Straightening out the crooked pictures

Finding solutions for our biggest problems

Steve Valk

Steve Valk
Location
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Birthday
September 15
Bio
I recently left my job of 31 years at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. The last position I held there was Sunday Metro Section Editor. I've also volunteered for more than 20 years with RESULTS, an advocacy group working to end poverty. Looking for a job now that will utilize my skills, experience and passion to help create a more just, equitable, sustainable and peaceful world.

Steve Valk's Links

Salon.com
Editor’s Pick
MAY 22, 2009 9:56AM

Senate to IMF: Change your ways

Rate: 3 Flag

The Senate debated and passed emergency funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan last night. As mentioned in my previous blog, the bill also included additional funding for the International Monetary Fund that would extend their line of credit by $100 billion. The money is intended to help low- and middle-income countries currently struggling in the global recession.

A motion was introduced by Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) to strip the IMF funding, but that was defeated by a 2-1 margin.

The greater concern, however, was whether the IMF would be handed a blank check and allowed to continue doing business as they've done in the past. For the poor in developing countries, the IMF's way of doing business has been a disaster. It's structural adjustment programs in the '80s and '90s resulted in user fees for health and educational services, fees that people living on a dollar a day could ill afford. These days the IMF wreaks havoc by imposing budget caps and wage ceilings that limit the numbers of health workers and teachers a nation can hire, effectively depriving the poor once again of vital services.

Thanks to the efforts of Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), the IMF's funding will likely come with some strings attached. Brown offered an amendment -- accepted by Senate leadership -- aimed at exempting health, education and food aid from IMF-imposed budget caps.

Here's the exact wording of the ammendment: "The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States Executive Director of the International Monetary Fund to use the voice and vote of the United States to oppose any loan, project, agreement, memorandum, instrument, plan, or other program of the Fund to a Heavily Indebted Poor Country that imposes budget caps or restraints that do not allow the maintenance of or an increase in government spending on health care or education; and to promote government spending on health care, education, food aid, or other critical safety net programs in all of the Fund’s activities with respect to Heavily Indebted Poor Countries." 

For the cynics out there who believe all members of Congress are corrupt, inept or both, I want to point out that there are people of courage and compassion on Capitol Hill. Sherrod Brown is one example.

The spending bill now moves to House-Senate conference to resolve differences. One of those differences is that the House bill contains no funding for the IMF. It's likely that Brown's amendment will survive conference, and Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) is leading efforts to further reform IMF policy to make it more transparent and participatory.

Members of Congress will go home next week for the Memorial Day recess. The debate about the IMF will resume when they return. Stay tuned. 

 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
A wise move by the Senate! Handing $100 billion to the IMF without trying to reform their outrageous policies would have been a huge missed opportunity. IMF policies have imposed limits on the number of health and education workers a poor country can hire, despite facing great disease burdens and millions of children not in school. For example, Kenya can hire only 5,000 of the 40,000 teachers needed to meet the demand for education, because of policies imposed by the IMF. Ironic, because Kenya has plenty of trained teachers not teaching, and class sizes of 60 to 100. Once in awhile congress does something right!
Just curious. Who else besides the U.S.A. funds the IMF? Are there any connections between the World Bank and the IMF?
FYI, I do not trust the motivations of institutions such as the IMF or The World Bank.
Rated. Congratulations on the Editor's Pick/Cover.
Thanks for writing about this on Open Salon, Steve. As voting citizens, we need to keep our eyes wide open and alert one another to this kind of irresponsible handing over of taxpayer dollars to the IMF without oversight or reform. They have done harm to poor countries for way too long now. When I learned about this debate of $100 mil to the IMF, I called the San Fran District office and asked a staffer there to let Senator Boxer know: "Support the Brown Amendment". Hopefully, my message got through along with other calls that I know were made. Power to the People!
Thanks for following this, Steve. I've been impressed by Sherrod Brown.
littlewillie, the IMF gets its funding from the wealthy, industrialized nations of the world -- U.S., Europe and Japan. U.S. provides about one-fourth, more than any other country. You're right not to trust the IMF, for a detailed account of their misdeeds during the Asian currency crisis, go read Naomi Klein's "Shock Doctrine." As I tell everyone, there's "Holy crap!" moment in every chapter. There's no direct connect between the World Bank and the IMF, although they were both created at the Bretton Woods conference following WWII to help rebuild Europe. The World Bank was given the mission to provide development assistance and the IMF was charged with regulating money and resolving balance of payment issues.

Joan, you're right to be impressed with Sherrod Brown. I've known him since he was in the House. He's been a leader on global health, but he's also a great champion of America's middle class. He would have been my pick for VP last year. Thanks for the encouragement.

Lisa, thanks for the kind words and thanks for contacting your senator. There's more for citizens to do on this issue. Check back for more opportunities to make a difference.
The IMF, World Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) sorely needed to have "pre-conditions" for any new funding for certain. Also, they should be prosecuted for their criminality. They should be held accountable for violations of their charters that "undermine the basic rights of the people they claim to serve." The onerous *preconditions* they impose on poor countries for loans are responsible not only for perpetuating underdevelopment, but often violate basic human rights. Admittedly, accountability is a pipe dream. And it would be naive to expect that the country [US] benefiting most from the misery/poverty of so many will ever acknowledge its culpability. Given how lax the Congress was in enforcing/investigating any law broken by Bankers and Wall St in this current global economic crisis.More at my post in response - IMF vs. The Bank of the South - IMF to Clean Up Its Act?