[Rant alert: this post is pure rant and has no redeeming substance]
- American Cheese. I don't mean that I don't understand how American cheese came to exist. Without taking the effort to look it up, I assume it was developed during a war, when milk was expensive. Or something like that. But what is completely beyond my comprehension is why anyone would eat it, let alone why any restaurant—a place that is trying to lure you in based on the irresistible yumminess of it's product—would serve it. American cheese seems as if somebody who hated cheese set about a way to sabotage cheese consumption by creating something so resolutely bland that the entire concept of cheese would be destroyed. And yet it and it's vile cousin Veleeta persist. Why? If there is one thing that should unify Americans of all political parties, religious affiliations and sexual orientations, it should be the absolute FAIL of American cheese as an edible substance.
So, by Things I don't understand, I don't mean things I either lack the education or mental capacity to understand. There are plenty of things I don't understand that I'm content to not understand. How computers work, for example. I understand programming, more or less, but how a huge collection of binary switches work together to allow me to do anything remains absolutely baffling to me. Sure, I could study for years and figure it out, but right now: no clue. And don't ask me to explain the finer points of Chinese calligraphy.
- "Everything happens for a reason." Has there ever been a more commonly held sentiment that is more obviously untrue, given even a tiny amount of thought? Unless the speaker means, "everything follows the rules of the universe," the statement is bunk. It's a statement that is usually used about a specific person's circumstance. It implies that the entire universe has been constructed in such a way that that circumstance was inevitable—and created for the purpose of that person benefiting from it. For it to be true, something would have to engineer a universe centered on that specific person. All the horrible things that happen to other people would have to happen for the benefit of that one person. Millions of people killed by Hitler? That happened for a reason. All the people killed in Katrina? That happened for a reason. The guy who was paralyzed when he was electrocuted in a freak accident? That happened for a reason. Much more likely, nothing happens for a reason. At some point, the universe just happened (see below). It had a bunch of fundamental rules that determined everything that happened after that point. And that's the entirety of the reason anything and everything happens. You and everybody you've ever known are just as much of an after thought as the hair that washes down the drain after a shower.
- Does God exist? It's not that I find that question hard to understand, I just don't understand why people aren't more baffled and intrigued by the question, "why is there existence?" Once you posit existence, anything is possible. But why would there be a big bang or whatever created existence? Any explanation has to posit existence before existence. Unless I'm not smart enough to figure it out. Which is definitely a possibility. This is the kind of question that used to give me headaches and cause me sleepless nights as a child. It fundamentally challenges the rationality of anything. Yet nobody seems to care.
- Movies based on toys. I have to admit that Pirates of the Caribbean proved to be fairly charming. And the concept of a movie based on a theme park ride is just as abysmal as one based on a toy. But come on, aren't there hundreds of good books writers and producers could rip off to make a movie without having to resort to toys? Or is the fundamental problem that we've reached a point in our cinema culture where plot and character have become so secondary to boom-boom that scripts are largely irrelevant.
- My team when used in reference to a team one doesn't play on. More specifically, the idea that a team owned entirely by some corporate enterprise or wealthy family that doesn't include you is "your team." It isn't. In fact, what you are is not a fan, but a patsy. The more you hold the belief that this team that doesn't care about you at all is yours, the more likely they are to reach into your wallet and take your money, with your blessing, to ensure they stay wealthy. If you have a sufficiently strong connection to the concept that the owner's team is your team, you will facilitate the owner reaching into your neighbor's pocket and taking his money as well, as you vote to have you and your neighbor pay the owners basic business costs.
- Why I'm ranting about any of this. Okay. I'm know the answer to this question. I just don't want to accept it.

Salon.com
Comments
However, Rob, I'm counting on you to be able to at least think about the "why is there existence" question :) You're the one guy I'd suspect might also have encountered some sleepless mights pondering such things.
Its great on a grilled cheese sandwich, LOL I love this post! I find that if I reflect on certain things too much (like the universe) I end up mind fucking myself and end up ruining my day, :) I remember when I was little, I would sit in the hallway and stare at the wall and think about what was beyond the solar system: those were really scary, yet fun times.
I'll leave it to others smarter than I to answer the other topics you raise. But I believe the same principal applies. In small, strategically placed doses, ignorance is good for you!
The human brain is wired to find patterns, including cause and effect. We don't do well with chaos or the unexplained when they hit close to home. "Everything has a reason" is an attempt to impose a feeling of control on a random event. We may not understand "why," but we can understand an event being part of a pattern.
God?/existence?/"Any explanation has to posit existence before existence." In order -- I don't know; I don't know; and I can't say, but let me toss this in and see if it makes any sense. Because we all studied Einstein intensely, we all know that Time is a dimension much like the familiar three spacial dimensions. Can't seem to go back in Time, so it isn't like you can walk back and forth or go up and down. But that's beside the point. At the Big Bang, all of our Universe's dimensions were created. Seemingly our laws of physics immediately came into play (any physicists out there, feel free to correct me). "Time," as we understand it, was created during the Big Bang. Hence any reference to what came before the Big Bang makes no sense. There was no "before" because Time didn't exist. It's painfully counter-intuitive. Bugs the shit out of me.
Movies based on toys: there's a built-in market. Kids who play with the toys will want to see the movie. The producers are counting on those kids shredding their parents' nerves until taken to see the movie. It's the flip side of the same coin that gave us toys based on movie characters (which is how George Lucas made his real money).
My team: Humans are tribal. Generally we "root, root, root for the home team." In the case of Chicago, you don't find many avid Cubs fans who were born on the South Side. That particular brand of Cubs fan usually gets the crap beaten out of him at an early age.
This droning length of b.s. was brought to you by me staying up too late.
When we ask a question like "Why did that building fall down?" we might be satisfied with answers like "The foundations were unsound," or "There was an earthquake," or "A bomber did it." But we should notice that these are just links in a causal chain; we might then ask, "Why were the foundations unsound?" or "Why are there earthquakes?" or "Why did the bomber do it?" And we might continue, like two-year-olds, indefinitely. Eventually we reach a point where we have to say, "That's just the way things are."
When you say, I just don't understand why people aren't more baffled and intrigued by the question, "why is there existence?" I think that one answer might be that people are baffled and intrigued by it, but eventually come treat it as being unanswerable, because if you were going to try to explain why, it's not at all clear what would count as a good explanation. If every other why question bottoms out in "That's the way things are," then we might expect the same thing to apply to "Why is there existence?" That might seem unsatisfying, but I think it might be all we have.
(I should note that I'm not a philosopher, as you know, and I recognize my limitations in philosophy more acutely than most, having seriously tried to do it---without much success---at times. :-)
But as far as the "why is there existence," the lack of time outside of the universe doesn't explain why there is anything at all. Everything else appears to be rigidly driven by physical laws, but existence is outside of that. Which is the exception that calls into question the rational understanding we have of the world. At least for me.
Rob, you're right that most people just give up on these kinds of questions as unanswerable. But the question of the existence of God (as a large concept) is also unanswerable, yet countless books have been published on the subject. Obviously, a large part of this is that culturally, theists and atheists are debating a topic that remains central to our understanding of morality and even to our politics. Existence is undebatable. But if you examine the arguments over God, the theist arguments are generally full of holes (because they take as a given that their version of God exists, rather than an indifferent über-figure that might exist), while the atheists get too caught up in the details of the theist's arguments (e.g., the brilliant but perpetually flawed Christopher Hitchens whose real agenda seems less an exploration of whether God exists than taking the piss out of people he dislikes).
I agree with you- nothing happens for a reason. It's very little that you have control over. It's why I'm so hooked on video games- god to have some fucking control is so nice. Life is way too random.
I'd also be interested to hear Rob ponder on the meaning of meaning ;) although I have to agree with what he's said so far, which I understand to be: "scientists will never know, because it is something we can't test" but hey, if he's willing to dip into metaphysics ;) I will watch you two chat