Scribblings from an ink slinger

One newsman's take on life, the world and what-nots

smalltownwriter

smalltownwriter
Location
California, USA
Birthday
December 06
Bio
In the newspaper business for more than 20 years. I write, I edit and take photos ... I'm a triple threat.

MY RECENT POSTS

Smalltownwriter's Links

Salon.com
MARCH 21, 2010 3:59PM

Plagiarism 101: What is it and how can I avoid doing it?

Rate: 17 Flag

The pen is mightier than the sword, or so the saying goes. I'm not judge, jury or executioner here in OS, but I will say that as a newspaper editor, the topic of plagiarism is forefront in my mind when looking to bring on new reporters or columnists.

Without getting into specifics on who is doing what in which post, I would like to layout some basic guidelines to help new OS writers avoid being accused of plagiarism.

But it's cool and I want to use it ...

If you really want to use a line that you think is pretty nifty, go ahead and do so, but be clear in your own writing that the line is borrowed and attribute the source.

My preferred way? Simple. According to so-and-so, "blah blah blah." Yes, Virginia, it can be that easy. (That's partly borrowed from "Miracle on 34th Street," by the way.)

If you're referencing a news story, inform your readers which publication it's from and the date it was originally published (if it's readily available).

This method is second nature to me, given my profession, but for those unfamiliar with basic journalism rules, it can be easily forgotten.

If using online search tools to research a subject, mention them. There is no shame in letting your readers know you did your homework.

One of the best compliments I received from an interview subject came from actor Robert Conrad. He's known for his TV roles in "The Wild Wild West" and "Black Sheep Squadron." Of course I had seen his TV shows as a kid but wasn't sure of his professional life so I researched the details before our conversation. He was making a fundraising appearance in my coverage area and I was writing a "pre" to the event.

After our interview was over he said, "Well, I have to tell you it's been years since anyone has known what I've done. Nowadays, I have to go over my entire career with these young reporters. You obviously put some work into this before speaking to me. I want to thank you for making that effort."

But I had the idea first ...

Just because you had the "idea" for a story or poem first, that doesn't give you the right to use someone else's words and slap your name on them. If you had the first idea, you'll probably have many more that are even better. Ideas are easy. The work to bring them to fruition is hard.

But these words spoke to me so what's the harm? ...

If written words speak to you, it's because you've made that invisible, intangible connection with the writer. By claiming them as your own, you are depriving others of that same connection. Attribute the source, if you'd like to try to pass along the connection, but don't post the words as your own.

But the phrase is a good one and in common usage, so can I use it? ...

If it's in common usage, yes you can. Phrases such as "a phoenix rising from the ashes" and "a look that would turn you to stone" are just a few examples. They are commonplace phrases and can certainly be used without attribution. You'd have to go back to ancient Greek philosophers to attribute many of them.

But my words are different and I'm using them in a comical way ...

That's called a parody and it is a protected form of free speech. Look at Weird Al. He uses the music and some of the lyrics of other bands to craft his musical parodies. Poems and short stories have also been parodied. Entire novels have been rewritten for this treatment. As long as it's clear that it is a parody and not being passed off as something else, then you're covered. This is also a gray area, in my opinion, and one man's parody is another man's ripoff. Just be careful and use some common sense.

These are just some basic guidelines I thought I'd pass along. I'm sure others will have more tips.

Author tags:

journalism, plagiarism, writing

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Thank you STW. This is a much needed post, how generous and kind of you. Rated.
good reminder for us all. from a professional. thank you.
Yes, thank you. Either people have forgotten these basics, or else they never knew them in the first place.
Or they don't care about the basics. All kinds of reasons for plagiarism.
this should be more highly rated... it's the most useful one of the lot.
To all who commented, I say thank you. It's nice to be able to write something different from my usual posts. :)
There seems to be confusion about paraphrasing. People have written at OS in the past couple of days that as long as they source the material and change a word here and there (or sometimes not) that they are somehow attributing the author. Not at all. Paraphrasing is stills stealing if you don't link to, or name the source or sources.
I guess I'm just an idiot. How can Julie Tarp write a post with the headlines "Breaking News: House Passes Health Care. She writes a whole post about it, and does not give the source. She gives out all the information, yet when I looked to see where she got this information, it wasn't there. I guess I missed out on the part about Sourcing".
http://open.salon.com/blog/julie_tarp/2009/11/07/breaking_news_house_passes_health_care_bill
Good post, STW, Actually, it's a big-town post! (r)
Scanner - Unless we have reason to believe differently, we must assume it was her own reporting. If it wasn't, then you have a good point. She might have cleared up any confusion by saying something like, "from varied news reports and from watching live debate on C-Span."
It almost appears that those insisting on a distinction betw blogging and writing are doing that in order to lower the plagiarism bar. It sullies us all.
Emma: Good point about paraphrasing. When doing so, I will quote the source and edit the text to make it shorter. The original quote might be, "Well, back in my day, we used papyrus, bat's blood, red wine, clay, wood and charcoal to make our artwork. All these newfangled methods have me kerflumoxed." I may paraphrase as, Joe Artist said, "Back in my day, we used papyrus (and other natural materials) to make our artwork."
Again, I'm not targeting anyone with this post and it is meant as a way to help upcoming writers avoid being accused of plagiarism. Plain and simple. No sides. No accusations. No judgments.
I don't understand the silence. She did not source a post that she wrote. Yet, I get Bar-B-Qued for what I did. Could it be she's got friends in high places?
Thanks, smalltownwriter - this is a great community service post! ~r
Scanner: I read the link you posted. As I wrote in my blog, I'm not judge, jury or executioner. I'm just me ... some guy at a computer. I'm not judging anyone ... you, Julie or any of the other ladies involved. My silence is easy: neutrality. The issue of plagiarism has come up lately and this is a subject with which I am familiar because of my profession, so I'm offering up some advice to new writers on OS (not to you or any of the ladies involved). It's not meant to point fingers. Thanks! Everyone take a deep breath and step away from the keyboard. ;)
WARNING -- Don't hijack these comments with attacks (either side) or I will use the power of the delete button. Consider yourself warned.
The question has been asked and answered on Scanner's blog. The bill that Julie reported on is in the public domain. Julie did not have to source it as she certainly was not pretending that she authored a piece of U.S. government legislation.
Thanks for this, my friend. I was questioning a couple of ideas, but you've explained this well.
R
Oh thank goodness for this post, I wanted to ask someone, but didn't want to get pulled into the mud, or look like I was taking sides.

I see alot of people giving information in their writing (not here) that is taken from previously gleaned info- for example: headlines. Reporters restate the same headline information over and over, why are they allowed to do it and it's not plagiarism?

I do know from classes not to directly quote other people, or steal chunks of info for papers (even if I distill it down into my own words) without having the web page in my sources list. I also know that taking quotes from many different sources (even cited) and stringing them together with my own thoughts is frown upon by most teachers. But if information is out there on the web as common knowledge- meaning you can look it up and find 3 or more 'sources' of the same information, and none of them citing each other, how do you know what to include and who to cite?

When in doubt source seems to be the general vibe, but do people want a list of all your reading minutia than went into your viewpoints (including the book you read as a child that formed that specific mythology in your head) for every blog post. At what point do you quit sourcing? at what point do you start?
smalltownwriter, You are a wiseman. I very much appreciate your tone here. Thanks.
EmmaPeel: Thank you for the clarification and for the tone of the reply. I appreciate it!
hyblaean-Julie: Excellent questions. As a reporter, the bulk of your reporting should be outside sources, otherwise it's an opinion piece. As an editor, I often have to remind my reporters that we simply tell the story of others, in their own words.

In a blog setting, or for a school paper, you can cite your sources at the end of the written piece. However, to copy and paste that info is certainly not OK and you should use quotes and attribute the source in the body text of the message.

If you're citing specific figures and statistics, it's easy to write: According to scientists at the Big Science Lab in Cucamonga, Calif., nearly 60 percent of people who are overweight eat more than they should and don't get enough exercise. The remaining 40 percent have medical conditions which limit their mobility. (Note: This is a statistic I made up ... do not use it for your own school papers.)

A lot of it is simply using your own judgment and some common sense. I hope this helps.
I am sorry I used your post to put up something that was off-subject. I know better than to hi-jack a site, and should have counted to ten before writing it. I have learned a lot from your post, and thank you for clearing up a few things for me. Peace!
Thank you. I've learned a lot this weekend. :)
Scanner: I understand. You know, in Blues Clues (a TV show my 18-month-old son just loves), they recommend that when you feel frustrated you should "Stop. Breathe. Think." It's good advice for anyone! :)