Diffuse minus Specular

Specular

Specular
Bio
CGI geek. Occasional writer of fiction. Secret fan of stuffed monkeys. Ex-rock-and-roll star turned mop boy at Celine Dione's Vegas showroom.

MY RECENT POSTS

Specular's Links

Salon.com
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 1:22PM

Infuriated over the Public Option Vote

Rate: 1 Flag

Yesterday, the Senate Finance Committee voted down two public option bills, with multiple Democrats defecting. Sen. Baucus used the votes as evidence that a public option couldn't get the votes to pass in the Senate. This infuriates me because it is both cowardly and short-sighted, if not a massive misread of the political tea leaves.

The public option is popular, which in-and-of-itself should give reluctant Senators cover to vote for the best plan on the table. But, more importantly, the people who oppose the public option do so largely out of ill-informed fears. The public option will not do any of the things that most objectors think it will do. It won't create a single-payer system. It won't give the government control over individuals' health choices. It won't create "death panels." It won't replace anything someone likes better. It will only give them a choice.

Because the opposition is based almost entirely on fear and misinformation, passing the public option is a huge win for Democrats. Once people experience the actuality of the public option, their fear and misinformation will be swept aside by reality. People who have had poor employee-based health care who get a better choice because of the public option will reward the Democrats at the ballot box. People who have good coverage they keep won't punish them.

If the Democrats continue with their cowardly ways, however, they will be punished. Americans aren't going to be happy with mandatory insurance policies when their only options are the same over-priced ones we have today. The proposed health care bill does little to control costs. It may increase costs because it disallows insurers to cherry-pick who they insure. Insuring actual sick people costs more than insuring potentially sick people. Somebody has to pay for that increase. Without a public option to keep them honest, that increase will be born by consumers, not insurance company profits.

A healthcare bill without a strong public option is poor public policy and even poorer politics.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
It is fascinating how Democrats fear the public that put them in power, and fear to stand up for their convictions. They allow the media and the opposition to define the terms of the debate, and as a result, they get nothing of consequence accomplished. Then, the disappointed electorate that put them in power defect, and the cycle renews itself.
I think Massachusetts' smooth gay marriage transition is informative here. Even when you face a lot of opposition to good public policy, when the opposition is based on fear of the unknown or misinformation, the public will respond positively to you doing the right thing once you've done it.

I think you're right about the defecting voters, Steve. Badly done public policy is great ammo for an opposition party. Even if you have no ideas—a la the Republicans—running against people who dick it up works pretty well.
When combining fear, ignorance, misinformation, and cowardice with a boatload of insurance company campaign contributions, the outcome is obvious.
Agreed. At this point, I'd be happy to see "reform" fail, and I hope House Democrats who promised to vote against a bill without apublic option are good to their word.
How apropos. I was cardoored today. If I hadn't been riding slowly (because I was thinking about healthcare reform: really) and wearing a helmet, I would have been in real need for some reformed healthcare.