La Dolce Vita

A few thoughts from Steven Rockford

Steven Rockford

Steven Rockford
Location
Arizona, USA
Company
Family & Friends
Bio
email: steven.rockford100@gmail.com

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
NOVEMBER 14, 2011 7:00AM

"We love torture,"

Rate: 12 Flag

said Bachmann and Cain.

Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity” – Martin Luther King, Jr.

If Dr. King would have watched the GOP presidential debate on Saturday, I’m certain that he would have felt that the responses given by Michele Bachmann and Herman Cain on the “necessity” of waterboarding would perfectly characterize the “dangerous” people he referred to in his quote.  These people aren’t just dangerous, they’re insane. 

They repeated the neocon talking point that waterboarding was not torture but rather a form of “Enhanced Interrogation Technique” (a term coined by Dick Chaney and continually repeated by the beltway echo chamber).  By now, rational people in this country recognize that waterboarding is indeed torture, and it is indeed a crime.   

As I mentioned in previous posts: 

1.  Reputable legal analysts have noted that waterboarding is illegal based on the following international treaties: 

   A.  Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (which the Senate unanimously ratified in 1955). 

   B.  The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (which the Senate ratified in 1992). 

   C.  The United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment (which the Senate ratified in 1994).  

2.  The US has executed foreign aggressors for waterboarding US troops.  

3.  Domestic waterboarders have been tried and sentenced (in Gov. Bush’s Texas court) without any public outcry.   

Furthermore, there have been many reports by FBI officials (here and here, e.g.) that Cheney’s “Enhanced Interrogation Techniques” were (contrary to the Bachmann and Cain speeches) totally ineffective.  Yet the beltway media continually bring this up as if it is a “controversial issue.” 

It’s not. 

There is no controversy.  Waterboarding “is torture" and it is an internationally recognized crime.  I was particularly incensed when one of Saturday’s debate moderators, Major Garrett, referenced “the long running debate we’ve had whether waterboarding is torture..  There is no debate Major.  Waterboarding is torture, and every time pundits and journalists refer to this as a fictional "long running debate" they look more and more like uninformed journalistic morons.         

I was even more incensed when I viewed the audience at Saturday’s GOP debate.  As you may have noticed, many of them applauded loudly when Michele Bachmann said that, if she were elected president, she would continue to use waterboarding as an accepted US practice. 

This follows previous GOP debates when the audience cheered Rick Perry’s execution record, cheered the idea of letting uninsured patents die, and booed when a gay soldier expressed his concerns on our wars in the Middle East.  

These people are not patriots.  They are deranged citizens of our country.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
The Israeli experience in this is instructive. Every now and then, there is a "ticking bomb" scenario, if not as much as is on TV. If you knew enough to know there was a ticking bomb.... you wouldn't have to do that very often.
In any event, every now and then, the Israelis liked to shake people to make them talk; no marks.
They worried though that if they did that, someone would be criminally liable for it, and so, it was legalized under a process.
What happened then was it happened a lot more, since it was now officially ok to do. In the past, people had done it when they really thought that it would save lives.
Long and short of it is there are times, rare, but they exist, where information is needed, and it won't be easy to get unless one gets pushy; regularizing the use of force to do so isn't a very good idea, since it tends to make it more acceptable, and therefore far too common.
But, if you are a small unit, and a large one is somewhere in your area, and you have two captives, you are going to do what you are going to do; see Sole Survivor for that dilemma in Afghanistan as a real case, where they let people walk away, and.... see the title. That is also rare, and something that people just have to be on their own about, and accept the consequences, and argument of course, for avoiding force using situations in the first place.
Yeah, Don, sounds good. Do we have any verified cases where torture has saved lives? As opposed to the many instances (and the common-sense realization) that torture produces false ("I'll say anything, just stop") 'information'? Just on practical grounds, let alone moral, it doesn't seem effective.
If torture is ok then the difference between us and the gestapo is what? A matter of degree? A few degrees of separation?

The GOP crazies have become disgusting.

R
@Myraid; I said it was rare that it would be justifiable, although in the Sole Survivor scenario, isolated Seal Team, executing prisoners was arguably reasonable too.I would have, maybe. I don't know what you do then, when you run into people who can identify your position like that, although that was the decision that the other Kerry, the SEAL Kerry, made one night in Vietnam. But, it is a bad idea to institutionalize it too. It can only be done when people are willing to face charges after, which would make it very, very rare, and because the problem with the whole neo-con "ticking bomb" scenario is that if you know there is a bomb, why don't you also know enough then to stop it, which means you don't have to torture usually in the first place to get what you need to know. Very rarely therefore would you want to do that, although in a combat situation with isolated patrols.... people will do what they will do too.
Yeah, that's my view of the ticking-bomb argument too. As for the rest of what you say, sigh, you're being practical. (Shoot me now.)
it is all wrong - the whole line of thinking is corrupt - and evil. failed states - failed policy - failed individuals. if we ever had "the mandate of heaven" ever - we have lost it - killing and torture acceptable management tools? never. when we even think about using them - we have failed - yet again.
So, it's cool when the DNP admonishes torture and then continues on with the practice anyway? President Obama was well aware of the TORTURE (what every single expert who has analyzed the situation called it) of Bradley Manning and did nothing for 13 months, until public pressure was too hard to ignore any longer. The President even has an assassination list which he used to authorize the first (that I know of) federally endorsed assassination of an AMERICAN CITIZEN, and he's hoping to execute additional assassinations on the people from the list (pun absolutely intended). All this from a former professor of constitutional law (CONSTITUTIONAL LAW!!!), for Christ's sake. He knows better...or, he should, anyway.

At least the GOP tells you that they're gonna forcibly ass rape you from the get-go. The DNP pretends that they do not want to use this tactic of fear and control until it suits their needs to scare and control people.

I'll take an honest asshole over a closet douchebag any day of the week, and twice on my scheduled torture day.
I have plenty of confidence in the American people to reject this immoral use of force. But, it shows how willingly some people will follow corruption. I expect more from the GOP.

Our vulnerabilities due to our freedom, are worth the risk to me.

Waterboarding doesn't pass the sniff test.
There is one man amongst the clowns in the GOP field who not only has the smarts and understands the peril this country faces economically, but who also has the moral character to reject torture and aggressive wars. That man is Ron Paul. Unfortunately, he gets completely ignored because the mainstream media has successfully painting him as a kook in the eyes of those who still believe democrats or republicans are here to help us. In the first hour of Saturday's debate, Paul was given 90 seconds to speak. 90 friggin seconds. Why? because the Republican establishment, as well as the liberal media, are afraid that his message of true liberty and less government will actually stick. He wins post-debate polls in a landslide, and the polls are pulled from the websites. He gets more military donations than all the other candidates COMBINED, yet he is ignored in the debates, or he gets asked some question that makes him look kooky to the uninformed. I know some who read this are going to say "Ron Paul is nothing but a kook who has no chance of getting elected", but where did they get that idea from? THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA. That is the brainwashing I'm talking about.

It's time for us to all be adults, put aside the ridiculous idea that the 2 party system cares about any of us, and vote for the only candidate in this election cycle, left or right, who actually gets it.
Just imagine one of them in the WhiteHouse, scary isn't it!
Okay, Don, maybe there are a few very rare cases there is a ticking bomb and we know exactly who set it, although I don't agree, I can see why some people think torture is justifiable.

But what about the other 99% of cases where we don't know if there is a bomb, who might have set it, or really much of anything. We don't even know if our captive is really the high-level terrorist or inoffensive guy who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time? Is that justifiable? Morally acceptable?

Let's not forget that any prisoner who wants to escape the torture will name names. But who is to say those people are really terrorists?The KGB and Stasi files were full of denouncements of annoying neighbors and other people who got denounced to pay off private scores --- or because the denouncer felt he had to say something. So, it is obvious that innocent people will be tortured.

And, let's not forget that torture creates enemies and hatred.

Finally, before Bush, the consensus was that torture doesn't yield reliable information. After Bush authorized the use of torture, there was tremendous pressure to justify it, which is not the way to produce an unbiased study.

In short, torture is clearly morally wrong, clearly bad foreign policy, and of dubious efficacy.
Let's just change the name to "Copious Nasal Rinsing" ?

Hey, euphemisms work.
They love Jesus but hate the poor.
They love Jesus and love torture.
They love Jesus and do everything they can for the rich to get richer.
They love Jesus but hate thy neighbor.
They love Jesus but would let an unisured person die.
They love Jesus but accumulate vast wealth.
Have they read the bible?
I saw this and I thought it was absolutely shameful.
I think that if we hold ourselves open to the availability of torture, because of the remote posssibility of some doomsday scenario, like Don mentions, we will wind up trying to use torture in all other scenarios as well. Far better to keep it off the table forever. We are stronger as an ideological/philosophical force in this world, anyhoot.
They both make my skin crawl.

UGH!! And Bachmann got applause for it. We SO need to get these people out of power and KEEP THEM OUT OF POWER!

rated
PS I think that advocate of nonviolence or no, MLK would have a lot of REALLLY pointed things to say to Herman Cain. And Herman wouldn't enjoy hearing them one little bit!
@Artist at Heart Brilliant. You embodied my thoughts in far fewer words than I could have hoped. The hypocrisy of the religious right is makes me sick. Telling women what they cannot do with their bodies while willing killing and torturing others. Disgusting.
if you think torture is justifiable, ever, then you must ask, why did the government of the usa insist on name, rank and number in response to questioning of american soldiers, and respectful handling of captured soldiers, at least in principle?

one answer was, if we torture, they will. if we wish to protect our soldiers, we must respect the human rights of the enemy.

but american governments, and many americans, have forgotten this principle.

of course, once you wage aggressive war, for profit, you have left ethics behind, and torture merely becomes tool. a tool peculiarly attractive to the creeps in big suits who have never been near the sound of angry gunfire.

so it's rafferty's rules now, and god help the soldier who falls into the hands of a afghan guerrilla band.
Don, you claim such "ticking time bomb" instances exist, yet to date, neither you nor anyone else has provided a single, real example of it. Either show us where such a scenario has existed with respect to U.S. torturers, or go back to watching re-runs of "24."