who seek to sit in the seats of government have been corrupted by a greed for either more power, wealth, or both. Those few who have great wealth now own the majority of those who hold positions in government.
The pyramid of power is quite a stable structure, as all pyramids are. Once established, it will do everything it can to continue in existence. It will even act in ways that are directly and obviously against the interests of the society that formed it. It has no conscience. It is a system, not a living being. It knows nothing of good or evil. It knows nothing of the needs and desires of the people who brought it into being. But it does try to survive; blindly, without thought, without consideration for the consequences.
Those who benefit most from it try to help it to survive. Those are usually the, so called, ‘middle-classes’ and those above them. The few, at the very upper levels, could not long retain their positions without that support from the middle classes.
What this tells us is that we – the middle classes – are the ones who give the most support to this system that we can see does not work as intended. We will never make serious changes to this system as long as we do support that pyramid of power by supporting our own positions in it. The best that we can do, maybe, is to change the individuals who govern us. But there is no reason to think that new individuals will not also, very quickly, be corrupted in the same manner and for the same reasons as our present lot.
We are left with two options and ONLY two options. We can continue using some form of the pyramid of power which has always failed us. Failed us whether we had a tribal system of it, a feudal system of it, a capitalist system of it, or a communist system of it.
Or we can devise a new structure – one not a pyramid – and build a social system that is different. Perhaps it could be one where all citizens share in the management of their society without ‘rulers’ or ‘leaders’. That kind of system would undoubtedly be a much less efficient society but it would also be a much more egalitarian one. It would change more slowly than one where a few can give orders for change to occur and have those orders obeyed by a sheep-like population. Slower but freer. More democratic. More open to enhancing individual talent and ability. One not susceptible to control by individuals of wealth. One owned and operated by the people who live in it.
I wonder if this is possible…..


Salon.com
Comments
I am well aware of some of the anarchistic, utopian communities that have done so poorly in the past - and in the present.
It is so unfortunate that most people of today have been thoroughly brainwashed into thinking that "if it ain't our way it must be something that's already failed" and "if we don't have career leaders then we must have anarchy."
It is assumed that our system, with its electoral feature, is the only form that democracy can take. A false assumption. A pyramidal social structure, supported by elections, is fraught with serious problems. So serious that it clearly, in our case at least, just does not work for the majority of the people of our society.
"One man - one vote" might work if there were no political parties, no individuals of wealth who wanted to control us through our political system and no greedy/power-hungry career politicians who will happily accept bribes from that wealthy elite in order to keep on getting elected and re-elected to positions of responsibility and the necessary power to fulfill that responsibility. Unfortunately that's the situation we have to contend with. Our "theoretical" democracy, isn't a democracy in actual practice. "Our" representatives are owned by others than us. They work to benefit those others. Our interests are of little or no importance to them. The interests of their financial masters and their political parties come first.
We are told, ad nauseum, that only chaos can result from getting rid of 'leaders'. It is implied that getting rid of leaders means getting rid of organizing ourselves because "only leaders can organize us."
Contrary to that anti-democratic propaganda and brain-washing, I think that we can organize our society just fine with no career leaders. Where we each take a turn at holding responsible office in an fully organized - not at all anarchistic - social structure. Where that social structure is horizontal, because responsibility and power are spread among the whole of the non-criminal, competent, adult population, rather than vested in 'leaders' in a vertical, pyramidal structure that hasn't ever worked for the majority of us....... not ever.
.
As such, it seems to me, we are still unconsciously following the herd or pack instincts of our distant ancestors when it comes to social organisations.
That doesn't mean we shouldn't strive to be better, and perhaps a system such as you describe will one day be feasible.
But good luck in changing it!
R♥
I accidently (Predestination?) bumped again.
FusanA has a Canadian Red Poppy Flower.
I have one (Canadians wear them) on a hat.
It's a baby-blue frayed bill, and I stuck one.
The hat reads ` Life is Good & Red Poppy.
A Red Poppy (I was told) Looks Like Lips.
`
You might be called ` Weird? Red Lips?
You may not be allowed to kiss hat tops.
I Know I'd be standing out odd kissing.
It may be a Felony. No kiss in the bank.
I just 'spoofing' and Wonder When FBI.
Waynesbor. PA. No trial. DA is sigh die.
My Probation Officer passed away. Sigh.
Milk & Hops/Yeast in Beer May Be a Sin.
`
I hush up . . .
We talk lactose
No drink milk
You be sorry
Bowels burp
Belly bloats
?
R
Such a system is feasible right now. We have the ability to design one and to implement it. We know what parts of our existence can benefit from co-operation and which parts benefit from competition. Most of us can put forward some concept of a 'better' society. Few of us are so foolish as to believe that 'better' means perfect. Perfection is a long, long way off. But it is time, and more than time, for us to take the next step forward in our social development.
Rob,
The fact that ANYONE goes to bed hungry is insupportably bad. I feel a deep shame for myself as a human being when I think of that.
If we lacked the ability to conceive of better, that would be one thing; but we DON'T lack that ability. We have it in abundance! We also have the resources necessary to solve this problem - and many others that plague us. I cannot even imagine why it is that we don't. What fatal flaw is inherent in us humans that allows the abomination of a greed society so badly organized that this can happen to so many of us; even to us!
Fusun,
I communicate badly at times. Kings - even Philosopher Kings - are symptomatic of our paternalistic society. They, or their modern counterpart, "elected officials", are our substitute parents. We expect them to care for us and we give to them our personal authority over ourselves for them to do that. Unfortunately they happily gobble up the authority and power that we give them and use it to further their own interest or the interests of those who bribe them.
Hi Art!
How ya keepin'?
Hang in there brother man.
Steel,
Oh great...... election chosen social managers has proven to be a total failure - a bust - so lets have more of it!
Really????
That's exactly the kind of "politicians' solution" that has made this system so horrible.
timsored,
I don't follow ......?
.
If those folks at the top are so unhappy, they don't need to stay there, now do they? One BIG difference between being rich and being poor is that poor people can't become rich whenever they want to........
.