So Peter Falk died last week, and someone posted the 41-year old video of his appearance on the Dick Cavett Show with John Cassavetes and Ben Gazzara. It was exhilarating to watch, but also sad and profoundly disturbing -- a time-capsule message from another era, or perhaps another world altogether. I’ve tried to embed some of it here because I think you may have to actually see it to understand what I’m trying to say. Having given up on that effort, at least for the moment, I have to direct you to the link at the bottom of this post. It's worth the extra effort when you see them saunter on stage, instantly owning it, Falk with his cigarette, Gazzara with a drink and a cigar.
Of course the first thing that strikes you is how impossibly young they all were. Cavett looks good for his age now (75), but Gazzara suffered a stroke in 2005, Cassavetes died in 1989 and of course, Falk is gone , too. They seemed immensely grown up to me when I first saw that broadcast. Well, of course -- I was eighteen years old, they were pushing forty. They were my Dad’s age. The odd thing is they still seem more grown up than I am, though I long overtook the phantoms on youTube. In fact I’m now technically old enough to have been one of their fathers. If my girlfriend in college really had been pregnant during that terrifying month of October, as the Viet Nam war was winding down, our child would be 39 years old now, a year younger than Gazzara was at that taping, two years younger than Cassavetes.
I get a migraine just thinking about it.
So why do they seem so powerful, so charismatic, so adult to me, even today? Why would they overwhelm and triviliaze some parallel talk show moment … Johnny Depp and Gore Verbinksi on the Jimmy Fallon show, or Matt Damon and Ben Affleck chatting with Conan? Those guys are all kids – little boys, playing at adulthood in the Hollywood Frat house. They seem flimsy and posturing by comparison. But it’s not their fault, that’s the worst part. It’s not something simple like … we have a puny new group of movie stars cluttering the multiplex screens … if that’s even true.
It’s about the times, not the people.
The era: the late sixties and seventies, when America was still the most powerful nation on earth, riding the storm surge of power and wealth from World War II. Yes there were cracks and fractures in that world, but they were easy to ignore. Our parents smoked and wore blocked hats and gave big cocktail parties and drank from flasks of rye at football games; we protested and demonstrated and smoked weed and ended the war in View Nam and brought down the President. Heady times. Who could have guessed that our swaggering parents would get lung cancer from the smoking and cirhossis from the booze, and that we would become the safety first, rules-making, no-kid-rides-a-bike-without-body-armor scared of its own shadow generation, about to drag the world into insolvency with our collective medicare and social security costs?
What did faded movie star Norma Desmond say in Sunset Boulevard ? “I’m still big. It’s the pictures that got small.” Well, it’s the whole world that’s shriveling now. We live in a diminished, attenuated world, one that seems to be running down like a hand cranked sewing machine. There are too many people, and too little of everything else – food, water, oil, education, breathing space. There was a kind of power moving through the world that Gazzara and Cassavetes and Falk inhabited, like the immense pulses of energy that move through the Pacific from the great Aleutian storms, creating the giant waves that break in Hawaii and the Northern coast of California.

That energy has drained from the world somehow, We’re all sitting in inflatable rafts in swimming pools, our new world tiny and tame and chlorinated. The power surging through their world made the success and charisma and swagger of those men possible: a world where a major studio like Columbia Pictures would finance a movie like Husbands. Today you’d have to shoot it on your iPhone and post it on YouTube; at best it might make the festival circuit and die a quiet death on the Sundance Channel. They were big stars making films for a major movie studio. America’s post-war wealth and confidence carried them along. It might not have created their stature but it gave them a place to stand.
Okay it was all an illusion, but it was a grand illusion and I miss it.
Watch the video. I think you’ll miss it, too.
http://youtu.be/4NiThZ8tJLI


Salon.com
Comments
good to see you, steven. :)
When you can get nostalgic about landing on the Moon you know the world is mutating in rather strange ways.
The dreams of a government of by and for the people has always been a mirage that was a wonderful dream but it has always been a gangster filled construction of papier mache´. But more of the dream leaked through in the past. Nobody cares about the stage settings anymore and the crooks stride the world like monster escapees from Jurassic Park now and something big and black and shadowy lurks just over the horizon getting ready to spring.
As I mentioned in a comment elsewhere, my mom went to school with Falk, knew him a little and called him "a devil," meaning mischievous but not law-enforcement-level mischievous. The street where he grew up, one block from my mom's house, was renamed after him in a ceremony he attended in 2005.
Sometimes people forget that Falk was more than Lt. Columbo. He was nominated twice for an Academy Award. The movies he made with Cassavettes - I've seen Husbands and A Woman Under the Influence - were so much more adult than the fluff that gets churned out now. Like you said, movies like those would be made on iPhones now and would be roundly ignored because they didn't include car chases.
You're right, I miss that grand illusion.
Nostalgia about then and now is an old man's disease and being an old man it sits on my shoulders too. Nickel cups of coffee at the Automat and fifteen cent Good Humors and Crackerjack prizes and the Brooklyn Dodgers. The past glitters with the diamonds of May West, W.C.Fields, The Marx Brothers, Fred Allen, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Fiorello LaGuardia, The Marx Brothers, and a host of others. There are compensations. This computer, for instance.
When you can get nostalgic about landing on the Moon you know the world is mutating in rather strange ways.
The dreams of a government of by and for the people has always been a mirage that was a wonderful dream but it has always been a gangster filled construction of papier mache´. But more of the dream leaked through in the past. Nobody cares about the stage settings anymore and the crooks stride the world like monster escapees from Jurassic Park now and something big and black and shadowy lurks just over the horizon getting ready to spring.
Jan Sand
JUNE 26, 2011 07:24 PM
The United States is still the most powerful country on earth. We are still the largest economy. We still have the most powerful military. We aren't first in any other category, but those other categories don't matter. In a head to head military confrontation, there is no country on Earth – today – that could beat us. (No, the Chinese can't. They have more troops but they aren't blooded troops as our are, and they don't have the means of delivering those troops to combat. We do.)
Notice that I said most powerful, not greatest. I don't know what greatest means.
That said, we are certainly at the end of our vigor. Once you reach the top of the mountain, all roads lead down.
We did not end the war in Vietnam. (I hate to say this because I was one of the organizers of many of those anti-war events.) We extended it. Johnson, conscience-struck, badgered from the left and the right, went home to Texas and we got Nixon instead. Nixon, far from ending the war, expanded it and each time we demonstrated, he expanded it further, until it collapsed from its own negative entropy. We didn't end the war in Vietnam. The Vietnamese won. Perhaps they won because we lost the will to fight, but anyone who watched the final evacuation of Saigon knows that we didn't end the war. The Vietnamese did.
In the clip, what fascinates me is that these guys didn't give a shit about propriety, they didn't take themselves, or each other seriously, and neither does Dick Cavett. The one thing they shared was an absence of the attitude of entitlement that is infused in today's performers.
Cassavetes makes a telling point when he talks about how everyone is too concerned with how they appear instead of being who and what they are. And then the three of them did exactly that, being themselves instead of the audience's expectations of them.
One thing becomes evident upon watching these clips carefully: these three men are angry. They are angry about what was going on in our culture, knew they were in a losing battle, but fought it anyway.
By the way, did you notice that the current Ray Romano vehicle, “Men of a Certain Age” is about precisely the same premise as “Husbands.”
And, don't skip over Geoffrey Cambridge's amazing commercial for Jockey underwear. Absolutely classic.