When Your Spirit Whispers

Pay Attention! _ Write It Down!
NOVEMBER 6, 2010 11:20AM

My Gut Reaction to Keith Olbermann's Suspension

Rate: 18 Flag

First of all I want to remind you of this "Special" presentation by Keith Olbermann after the Proposition 8 vote. After all that has happened in the past two years, please try to understand what it means to people like myself, to have the only network that seems to be on our side, suddenly rip the last vestige of hope away!

 

 
I come from a working class family, from an era in America’s history where we actually made things to sell to the rest of the world. I watched my father and his friends constantly fight big business to keep their heads above water in order to support their families. I grew up as a gay child in a era where bullying was accepted from preschoolers right up to the adults, especially against anyone who was perceived to be gay. As an over 60 adult, I personally can remember absolutely no time in my entire life when I actually believed being an American was special for someone like myself. I have always been forced to live OUTSIDE that box where people feel like they are part of something that works for them, something to be proud of!

With that in mind, let me tell you MY perspective on where we are now. The Justice Department should be renamed the Legal Department, because there is no justice in a branch of government that robotically defends injustice. We do not have a system of justice, we have a system of laws, and those laws, now more than ever, are being sold to the highest bidder in a system that is being perverted through its huge loopholes. Judges should not be recalled because they interpret the constitution against the popularity of an ill informed electorate.

I remember a time when those around me, those who believed the system actually worked for them, would talk about the airwaves, proudly talking about how that related to the free flow of information. “The airwaves belonged to the people!” Now, as I travel in my car across America, those airwaves belong to far right wing pundits who spew hatred and lies 24 hours a day, because those airwaves do not belong to the people, they belong to the media monopolies who are supported by the legal system who are backed up by the judges who are elected by their listeners who believe their lies and react to their inflammatory speech.

Here’s what really pisses me off! People have the gaul to lecture me about losing faith in our president and in the system! People actually think it’s OK to tell ME that I’m being too negative! Excuse me, but it’s time to stop ignoring the elephant in the living room!!

Even Jon Stewart, in his rally for sanity, in my opinion, sold out. Everyone seems to buy into the notion that everything is equal. Opinions are equal to facts, lies are equal to truth, Republicans are equal to Democrats, and on and on! Within that restructuring of reality, we have come to the acceptance that one side of the political spectrum gets to cheat while the other side is expected to play by the rules. And it does not help that the leader of the Democratic party thinks it is to his advantage to continue to compromise with an uncompromising ideological obstructionist Republican party.

Here are the facts: Our system is broken! It is so broken that there is no hope left for those who actually believe in our system of a democratic republic. There is no hope left for those who actually take the time to understand the truth or the history of our great republic. There is no hope left for those who actually read the US Constitution or the Declaration of Independence. There is no hope left for those who believe in the power of one’s vote.

Stop telling me there is hope unless you can give me something tangible! It needs to be something outside the political box of Republicans and Democrats! Tell me how we are going to defeat the corporate takeover of everything! Tell me how we are going to take money out of politics! Tell me how we are going to reclaim the airwaves and actually have fair and balanced news! Tell me how America can start making things and exporting things again! Tell me how we can bring back local banking and destroy banking monopolies that are “too big to fail!” Tell me how we can break the deadlock in the Congress when the foxes are guarding the chickens! Tell me how we can support a necessary infrastructure with an electorate that erroneously believes the insane idea that government should be run like a business, but with no money coming in and more money going out. Tell me how we can take the greedy middle man out of the health care system when we have a voting electorate that believes profits above human life is OK!  

BUT don’t tell me our system might have faults, but it’s still the best the world has to offer. That just another f*#king lie! 
 
Back to Keith! Wake up America! Part of the corporate conspiracy is to get YOU to sign contracts that take away your constitutional rights. As for this particular controversy, it's another part of the plan where one side gets to cheat while the other side is expected to play by the rules! In this case, justice is served when MSNBC does away with the clause in question and reinstates Keith!           

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I completely agree with you about Keith. I was really angry when I found out at first. I thought they were taking away his right to free speech. Then I learned that was their contract and he signed it and supposedly it was to be proof of a lack of bias. BS now I say, they are all biased. He has openly said his opinions and beliefs, we admire that about his, it irks the right. Someone mentioned that GE the parent company should disclose their political contributions if they are actually having a problem with this. I think he knew he would be caught, who wouldn't I think he was testing the system that he was being governed under. I don't think his voice will be long silenced. Maybe this was a way out for him of his contract for some reason. Okay, if he is not that clever, it goes back to my original premise, how in the world could you expect anyone not to make a political contribution in America? Right. Exactly. He should be reinstated if he wants to be, and they need to change their bs contract.
Wow, you raise so many issues I want to comment on. "Justice" is about an eye for an eye, commit a crime and get punished, crime and sin have a lot in common. I, too, as a gay man have never felt that this country belonged to me, that I was part of it. If this is the best humans can do, then we're really in trouble. The gay marriage folks believe that by fitting in, they can be "equal." Equal to do what? To consume mindlessly and to protect the interests of the monied class? To fight its wars and keep its streets safe? I don't want that equality. The system is indeed broken, it always has been. But it's never been anything but broken. That's the truth they never tell us.
Yes, reinstate him. Thanks for this.
avimecca,

I understand where you are coming from, but in all the definitions of justice from many different sources, revenge is way down on the list below fairness , being treated fairly, or doing what is right. When I think of justice I never think of revenge. In the realm of marriage, there is also the issue of inequality. Marriage exists, and through its existence there is institutionalized discrimination. So labeling everyone who supports equality within that institution as assimilationists, I believe is an unfair generalization. I do not necessarily support the institution of marriage, but have to fight this fight after what I saw during the AIDS epidemic when families absent for twenty years came to claim all the possessions of their deceased sinner sons, at the expense of their longtime partners.
Dude, I really, really like KO. As you said he was and is a tremendous Ally to our community. BUT, he screwed up.

You know as well as I do that he had dozens of lawyers review his contract before he signed it. He KNEW what the rules were and he knew that they were constitutional. He deserves a temporary suspension for his actions. (note TEMPORARY).

Above and beyond the fact that I believe that there needs to be consequences for our actions, there is a more important reason he should be censured. As Saint Rachel said in the following video, his suspension serves to high light the difference between a true news organization like MSNBC and a fully own political organization like Fox News. To me, Fox news is part and parcel of the Republican party and should be treated as such (inc. equal time, tax and legal!!!!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nZnMumCKXU
Part of me wants MSNBC to be as powerful and partisan as Fox News but for the Democrats. I want a tv station that stands up for the left like that crazy Fox station does for the right with all the money and influence right out there in the open. Power play. Take back the airwaves with equal force.

Another part of me respects that there are journalists who continue to be unbiased and if Keith signed that contract he should have honored it. What was he thinking? Did he want out? I haven't read a statement from him. What is his next move?
I'm not quite sure about contracts that take away constitutional rights being constitutional. From what I've read about the wording of the clause, I don't think it's so clear that it applied to Keith. With all that said, there is a clear bias within the media in the US. The right has free reign to do or say whatever they want with no consequences, but progressives are held to a different standard and given weaker signals and less air time. For myself, I find that unacceptable.
I come from the same era, the same middle class, beat up the fag time in America. I didn't come out until i was 50 for reasons I'm sure you understand. I completely agree that the system is broken, and I completely agree with wanting solutions not just more BS answers. My partner Susan and I have the same elephant in our living room, the same anger and the same despair. You are most certainly not alone.
And yes, we want Keith back on the air..
Considering the Supreme Court we now have and the election we just experienced, here are a few things to think about. How many of the readers of this blog have read the terms of service or contracts that come with software downloaded to your computer before you click accept? If you did read it, did you understand it? What if all employers in the future banned all employees from participating in the political process as a term of employment? Would you still say that’s constitutional, they knew what they were signing? Do you think it’s fair for an employer to give some permission to participate politically while denying others permission to participate, as a stipulation of the contract? Do you believe it is a direct conflict of interest of a corporation to donate huge sums of money to a party that will vote to allow a merger that may violate anti-trust laws, while that same corporation suspends an employee because that employee donated to candidates who might vote against that merger on grounds of anti-trust violations?
Hey, there is hope:

http://www.growingpower.org/

For me, hope comes from many directions--partly from the grassroots organizations, working all over the country in hundreds of different ways.

In my personal life, I know people of all incomes, races, religions, gay, straight, and these are decent people doing their best every day to make the world a little better and treat the people around them fairly. These people give me a lot of hope.

Our country has had a violent, brutal history from the get-go up to the present, but I still believe in the value of the Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence. We may never have a utopia or even the best country in the world, but most of us are here for the duration--where else can we go? We better make it work.

I do still hope for a democracy that has enough of a social safety net, so that each person has access to the basics--food, shelter, health care, a chance to work, the freedom to love and worship and exrpess as they wish (...and a country that values and protects its natural and human resources, and respects those of other nations, too).

Thanks for your interesting and very thoughtful writing! I really enjoy reading your blog.
And thank you clay ball, for doing your part to keep hope alive!
I agree with the system being totally broken and posted about that last week myself. I love Keith too, and I am a strong supporter of gay/lesbian/bi/trans rights.

Having said that, Olbermann wasn't forbidden to contribute, only to get the network's permission. He didn't. And if he found any clauses in his contract unworkable, he has high enough ratings (and, I assume, talented enough legal counsel) to get those clauses out of his contract before he signed it.

War is hell, but this was just stupid to do.

Bottom line, he'll be back in a week.
We were just discussing this morning how Olbermann must have known his actions would be tailed by those seeking to get him to shut up??....then we wondered if he wanted out of his contract so he went forth with political donations??...then we swerved back to ego and did he think he'd get away with it???
I agree completely with safe bet's Amy here...all the way down to Saint Rachel : )
So glad you are writing about it.
What I'm trying to do is get people to talk about the bigger picture. Do we want every aspect of our lives controlled by corporate interests? I refused to join a gym that wanted me to sign a contract that took away my right to legal redress. The corporations own us, they own our politics, our legal system, etc. Complete power corrupts. So I'm not interested in whether he signed it, or if he knew, or what his motives are/were. What interests me is that the right wing nuts have all the power and they are dishonest and they don't play fair and they don't realize they are pawns for corporate interests. Keith is/was my voice !
The Olberman bit was great. Why can't ministers and self-styled speakers-for-God talk like that? Why can't pundits and opinion people do that every day?

Damn - I don't get MSNBC and really would like to hear Olberman and Maddow on a regular basis. I do get Fox, but don't watch - listen instead to mealy-mouthed CNN.

I hope Olberman gets reinstated - the country needs voices like his.
And he echoes my sentiment to people opposing gay marriage - "What the heck is it to YOU. How does it impact YOU in any way? What goddam business is it of YOURS?" In "The Land of the Free", why are some people legislating other people's private lives?

I live in Canada where, with a minimum of hurrumphing, gays were brought in under the marriage regulations...and, just as would seem reasonable, straight people have not been affected in any way whatsoever (except, perhaps, in having to buy more wedding presents...)
I hear you....and I also think his voice is needed on air.
The rest is just our discussion of what might have been on Mr. Olbermann's mind leading up to this...
I watch KO regularly and loved his speech. Great Post! Yes, bring back Keith!
Best Wishes,
Blittie
Just Thinking,

Yes! This is exactly what we need. Critical thinkers talking about real issues. I appreciate your input!
I don't know how we get from where we are to where we need to be. I do refuse to accept that there is no hope left. There is always a way to change things; it might be really painful and hard and it might not happen in our lifetimes, but ultimately, no corrupt system is indefinitely sustainable.

Meanwhile, I agree with much of what you say: we are living in a corporatocracy. But until the majority of people get uncomfortable enough to realize that too, anyone who would say so is going to be yelling into the wind for a while.

And regarding Keith: I personally don't think it's something worth firing him over, but he shouldn't have signed the contract if he didn't mean to abide by it. Unfortunately, he may have put himself right where his corporate bosses wanted him...
Keith will be back; at least it seems to have been an educational event, in more than one way. I appreciate the way he is not afraid to say it like he sees it--it's refreshing.
Welll... look at the discussion that has followed this news?

Purpose maybe, to get the old thinking wheels turning. One place to start perhaps. If KO hadn't done, how long before the next opportunity for people to began to question? Bunches of little bytes adding up to..

(Rated for) ..the big picture.
The late Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau once said, "The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation." He had his faults, but he got that part right. I don't watch much American "news" any more, preferring to get my information more from print, radio or more balanced outlets like the BBC and CBC but the hypocrisy and double standard regarding this suspension don't pass the smell taste. Being right wing apparently means being responsible for nothing but expecting everyone who isn't to toe the line. I, too, refuse to bow down to corporate rule any more than I absolutely have to in order to live my life. I am the kind of person who rails against the constant invasions of personal privacy and civil rights, and I swear that I will harm the next person who says to me, "What does it matter if there are cameras watching you everywhere if you're not doing anything wrong?" Grrr...don't get me started!
The thing that worries me about misunderstanding the rights issue is that the misunderstandings will lead to the disposal of a system of rights before it will lead to freedom for the oppressed. In other words, it is in the interest of those all, and most especially those most likely to be oppressed, to understand how the system works. Olbermann did not sign a contract which removed his rights. Olbermann's rights were intact.

I agree with Olbermann. I endorse the candidates to whom he contributed. I endorse his politics. But there is a good, and perfectly reasonable point that a news agency must hold about impartiality. They did not ask that he not contribute. They only asked that you let someone know. I would much rather know that a journalist is contributing to a campaign of they are also interviewing him.

This society functions best with informed participation, although it does not mandate it. In the most recent cycle, the participation among 18 to 29 year olds was 11%. That is only one in nine. It is distressing for the obvious reasons. The results are not truly representative of the whole. But the level of participation is almost certainly a result of low information as well as low concern by this group. While it is better among older groups, it is not optimal.

If we default to deciding for those most like us, or those we like most, we're all screwed. We need Olbermann. We want Olbermann. But Olbermann screwed up.
Basically the question stands on the right of an employer to demand an employee to surrender constitutional rights. Is that demand legally valid or can it be ignored? The Supreme Court recently ruled that corporations have the right to anonymously donate to political candidates. People have objected to that ruling because the fiction of a corporation being an artificial person should not apply to all the rights given to a real citizen. Now with the Oberman case we have the strange result that a real human being is denied the right to donate anonymously while a corporation retains that right. It's an Alice in Wonderland world.
False premise. The rights are not "surrendered". The right does not apply. It is not censorship. And the comparison of a corporation's right to donate anonymously is with regard to its relationship to government, not to its clients or bosses. This requirement given to Olbermann is with regard to his bosses, not government. The business, NBC, is not an agent of the government trying to suppress opposition to itself.

Now, Citizens United does allow anonymous donation by corporations. And an individual can be revealed with a Freedom of Information Act request. I think the Citizens United decision is a very bad one. But, it has no bearing on this action. The relationship between employer and employee does not involve censorship. Just like if you boycott GE because you dont like their politics, that is not censorship. Severing a client/vendor relationship is analogous to a employer/employee relationship.
The bigger question is: in a society where everything is for sale to the highest bidder, where are the rights of those who do not have the money? We were supposed to have airwaves that belonged to the people for a free exchange of ideas. Those airwaves have been sold to a monopoly. Wherever you stand on the question of Olbermann, the bigger question is what do we do to balance the free exchange of ideas. The bigger observation is: those who do not subscribe to the ideology of the far right get screwed! The moral question is about 24/7 spewing of hatred, misinformation, outright lies that go unpunished, while participating in constitutionally protected rights gets punished. The bigger question is what do we do as progressives to stop this unbalanced situation? The reality is that all of this stems from protections that were removed by those who are the abusers!
I really think that people should refuse to put any money into this economy at all. If they dole out tax breaks, bury it. If you work a public job, go on a sit down strike. If you don't like what a corporation is doing, do anything to undermine their operations that you can: embezzle from the inside, protest and disrupt from the outside. All out war. Nothing less will beat back austerity and begin some kind of generalized collective action/consciousness.

Rated.
Basically the question boils down to whether an employer can require an employee to sign away any basic right. Should an employer be able to require an employee to disclose how he or she voted? If an employee signs that sort of agreement to get work is it legally binding? I would say no. Just as no man can be legally bound by contract to sell himself into slavery or a woman to agree to be brutalized in order to get married. These things violate basic citizen's rights and a contract that demands revelation of political contributions is in the same order as demanding how they voted and it is a vital invasion of personal privacy and should not be respected. The Supreme Court decision declared that contributions should be permitted to be anonymous as a basic right of freedom of speech and anonymous means anonymous to the public, to an employer, to anyone or otherwise the word is meaningless. An agreement to disclose is thereby illegal and should not be respected.

The underlying assumption behind the request is that commentators be unbiased and that is fundamentally ridiculous. We are each biased in many ways and Oberman's point of view was why he was hired. The broadcaster does have the right to oversee what material is broadcast but that is an entirely different matter.
I am heartened by all the civil discourse here and appreciate all the OSers who are able to disagree on specific aspects of this controversy without descending into personal attacks!

There is an aspect of the corporate world that I think has spilled over into the larger non-corporate community that seriously troubles me! It can be seen in the numerous times during the past decades when corporations have explained or excused absolutely reprehensible immoral behavior by pointing out that they have operated perfectly within the perimeters of the law, while downplaying the fact that they and their high paid lobbyists wrote the laws. Over those past few decades these corporate entities and their lobbyists have very systematically stacked the courts, changed the rules within the government to allow total gridlock when things do not go their way, and very successfully gutted all legal protections of the public in the realm of oversight and antimonopoly laws.

The reason I keep coming back to the bigger picture in this discussion is that too many people seem to now take that corporate line that MSNBC or their owners are perfectly within the perimeters of the law in action they took against KO! This is why I posted the video I chose above. As a Gay man my life is filled with situations that have been totally discriminatory, excused by the idea that they were perfectly within the perimeters of the law. Well, sometimes the law is wrong!

I cannot ignore the fact that MSNBC is in the process of being taken over by a corporate entity that leans to the right politically and has very large contracts with Rupert Murdoch. I cannot ignore the fact that this very same corporate entity has poured literally millions upon millions of dollars into political campaigns against Democrats and for Republicans in what is a clear conflict of interest because the new Congress will now have the power to approve their merger that many rightly believe will further the monopolization of the media to a point that is absolutely dangerous to our democracy!

So I am absolutely unable to believe that this is simply a minor slip up on either party’s part. As a minority, I am very familiar with rules and laws that are designed to be used discriminately against people to silence them while the application of the law against others is ignored as long as they tow the line. The proof is in the pudding, as my mother would say. Where are the real progressive voices in the US media? Tomorrow they may not exist at all!
I love Keith. He keeps me sane in this world of insanity.

Great post!
One of the basic tenets of the English Common Law is that laws are arrived at by precedent. It allows for change where change promotes fairness. For that to happen decisions have to be arrived at by juries, not courts. It does seem that at our present juncture courts have been bought by corporations. Everyone should be outraged. One value that both conservatives and progressives share is fairness. I like KO. I watch too much MSNBC. I like Chris Mathews and Rachel Maddow. Ed and Kieth are a little strident for me some of the time and Lawrence O'Donnell may have the Last Word but it's too late.
Thanks for this excellent article. To me it is not even debatable ...Olbermann should be reinstated...immediately!