
The internet as we know it is officially doomed, as of today, and I’m already feeling nostalgic. Funny that a technology could move so fast across the landscape of my life – from a geeks-only fluke to a curiosity, to a useful tool, to a powerful engine of procrastination and finally a central venue for all my communications, research, entertainment and shopping, only to be reduced to the closed down, controlled, censored corporate cash cow it’s about to become, with the Obama administration’s blessing.
Internet, we barely knew ye.
But of course the Proprietors of our Nation couldn’t allow this internet business to go on the way it was heading. What a frightening thought – free, unobstructed communications, with no control and no profit … people just saying whatever they want, whenever they want, leaking documents, downloading YouTube videos that make Proprietor-controlled media outlets look like liars. You knew there’d be repercussions after the “Colbert bombed at the Press Association Dinner” narrative was reduced to one more punchline, a million downloads later.
The bigger headache for the Proprietors, from the start, was how to monetize this new tool and use it to consolidate power. After all, the ‘world-wide web’ seemed inimical to the consolidation of anything, an open-source free-for-all, wild and uncontrollable as the American Frontier itself. But they managed to organize that anarchic sprawl – nothing like guns and small pox, railroad lines and highways, corporate tax breaks and zoning variances, to tame a continent. It took a while, but our coast to coast shopping mall stands as the shining trophy of their triumph. We outlasted the last of the Mohegans; welcome to Mohegan Sun!
The free internet will collapse much more quickly. The Proprietors understood almost from the start that all you really need to control the internet is to control people’s access to it. (Remember stuffy old Al Gore’s warnings about ‘toll booths on the information superhighway’?) That’s the real value of the high speed cable or DSL connection. Dial-up was slow, and anyone could get on-line any time and go anywhere. But Comcast controls our access to the internet now, and that's fine with us we like it, we like the speed and convenience, the bread and the circus, football in HD on a giant flat screen TV or a bucket of chicken from KFC.
So Comcast, or some corporate entity identical to Comcast, will soon determine which web-sites you can visit easily and which ones take forever to load, which services you can use at all ... perhaps even what content you’re allowed to see. China is doing that right now and despite all our disapproving noises, our government is moving in exactly the same direction. Netflix is one of the earliest and most prominent victims. They’re in for the fight of their life right now, and it must be disheartening to know that they can take a law-suit all the way to the Supreme Court only to lose with chilling certainty to a court which has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the Proprietor oligarchy. This is a group of judges who think corporations are people, though they’re not so sure about actual people, whom they rule against in one cruel and Dickensian decision after another. Am I a crackpot conspiracy theorist to speculate that this is the real reason they decided the 2000 election Bush’s favor? Whether by plan or happy accident, he managed to pack the court with a lifetime’s worth of frightening conservatives who can be guaranteed to rule along Proprietary lines.
Don’t get me wrong: this is nothing new. The ruling elites have struggled to hold onto their power, growing ever more corrupt until toppled be revolution or debauchery or both, allowing another group to rise and self-destruct in the same way, since the caveman with the biggest club figured out he could get the most Mastodon meat. People are predictably awful, power corrupts, history repeats itself.
But something new has arisen in our era, strutting rather than slouching toward its dystopian Second Coming. This Oligarchy has managed to combine the power of mass media with a diabolically subverted education system (Leave No Child Behind) and an unwavering ability to strike the proletarian nerve with ‘values issues’ like abortion and gay marriage. It’s relatively easy to convince an ignorant rabble that government is bad and taxes are worse, that health care is evil and the gilded age for the wealthiest stock manipulators and hedge fund Sun Kings (more despicable than any top-hatted grotesque in a Communist propaganda cartoon) should proceed without a hitch. That billionaires like the Koch brothers are behind this bogus ‘grass roots’ movement should surprise no one. Instead, step back with grudging respect and admire their audacity. How to get poor people who can’t afford a doctor’s visit to cut taxes for millionaires and deny themselves any kind of proper health care, education or secure employment? Use their own prejudices, leverage their fear, manipulate their anger. “Get the government’s dirty hands off my Medicare!” What a perfect delicious, sublime sentiment with which to inoculate a population through the IV drip of a thousand blaring radio and television propaganda shows, a million campaign ads.
The only way to break this Oligarchy would be to outlaw television advertisements in political campaigns. That would sever one of the crucial linkages that bind the system together. If candidates didn’t need the money they spend on television, they could break free from the powerful interests who control that funding. They couldn’t be bought; they wouldn’t be owned: their next election would not be in the hands of deep-pocketed, demanding contributors. But of course that will never happen. It would destroy local TV stations, who depend on that gold-rush of combative ads, and their ‘grass roots’ battle against the socialists trying to deny people (corporations are people now, remember) their right to be heard in ‘the public square’ would be funded by the same people who keep thr Tea Party afloat. Elections will proceed as usual, the only change being that even more money will be spent than ever before. Big money fails sometimes – occasional candidates are simply too extreme to be electable, no matter what. But most of the time, the system works well.
The internet was the first real threat to this unprecedented consolidation of power. But that threat is gone and the only thing that will bring this global hegemony down is some vast international implosion of greed: the end of cheap oil, the acceleration of global warming, the destruction of the oceans the contamination of the drinking water. The world the Proprietors have built as a palace for themselves will have to crumble to bits from its own mindless greed, as all the others have, throughout history. Unfortunately, this time, the rest of the world is going to come down, also. They’ll take us all with them when they go – they’re ‘too big to fail’.
But so were the dinosaurs.
And this afternoon, the thought of a whole planet staggering through the rubble, reduced to plowing with horses, heating with scavenged wood and lighting homes with tallow candles, a life of medieval toil at the mercy of the elements, with travel and indoor plumbing and refrigeration the subjects of a dim racial memory and hare-brained science fiction – it seems like a fine trade-off. If that’s what it takes to bring these foul greedy tyrants to their knees, bring it on. I would go to war against them, but the war has already been lost. Today’s FCC report proves it; we live in their world, and we will go on living in their world until they bring it down around us. Then we’ll be living in their ruins. I can only hope the next oligarchs, the shrewd operators who get control of the fresh water, or manage to piece together the first electrical generator, will have learned something from the blind gluttonous excess of their predecessors.
But I doubt they will. They never have before.


Salon.com
Comments
Only I'm not laughing.
China is becoming more free, and the USA is becoming more like China.
Just wait until their campaign web site for 2012 is up and users will think they're on dial-up as they try to access it!!
I can't believe this conversation is even happening in the United States, "Land of the Free." Why do these "pin-heads" (talking to you, O'Reilly-a-tons) think that just because the tyrant is a corporation that things are any less totalitarian? Bizarre. The king is dead; long live the king.
rated with love
Government has two ways to tackle this: shut down the place, as is being done to wikileaks, or shut down access, as is being done in China. The latter is easier to circumvent by anonymizing networks, etc.; it is the former that really worries me.
Quit the fearmongering.
1. Google has cachet for a certain reason -- it has talent working for it. Yahoo and the rest of AOL's friends are losers because they cannot do a good job. So the company that is sitting on a pile of cash will offer its search services (which will undoubtedly suck) or its own Facebook equivalent. Given that the system will now be run on the basis of anything but meritocracy, the quality of the content will be bad. All this will lead to is the fragmentation of the internet.
I, as a user, will not find the internet compelling beyond checking my email. Why would I pay for a high speed access to Comcast when I 500 kpbs will suffice? Similarly, why will I pay AT&T or Verizon for a dataplan when they are trying to promote some loser company? The carriers will meet the same fate as Cable and the reasons that are pushing people to try free to air stuff will resurface.
2. If Amazon had to pay Comcast to provide me access, Amazon will also pass these costs on to me. At some point, brick and mortar business will begin to look interesting and Amazon can go take a hike.
3. The crap on youtube will now be funded by Google, which will think twice before investing its dollars in buying companies.
It doesn't matter what these corporations do in Washington DC and whom they take out for a nice lunch. They still need to prove themselves with the customer. Comcast had 10 years of monopoly and it still hasn't managed to get a solid customer base. These corporations can be bailed out like banks and they still won't be able to please the customer. Why? Because they never understood the customer. If they did, they would not be in DC greasing palms.
Overall, I think this is bad for the innovation in this country. Countries like India may not provide super fast access but by not squatting on the well, they will slowly take the lead in internet based innovation.
And yes. I expect the Obama administration to sell us down the river, but only 50% of the time.
And yes, it's true that lots of other countries like most of Europe and Japan and South Korea have internet systems many times more swell than what we have.
The only feeble argument that I can make on the other side is to never underestimate the ingenuity of the hackers and the geeks. This group of Nazi communist socialist subversives always can find ways of subverting the major paradigms of electro-technology.
That's what measures and countermeasures are all about. And someday, one of those no good pinkos will come up with a business plan that will blow them all out of the water.
Rated.
As far as the Supreme Court is concerned, only Congress has any power to regulate the internet at all, and that's very limited. They've made exceptions, narrow ones, in the case of illegal content like child pornography, but that only on the grounds that the production of the material itself involves an illegal act, and a serious one involving direct harm to someone else--not something abstract like violating "intellectual property rights" (whatever that means, and it's a whole other kettle fish which is still very, very mixed up and very disputable). But even then the government had to frame it within the purview of previous case law involving illegal wire transfers of money. Since, remember, the internet is a TELEPHONE-based medium.
So, controlling content over the net is like someone trying to tell you what you can and cannot say over your own phone. As a matter of fact, that's exactly what it is. Even the direct-line signal is shared between online and telephone components, so the same legal framework applies. And this isn't the same as saying you can or cannot wiretap someone, since it's not about collecting data and using it later in a criminal case, but rather about whether anyone or any entity has the power to determine beforehand what you can and cannot say over your phone...
The answer is no.
At least that's how it'll be argued, and you can see how that can go on and on and on...
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20001825-38.html
Old New lefty -- I hve faith in the geeks too. Geeks and lawyers, save us now.
Abrawang -- I refer you to this classic dialogue from the end of "Chinatown", when Jake Gittes finally confronts Noah Cross:
Jake Gittes: How much are you worth?
Noah Cross: I have no idea. How much do you want?
Jake Gittes: I just wanna know what you're worth. More than 10 million?
Noah Cross: Oh my, yes!
Jake Gittes: Why are you doing it? How much better can you eat? What could you buy that you can't already afford?
Noah Cross: The future, Mr. Gittes! The future. Now, where's the girl? I want the only daughter I've got left. As you found out, Evelyn was lost to me a long time ago.
Jake Gittes: Who do you blame for that? Her?
Noah Cross: I don't blame myself. You see, Mr. Gittes, most people never have to face the fact that at the right time and the right place, they're capable of ANYTHING.
This puts me in mind of another great thinker...
I know not with what weapons WWIII will be fought, but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones ~ Albert Einstein
I'm not certain what Mohegan Sun has to do with anything, but I lived in Stafford Springs for awhile. The signs intrigued me, but I never made it to the reservation.
I don't see any bright spots here, and feel sick about it.
But, lets keep trying to bash them, Steve, if only because it makes up feel better.
Richard Moore