Perry takes aim at Big Government, shoots economy in the face.
The bulk of Republican proposals to kick-start the economy seem to revolve around dismantling the federal government. Mitt Romney said Tuesday he’ll cut the corporate income tax to 25 percent, curtail labor unions, launch new free trade agreements, roll back all Obama-era regulations and cut non-defense discretionary spending by 5 percent. He will gut health care reform and somehow go after China for currency manipulation.
This, then, will get us those 22 million jobs we need? The Atlantic weighed in with, “As odd as it may seem, Romney appears to believe that one way to create jobs is to eliminate them.”
Ron Paul, when asked what government agencies he would eliminate, suggested the question would be better phrased to ask which ones he wouldn’t.
In the La-La Land of the conservative thought bubble, it’s all about killing the golden goose. I refer to the goose that bails out states, industries and disaster areas. The goose that hires so many in poor, rural areas through subsidized education, health and social safety programs. The goose that invests in cancer-beating basic research. The goose that throws money at defense contractors as if they were gander from heaven. The goose that invented corporate welfare. The goose that extended unemployment insurance for the longest term ever for the most people ever. The goose that pays grandpa’s rent when the company for which he worked for 35 years forget to give him a pension. That goose.
Even the hated U.S. Postal Service is part of the goose. Today it contemplates winding down or declaring insolvency—this week its director threatens to throw 100,000 people out of work next year.
Michele Bachmann wants to reduce government “to its original size.” Sometimes stupid is as stupid talks. I hear pundits tell us that this is all just for show, just for the diehards, and that as soon as the right-wing primaries are over it will be time for talking sense. Do you believe that?
George Stephanopoulos writes for ABC News that:
Perry wrote in his book “Fed Up” — that Social Security is a “Ponzi scheme,” a “failure,” “something we have been forced to accept for more than 70 years now,” and one of many New Deal programs that have “never died, and like a bad disease, they have spread.”
I believe Perry wrote those things well before the primary season began.
The nonsense is almost random. We could line up a bunch of I-H8-Big Guv quotes and a random list of conservative front runners and also-rans and it could be anyone of ‘em sayin’ any one of 'em.
Quick, who said?
…Not asking for Pharaoh to give everything to everybody and to take care of folks because at the end of the day, it’s slavery. We become slaves to government.”
(Rick, not Michele.) And really. Pharaoh? The Department of Outlandish Remarks Department is getting pretty redundant around here.
Don’t Know What You’ve Got ‘Til It’s Gone?
Clearly, Republicans are refracting enough undifferentiated anger to power all of Houston for at least a year. And they’re trying to direct all that anger at the one entity that best represents American political aspirations, even if it all too often honors them in the breach--and has since its inception. I don’t know about you, but I am not ready to throw in my lot with Texas, with all it’s voodoo job counts based on government job growth linked to population increases, with its crap-on-crap textbooks, degraded environment and ambivalence about “intelligent design.” No, Texas, you can have all that.
They say they want to kill the golden goose but they don’t even want that. They want instead for its largesse to accrue exclusively to a kind of Blackwater/Xe blood-siphoning that redirects government spending to favored corporations—just like in Texas! And then, beleaguered citizens, they want to keep the whole defense behemoth in place to protect private global energy companies with the kind of adventurism that artificially boosts rural employment through military service while killing our sons and daughters because—TADA!—there are no other job options.
Our deeply flawed system of governance reveals us to be but adolescents in the long-term quest for self-determination. In Norway, they structured their oil wealth so that they would grow a $500 billion endowment—$100,000 for every man, woman and child in that nation. And no one ever touches that corpus. How long do you think that would last here? And then they have the audacity to continue to tax at European social democracy levels. The result? A republic that mostly works. Unlike, well, unlike any country where a significant, mouthy plurality wants to rip its social fabric to shreds in order to sit around the neighborhood oil drum and sew homemade state flags. If this is the advent of state’s rights democracy, frankly, you can have it. And, oh yeah, from the afterthought department: try to squeeze more than a couple million jobs out of the whole deal over the next four years if you are really, really lucky.


Salon.com
Comments
People like Reagan and Nixon must be turning in their graves at the thought of what their machinations have wrought.
It would be one thing if this already diminished government was producing top level results in education, literacy, longevity, low poverty and crime rates etc. But you know that it isn't. And of course the Repubs don't dare point to another country where this approach has been successfully implemented. Not only would argument fly in the face of American exceptionalism, there are no examples to point to. Great post.
Former GOP operative Mike Lofgren, writing on the Truthout.com website, (http://www.truth-out.org/goodbye-all-reflections-gop-operative-who-left-cult/1314907779), recounts chapter and verse arguments that prove we're right about the Republicans and their agenda....but no one seems capable of stopping the juggernaut that is tearing away at the fabric of our lives.
I keep getting sucked into the error of thinking that logic counts - weren't you the one who pointed that out to me - despite the fact that it's the narrative that drives the political process, not the truth.
As someone who struggles to find truth, I have an innate inability to understand people who tell deliberate lies to manipulate other people with their falsehoods. Deep in my heart, I really believe that these creatures are really cynical frauds who know that the bullshit they're dishing out stinks to high heaven, but do it anyway because that's the source of their power, and their revenues.
But I am reaching the point where I am finding it difficult not to believe that these cretins really believe the rhetoric they are spouting, that Rick Perry really believes that he's on a mission from God, and Michele Bachman really believes her smarmy rhetoric.....and these people have the temerity to run for the presidency.
The arrogance defies belief.
Hmmm, maybe I shouldn't say that too loudly...
rated
Alan, yes, we did discuss narrative as a driver, and this is part of it. Yes, we are talking to "ourselves," but people, other people do read some of this, and are at least bolstered that they are not alone.
Jan, "insane clowns on one side or the totally corrupt manipulators on the other ..." wish I said that. There are so many ways for an insane clown posse to getcha.
Shiral, you organ grinder....
John, good to see you here, yes, sacking the fireman...sounds like a major story for the major media to ignore.
Candace. Thank you.
Best, all.
Michelle's intellect has never grown beyond its original size. Problem is, she's not alone. Anyone who thinks the individual has a snowball's chance in hell succeeding or prevailing against multi-national corporations absent the assistance of govt, or lawyers or unions -- all of which the Rabid Rights wants rid of -- hasn't got a brain in their head. But at least in Bachmann and Perry they've got candidates that represent the brain-dead.
Sign I wanna see: Rick Perry for President -- W wasn't ignorant or incompetent enough to truly represent me.
When Obama was elected, things were bad. Now they're worse. Unfortunately, he'll probably be held accountable (I certainly don't hold him responsible). And, I'm pretty much convinced that come January 2013, whoever is inaugurated President is going to find things are even worse yet. What comes afterward is anybody's guess, but I'm not optimisitic.
I'll make this prediction here and now--and maybe later in a blogpost--I see this whole have vs. have not (Teabagger vs. anybody even slightly more liberal than they are) degenerating into violence in the street BEFORE this coming election cycle is over.
When will we hear that they will be willing to give up theirs?
Rated.
According to my research:
Texas Forest Service appropriations :
Biennium Total (in millions)
2002 – 2003 $43.5
2004 – 2005 $70.6
2006 – 2007 $72.4
2008 – 2009 $75.2
2010 – 2011 $109.2
2012 – 2013 $75.4
Question: how is going "back" to a level that matches 2008-2009 spending at all irresponsible or, as some have claimed, "gutting" the department. Another question for those who live in the real world and understand how unchecked government bureaucracies can grow (yes, like wild fires) out of control, taking freedoms as well as money away from people why was $43 million considered enough in 2002-2003 but almost double that amount (75 million) is needed for 2012-13?
In addition, the 2010-11 increase was apparently due, according to my reading linked below, to unusual one-time upgrades to equipment and by any logical measure should be considered an occasional, not a yearly, expense.
Of course the bigger issue and the most frustrating thing on display here, evidenced by the comments, is just how difficult it is to make any cuts in spending of any kind because people will always play politics with them. And keep in mind most of the time when we talk about cuts we are actually talking about a cut in the increase. You deride the greed of "corporations" (feel free to be a part owner in one of them and buy some stock, if you want, so you can get some pay-back on that greed) yet the greed of government bureaucracies escapes your wrath. Why are they always so unwilling to make cuts in their programs including their own salaries? Why do they instead seem to take advantage of every opportunity to grab even more of the pie, as if there are no consequences to doing so?
Perry "cuts" the budget of firefighters to an amount equal with the amount two years prior when the previous year's increase was mostly due to upgrading equipment, and people act as if its armegeddon. In addition, unlike California (where I live,) Texas has a healthy "rainy day fund" which is set up precisely for unforeseen disasters like wild fires in case there isn't enough money in the budget. If you fault Perry for not being able to foresee these fires, at least give him credit for having a rainy day fund.
I guess I could be equally irresponsible and say, with as little factual evidence as has been given here, that since arson is suspected in the Texas wild fires I guess the likely hood they were started by some angry, anti-Republican activist should be high on the priority list. It would make about as much sense as blaming Gov. Perry for not being able to put them out.
Finally, I will say as someone who was raised in Texas and now lives in California, the idea forwarded here that a dominantly left, liberal Democratic party of the Golden State is somehow immune to rewarding their buddies or cronies than the more politically balanced government of the Lone Star state (as the writer here states: "government spending to favored corporations—just like in Texas!") is amusing to say the least.
I don't know enough about Perry to be a supporter or detractor, but there's a lack of balance in this article that I do not find helpful in facing the very serious problems that we face, well written and interesting though it may be.
source: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/276494/did-perry-slash-volunteer-fire-fighter-budget-katrina-trinko
1. Population growth
2. Increased home building in rural settings
3. The rising cost of healthcare
4. The need to hire and train additional firefighters
5. Salary increases
6. Pension and/or 401k cost increases
7. Inflation
8. Bureaucratic inefficiencies
9. Increased technology costs
Any other questions?
11. Global warming.
Just getting warmed up.
I wonder if it ever occurs to socialists that if every citizen was an employee or beneficiary of the government, then there could never be enough taxes paid to afford the government payroll, not to speak of the benefits to all those poor, uneducated, and otherwise unfortunate people on the public dole.
The best news in the unemployment reports these days is that public jobs are being eliminated while private jobs are being created.
you're all gonna sit on your ass and watch. hasn't worked so far, has it? "so let's..." means you and a few hundred thousand others telling the democrat party to .
I would rather vote for one that says up front he is going to stab me in the back than vote for another who pormises and does not deliver.
I really like surprises, honestly i do, but not when someone is using my funds.
Rated ♪♫•**•.¸♥¸.•*¨*•♪♪♫•**•.¸¸♥ d