Steve Klingaman

Steve Klingaman
Location
Minneapolis, Minnesota,
Birthday
January 01
Title
Consultant/Writer
Bio
Steve Klingaman is a nonprofit development consultant and nonfiction writer specializing in personal finance and public policy. HIs music reviews can be found at minor7th.com.

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 6:44PM

Killing the Golden Goose

Rate: 24 Flag

perry-gun 

Perry takes aim at Big Government, shoots economy in the face. 

The bulk of Republican proposals to kick-start the economy seem to revolve around dismantling the federal government.  Mitt Romney said Tuesday he’ll cut the corporate income tax to 25 percent, curtail labor unions, launch new free trade agreements, roll back all Obama-era regulations and cut non-defense discretionary spending by 5 percent. He will gut health care reform and somehow go after China for currency manipulation. 

            This, then, will get us those 22 million jobs we need? The Atlantic weighed in with, “As odd as it may seem, Romney appears to believe that one way to create jobs is to eliminate them.”

            Ron Paul, when asked what government agencies he would eliminate, suggested the question would be better phrased to ask which ones he wouldn’t.

            In the La-La Land of the conservative thought bubble, it’s all about killing the golden goose.  I refer to the goose that bails out states, industries and disaster areas.  The goose that hires so many in poor, rural areas through subsidized education, health and social safety programs.  The goose that invests in cancer-beating basic research.  The goose that throws money at defense contractors as if they were gander from heaven.  The goose that invented corporate welfare.  The goose that extended unemployment insurance for the longest term ever for the most people ever.  The goose that pays grandpa’s rent when the company for which he worked for 35 years forget to give him a pension.  That goose.

            Even the hated U.S. Postal Service is part of the goose.  Today it contemplates winding down or declaring insolvency—this week its director threatens to throw 100,000 people out of work next year.

            Michele Bachmann wants to reduce government “to its original size.”  Sometimes stupid is as stupid talks.  I hear pundits tell us that this is all just for show, just for the diehards, and that as soon as the right-wing primaries are over it will be time for talking sense.  Do you believe that?

            George Stephanopoulos writes for ABC News that:

Perry wrote in his book “Fed Up”  — that Social Security is a “Ponzi scheme,” a “failure,” “something we have been forced to accept for more than 70 years now,” and one of many New Deal programs that have “never died, and like a bad disease, they have spread.”  

I believe Perry wrote those things well before the primary season began.

      The nonsense is almost random.  We could line up a bunch of I-H8-Big Guv quotes and a random list of conservative front runners and also-rans and it could be anyone of ‘em sayin’ any one of 'em.

            Quick, who said?

…Not asking for Pharaoh to give everything to everybody and to take care of folks because at the end of the day, it’s slavery. We become slaves to government.”

(Rick, not Michele.) And really.  Pharaoh?  The Department of Outlandish Remarks Department is getting pretty redundant around here.

Don’t Know What You’ve Got ‘Til It’s Gone?

Clearly, Republicans are refracting enough undifferentiated anger to power all of Houston for at least a year.  And they’re trying to direct all that anger at the one entity that best represents American political aspirations, even if it all too often honors them in the breach--and has since its inception.  I don’t know about you, but I am not ready to throw in my lot with Texas, with all it’s voodoo job counts based on government job growth linked to population increases, with its crap-on-crap textbooks, degraded environment and ambivalence about “intelligent design.”  No, Texas, you can have all that. 

            They say they want to kill the golden goose but they don’t even want that.  They want instead for its largesse to accrue exclusively to a kind of Blackwater/Xe blood-siphoning that redirects government spending to favored corporations—just like in Texas!  And then, beleaguered citizens, they want to keep the whole defense behemoth in place to protect private global energy companies with the kind of adventurism that artificially boosts rural employment through military service while killing our sons and daughters because—TADA!—there are no other job options.

            Our deeply flawed system of governance reveals us to be but adolescents in the long-term quest for self-determination. In Norway, they structured their oil wealth so that they would grow a $500 billion endowment—$100,000 for every man, woman and child in that nation.  And no one ever touches that corpus.  How long do you think that would last here?  And then they have the audacity to continue to tax at European social democracy levels.  The result?  A republic that mostly works.  Unlike, well, unlike any country where a significant, mouthy plurality wants to rip its social fabric to shreds in order to sit around the neighborhood oil drum and sew homemade state flags.  If this is the advent of state’s rights democracy, frankly, you can have it.  And, oh yeah, from the afterthought department:  try to squeeze more than a couple million jobs out of the whole deal over the next four years if you are really, really lucky.

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
The snake oil pitch they're peddling shouldn't fool a fool...which tells ya lots about what kind of people are buying their crap.

People like Reagan and Nixon must be turning in their graves at the thought of what their machinations have wrought.
now, this is the kind of opinion piece that used to be more prevalent on this site, written by you and many who have left, where statements are backed up with research and facts and links. i am delighting in reading it, steve, just for that. but also because i happen to agree that these foolish quotes from people who *far* too many citizens might vote for demonstrate how little they understand about economics. it's a very frightening group.
Who hears politicians talk about getting rid of social safety nets and runs out to vote for them? Only the very very rich need not worry about financial misfortune...
Interesting that Perry is asking for federal aid to put out the fires in his state. He sacked half the firemen.
Hey I am immigrating to Norway, if I can and if they will take me.
Steve, one of the points all Repub candidates agree on is that they must reduce the size of government. I did a blog about a year ago (which I'll soon update) showing that the US tax "burden" is around 28% of GDP versus the mid 30s to around 50% for all of Western Europe, Scandinavia, most of Eastern Europe as well as Canada and Australia. And the gap is much greater when you factor in the disproportionate portion of taxes that goes to the military.

It would be one thing if this already diminished government was producing top level results in education, literacy, longevity, low poverty and crime rates etc. But you know that it isn't. And of course the Repubs don't dare point to another country where this approach has been successfully implemented. Not only would argument fly in the face of American exceptionalism, there are no examples to point to. Great post.
We keep talking to each other and congratulating ourselves for having seen the little man behind the curtain, the one who pretends to the Great and Terrible Oz, but we're only talking to each other, and congratulating ourselves for having seen the fools for the fools that they are....but they keep achieving their goals and we keep failing to achieve ours.

Former GOP operative Mike Lofgren, writing on the Truthout.com website, (http://www.truth-out.org/goodbye-all-reflections-gop-operative-who-left-cult/1314907779), recounts chapter and verse arguments that prove we're right about the Republicans and their agenda....but no one seems capable of stopping the juggernaut that is tearing away at the fabric of our lives.

I keep getting sucked into the error of thinking that logic counts - weren't you the one who pointed that out to me - despite the fact that it's the narrative that drives the political process, not the truth.

As someone who struggles to find truth, I have an innate inability to understand people who tell deliberate lies to manipulate other people with their falsehoods. Deep in my heart, I really believe that these creatures are really cynical frauds who know that the bullshit they're dishing out stinks to high heaven, but do it anyway because that's the source of their power, and their revenues.

But I am reaching the point where I am finding it difficult not to believe that these cretins really believe the rhetoric they are spouting, that Rick Perry really believes that he's on a mission from God, and Michele Bachman really believes her smarmy rhetoric.....and these people have the temerity to run for the presidency.

The arrogance defies belief.
There are terrible things happening in the USA. People losing jobs, homes and the possibility of any decent future. The shift of wealth upwards away from where it is needed to maintain the country and keep the population well housed, well fed, industrious and productive and hopeful is completely disastrous. But what is even more appalling is the lack of the huge reaction that is needed to turn the system around. That the population is looking to solutions from the insane clowns on one side or the totally corrupt manipulators on the other through the normal political processes which have been completely aborted by corporate money indicates the people of the nation are totally confused and lost and without viable leadership. I cannot see any way out until violence may break a way through but the private military now assembled in the foreign wars is probably well prepared to return home to stifle that as well.
It's still satire for the moment, but one of these days, I'm afraid it wouldn't surprise me to hear one of these TP'ers say "Really, poor people--I hear some of them still have both lungs and both kidneys! Austerity calls for sacrifice!"

Hmmm, maybe I shouldn't say that too loudly...
rated
Some pointed comments here, just like I like them.

Alan, yes, we did discuss narrative as a driver, and this is part of it. Yes, we are talking to "ourselves," but people, other people do read some of this, and are at least bolstered that they are not alone.

Jan, "insane clowns on one side or the totally corrupt manipulators on the other ..." wish I said that. There are so many ways for an insane clown posse to getcha.

Shiral, you organ grinder....

John, good to see you here, yes, sacking the fireman...sounds like a major story for the major media to ignore.

Candace. Thank you.

Best, all.
Michele Bachmann wants to reduce government “to its original size.”

Michelle's intellect has never grown beyond its original size. Problem is, she's not alone. Anyone who thinks the individual has a snowball's chance in hell succeeding or prevailing against multi-national corporations absent the assistance of govt, or lawyers or unions -- all of which the Rabid Rights wants rid of -- hasn't got a brain in their head. But at least in Bachmann and Perry they've got candidates that represent the brain-dead.

Sign I wanna see: Rick Perry for President -- W wasn't ignorant or incompetent enough to truly represent me.
the us government has been raped by the right so bad it cant get off its belly. now they stand next to the squrming corpse and blame it for not being able to run a marathon. lets see how the gov does after getting gang banged by half of dallas
Killing the Golden Goose? That bird is shot deader 'n a door nail. I think it got hit all at the same time by about a hundered different loads of 4-shot in a slough just to the northwest of Minneapolis.
When Obama was elected, things were bad. Now they're worse. Unfortunately, he'll probably be held accountable (I certainly don't hold him responsible). And, I'm pretty much convinced that come January 2013, whoever is inaugurated President is going to find things are even worse yet. What comes afterward is anybody's guess, but I'm not optimisitic.
I'll make this prediction here and now--and maybe later in a blogpost--I see this whole have vs. have not (Teabagger vs. anybody even slightly more liberal than they are) degenerating into violence in the street BEFORE this coming election cycle is over.
If the politicans think pensions, free medical and social security are drains on the budget.
When will we hear that they will be willing to give up theirs?
How are they supposed to squeeze anything out of their plans exactly? A couple million jobs--please! More like nothin' for noone nohow.

Rated.
Not at all Republicans are as far to the Right as you think. The media encouraged that, because its more fun to watch. We'll see. Social security now has an issue that can't be gainsaid, because of a demographic shift, but, one can deal with that with somewhat higher taxes and somewhat lower benefits, if one wants. We'll see if people want to think that way or not, shortly, in my bet.
There's so much here I could respond to but since a common thread seems to be a call for accurate reporting (even though it seems ironically lacking) I'll just focus on the Texas wildfires issue.

According to my research:

Texas Forest Service appropriations :

Biennium Total (in millions)
2002 – 2003 $43.5
2004 – 2005 $70.6
2006 – 2007 $72.4
2008 – 2009 $75.2
2010 – 2011 $109.2
2012 – 2013 $75.4

Question: how is going "back" to a level that matches 2008-2009 spending at all irresponsible or, as some have claimed, "gutting" the department. Another question for those who live in the real world and understand how unchecked government bureaucracies can grow (yes, like wild fires) out of control, taking freedoms as well as money away from people why was $43 million considered enough in 2002-2003 but almost double that amount (75 million) is needed for 2012-13?

In addition, the 2010-11 increase was apparently due, according to my reading linked below, to unusual one-time upgrades to equipment and by any logical measure should be considered an occasional, not a yearly, expense.

Of course the bigger issue and the most frustrating thing on display here, evidenced by the comments, is just how difficult it is to make any cuts in spending of any kind because people will always play politics with them. And keep in mind most of the time when we talk about cuts we are actually talking about a cut in the increase. You deride the greed of "corporations" (feel free to be a part owner in one of them and buy some stock, if you want, so you can get some pay-back on that greed) yet the greed of government bureaucracies escapes your wrath. Why are they always so unwilling to make cuts in their programs including their own salaries? Why do they instead seem to take advantage of every opportunity to grab even more of the pie, as if there are no consequences to doing so?

Perry "cuts" the budget of firefighters to an amount equal with the amount two years prior when the previous year's increase was mostly due to upgrading equipment, and people act as if its armegeddon. In addition, unlike California (where I live,) Texas has a healthy "rainy day fund" which is set up precisely for unforeseen disasters like wild fires in case there isn't enough money in the budget. If you fault Perry for not being able to foresee these fires, at least give him credit for having a rainy day fund.

I guess I could be equally irresponsible and say, with as little factual evidence as has been given here, that since arson is suspected in the Texas wild fires I guess the likely hood they were started by some angry, anti-Republican activist should be high on the priority list. It would make about as much sense as blaming Gov. Perry for not being able to put them out.

Finally, I will say as someone who was raised in Texas and now lives in California, the idea forwarded here that a dominantly left, liberal Democratic party of the Golden State is somehow immune to rewarding their buddies or cronies than the more politically balanced government of the Lone Star state (as the writer here states: "government spending to favored corporations—just like in Texas!") is amusing to say the least.

I don't know enough about Perry to be a supporter or detractor, but there's a lack of balance in this article that I do not find helpful in facing the very serious problems that we face, well written and interesting though it may be.


source: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/276494/did-perry-slash-volunteer-fire-fighter-budget-katrina-trinko
Ret, A few answers to your question: "why was $43 million considered enough in 2002-2003 but almost double that amount (75 million) is needed for 2012-13?

1. Population growth
2. Increased home building in rural settings
3. The rising cost of healthcare
4. The need to hire and train additional firefighters
5. Salary increases
6. Pension and/or 401k cost increases
7. Inflation
8. Bureaucratic inefficiencies
9. Increased technology costs

Any other questions?
10. Prolonged drought.
11. Global warming.

Just getting warmed up.
If that's true, then I take it that in a time when we are in one of the worst recessions in our nations history, you can find at least as many reasons for setting spending levels to equal those of two years ago, which is what the Texas budget for forest service is.
Excellent post. Perry et al. are either ultra-cynical manipulators of the hapless anger of a large and perenially deluded demographic, or they subscribe to a form of magical thinking wherein they believe if they say something often enough and loudly enough it must be true. Or both; my money is on both, actually. Either way, given the bleak economic outlook and the failure of Obama and the Dems to do anything substantive even when they controlled both the executive and legislative branches, we're looking at a very real possibility of Rick Perry winning the election next year. The very thought makes my skin crawl, but it is what it is.
On a side-note, last night Jon Stewart pointed out an amusing element of Romney's jobs plan. Mitt says what we need do is turn this country into a "job-creating machine" but there was little or no explanation of how that was supposed to be achieved. The answer was right there in front of us the whole time: all we need to do is whip up a miraculous job-creating machine. Why didn't Obama think of that!?!
Ret, Actually, no. Due to reasons 1-11.
"Ripping the social fabric to shreds" is what we can't afford. Jan Sands may be right, maybe much more change needs to come from the grassroots level. Not through violence, though. As Rei Momo posted yesterday, a greener economy and a more sustainable one, and publically funded elections, would be a great start.
"In the La-La Land of the conservative thought bubble, it’s all about killing the golden goose. I refer to the goose that bails out states, industries and disaster areas. The goose that hires so many in poor, rural areas through subsidized education, health and social safety programs."

I wonder if it ever occurs to socialists that if every citizen was an employee or beneficiary of the government, then there could never be enough taxes paid to afford the government payroll, not to speak of the benefits to all those poor, uneducated, and otherwise unfortunate people on the public dole.

The best news in the unemployment reports these days is that public jobs are being eliminated while private jobs are being created.
you can change the course of the ship. you just have to be a citizen, instead of a civilian. there are varying degrees of anguish in this piece, and in the comments, but as ever, no one says : "so let's..."

you're all gonna sit on your ass and watch. hasn't worked so far, has it? "so let's..." means you and a few hundred thousand others telling the democrat party to .
People like UncleChri who are so totally impressed and delighted by the wonders of all the jobs being created by the private sector seem to be a large element in the country. Considering the huge numbers devoted to Scientology, astrology, the fantastic predictive powers within Chinese fortune cookies and the healing powers of copper bracelets, I seriously wonder whether the species will last until a wandering asteroid finally wipes us all of the face of the planet so the process can start all over again.
Steve, just to let you know, the Republicans do have a jobs plan-for themselves! These "folks" are UNEMPLOYABLES (They have the nerve to complain about recipients of government funds). The "private-sector" I have encountered terminates any employee pushing religion, fear or personal life-style on company time or property. Their "job creators" have lawyers; Washington is the only place where they won't be sued and prosecuted.
If nothing else, we can depend on one thing in this life and that is for politicians to not keep their word.
I would rather vote for one that says up front he is going to stab me in the back than vote for another who pormises and does not deliver.
I really like surprises, honestly i do, but not when someone is using my funds.
Rated ♪♫•**•.¸♥¸.•*¨*•♪♪♫•**•.¸¸♥ d