OCTOBER 18, 2009 7:36AM

Don't Follow That Guru Into The Sweat Lodge

Rate: 0 Flag

After reading this in-depth rundown with insightful commentary on the tragedy near Sedona, I was reminded of an essay I wrote regarding spirituality and destruction.

 In this  post on Making Light, Teresa Nielsen Hayden comments on the use by the guru, James Ray, of language that invokes war, death and sacrifice.

 It reminded me of Timothy Treadwell, the subject of the documentary "Grizzly Man" by Werner Herzog. Here is the essay I wrote after seeing that movie.

Four Simple Questions That Might Save Your Life.

 After watching Grizzly Man, the incredible new documentary about the life and death of Timothy Treadwell, I couldn’t stop thinking about this strange man who committed suicide by bear, all the while pretending that he was actually helping protect them from poachers who essentially didn’t exist. As wild as his story was, there was a thru line that seemed very familiar. Timothy thought he was living out of love for bears, but in fact he was consumed by his own appetite for destruction, and while his format was unusual, we are all vulnerable, capable of making the same deluded mistake.

In his outstanding book, War Is A Force That Gives Us Meaning, Christopher Hedges writes on page 158 “Sigmund Freud divided the forces in human nature between the Eros instinct, the impulse within us that propels us to become close to others, to preserve and conserve, and the Thanatos, or death instinct, the impulse that works towards the annihilation of all living things, including ourselves.”

In the Grizzly Man, we learn that before he discovered his love for bears, Timothy was bent on self-destruction. He was an alcoholic, and nearly died from his excesses. What seems to have rescued him from his obsession to drink was a higher calling to protect the grizzly bears of Alaska. An ecologist who knew him is interviewed in the film, and she goes so far as to say that Timothy’s desire to be a bear, to be other than human, was a religious experience.

Later, in the film, Timothy is shown thanking the bears for rescuing him from his previous life of drinking. Carl Jung, in a letter to Bill Wilson, a co-founder of alcoholics anonymous, described what he believed to be the only solution to an alcoholic obsession with drink. He describes the recovery from alcoholism of a mutual friend.

 “His craving for alcohol was the equivalent, on a low level, of the spiritual thirst of our being for wholeness, expressed in medieval language: the union with God.”

He concludes his letter with these words,

“You see, "alcohol" in Latin is "spiritus" and you use the same word for the highest religious experience as well as for the most depraving poison. The helpful formula therefore is: spiritus contra spiritum.”

In Timothy’s case, he had the religious experience that Jung describes, a selfless, spiritual awakening of sorts, that freed him from the grip of his obsession with alcohol. Unfortunately, the god with whom he communed was not Eros, but rather it was Thanatos wearing a bear suit. As Mr. Hedges explains, in the beginning, love and destruction feel the same. He was lifted out of his mundane concerns, delivered from his vice, but the mechanism of his freedom was a renewed devotion to Thanatos, not Eros. As Hedges writes on page 159, “The initial selflessness of war mirrors that of love, the chief emotion war destroys. And this is what war often looks and feels like, at its inception: love.”

If it were so easy to discern the difference between the paths of love and destruction, then perhaps fewer would chose the latter and more would choose the former. How could Timothy have known that his noble calling to save the bears was actually a slow path to suicide? It’s actually very obvious. In fact, in hindsight, much of our race’s greatest follies should have been visible from a long way off. It is simple to discern, but it is not easy. The allure, the seduction, and the promise of belonging to something that cures the boredom and pain of daily life is strong.

How can we prevent ourselves from following the siren song of Thanatos? I have devised a simple checklist to discern the difference. It’s hardly all inclusive, and it’s not exact, but it may help to start the process of self-questioning and introspection that might derail a selfless devotion to the path to ruin.

 1. What language do I use when I describe object of my devotion?

 Perhaps Timothy could have paid attention to the words he used to describe his time with the bears. Phrases like “Decapitation at any moment,” “Life on the edge of destruction,” and “die doing what I love” came up often. They were clear warnings. If one is engaged in an activity that can be described as dangerous, deadly, on the edge, or harrowing, there’s a chance that Thanatos is in the driver’s seat.

 2. Does my cause require me to take up arms?

 If learning how to use a rifle is part of your cause, there’s a possibility that your love of freedom, the fatherland, god, or the revolution might actually be a hitch in the Army of Thanatos. History is full of cases where armed force was necessary to thwart the armies of Thanatos, but it’s a safe bet that if you’re armed, you should ask serious questions about whether Eros or Thanatos are calling the shots in your devotion to selfless service.

3. Is it possible that the people whom I’m trying to help may mistakenly be killed?

If euphemisms like collateral damage and friendly fire are part of your campaign, then you might actually be on the wrong path.

4. If you die, will you die doing what you love?

I’d say that overall, a love shouldn’t require your expiration. Certainly self-sacrifice is part of love, but conditions that require the ultimate sacrifice are very, very rare. If your passion routinely puts you in deadly situations, then you have probably given yourself to Thanatos. Extreme sports come to mind, but there are many ways people find a transcendent, spiritual experience by courting death. The spirit that they seek is destruction, not love, remember, they feel the same in the beginning, but they are not the same, one is a creative force, and one is destructive. Again, I refer to Hedges, on page 171 “The Thanatos instinct is a drive toward suicide, individual and collective.”

These are but four simple questions, neither an authoritative or complete list. If anyone who reads this would care to add criteria, or refine my suggestions, I welcome your comments. I believe that scrutinizing our passions, and looking for traces of Thanatos is some of the most important work we can do in our lives.

 

Author tags:

thanatos, guru, cult

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:

Sean Sakamoto's Favorites

  1. facewall Kerry Lauerman
  2. facewall Joan Walsh

view all