Ixtoc Sister Spill Portends Doubtful Outcomes for Deepwater
Image courtesy Central Florida News
Today marks the anniversary of the 1979 Ixtoc oil spill in Mexico’s Bay of Campeche. The catastrophic event ultimately released 3.3 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico over a period of 357 harrowing days until it was finally stemmed by the drilling of relief wells.
The spill, which occurred in only 160 feet of water 50 miles offshore, was sparked by an exploratory drill bit hitting soft stata below the seabed. This caused a loss of hydrostatic pressure—the pressure that allows liquids to flow in the right direction with appropriate pressure levels. When workers attempted to remove the drill bit to shift location, they set off a chain reaction that allowed a catastrophic blowout that caused an explosion when oil and gas reached motors aboveboard.
At Ixtoc, too, the shear rams—those supposedly all-powerful jaws located within the blowout preventer—failed. They were of insufficient strength to cut through the reinforced pipe.
The spill released "30,000 barrels of oil a day" into pristine Gulf waters, Professor Tyler Priest told NPR yesterday. Priest is Professor and Director of Global Studies at the University of Houston, and is an expert on the oil and gas industry,
The damage caused by the spill, the third largest in history according to Wikpedia (unless we surpass it now), was considerably less than what we can anticipate, according to Priest. In the Ixtoc case much of the oil drifted offshore to deeper waters, fouling marine environments that remained out of sight and out of mind. Significant damage was caused along more than 150 miles of coastal Texas, but nothing like what will be caused by the inevitable fouling of estuaries and marshes along the coast of Louisiana.
In comparison to Ixtoc, “I think that the damage is going to be a lot worse,” Priest told NPR.
Like Open Heart Surgery at 5,000 Feet
What stands out in comparing the Ixtoc disaster to Deepwater Horizon is the length of time it took to drill relief wells to ultimately cap and control the spill. At Ixtoc, it took one year. One. Full. Year. And that was at a depth of 160 feet, not 5,000.
What took them so long? Ixtoc workers drilled two relief wells, same as the current strategy of BP as stipulated by the Obama administration. In the case of Ixtoc, the first relief well did little good. According to Reuters , Ixtoc “continued to leak oil more than three months after Pemex completed its first relief well.” And in that case, Pemex, the driller, was able to shore up its efforts by pumping cement and water down the runaway well, something that cannot be done in the case of the BP spill. Pemex used divers to attempt to fix the blowout preventer, another option unavailable to us.
The earliest timeline for capping the Deepwater Horizon spill with the aid of a relief well was said to be August. This morning White House energy advisor Carol Browner told NPR, “90 days.” That puts us into September. But who is to say that estimate has any validity? Experience counters persuasively that more is likely to go wrong, that one relief well may be insufficient, and moreover, that even with two relief wells in place it’s not a done deal by any means. At Ixtoc, it took from March to May 1980 just to finish the job until the well was, as Priest put it, “officially capped.”
At Ixtoc they were able to pump heavy mud into the two relief wells—an option not available to us. Browner indicated that the relief well has to intersect some part of the original wellhead area, an operation that others have described as open heart surgery at 5,000 feet.
Meanwhile, informed estimates of the total cost of damages are beginning to climb from the 4 to 6 billion dollar range to the 10 to 14 billion dollar range. These estimates seem to increase daily. The survival of BP, seen as a foregone conclusion two weeks ago, is now questioned by some analysts. These cost estimates, while dependent on a variety of uncontrollable variables, all assume the spill will be stopped this summer. That cannot be a foregone conclusion at this point.
At the Mercy of Weather and Currents
Forty-four days into our worst environmental disaster in history the well may have already released 900,000 barrels of oil into sensitive Gulf waters if you accept the conservative 20,000 barrels a day estimate now being advanced by the Browner. We are at the mercy of weather and ocean currents now.
In fact, the future of the Obama administration and of the Democrats in general may be at the mercy of those weather and ocean currents. If currents take the oil around the horn of Florida and up the east coast—if a hurricane rains down oil 50 miles inland—if all this and more occurs in the coming months, public disgust will peak just in time for the mid-term elections.
As of this moment, Deepwater Horizon absolutely has the capacity to become Obama’a Katrina, even though the analogy is deeply flawed. It comes down to three things: the degree of devastation within the Gulf, the potential for damage beyond the Gulf, and the length of time it takes to get the spill under control. The Obama administration can effectively control none of these variables, though its direct efforts may prove most effective containing coastline damage within the Gulf.
We are at and beyond the limits of the restorative technology available to us. A BP senior technology executive admitted as much in 2005 when he said we had better master drilling at 5,000 feet before we go to 10,000 feet. But the fact is, the technology seems to have changed remarkably little since 1979.
How bad was Ixtoc? We’ll never know. According to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, “thorough studies of the ecological damage in Mexico have either not been carried out or the results have not been released.”
Pemex never paid for the damage it caused the economy of the U.S. and Mexico, nor did it pay for any environmental damage its spill caused. Why? It claimed sovereign immunity. Perhaps BP’s best survival strategy would be to become nationalized by the U.S. government. Is another bailout on the deepwater horizon? If it takes six months to cap that well all bets are off.
* * *
UPDATE: June 5 -- A wire services article in the Minneapolis Star Tribune cites unnamed analysts now putting high end estimates of the financial costs of the spill at $20 billion. High end estimates have tripled over the last two weeks.
UPDATE: June 7 -- U.S. Coast Guard chief Thad Allen on CBS network's “Face the Nation,” Sunday, June 6:
“"This will only end when we intercept the well bore, pump mud down it to overcome the pressure of the oil coming up from the reservoir and put a cement plug in. That's what I would call bottom kill rather than top kill. The spill will not be contained until that happens," he told host Bob Schieffer.
"But even after that, there will be oil out there for months to come. This will be well into the fall. This is a siege across the entire Gulf," he said.”
And that’s if nothing else goes wrong.


Salon.com
Comments
People should stop writing about things they don't understand. Does that make any sense to you at all unless I am just not getting what you are saying.
I don't understand the point you are trying to make. Priest didn't discuss this.
They pumped mud down the relief wells to block the flow of oil coming from from the source of the leak. This has been reported by a number of sources.
Apparently they used a lot of his post info and he was never credited.
It has nothing to do with wrong numbers or info as someone commented below..What it has to do with is that we need to keep being reminded of these horrible mistakes so it does not happen again.
Rated with hugs and a tip of the hat to you kind sir.
I wasn't even aware of the Ixtoc spill until you posted this.
Rated for great information.
Hopefully earlier oil spills can offer some sort of learning-from-previous-mistakes, even though each situation sounds like it brings unique circumstances for troubleshooting.
Sure, that pipe is 5000 feet below the sea. But with the kind of money the oil industry is making, you would think they could afford some pretty impressive emergency systems. If we can retrieve stuff from the Titanic, surely we should be able to plug that leak?
I'm guessing that $500,000 acoustic backup switch is looking pretty good to the guys in the BP boardroom right now. Pity they didn't buy it.
It should be Cheney's.
This is technically right, if the rate stays constant for the entire period. However, before criticizing the math, you might want to read the original source linked in the article above, which states that the leak initially started at 30,000 barrels a day, but went down after the team was able to reduce its daily rate.
As far as the damage of the oil into deep sea ocean, it's not as great because most ocean life uses the shores as it's nursery and the greatest amount of sea life, some 80%, is found along the coast, most of that is associated with the coral reefs. Most ocean life is small and feeds the larger animals we think of when we think ocean life. This is why so many focus on the health of the coral seas. Kill the corals and you kill the majority of ocean life. Not only that, many other animals, land animals, also use the coast as their nursery. It is the coast where the greatest amount of damage can be had.
ttfn, thanks for the comment, that may well be. I chose Ixtoc for this cautionary tale because of the length of time it took to cap it.
Connie, RE: "in my opinion, it shouldn't be Obama's "Katrina"." Agreed. But that may not stop it from becoming such.
Thanks, all, for your comments.
After two years, marine life had nearly returned to normal
Perhaps because of those microbes, aquatic life along the shoreline in Texas had returned to normal within three years -- even as tar balls and tar mats remained along the beaches, sometimes covered by sand, according to Wes Tunnell, a marine biologist at the Harte Research Institute of Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi.
"We were really surprised," Lizarraga said. "After two years, the conditions were really almost normal."
I don't think we know enough about what is going to happen to make any major changes right now. It seems mother earth has learned a few things about taking care of herself.
First, the comparison to Ixtoc 1 is very apt. This isn't unprecedented.
Your skepticism regarding the relief wells is conjecture and isn't supported by oil and gas experts.
The depth figures are the depth from the sea surface to the sea bed. the first relief well was 'spudded' or started on May 2 and the plan for the well is to complete within 90 days of May 2. It is currently "on plan" and the progress is well documented on the BP website.
There have been huge advances in directional drilling technologies in the 30 years since Ixtoc 1. The relief well solution is a proven technology with a low chance of failure.
In contrast, every single under sea containment strategy other than relief wells is highly experimental and has never been successfully implemented (or needed) at 5,000 feet, where the water pressure is 200o psi.
As far as costs to BP, the financial markets have priced them at over $20 billion since the initial spill, knocking over 1/3 off BP's market cap. As far as I'm concerned, the payout will be at a minimum $10 to $15 billion or about 3x Exxon Valdes and Vioxx. These are not unreasonable precedents.
I like your article, and think the only seriously flawed assumption is the assumption regarding probabilities of success regarding relief wells. However, I suppose it is worth contemplating since it is being assumed as a given by virtually all analysts.
This is a link to a diagram of the relief wells, including their current depth:
http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/incident_response/STAGING/local_assets/downloads_pdfs/releif_well2_large.pdf
The total depth from sea level to the planned intersection point is 18,000 feet. Well #1 is at 12,000 ft @ may 30. The speed of drilling decreases with depth, so it will likely take approximately the 90 days planned.
As I see it, though the technology is well advanced from that of 1979, it is not up to level needed to fix this problem in a timely manner. Thanks for taking the time to offer a detailed response.
As long as the relief well is under control -- specifically with intact connections at the ocean floor -- the pressures @ 18,000 feet are well within the range of conventional oil and gas technology.
The unusual problem in this situation is that the well blew out and the connections were broken at the sea floor. Therefore the ocean temperatures and pressures @ 5,000 feet are the critical factors.
I suppose the 'open heart surgery' analogy is apt in the sense that it isn't particularly difficult in an a modern operating room, but would be a a huge challenge (or impossible to survive) in a remote wilderness location.
The risks with the relief wells that concern me are things like hurricanes. That is, the added lack of control that occurs when drilling on an ocean.
There is plenty of technical information available for people to form their own opinions. This is the way I see it, but certainly others have their own points of view.
blown-out oil/gas well two miles down in the ocean and may help all of us deal with, and protest to, our overlords
more intelligently!
On April 29th I posted "Drill Baby?" ( http://open.salon.com/blog/sophomorocat/2010/04/29/drill_baby)
and urged everyone to bombard our "leaders" over the spill, it was almost two weeks later that the mass media
started featuring it.
But before that call of mine to descend from our OS "Ivory Towers", I e-mailed President Obama, both of my
states senators, my congressman, the committee members of the energy committee, the finance committee and
every influential elected official that I couild think of urging them to "now, today, immediately" take charge of and do
something about, what even then I could see would not be, easily pluggable.
At this point I suggest that we send the entire U.S. Corps of engineers to take over and do this thing and then
bill BP and the other usual suspects Halliburton etc.for the cost after. Seize their assets now before their investors
bleed away any assets worth seizing.
The corps can then stop by N'awlins and finish what they started there when they are done.