Stellaa's Blog

Flickers

Stellaa

Stellaa
Location
Santa Rosa, California, USA
Birthday
August 21
Title
Flaneuse
Bio
Δεν ελπίζω τίποτε. Δεν φοβούμαι τίποτε. Είμαι λεύτερος." Nikos Kazantzakis

Editor’s Pick
OCTOBER 20, 2009 3:14AM

Illegal Alien Costume is Hateful, Bigoted and Racist

Rate: 53 Flag

Fox News pundits , bloggers and commenters across America are dumbfounded as to why people are offended with the illegal alien costume.  After all it's all in the spirit of fun and Halloween, with a wink a giggle and nod.    It's that enemy of America " Political correctness" they scream hating on Halloween.  

Well it's not simple Halloween fun.  If you don't understand why it is offensive, let me break it down for you.   And yes, I am being the PC police, cause obviously, lots of people don't get it.  

First some data, from the  Southern Poverty Center's Hatewatch Report , they track hate groups and hate crimes in America.  

  • Hate crimes targeting Latinos increased again in 2007, capping a 40% rise in the four years since 2003, according to FBI statistics released earlier this week.
  • As anti-immigrant propaganda has increased on both the margins and in the mainstream of society — where pundits and politicians have routinely vilified undocumented Latino immigrants with a series of defamatory falsehoods — hate violence has risen against perceived “illegal aliens.” Each year since 2003, the number of FBI-reported anti-Latino hate crime incidents has risen (see table, below), even as a swelling nativist movement has become larger and more vitriolic.
  • At the same time as anti-Latino violence has risen, the Southern Poverty Law Center has reported a major increase in hate groups — from 602 in 2000 to 888 in 2007, a 48% percent jump — and said that the growth has been almost entirely driven by the immigration debate. 
  • White supremacist groups that normally target African Americans and Jews have focused heavily for the last several years on the “threat” of Latino immigrants, exploiting the issue successfully in order to recruit more and more members, especially in the border states. 

Second, after  the hate crimes and hate groups, there is the ridicule of the undocumented immigrant. There is nothing funny about the human struggle and plight of undocumented immigrants in America and anywhere in the world.  

People  risk their lives to come and make a living.  People  work at some of the hardest jobs--jobs that citizens scorn.  People live under the radar and cannot report the thousands of crimes committed against them and their families.  People  are separated from their families, living in isolation.

What is funny about that?   What is light hearted fun about being arrested and deported while wearing an orange jump suit?  

Finally, who is the potential buyer of such a costume?  Most likely it's someone who harbors anti immigrant sentiments and can in the "lightness" of Halloween, add to the stew of hate and bigotry.

Finding the costume in Target takes the hateful feelings from the margins and gives them  legitimacy.   Such sentiments must be marginalized and not sanctioned by mainline institutions.   

So, Lou Dobbs and Fox News think that the PC police is at it again.  In a time when they stirred up hatred against people, we should not be joining in the hatred of undocumented immigrants.     

Modern nations have created artificial boundaries to define territories, yet human beings have migrated for thousands of years to survive and to seek a better life.  We may erect walls in America, walls in Europe, walls in other nations and people will struggle to climb the walls to survive.  It is our human nature to want to make a better life for ourselves and our children.  

Of course we have laws on immigration, no one is saying that we have to abandon them, but, we can show some kindness, some humanity in spirit and some compassion for human beings who struggle.  

You say I am being politically correct?  Hell yes I am.   From what I see, it seems that we still did not learn how to not humiliate and put down minorities and the downtrodden.    So, have your Halloween fun, but you do not need to do it while making fun of the misfortune of others.  

I heard on the radio the UN commissioner on human rights, I think, he said something truly simple, yet true: "In economic hard times people blame their governments and foreigners".  So, we know that we have a tendency for hateful sentiments, why legitimize them?   

 

UPDATE : Target has pulled it off the shelves, I think others may have as well.  

Added on October 22, 2009, in case you think it's just about one costume, here are the three cosumes with the following descriptions via the OC Register: "Sexy Illegal Alien" costume, which included a sombrero, a metallic minidress with a poncho, and handcuffs, as well an alien mask with a bushy mustache.

Is it still harmless?  Yes, they have space alien eyes, but do you see a theme?   

b78561511z120091021182224000gerkbhbj2_lg

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I live in Mexico. I have an AMERICAN gardener. Why-oh-why? Because all of the HARD working Mexicans have left town. They've headed north to WORK. To earn a pittance, which a large portion is sent back to Mexico.

I say open the fucking border. There will be turmoil at first, and then things will settle down. Free markets.

It's the brown skin, cookie. That is what this is has always been about.

Just sayin'.......
Ginny, this is not in the Americas, it is world wide. People struggling to survive.

Natalie, thanks. I get tired of the nod, nod wink wink, let us have our fun. A little human kindness and compassion should not be a hard thing to come by.
I concur...I can't believe the connection isn't being made that this is equivalent to promotion of racism and hate crimes, I don't care if it is Halloween or not. I wouldn't laugh at the Priest costume, it makes my stomach turn. Any "costume" which benefits from the suffering of another human being is out of line to me personally - I realize not all of them can be banned, however, this is a very relevant and topical national issue, not a loose passing reference to something like a "gypsy" where most people who where this are trying to look cool and not even realizing the impact it may have to an ethnic group. This costume has an obvious hateful statement.

If I were CHIRLA, I would have definitely have gone after this. It would have been insane for them not to have.

I understand not legislating people's behavior, I do, however, to let this go unchecked would be equal to blessing it. Silence is equal to indifference.

Thank you for speaking the truth Stellaa; not what is going to "sound good." The best choices are often the hard ones.
Australia has a lot of asylum seekers. A week or so ago there was a young 9 year old girl stranded on a boat with her family begging for refuge. It was heartbreaking. In 2001, 353 people (mainly women and children) died when their refugee boat sank while trying to reach Australia from Indonesia, so yes, this is a world wide problem.
this isnt even political correctness, stellaa. its genuine morality.

i think of political correctness, generally, as being something that doesnt really matter and people use as an excuse to get to feel some superiority.

this DOES matter, and it is offensive to any thinking, non-bigoted person.

i am going to go to our local target tomorrow, and if it is there, i am going to talk to the manager and make sure he knows how people feel about it.
i just found an article. it says "costume protested by immigration activists."

huh. seems to me it would be protested by anyone who doesnt pride himself on ignorance.
I looked at some of the news sites on this topic and read a selection of comments, and I gotta say, the US is a scary place. It's astounding how many people defend this because "illegal immigrants" are breaking the law. Several people seemed to think there was some kind of choice involved, as if some poor fuck from Mexico could decide to be a legal immigrant if he wasn't so lazy or criminal minded. One poster said the costume was not complete without welfare check and medicaid card.

I take it personally. When I hear a lot of hate spewed about Latinos, and I see the big, dark, empty void where awareness and empathy should reside in people's minds, it scares the shit out of me. Sometimes people say stuff around me because I'm light-skinned and have no accent, and then they get embarrassed because, surprise, I'm still a Latina, and then I hear the even more offensive, "Oh, not you" shit. When I hear all the immigrant bashing, I feel even more like an outsider. Thank god for pools of sanity and tolerance like OS, and folks like you, stellaa.
Christ. There's a Halloween costume out there depicting 'illegal aliens'? This is being sold in stores? Like it's funny? Wtf???

I think I'm going to throw up.
I wholeheartedly agree with you on this. Of course, it really depends on what the costume is supposed to represent. Demonstrators occasionally dress up in these jumpsuits to make a political point - they're making fun of the government. But here the costume is clearly being worn as a "joke," and it isn't funny.
This makes me think about the Roma people and the persecution they suffer wherever they go. Anti-semitism gets a go and a wink in South Carolina, and let's not forget, homeless people get beat up by punks all the time.

Stuff like this is so damned upsetting. Haven't these folks learned how to have real fun? Don't they know that it is possible to enjoy yourself without it being at someone else's expense?
Undocumented immigrants are people....I was properly chastised and corrected for using thre term "illegal aliens" which is a dehumanizing characterization on its face.....It is a hateful code word for unwanted people of color who don't deserve to be treated with the basic respect and dignity that should be accorded to all people regardless of the nature of their political or social status.....
Target should be targeted....Adults who purchase such costumes for their children are teaching hatred and encouraging and condoning bigotry at the most basic of all societal levels....And then I get accused of overreacting............
you ain't politically correct, you is just plain correct
Most racists are in denial about their racism and bigotry, at least publicly. They dance around the margins of racism--this illegal alien costume is a good example--and then try to act all innocent when people call them on it. Racism and bigotry is pervasive and malignant and, increasingly, winked at by media outlets such as Fox News and most talk radio. It pushes the boundaries of racism, making ever more outrageous observations appear to be socially acceptable. I have noticed this trend for years, but it has accelerated in recent years to a point where it has become disturbing to watch much of the mainstream media.
If you want a really scary costume, you should get a Lou Dobbs mask.
The costumes are definitely tasteless and probably hateful. I can't believe that a major store would even put them on the shelf for sale, but it's hard to ignore that "illegal" immigration is a huge problem.

The propaganda that these illegals do jobs that other Americans won't do is only partly true. Illegals permeate the construction industry which forces wages down while doing nothing to reduce the price of product. I've watched my own value on a steady decline for years because of it.The excess money goes right into the pockets of those who do the hiring.This leaves legal Americans out in the cold in many instances, regardless of race.

This is not a racist attitude, but a personal observation from spending forty years in the construction industry. Other industries can speak for themselves.

Let me state that I don't blame illegals for coming here. I would likely do the same if I were in their positions, but they should also carry some responsibility for creating at least some percentage for the problems against legal immigrants or citizens of their race. To think illegals that commit crimes here aren't a part of that problem would be to ignore at least a part of the reality of the situation. After all, for most of us, perception is reality, so many see the crime and relate it to Hispanics, without ever thinking any further than that. Yes, that is wrong, but we are talking of perception, not reality.

Immigration reform is and always will be a political albatross. I will admit that you are far wiser than I am about this issue Stellaa, so feel free to correct me, but here are some things I'd like to see done about the "illegal" immigration problem.

First, there should be some kind of policy in place for amnesty for long time illegals that are here. Maybe those that have been here five years or longer. Not everyone deserves to stay just because they have crossed a boarder. They are still entering our country illegally. There is just no denying that fact.

Second, I would REALLY like to see those who hire illegals get prosecuted. We don't need any new laws in this area, just enforce the laws that are already on the books. I feel that those who hire these people and exploit them for personal gain are the biggest part of the problem. If they weren't so eager to hire illegals a large part of the problem would cure itself.

And third, and maybe most importantly, I would like to see the U.S. find a way to pressure these other countries to become productive so that these illegals would have more incentive to stay in their own country. They are proud people. Give them something to be proud of.

It seems to me that most of these Central American countries have many natural resources that generate plenty of wealth. The problem is that most of that money goes straight to the top leaving nothing for those who actually do the work. It's exactly what is happening to America. The systematic elimination of the middle class is a very real problem. Those in power have to care enough about the people to share the wealth. That includes here and abroad. Creating a middle class in these other countries (and saving our own) would be a worthy goal for the entire hemisphere.

How you change that, I have no idea, but I know that happy people that have enough to eat won't be so hungry to enter other countries illegally.
If we could all walk a mile in someone else's shoes, just for a day, there wouldn't be the ignorance and hatred there is. Compassion seems to have become a lost art. Great and important post.
The absence of shame is so distressing. If I find one at Target, I too would complain. Do they believe this has something to do with freedom of expression?
I think you're right, Stellaa, that the costume is cruel and offensive, but I could not disagree more with your defense of that position.

The costume is unacceptable because of its association with Halloween, a holiday for children. The costume, which carries an unmistakable political message, should not be foisted on a wearing child any more than the "um...um...um...Barack Hussein Obama" refrain should have been foisted on children. As the costume will be viewed by innocent children who should not suffer the consequences of their parents' illegal conduct, it is cruel and offensive.

This rare moment of accord between us having passed, I could not disagree with you more on the issue of adult immigration. The United States has every right to require those who seek to cross its borders to conform to certain policies and procedures. Man is not endowed by his creator with the inalienable right to live in the United States. Those who transgress those policies and procedures are criminals and should be treated as such. I would make those policies and procedures even more restrictive by requiring would-be entrants to demonstrate good character as well as the capacity to survive and contribute without reliance on public assistance. I was required to do all of the above when migrating to a foreign country and didn't for an instant resent those rational requirements.
hey gordo, aren't you the lou dobbs self-righteous american of the day! you obviously know very, very little about the history and present practice of using illegal labor in this country. u.s. immigration policy has always been a hodge-podge set of rules set up to bring cheap labor to the u.s. when we need it, while whipping up self-righteous xenophobes, such as yourself, for cheap political support. i'm sure that even though you feel so swell talking about "criminality" and such, that you enjoy much of the fruit of cheap, easily exploitable labor from mexico, including the food you eat and many of the services you receive. the u.s., despite its economic trouble, will suffer a major decline in its labor force and we will increasingly need to import more and more labor. meanwhile, people like you will continue to buy all the bullshit that lou dobbs and his ilk of racist pigs peddle.
It's interesting to read both sides of this discussion. The increasing hate and bitterness directed against immigrants is something we can't continue to ignore. Have you seen the move "A Day Without a Mexican"? It's a really good depiction - while still being a funny movie - of how interdependent the Mexican immigrant community and the non-immigrant community have become in LA. Worth a watch.
I guess this is a dumbass costume. I can imagine the reaction of Fox News viewers when a child wearing this comes to the door -- a moment of laughter at the expense of the human beings it mocks. But frankly I think the reaction (across the country, not just yours) to this costume is somewhat misplaced, just because the costume is an easy thing to focus on, and trivial compared to the conditions, laws, history and practices that underlie the prejudice which it exploits.

The reason the Republicans are freaking out over immigration from the south is that most of the Latinos who come in vote Democratic.
hear hear!

"t is our human nature to want to make a better life for ourselves and our children. "

I think we see too many images of people running across the border, climbing walls or being arrested. we're not seeing enough of where they're running from. we really aren't considering why a human being with a family depending on them would uproot themselves from all that is familiar and loved to come to a country that will exploit and discriminate against them. this is a complex economic problem.
These are carried at stores like Target, etc? Any pix? This is insane. Truly insane. Nativism all over again.
By the way Target took the costume off their shelves. Yet, the costumes now with the publicity are flying off the shelves in other places and going for high bids on ebay. For Halloween I don't get why anyone over the age of 10 needs to buy a pre-made costume.
Like I said, I in no way deny that we have immigration laws. At the same time, in the history of humanity borders, passports and immigration are fairly new. Human beings, not just in the Americas, migrate for better conditions and will till the end of time. We take advantage of people in these circumstances all over the world, we then discard them in a whim.

Serenita, I could not agree more, the breaking of the law is a higher virtue to some than compassion for human beings.

Mark, at first I did not think much about the costume, but when I saw so many "liberals" missing the point and trivializing the offense that the latino community took I kept getting angrier and angrier. Then there is the facile dismissal that it's just the PC police, well obviously this society still needs to be reminded what behavior and thoughts should not be mainstream. Racism is not reduced to using and not using the "N" word. It has many layers, many manifestations. Todays liberal is proud to have shed the obvious, but misses so much.
Alice, I refuse to put pictures, check out Judy Kasten's post.
I was stunned when I saw the costume and the defense of it here on OS. Legitimized racism and xenophobia can never be good things no matter what the rationale.
Unbelievable! Hate is becoming the American Way, thanks to Fox News and other fear-mongers. I agree with Ginny. Open the f---g border! No one WANTS to give up their homeland for a white-bread life. As long as our corporations are taking all of Latin America's resources, where else can they come to recover them?
I doubt that "haters" intentionally created and merchandised this costume but it's in such poor taste that it must be yanked off the shelves. Certain jackasses will come up with their own version of it thinking that they're so very clever but it's a little like putting on the old ghost costume of a white sheet with eyeholes and then putting on a white cone shaped hat and wonder why people think you're dressed up like a Klansman.
Get the damn thing off the shelves!
OK, so I have one major objection here... But before I go into it, let me first say that I agree with you 100% about the immigration issues you've brought up, as well as the barely-hidden racism and bigotry that exists in this country. That being said...

If you find the costume offensive, don't buy it. It falls clearly under the same category as a copy of Hustler. If it offends you, you don't have to buy it. To say a piece of tasteless satire is so objectionable that it should be censored is wrong. The first amendment must protect speech that others find offensive. If you want to protest Target and other stores for selling it you should, and with any luck they'll stop selling such things of their own right (which was what happened here). But such tasteless things have always existed (ask any Wiccan). Maybe this one hits a little closer to home and that's why we (yes, WE) find it so offensive.

This statement was the one that raised major red flags in my head: "Such sentiments must be marginalized and not sanctioned by mainline institutions." That statement struck me as highly reactionary and marginally fascist. I don't think that was your intent, but the when I read it, I got chills down my spine. Please allow the rest of us to make our own decisions. Don't censor it just because you don't agree.
I don't think it's being "politically correct" or overly sensitive to suggest that we need to think about the people who are actually in the suits. They often come from areas of southern Mexico that have been economically devastated to the point that there is simply no way of making a living there. Some of the devastation has been caused by trade policies in which small farmers have been put out of business by massive imports of American factory farm produce.

Many of these people have come here at great personal cost and danger. When they get here they often end up being exploited by employers and labor contractors. Many of them do backbreaking work that makes a person old at age 40. They live stacked up in apartments in order to save money to send back home to their own families.

Whatever one thinks about immigration issues, there's no reason not to feel compassion for these people, and were we in their shoes, we would do the same thing. To the extent that people reflect on the people in these illegal alien suits, I suspect the suits will not be as funny as they might have hoped.
The costumes are a bad idea. Racist? Hate crime? Hardly..

How many other laws should we allow people to break based on "compassion" and "human kindness?

Give me a break. They are here ILLEGALLY. For those of us who believe in the rule of law that means they should be sent home until they can abide by our laws. Not a difficult concept.
Aric, you make a great point. At what point does a sentiment express personal freedom and choice and at what point should society shun the dehumanization of others?

This is the fine line of democratic societies and societies that respect the human rights of others and hold to freedom of speech and choice.

Is it fascistic to say that hatred and bigotry should be marginalized? Do I want people to feel shame and to feel scorn if they express racist and hateful feelings: You bet I do.

Fascism is complex and an over simplification of my position.
Blackfon, if the "rule of law" is your standard, then you should live by that standard in all the areas of your political thinking. All those who broke the rule of law, our treaties and other laws should be punished. Yet, you only choose to apply that standard to certain populations.
Mishima, you make an excellent point.

Aric, another thought, at some point our society decided that "black face" and the "Shilock" type character are not acceptable. Making fun of people with disabilities is not acceptable, is that fascistic?
OK, let me put it this way: would you allow me to determine what ideas and sentiments you and your [hypothetical] children should be exposed to? I should hope not.

I decide what I should be exposed to. You decide what you should be exposed to. It's as simple as that, and that's the entire idea behind the expression "freedom of speech".

Maybe we need to invent a ratings system on haloween costumes. There'll be an entire adult section at the costume store, where you'll find this costume and the masks with axes planted in their skulls and eyeballs hanging out (which I find far more offensive and innapropriate for children).
And to answer your question: No, outlawing bigotry and racism and discrimination of any kind is not fascist. It's pretty necessary, in fact. However, I don't believe that's really what this represents. In my mind, this costume really is like the copy of Hustler: very offensive, often racist, misogynistic, and usually chauvanistic, but due to the nature of the media and the intented target demograph, must be protected. Sure this costume was available in Target, where our kids might see it. Hustler's available at 7-11, where my kids might see it.

Again, just because 99% of the human race finds it offensive doesn't mean it should be censored.

Controlled, as is the case with Hustler? Maybe. But removed from the market? Fascist.
I have to agree with Aric on this one. If I laugh at it - in the "Oh no they didn't" way - I don't much like being deemed a racist. You think the people who would actually buy such a thing are going to be taught an important lesson by removing it? Absolutely not.
Yes, that is why I am expressing that this costume is racist and hateful. I do think that such feelings should be marginalized and not acceptable. I want people to know that it is not ok, that the costume is filled with racism. If it marginalizes those with such feelings, so be it, they should be marginalized and scorned.
Julie, if they see it readily available, they perceive a tacit social acceptance. Their behavior will not change, but they will say, "nothing wrong with this, they sell it in stores, I am not the only one who thinks this way and it must be ok to think that way".
Even when it's hanging next to a "redneck" costume? (Most likely a mirror image of themselves.)

I think you're giving them a little too much credit. The thought of acceptable/not acceptable wouldn't even enter their tiny little brain.
A post like this deserves a crowd of Bravos!
Did I say the "redneck" costume is not hateful? I despise the bigotry and dehumanization of poor whites that struggle to survive just as much. One stupid "mask" does not make the others ok. I am specifically speaking here why this "ha..ha" moment, is not so "ha, ha".

Julie I am not, Fox news legitimizes, Lou Dobbs by having a voice legitimizes and major retail chains legitimize. Why is this still ok and other symbols of hatred have been marginalized?
@Aric,

Actually, CHIRLA lobbied the subjective morality of a "non-human voting entity" the all-mighty "corporation" (i.e. Target, WalMart), using free speech, which could negatively impact the all-mighty dollar, in which it is legally obligated to protect (shareholders), and won.

This is where the "real" conversation happened - Wall Street - This is where America balances its morals, occasionally. We're just discussing the merits of it.
Stella said....."Blackfon, if the "rule of law" is your standard, then you should live by that standard in all the areas of your political thinking. All those who broke the rule of law, our treaties and other laws should be punished. Yet, you only choose to apply that standard to certain populations."

The topic of your post has to do with illegal aliens. I was addressing that specific point.
Thanks for explaining that Stellaa. I haven't been really paying attention to that particular morsel of controversy -- haven't gotten over balloon boy yet.
R
Great points, Aric and Julie.

Is there anything more satisfying than seeing professed "liberals" called on their own hypocrisy? "I have here in my hand the names of ten retail outlets that are selling the Illegal Alien costume."

Don't waste your time. No sense preaching to this deaf choir.
When I first read your post I assumed this costume depicted a Mexican immigrant, but I see it's actually an alien from outer space in prison coveralls with a green card. This costume is a play on words. A pun. I share your feelings regarding bigotry towards immigrants, but really feel your anger is misdirected. Tempest in a teacup, in my opinion. Kind of scary how quickly people start justifying censorship. Relax, peoples!
"Julie I am not, Fox news legitimizes, Lou Dobbs by having a voice legitimizes and major retail chains legitimize. "

Can anyone translate this into English, our language of choice hereabouts?
I must say that removing the product from the store has very little to do with free speech and much more to do with the market itself. If these things sold like hotcakes, I doubt we'd see removal from the store. No. That's about market value and concern over brand retention by the store.

Free speech is about discussing it. And certainly you can create your own costume like it. That's free speech. A fascist nation would never allow production of the costume in the first place or you know, jail you for wearing it. Let's not throw those terms around wildly or they'll lose their power when they're really needed.

I think both Jodi's post and this one both make good points. I did dress like a homeless person as a child. No one said a word. I did wear a costume to look like a gypsy. No one said a word. Yet, these outfits must have been offensive to those they 'represented.' If we're going to discuss this costume, we need to be open to discussing the others. (And don't even get me started about the five year old prostitute-like outfits that I saw in the store ...)

Of course, in the end, it's all about judgment and values. What do we want to teach our children about respect for others really? That's the key.

My father was complaining about political correctness, and I agree that it can go overboard. It really can, but what's it about really? It's about being kind and respecting each other. That's not a bad thing.
Because it really ISN'T a symbol of hatred. It was some dumbass's idea of a joke. It's obviously in extremely poor taste and is offensive to many. It was never intended as racist or hateful in any way. Quite the opposite, it was intended to be laughed at. WHY you laugh at it is what can be defined as racist and hateful.

Saying that because Target sold it (past tense) they were legitimizing it is kind of like saying they're approving us burning witches at the stake because they sell pointy hats. I can see why you think that, but I disagree.
Wow, whatever happened to America's sense of humor? It's just a costume! Seriously, get over it! If an illegal alien takes offense, send them back to their home planet! Sheesh!
Tempest in a teacup you says Tom. It's about an "alien" from another planet with a thick black mustache.

On hypocrisy, lets not go there Gordon cause your basket is full. I admit the conflicts in democratic societies between issues, do you?

Furthermore, I have spent the last couple of months focusing on the healthcare issue, but when I see people bantering around this issue and trivializing the feelings of the Latino community. Further the continual bashing of PC notions is an oversimplification and buying into right wing reactionary values and notions.
By the way, this excellent conversation was brought to you by the Illegal Alien Haloween Costume.

If it never existed, which I think you'd prefer, we'd never be exposing these issues and raising awareness.

:-P
One of the common fallacies in arguments is the comparison of apples to oranges (or the fallacy of analogies). This is usually faulty because you just can’t compare two different things sometimes. There are too many variables. In other words, each issue must be examined on a case-by-case basis. There is no one formula one can apply that can universally be applied (sorry Kantian’s).

I agree with Stella… she is making an argument about the nature of the costume… why it is offensive and the dangers of legitimizing bigotry (through major corporations no less). It isn’t about Hustler magazine. It has its own context. I believe it’s wrong to think one’s argument is bad just because it doesn’t fit into another faulty, comparison/analogy formula.
Yes, it's a fact of social psychology that in difficult economies, people often blame foreigners, certain ethnic groups, etc., which doesn't say much for human intelligence!! Generally speaking, I find far too many uneducated, unintelligent, unthinking people in this country. Furthermore, unless one is a Native-American, then one is an immigrant. Ours is a nation of immigrants! Period.
Andy, you ask where America's sense of humor went, this is not about humor, read the statistics on hate groups against Latinos. Where do you draw the line on this kind of humor?

Aric, I am not saying that selling it at Target legitimizes it, I know it does.
No Stellaa, you didn't say it was hateful - nor did I imply that you did. What I'm saying is (not specifically to you) why does one deserve an outcry and the other does not? Because of who the intended target is? If we want to be offended by Halloween costumes on a national stage, what about the redneck ones? Those offend whole populations as well.

What about witches? I mean, they were rounded up and burned at the stake. Recently in Africa ( I think) a father burned his own child with acid because he thought he was a witch. I find that horrific.

Do you see what I'm trying to say here? Yes, it's offensive to anyone with any sense, but there are a lot of offensive things out there and censoring isn't the answer. I think it cheapens the legitimate immigration disaster by tacking issues with it onto a Halloween costume.
Mr. Photoguy, thank you for making sense of what the problem is here.

Julie, the topic at hand is this costume. This costume that Latino groups spoke up against. If other groups speak up about other costumes, all power to them and they should make their points. Why is a Sambo costume not acceptable anymore? Because people spoke up against it and we as a society accepted the distaste of the Sambo character as a depiction of African Americans.

Dehumanizing others is not trivial.
And neither is considering someone a racist because they don't care about a costume.
I make a point not to draw lines when to comes to poking fun and humor. Laughter is the best medicine for all of us. Learning not to take things like this so seriously will empower decent people and disenfranchise haters. Hate isn't about laughter, it's about hate.
As for the stats, I'm well aware of them. I've dealt with hate and racisim and all it's ugly manfestations.
It never stopped me from having a sense of humor. Comedy needs no boundries. If we can't loosen up about things like this, we're doomed to a grey-faced serious world where more and more terrible things will happen.
That's just my two cents.
Mr. Photoguy: I totally agree with you. However, you forgot to tell us how it was comparing apples to oranges. How is this a faulty analogy? I thought it was apt myself. Of course ti's not about Hustler magazine. That's why it's an analogy.

Stellaa: I hope you're not saying that a costume is acceptable until it's not, because that's kind of what you just said. The reason why Sambo costumes aren't allowed anymore is because a bunch of people [legitimately] raised a stink. You are currently raising a stink about this costume in the hopes of making it not acceptable. The witches, rednecks and nerds? They can all go fuck themselves. Those costumes are their problem. (That's kind of what it sounds like you're saying).

@ Julie: Thank you for your contributions.
Blackflon mentions the "rule of law", but he does not understand that they are not "illegal" according to law until there is a legal preceding about the matter. In other word, the law of the land is "innocent until proven guilty." The law does not exist to support your darker impulses or prejudices. The law exists to provide stability. Premature and unjust actions against an individual or group, even if they would later be found to be guilty, does not promote justice or stability for you. It makes for an unstable situation. That is why "innocent until proven guilty" exists.

Excellent job, Stella.
And Aric Dante:

This conversation was not brought by the costume. The conversation was brought by someone who pointed out the costume as anti-social. There is a big difference there. That is like saying sanity is brought to you by insanity, and therefore necessary and valid. That would be a nihilistic, deterministic absurdity. The concepts of sanity or social justice have validation over, above, and separate from the privation of same. Aric, surrender all of your wealth so that you might know wealth. The prescription is an absurdity.
Stella, I hadn't even heard about this. classy! I'm glad target's pulling them, but it's amazing they thought to carry them in the first place.
Julie Tarp:

Maybe you can answer this. Why is it worse to "be seen as racist" than it is to actually be racist? I have never understood this. To illustrate what I mean, consider the Justice of the Peace in La. who recently said that he was not racist, he just did not want the interracial couple to have children. The concept is a racist notion, but he considers himself to no be racist. The other examples of this are virtually universal. People dont want to be "seen" as racist, but are very willing to be racist.

And as for why being racist is a dangerous thing for a society, consider the early 30's in Germany as just one example. The lives of Jews was made illegal. Practically everything about there lives was incrementally taken away until they were physically removed. This had the political/psychological appeal to the majority as being a panacea for their problems. It was scapegoating. This happens from time to time, and it is not rational. It leads to genocide. Doing it is a bad thing, no matter how you justify it to yourself. And it starts out small, like costumes. I can tell you why doing it is bad. Tell me why you think "being seen" that way is worse?
Thanks Bill, for letting us know you went to college. You're quite right, it was Stellaa who brought it up. The costume did not blog about itself.

I was, for a small moment, trying to lighten up the conversation by pointing out ONE positive thing that the costume represents. This conversation, however, seems replete with humorless people. Thanks for the bucket of water over my head.
Bill, please, I don't need a lesson on why racism is bad for society. Here's a post from me that you might enjoy:

http://open.salon.com/blog/julie_tarp/2009/01/19/every_forty_yearsrepost_for_mlk

It matters to me because I'm not a racist. If you're stating that someone who doesn't agree with the HALLOWEEN COSTUME, but thinks there are bigger atrocities in the world is a racist, I think that's completely ridiculous. Are rednecks okay to make fun of (key words being made fun of) because they're idiots?

Is someone now making the lives of immigrants, in this case Mexicans, illegal? Costumes = genocide? Wow.
Only in America. Sheesh.
I googled it and found an enlarged photo and there is no mustache, large, black or otherwise. I think your heart is in the right place, but you're coming off a little like Rosanne Rosannandana with her "too much violets on tv."

I don't think the immigration issue is funny, but I do think that the obsession with illegal immigration is funny. Not "funny ha-ha" so much, more like "smells funny".
All humor is at the expense of someone else. For humor to be popular, it has to sink to the lowest common denominator, else the common man won't get the joke. I have a great Diogenes routine, but it never gets any laughs because my audience has to know who Diogenes was to get the punch lines.

Let's see. I have a George Bush with Hitler mustache mask and a George Bush as a chimpanzee mask. Or how about a cop uniform with a pig's mask. Or a dumb blonde. Or a blind person. A Chinaman. A Frenchman. An Arab. If I dress up as a parrot with a Condi Rice face, am I debasing women in general, black women in particular, blacks overall, or parrots? Which one crosses the line? What line? Really, who gives a shit.

Someone makes an orange jumpsuit so the morons out there can dress up one night as an illegal alien. Yawn and a great big boo-hoo. This is America, Welcome to the the Big-Top. Put your George Bush mask and party on, Jose. Just wait'll you get a load of Valentines Day.
Tom, there are a number of "illegal alien" masks and costumes, obviously there is a demand for your kind of "humor". http://www.ufwaction.org/campaign/halloween2009
Token: that is a novel definition of humor, enjoy your desire to debase others through humor.

Just as an aside Chinaman went out some time in the 70's, only those who insist to piss off Asian Americans and particularly the Chinese, use that term. Of course I am being PC again, but just pointing out the purposeful placement of that word. Yes, yes, I know about the Frenchman cover and I know that it's that gorgeous English language that I am insulting. And you know that you specifically used that word to serve your purpose.
Quietly leaving the room.
@Bill Beck.........
"innocent until proven guilty" is a matter for the courts.

I believe that as soon as someone crosses our border illegally they have committed a crime. The courts will decide innocent or guilt.
Blackflon;

You are absolutely right, it is a matter for the courts. "Illegal alien" has the word "illegal" in it, see? "Legality" is a latter for the courts. Bingo. Pass go and collect $200.00.
ok... i have to point out that these costumes have been around for years:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/57136902@N00/310314627/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/poco-cocoa/285834316/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/libbyiscool/1791042224/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/blogmasterg/285133540/

why are we freaking out over them? there are some far more offensive homemade ones and the one target is carrying doesn't actually imply anything about race.

and i say this as a person who does believe the borders should be open. we've massively fucked up our relationship with mexico and that is incredibly sad. but i have a hard time rallying my anger for this silly costume that has wisely eschewed any of the racial overtones i see in homemade ones.
So Julie, if someone burns your house down, is it ok because "there are bigger atrocities in the world"? What does the relativism have to do with anything? Are any two crimes exactly the same, and all others must be thrown out? The notion makes no sense.

Here is another way to look at it. Small things build to larger things. There is a socialization process. The reason for mentioning the early 30's in Germany is that it started with small things. Civilization and justice start with small things. Stella is absolutely right. If you dont take care of the small things, they become bigger things. This particular event is now a rather large thing. The statistics that Stella cited indicate that hate crimes are no small thing. A cavalier attitude about picking on whomever, frequently leads to larger oppression when the population is placed under stress. And as for "rednecks" being "picked on", it is never a good thing. But deserving or not, ethnic white, Celtic, Northern European, plain ol' white people are not being oppressed in the Northern Hemisphere by virtue of their whiteness. To compare that to Latinos from Central and South America here is the United States is not an apples to apples comparison with regard to oppressive policies. Immigration policy in the Unites States is racist in favor of white people from places that are predominantly white. That is a matter of fact. There is no scrutiny on the Canadian border like there is on the Mexican border. We dont scrutinize nannies from Norway the way we do gardeners from El Salvador. Immigration polices are necessary, but the U.S.'s policy has always been racist. This mask thing is just the child of that racist policy.
Two reasons for what you call a freak out.
1. It became a national issue when the Farmworkers and some other groups made it an issue.

2. I noticed that people did not see a problem with the costume and I looked into it and found out why it is a problem, why it is hateful.
I dont get how you think it is about "censorship." There is no rule or law against making or selling the costume. Speaking against the costume is not censorship. Even Target taking it off of their shelves and refusing to sell it is not censorship. The issue has nothing to do with censorship. Presumably the company which provided the costumes to the store will get them back and can sell them wherever they can. Censorship is no allowing them to express their perspective. No one has a right to be in a particular retailer. And further, reprehensible speech does not have to be heard without an argument. I dont get how so much nonsense gets turned into a "censorship" or "free speech" issue. This ain't it.
Hey, TJ, who is Lou Dobbs? I've been told that he works for CNN, a network we all know is an instrument of the Democrat Party, so he hardly matters.

You've certainly painted a vivid picture of my life. Unfortunately, it is completely unfactual, but that's never stopped you and your ikky ilk before.

So while y'awl are fretting about holiday wardrobe, your illustrious leader will continue making his bumbling mistakes, domestic and foreign.

My vote for the funniest Halloween costume would be Obama in a Thomas Jefferson get up, going to D.C. with hand outstretched begging alms from business leaders he sought to destroy. That's really rich.
Yep, small things lead to larger things. Racial attitudes in Germany eventually led to genocide.

Censoring a haloween costume will eventually lead to... who knows, but I'm guessing it's probably more censorship. Certainly it's not going to make racial attitudes go away. Certainly it won't make those racial attitudes NOT turn into genocide if that's where it's gonna go. If anything, censoring this costume is likely to piss off the bigots and racists in the world and make them feel even more picked on. Maybe wearing a fucked-up costume like this one will keep one redneck from beating up an immigrant on haloween night because he already got it out of his system.

In any case, it seems clear that my opinions and thoughts "must be marginalized and not sanctioned by mainline institutions" in order for others to view me as decent human being. Let's start with how I feel about a haloween costume, shall we?
Aric,

That is a red herring. No one said to "censor" it. It is not a censorship issue. You are using a false defense of a racist practice. It has nothing to do with censorship. Saying that racism is wrong is not censorship. Cut the crap.
but i don't see how this one is hateful. the alien mask by itself wouldn't be. my father was actually incarcerated, but i don't get offended when i see someone wear an orange jumpsuit for halloween.

i do think it is a more specific comment to add a sombrero or a giant mustache or poncho like some of the people in the pics i shared did. that crosses a line. i see a clear difference between that and what target did.
@Bill Beck.......a person is "illegal" as soon as he breaks the law and crosses the border. How many illegals have ever gone to court protesting their innocence? Very few I would wager.
A fine illustration of the racist nature of AmeriKKKa- but oh, the hilarity: the Far Right somehow knows Latin Americans also love church, country (well, theirs that is, and Rome) are pro-life, pro-business, all about small business jobs creation, and so much more- BUT, THEY'RE SO- brown.

Bummer racist right.
Blackflon:

You said it right the first time. It is a matter for the courts. Second, they dont have to protest their innocence. They are innocent by law. They must be convicted to be "guilty". That is the "rule of law" that you referred to, Blackflon. That is how it works.

Your view of inherent guilt is something other than "rule of law". I think I know what it is, but I wont accuse it. What it is NOT is "rule of law." The law states something very specific. Guilt requires due process. Innocence attaches as a base. It does not only apply in murder or robbery, or assault. It attaches in boarder jumping and every other matter before the justice system. Due process is the American way, Blackflon. That is the "rule of law" that you mentioned, and would now seek to deny.
I've been kind of amazed at the anger and conversation over here. Let's see .... how about this, would this be a good costume ... would it be as funny if the mask was of a black man, but we kept the orange jumpsuit? No, gosh, it wouldn't.

I remember when I used to see those shirts that asked Hilary Clinton to "Get Back in the Kitchen, Bitch" or those other shirts that said "It's called The White House." Those were offensive. Both were hurtful, though surely some ass wipe found them funny.

So, you see, the allusion to immigrants here is strong enough that it's offensive. It's one thing to poke gentle fun. It's another thing to reinforce a stereotype in a way that is hurtful. I think we are all adults and can tell the difference. We might even chuckle for a second. "Illegal Alien! ha ha." But yeah, in the end, it's a bit too tasteless to be okay.

What I'm seeing is a lot of defensiveness. No one wants to be called a racist, sure. But in order to have a discussion about racism, it might be a good idea to remember that it can be our insensitivity to a situation can reveal deeper, hidden things about ourselves. The "caucasian-centric" point of view isn't the only one, is it? But because it is so well represented in our country, we can forget that there are other viewpoints equally important.

At least, we should have the ability to admit, "Oops. You might have a point. I guess I could see how a child with immigrant parents might see that costume and feel like less than. I don't want that."

Cluelessness is only a defense for about a minute, people. I remember I had a student once who thought it would be very, very funny to dress as a gardner and call himself "A Mexican" for Halloween. ha ha. Interestingly, the kids in the class who had family from Mexico were less than amused.

Maybe it's just a call to remember that no one is alone out here on the playground, kiddies. Time to see another point of view besides the most culturally represented in our country.
Odette, I think you have summarized the discussion. I got off point with the discussion, what you say is the crux of the point I was trying to make. Thank you.
And just because I have discovered it isn't clear, and that's on me for being less than clear ... I'm talking about myself here, people. Well, yes, I'm addressing everyone, but I can only judge myself.

I'm white. I'M WHITE, and even though I had a great, great, great grandmother from the Trail of Tears and we've got people who passed in my family because they were the children of slaves and of a white owner (god. so depressing), when you see me, I'm white. I'm Candidate Skin Cancer #1. And I'm just gonna say it ... it's really easy for me to accept the normative culture as the "right" one, as the dominant one. But that is wrong. And there shouldn't be a normative culture. That is, everything is measured against Caucasian/Not caucasian in our culture and usually Caucasian Male. It's easy to fall into a rut, that's all. So, we should be mindful. That's all I'm saying.

I'm not calling anyone a racist. I have no idea if anyone here is. How can I? I'm simply saying it's good for us to rethink our assumptions on these issues as often as possible.
And thank you, Stellaa. It's a good post. I'm just amazed everyone is getting so defensive about it. Clearly, it's more than a costume or we wouldn't all be getting so mad, right?
I would like everyone to reach up with your right hand. There you go! Now pat yourself on the back for being so very advanced and evolved as to poo poo the offending of others. Feels good, right? Now pinch yourself and wake up. The illegals don't give a shit so long as you don't call Lou Dobbs to come get them in his 'freedom van.'
@Stellaa & Odetteroulette - thank you both for making this a very balanced discussion. It is important to remember we all have encountered racist ideas and uncovering them does not make us "bad", it just makes us human (Thx O).

The overall theme about a costume of this nature (I consider racist, not funny) being pulled from mainstream America's stores shelves is a win, albeit a late one, for the Latino community. I think that is worth celebrating. Trick -or- Treat!
Andy, are you proud of yourself? I just want to know. I could delete your comment but I will let it stand, let people see how you think.

The Latino community cares.
I agree with you. The costume is in bad taste, especially for kids.
@Andy - you know I love you man, but really? I don't think this about poo pooing people. Seriously, you can agree to disagree with me, but this isn't about being right, it's about being concerned. I sincerely believe there is a root to problems and this is a symbol of one. I know your not singling me out, but I just want to point out there was some thoughtful discussion here.

I'm going to hope this was an attempt at humor I don't get...
Right on, sister. While I agree with Aric that we shouldn't have laws prohibiting the sale of such things, posts like this and grassroots backlash and boycotts galore are the way to put pressure on the institutions that risk their customer base with such tasteless crap. And I agree with whomever said this is a genuinely moral issue, not just some pointless PC exercise. When we were kids, "hobos" were popular, and I suppose they were a politically incorrect version of homeless people, but to tell you the truth, I never even heard of homeless people when I was a kid. This feels altogether different, and as a personal matter, I would simply not ever allow my child to think of an "illegal alien" as someone to mock. But they wouldn't go there themselves, having been raised in this household.
I completely agree, Stellaa. It feels like the racist tide just keeps rising and rising. The census taker who was lynched, the bi-racial couple denied a marriage license, and this and more and more I'm sure I 'm unaware of or is unreported.
OK, now I read all the comments, and....Wow. Just wow. Congrats on such a good discussion, Stellaa. I think the conversation is mostly about the struggle over which battles to pick. I think it's true that people have different lines on such things, and that's OK. A couple things that stand out to me:
1. First, I'm not understanding why Aric and others see this as "censorship." I didn't see Stellaa call for legislation against such costumes. Isn't what she doing here exactly what civil libertarians would endorse? A grassroots effort to raise awareness against a product and produce enough pressure to influence the market? I say this even as I agree with Aric (and others) that Hustler magazine and other costumes that promote stereotypes are in fact excellent analogies to consider. I think it's precisely true that they all require a personal moral decision rather than a legislative one, and I also think it's true that many of them fly under the radar simply because they aren't the issue of the day. That some of us dressed vaguely as homeless people as children is relevant but only to the extent that we were apprised of the condition of homelessness, understood that a group of unfortunate people were offended by the costume, and chose to wear it anyway. That's the whole point of consciousness raising, which is how I see Stellaa's post.
2. And yet, I must admit that my first reaction--expressed in my first comment--came before I knew what the costume looked like. What an interesting foray into the mind! How many of us pictured some old Mexican dude looking careworn, maybe with some veggies flowing from his pocket? Jesus. What does that say about us? I don't know. I also know that an actual space alien changed something for me, made it less offensive. Can't easily explain why, just being honest.
3. As usual, I love what Odette says, and I think the heart of the matter is the morality of the thing. I think all the other offensive costumes listed--cop pigs, Hitler Bushes, dumb blondes--make me uncomfortable too. The truth is, I always found Halloween problematic for just that reason. I hated the gore for my kids when they were small, and they're almost all out of the Halloween thing anyway, but at the end of the day, the farther into fantasyland the better, I guess. Or the tamer. Mostly they just wanted the fricking candy, so they threw something together last minute, like a baseball player or "business man" or something really lame.
4. I see Gordon's point about making kids the messengers of adult political rage. I mean, what the hell do 10-year-olds know about the whole issue? Why would they want to be an illegal alien? Truthfully, if one of my boys picked out the costume when he was small, it would simply have been because of the alien, not anything to do with green card or the orange jumpsuit. They wouldn't have gotten it. I feel the same way about young kids going around as Obama or Bush--and I mean negative costumes about them--I mean, are these really examples of parents living vicariously through their kids?

Anyway, I found this a really interesting discussion and have become muddied in my thinking after reading many of the comments. Which is as it should be, I think, when one engages with lots of smart people.
I started to comment here and it became a diatribe with thoughts of all that was said in your blog and in the comments so I had to post something to get it all out. You , Stella, always make me think and that is so fabulous. And I have to add that Bill Beck made some very good points too. Bravo
Where do you draw the line on humor as a means to gain greater understanding of ourselves? Well, you could ask some of the greatest humorists:

George Carlin
Lisa Lampinelli
Richard Pryor
Bill Hicks
Shakespeare


I imagine you probably wouldn't care too much for their answer though because all of them pushed and blurred the lines to the greatest possible extent. Plus you can't because most of them are, unfortunately, dead. Laughter kills hate, as long as we all understand that humanity is the punchline of it's own eternally pervasive joke.
Andy, my friend, your temper is overtaking your thought processes. But I'm glad you've taken it upon yourself to speak for an entire group of people you've never met! Good job! I'm sure that they will all thank you.

And you're projecting. I know I don't feel morally superior because I'm "thoughtful" of others. I'm pretty sure no one else feels that way either. Perhaps that's you, feeling morally superior because you "get" the joke. Yes. ha. ha. It's so funny. Yes.

All I'm saying is let's talk about it and think about other peoples' feelings occasionally. I'm pretty sure that's the crux of Stellaa's post, that what we might perceive as a joke, is quite possibly offensive and might actually encourage racist behaviors down the line. What's wrong with that stance? I'm really curious about why you and others appear so angry and touchy about that viewpoint. For pete's sake, as has been stated by those who disagree, it is just a costume, right? And that you perceive that concern about treating others the best we can as a problem is, I admit, interesting.

I'm sorry but I don't get your over the top hostility.
Stellaa,
You were right to point out the ugliness of this all. I'm surprised at the reactions of some. Brava.
Kate, Odett and Stellaa: I don't feel superior to anyone, as I don't have robot parts yet. I always speak for large groups of people I haven't met yet, otherwise I'd be required to poll everyone before speaking for them and that's way too much work.
I'm not angry, just sandpapery, if I rubbed you the wrong way, or the right way, I'm sorry for leaving you with the feeling that you need to moisturize in either case.
What I mean is, if we take ourselves and things like this alien costume too seriously, the world begins to suck at an ever increasing rate.
Consideration of others feelings is important to an extent. Take it too far, like anything else, and it becomes madness. Where are we going to be in 100 years if ths trend continues? Carlos Mencia would be swinging from a tree for his commentary in that world!
Oh, and I don't hate anyone, especially you three! Even if you disagree with my particular brand of insanity, I don't hold it against you and I certainly won't print off "dart posters" of anyone's avatar. Healthy disagreement keeps us all human.
Yeah, think I was a Gypsy (Romani, now that I know their real name) for 10 years running. I'm sure the real Romani in my neighborhood loved that :/
The things we do when we don't know better.
Totally concur Andy...that's what I figured. I figured it was your sense of humor, and didn't read too much into, but always like to make sure...

And, a little sandpaper never hurts anyone, that's how many of these discussions get off the ground.
For anyone still reading this: Apparently I didn't make it clear yesterday why I thought this was censorship, since a lot of people have questioned it. I'll try my best to explain:

Just as wearing this costume is raciscm in disguise, pulling this costume from the shelves because some people are offended is censorship in disguise. Wearing this costume is a slippery slope to racism, and pulling it from the shelves is a slippery slope to censorship.

Or, put another way: Just like "I dislike illegal immigrants" can lead to "I want to insult illegal immigrants by wearing an offensive costume" which in turn can lead to "I'd like to eradicate all illegal immigrants", "I dislike this costume" can lead to "I'm removing this costume from our shelves and will encourage everyone else to do the same", which in turn can lead to "If I had my way, these costumes would never exist." Which is censorship. Kind of like "I dislike this book" can lead to "I discourage anyone from reading this book" which in turn can lead to "Let's all burn this book".

I hope that makes it clearer.
Aric:

That is not censorship.
odette's comment really helps me clarify my thoughts here. she said,
"would it be as funny if the mask was of a black man, but we kept the orange jumpsuit?"

and this mask isn't a hispanic man mask. it's literally an alien. all the racism is coming from connotations of the phrase "illegal alien", but i still don't see how the costume itself is racist. it's really sort of sad that a space alien mask is now all you need to imply, "latino".

how about this, would it be as funny if you stenciled a maple leaf on the forehead? funnier? more offensive?
one more for odette:

"Clearly, it's more than a costume or we wouldn't all be getting so mad, right?"

what if i said, "clearly homosexuality is more than a lifestyle, or we wouldn't all be getting so mad, right?"

i think it is a mistake to defer to our instincts on issues like this. i honestly don't know why this costume is deemed racist when it doesn't actually comment on anyone's race. we should think hard about whether or not it does cross any lines and why that's important, instead of just assuming our anger must be justified because it's so fiery.

i am really curious about why this costume is such a big deal when i have personally seen variants of it for years. the one target had for sale was much more tasteful than some of the homemade ones. why isn't that acceptable?

and i dressed as sarah palin last year. as a woman, i didn't mind seeing her burnt in effigy or hanging from a tree. i didn't get shivers thinking anyone might really do that to her. i do think it was still different for people to hang effigies of obama, but both sides got angry about those stories. both sides claimed the violence was ramping up.

are their feelings justified just because they have them? i don't see how we can be a tolerant nation if we are so willing to be swept up into angry mobs.

and thanks for an interesting chat on this subject. it was refreshing to see so many people commenting here and on jodi's post.
Bill: broad-stroke statements mean nothing. Please explain or refrain.

How is it not censorship? How would you define censorship? How would you define this, then, since it's not censorship?
Thank you Stellaa (and Bill for your excellent responses).

This is not a Freedom of Speech issue. This is about corporate-sponsored racism and the violence to which it often leads. For Christ's sake, public censorship of bigotry did not lead to genocide in Germany. Tolerant and enthusiastic attitdues toward bigotry and scapegoating did. If a major corporation decides it makes financial sense to endorse these sterotypes, I do not have to accept it and spend my money there. I also have the right to try and shame them into not being bigots.

Next people here on OS will be saying that civil rights legislation is censorship because if forbids institutionalized racism by those who feel it is their God-given right to be a bigot.
Thanks for writing about it.
I'm am not sure if anyone has mentioned this issue, but I was always bothered by the word "alien" used in context of immigration, documented or not. The word "alien" is mostly used to describe an imaginary creature from another planet. By using the same word to describe a person who has migrated to this country is to suggest that immigrants are not human, but creatures from some different planet. I find this extremely telling and horrible. This word should not even be used to describe immigrants.
...enjoy your desire to debase others through humor.

Ouch. Stella, you're such a finepee-pee whacker. Now, I want you to write down all the names of everyone who talks while I am out of the room having my coffee and cigarette.