The Most Revolutionary Act

Diverse Ramblings of an American Refugee

Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall

Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall
Location
New Plymouth, New Zealand
Birthday
December 02
Bio
64 year old psychiatrist, activist and author of free ebook 21st CENTURY REVOLUTION - a free download at http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/120942. My 2010 memoir THE MOST REVOLUTIONARY ACT: MEMOIR OF AN AMERICAN REFUGEE describes the circumstances that led me to leave the US in 2002. More information about both books (and me) at www.stuartbramhall.com

AUGUST 4, 2010 11:49PM

Hugo Chavez vs Subcomandante Marcos

Rate: 0 Flag

Subcomandante Marcos

Subcomandante Marcos

Last night I dreamt that Subcomandante Marcos (the elusive Zapatista leader) was running against Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. I often have really bizarre dreams when I fall asleep to the BBC World Service (I know it’s a bad habit, but the cricket scores always send me right off to sleep). However as a psychiatrist, I know a classic wish fulfilment dream when I see one. I have to admit that Marcos has always been a bigger than life figure to me (second only to Super Barrio – see July 14 blog). He seems to have made all the right decisions about not pursuing either public office or media attention. In fact this is the reason he gives for the masks worn by EZLN – to protect themselves, not from right wing assassins, but from the temptation to be corrupted by the public spotlight.

 

Hugo Chavez

Hugo Chavez

 

Superbarrio

Superbarrio

 

Despite the massive improvements Chavez has made in the lives of the indigenous people of Venezuela, I personally feel that their socialist revolution will only become permanent when the people themselves run it. I’m not naïve, though. I know how extremely oppressive the forces of neoliberalism are in the third world. That sometimes it only becomes possible for the disenfranchised to self-organize when someone like Chavez comes along to give them some breathing space – by taking the boot of the international corporate elite off their necks. And clearly Chavez has done so – against enormous odds and at great personal risk. By nationalizing oil revenues and reneging on IMF debt repayments, he has substantially reduced unemployment, as well as providing food security, universal education and healthcare and increase life expectancy for Venezuela’s majority indigenous population – including improved nutrition, health and overall life expectancy. Let’s face it – the old Venezuelan regime was a death trap for literally millions of people.

Evo MoralesEvo Morales

Because of its decentralized nature, the EZLN has a website but no “official” spokesperson. However several Zapista leaders have contrasted Chavez’s presidency somewhat unfavourably with that of Latin America’s first indigenous president Evo Morales. They note that despite major political and economic reforms, as well as major government support for self-organizing initiatives (including pirate radio and self-sustaining housing and communal councils and cooperatives), all these reforms have occurred from the top down. Whereas Evo represents bottom up power. He won the presidency based on the strength of Bolivia’s popular movements, which had deposed three presidents in four years. And Evo understands exactly where his power comes from – that he has no chance of remaining in office unless he remains accountable to the base that elected him.

Is It a Male Thing?

The other thing that bothers me about Chavez is that absence of any succession planning. I have yet to see a satisfactory explanation why only Chavez is capable of preserving socialism in Venezuela. And as a woman and feminist, I can’t help but wonder if it isn’t a male thing. When women are alone, they often talk about a strong male tendency (of their husbands in particular) to self-aggrandizement. I don’t believe men are born this way. It seems to me that modern society socializes them to get bigger than life in their own heads. This seems to be born out in a number of studies contrasting female with male leadership styles (many related to the 2006 Norwegian law mandating 40% female representation on corporate boards see April 19 blog). One factor that stands out in most studies is that women tend to have a more inclusive – as opposed to autocratic – style of leadership.

Women of the EZLNWomen of the EZLN
Military armMilitary arm

One thing that has always impressed me about the Zapatistas is the role indigenous women have played, via sustained self-organizing, to ensure that the EZLN is as much about women’s right to self-determination as the indigenous struggle for political and economic rights.

Women have always had a powerful voice in both the civilian and military arm of EZLN – not because Marcos or any other male leader has given it to them. Because they have organized and demanded it.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
" I personally feel that their socialist revolution will only become permanent when the people themselves run it."

that got my attention. it's called 'democracy,' and you would be amazed how few people have any idea what it is, in spite of constant use. a tribute to the power of newspeak and doublethink. when a creature like churchill can proclaim himself a champion of 'democracy,' you can be sure the word has been gutted. after that, "the people's democratic republic of korea" seems almost sensible.

venezuela looks like getting to democracy ahead of usa. but you are right, chavez is a garden variety tyrant[classical] who is very fragile, under great pressure from the usa, and open to attack from the left as well. he will either go for the gun or flee to cuba, is my guess.

i write at http://electorocracy.blogspot.com/ when i'm feeling optimistic.
Thanks for the feedback, Al. I like your blog - especially the part that emphasizes what people have to do if they want democracy.
i'm glad venezuela is a sovereign country that doesn't have to do what foreign citizens say.
Your take on Chavez is really pretty much a dreamworld, though to your credit you recognize his autocratic leadership.

You seem not to be aware of any of the evidence against Chavez' regime, but just repeat propaganda without dealing with facts. To take one example from your post, you repeat the standard Chavez trope on how his government "provides food security".

Actually, after Chavez nationalized food distribution, the agency delegated to do it failed miserably. So TWENTY PER CENT of Venezuela's ANNUAL food supply rotted, and was thrown away.

Not only that, but for every four dollars shown on the books as "purchased food abroad" only 1 dollar's worth made it to Venezuela. The rest was presumably stolen by the bureaucrats.

My figures come from the official Chavez government report. For an english language discussion with Spanish linkages, see here:

http://www.caracaschronicles.com/node/2606