Steve Klingaman

Steve Klingaman
Location
Minneapolis, Minnesota,
Birthday
January 01
Title
Consultant/Writer
Bio
Steve Klingaman is a nonprofit development consultant and nonfiction writer specializing in personal finance and public policy. His music reviews can be found at minor7th.com.

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
JULY 12, 2012 8:31AM

Peregrine Financial’s Failure and the Failure of Regulation

Rate: 11 Flag

Peregrine

Russell Wasendorf Sr. before the fall.

Image: wcfcourier.com 

 Russell Wasendorf Sr., 64, founder and chairman of Peregrine Financial Group, slumps forward in his car in the parking lot of his firm, a tube running from the exhaust pipe to his slightly cracked window, a suicide note on the seat beside him.  He is discovered there, close to death, and later falls into a coma in the hospital where he remains on life support.  So fails another firm engaged in the criminal financial malfeasance, in this case stealing farmers’ hard-earned funds invested as a hedge against commodity price volatility.  Investigators find that the company’s bank account is $220 million dollars short of what the books say it is, with a paltry $5 million available to panicked creditors.  When will we learn that Ponzi schemes grow in the shade of self-regulated industries?

            Wasendorf is—or was—one of those rock-star CEOs to his own minions.  His inner circle was known within the Cedar Falls, Iowa-based company as “Wasendorfians” according to Associated Press.  Blind loyalty and deference to the charismatic founder of the company set up a culture that allowed the kind of machinations that build fraud machines, which is what this firm was.  The handwriting on the wall was there for all to see. A relationship with convicted Minneapolis mega-Ponzi-schemer Trevor Cook, a $700,000 fine from the National Futures Association, and an over-the-top opulent campus should have been signals that something was amiss, but it took a federal lawsuit over Peregrine’s dealing with Cook to bring down this particular house of cards.

            But where, we wonder, was the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the federal agency charged with regulating the agricultural futures industry?  On the sidelines, the answer seems to be, where we can usually find the federal agencies charged with protecting the public.  The MF Global meltdown, a debacle much larger than the Peregrine fiasco, should have been the canary in the CFTC’s coalmine.  But instead of getting aggressive, the agency allowed the National Futures Association, an industry interest group, to conduct a little PR and window dressing “study” that showed the industry to be solvent and well-regulated, just as Peregrine was getting ready for the swan dive to oblivion.  It was not an “audit,” says the National Futures Association in its defense.  So what’s the point other than to fool investors?

            The CFTC is just one of a number of federal financial regulatory agencies that don’t regulate because they little or no budgets with which to regulate.  And that is by design. The simplest way to disable meaningful regulation, free marketers in Congress have found, is to leave the enabling legislation in place whiled gutting the agencies with budget cuts.  This form of de facto deregulation allows firms like Peregrine, and men like Wasendorf, to make their own rules.  And Wasendorf did, attempting to cut reporting corners at every opportunity. And he was good at what he did apparently, up to a point, the same as all Ponzi schemers. 

            Phil Flynn, a former Peregrin trader, was reported in a Tuesday AP story as saying, “It's mind-boggling to me. They're talking about new regulations, but that doesn't get to the crux of the problem. The crux of the problem is, where's the money? You say you have X amount of dollars. Where is it?”  Flynn, it should be noted, left the firm in February after the National Futures Association fined the firm, because he evidently saw what he called “the big red flag.”  His big regret?  That he didn’t get out faster.

            And where is money? While the CFTC allowed Wasendorf to play Where’s Waldo with the firm’s assets, 30,000 creditors faced a hidden exposure they never saw coming. 

            Meaningful financial regulation remains right where we left it before the Dodd-Frank bill—nowhere.  A few in the financial press, perhaps most notably the New York Times led by business reporter Gretchen Morgenson, have continued to raise the issue, but it seems that to those in Congress and the financial industries they fail to regulate the failures of criminal firms are more like freak occurrences of nature rather than inevitable and predictable outcomes of deliberate strategies of self-regulation by industry, a practice that has never worked, and never will. The outcome is that Peregrine is in bankruptcy, its customers who played by the rules are fleeced and the CFTC, which, like Peregrine, didn’t, goes on with business as usual.

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
The CFTC is sort of like the old joke about giving a deserving employee a big title instead of a raise.
I read about this yesterday and now in your outstanding post today. In my mind (and this is totally naive), I have a reaction that this is just stuff that does not happen in the Upper Midwest especially in an un-presupposing city like Cedar Falls whose claim to fame has typically been UNI. I guess what I mean is that we tend to think of people from the Upper Midwest as conservatives who take the role of fiduciary very seriously. They might not be familiar with or use the term but most certainly are typically are sound guardians of other people's money. One more bubble burst dammit.
Great reporting Steve. Of course the problem is 'regulatory capture' but the most amazing question is: Why does the public put up with this? Why isn't there more of a public outcry? The answer is that it's not only public ignorance of financial issues, which might get corrected eventually with more lessons from the school of hard knocks, but also the difficulty of politicians getting elected on a platform of meaningful financial reform because, such a politician will come up against the rhetoric of an establishment politician who will argue, in a campaign, that most reforms will wind up making the situation worse by scaring away investment capital, and that tough reforms are just a Trojan Horse for the real agenda of 'reformist politicians', which is socialism and greater government control over everything, quickly making Amerika into another Pol Pot/Khmer Rouge Cambodia. So, in a dirty election campaign, the fear of intrusive government will usually trump the fear of unregulated cowboy finance capitalism. It's an impossible situation and it means a kind of crypto nativist Amerkan populist fascism will be the next big political trend soon, as populist, small capitalist Main Street demagogues begin ascending in the economic/political narrative.
Nice work.

The entire financial industry is a rotten husk insolvent without free government money. I'm waiting for Bank of America or JPMorgan to take another staggering loss. This time the whole house of cards will come crashing down.

r
"When will we learn that Ponzi schemes grow in the shade of self-regulated industries?"

Great line! I wonder if the strategy of leaving the shell of regulation in place while gutting the budgets and actual staff that do the work is so Republicans and free-marketers have access to a ready-made scape-goat when their casino markets collapse: Government over-regulation!
But it's actually much worse than this. In fact it's not a self-regulated industry, finance is highly regulated, it's just that most of the regulatory agencies favor those they're supposed to be watching. The SEC's biggest action in the past year was to take one of the world's largest ratings agencies offline when they dared to rate all the big investment banks at junk status, which is where they all belong. So...who believes in regulation now?

Worse, some of the regulators have been bought off, many are angling for a position within the industry, or they've just come from the industry, and if a rare honest one shows up on the job, they're made to feel like a leper at a dance party. If the LIBOR scandal--which makes this Peregrine thing look like chicken feed--teaches us anything, it's that even the central banks and top regulatory agencies are in on the fraud. It was only investigated once whistleblowers within the agencies now doing the serious investigating--ahem, don't expect it to go very far, ya know?--came forward and said, "Ah, excuse me, but this is all bullshit and you're all crooks and I'm outta here."

Truth is we have a bullshit financial industry run around banks that are dead, central bankers that are corrupt, officials that have been bought off, and bankers that are, well, psychotics hooked on rocket fuel. If Jamie Dimon's institution can be leveraged for more than $79 trillion and still be called a well run business by the president, then really, what's a few suicides here and there?

And Jamie will NEVER commit suicide. Count on it. That piece of shit has no shame. And no shadow.

Rated.
And by the way, just so people don't think I pulled that $79 trillion figure out of my hat (they carry $1 trillion in deposits against that, with another trillion in opaque "liquid," which itself might be hedged for trillions more), it comes from the 2011 Q1 and Q2 numbers at the OCC (Office of Comptroller of Currency) at the US Treasury. Banks don't like anyone to know their real numbers, so their reports are purposefully opaque, but they do have to make sure they're insured by backstopping their amounts with Fed if they want full FDIC coverage.

Here's the report:

http://www.occ.gov/topics/capital-markets/financial-markets/trading/derivatives/dq211.pdf

If you want the skinny, read the abstract summary near the beginning, and skip down to pages 8 and 9 for the breakdown of what these banks are really made of, including especially notional derivatives. Dodd-Frank, which is also purposefully opaque, actually extended the horizon on notionals and other exotics so that they wouldn't be counted in the imaginary 10-to-1 ratio, which means that even when it kicks in these zombie behemoths can take this load and keep shoving it down the road and say, "Yep, we're in compliance."

Interesting note: global GDPs collectively are less than the amount now backstopped at EITHER, JPM, or BofA (a mere $75 trillion).

Here's a nice analysis at the blog, The Daily Bail:

http://dailybail.com/home/holy-bailout-federal-reserve-now-backstopping-75-trillion-of.html
I like the term "notional," too. I mean besides it's financialese meaning. Because that's exactly what these institutions are--notions.
Excellent reporting.

"Meaningful financial regulation remains right where we left it before the Dodd-Frank bill—nowhere." Will it never change?
"When will we learn that Ponzi schemes grow in the shade of self-regulated industries?" Another fine post. Thank you!
You only touched on one aspect of the mess that is the CFTC it's evil ways and those controlling the strings (the real criminals). Financial regulation is a joke and if you started arresting all those involved we would see many in Congress behind bars on serious criminal charges, it would not stop there.
Steve - when we learn about ponzi schemes? There is only one self regulated organization that can legally run a ponzi scheme that I know of. The Fed. gov.
you see the result of the constitution, but you won't change it.

einstein characterized that mind-set as insanity, but people only hear what they like.
@boko: you know it doesn't matter, they don't understand. even sheila bair is full of shit now. she was on tv a while back talking about the whale bet and she balanced any potential losses against shareholder value. shareholder value! the toilet paper of the moment. so, it's all tied up. they're going to use an oops moment to distract people for another 5 minutes from the giant planet about to hit earth and book a flight to the caymens. . .shit is as shit does. yeah.
(Risky, Dirty) business as usual. What's the point of even having regulations or regulatory agencies such as the SEC if the rules are not enforced?
I saw the article in the WSJ the other day. You gave some great background . In the 80s, I was once involved with a Cedar Falls Publisher who started a derivatives magazine start up( along with a Commodity news org) It was such a different culture for me as a New Yorker.There was prayer before business meetings
DEAR friend,
i am very sorry if my message will be a kind of embarrassment 2 you since I do not know you in person or have met U before,well How are you and how is your work? i hope that all is well with you, My name is miss blessing ,i know that you may be surprise how i saw your profile today at(open.salon.com)when i was browsing looking for honest partner,then i feel to drop this few line to you,and i will like you to contact me through my email (blessingcole1515/@y/ah/o/o.c/o/m)so that we can know each other better and exchange our pictures to enable us to be come partner.my beloved friend Remember the distance or age does not matter what matters is the love we share with each other.i am waiting to hear from you soon at blessingcole1515@yahoo.com.kiss regards my love.thanks and God bless you my beloved friend,i love you.