The pen is mightier than the sword, or so the saying goes. I'm not judge, jury or executioner here in OS, but I will say that as a newspaper editor, the topic of plagiarism is forefront in my mind when looking to bring on new reporters or columnists.
Without getting into specifics on who is doing what in which post, I would like to layout some basic guidelines to help new OS writers avoid being accused of plagiarism.
But it's cool and I want to use it ...
If you really want to use a line that you think is pretty nifty, go ahead and do so, but be clear in your own writing that the line is borrowed and attribute the source.
My preferred way? Simple. According to so-and-so, "blah blah blah." Yes, Virginia, it can be that easy. (That's partly borrowed from "Miracle on 34th Street," by the way.)
If you're referencing a news story, inform your readers which publication it's from and the date it was originally published (if it's readily available).
This method is second nature to me, given my profession, but for those unfamiliar with basic journalism rules, it can be easily forgotten.
If using online search tools to research a subject, mention them. There is no shame in letting your readers know you did your homework.
One of the best compliments I received from an interview subject came from actor Robert Conrad. He's known for his TV roles in "The Wild Wild West" and "Black Sheep Squadron." Of course I had seen his TV shows as a kid but wasn't sure of his professional life so I researched the details before our conversation. He was making a fundraising appearance in my coverage area and I was writing a "pre" to the event.
After our interview was over he said, "Well, I have to tell you it's been years since anyone has known what I've done. Nowadays, I have to go over my entire career with these young reporters. You obviously put some work into this before speaking to me. I want to thank you for making that effort."
But I had the idea first ...
Just because you had the "idea" for a story or poem first, that doesn't give you the right to use someone else's words and slap your name on them. If you had the first idea, you'll probably have many more that are even better. Ideas are easy. The work to bring them to fruition is hard.
But these words spoke to me so what's the harm? ...
If written words speak to you, it's because you've made that invisible, intangible connection with the writer. By claiming them as your own, you are depriving others of that same connection. Attribute the source, if you'd like to try to pass along the connection, but don't post the words as your own.
But the phrase is a good one and in common usage, so can I use it? ...
If it's in common usage, yes you can. Phrases such as "a phoenix rising from the ashes" and "a look that would turn you to stone" are just a few examples. They are commonplace phrases and can certainly be used without attribution. You'd have to go back to ancient Greek philosophers to attribute many of them.
But my words are different and I'm using them in a comical way ...
That's called a parody and it is a protected form of free speech. Look at Weird Al. He uses the music and some of the lyrics of other bands to craft his musical parodies. Poems and short stories have also been parodied. Entire novels have been rewritten for this treatment. As long as it's clear that it is a parody and not being passed off as something else, then you're covered. This is also a gray area, in my opinion, and one man's parody is another man's ripoff. Just be careful and use some common sense.
These are just some basic guidelines I thought I'd pass along. I'm sure others will have more tips.


Salon.com
Comments
http://open.salon.com/blog/julie_tarp/2009/11/07/breaking_news_house_passes_health_care_bill
R
I see alot of people giving information in their writing (not here) that is taken from previously gleaned info- for example: headlines. Reporters restate the same headline information over and over, why are they allowed to do it and it's not plagiarism?
I do know from classes not to directly quote other people, or steal chunks of info for papers (even if I distill it down into my own words) without having the web page in my sources list. I also know that taking quotes from many different sources (even cited) and stringing them together with my own thoughts is frown upon by most teachers. But if information is out there on the web as common knowledge- meaning you can look it up and find 3 or more 'sources' of the same information, and none of them citing each other, how do you know what to include and who to cite?
When in doubt source seems to be the general vibe, but do people want a list of all your reading minutia than went into your viewpoints (including the book you read as a child that formed that specific mythology in your head) for every blog post. At what point do you quit sourcing? at what point do you start?
In a blog setting, or for a school paper, you can cite your sources at the end of the written piece. However, to copy and paste that info is certainly not OK and you should use quotes and attribute the source in the body text of the message.
If you're citing specific figures and statistics, it's easy to write: According to scientists at the Big Science Lab in Cucamonga, Calif., nearly 60 percent of people who are overweight eat more than they should and don't get enough exercise. The remaining 40 percent have medical conditions which limit their mobility. (Note: This is a statistic I made up ... do not use it for your own school papers.)
A lot of it is simply using your own judgment and some common sense. I hope this helps.