The Most Revolutionary Act

Diverse Ramblings of an American Refugee

Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall

Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall
Location
New Plymouth, New Zealand
Birthday
December 02
Bio
64 year old psychiatrist, activist and author of free ebook 21st CENTURY REVOLUTION - a free download at http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/120942. My 2010 memoir THE MOST REVOLUTIONARY ACT: MEMOIR OF AN AMERICAN REFUGEE describes the circumstances that led me to leave the US in 2002. More information about both books (and me) at www.stuartbramhall.com

FEBRUARY 18, 2012 11:23PM

Israel as Collateral Damage (in a War With Iran)

Rate: 9 Flag
US Troops Land in Israel for Austere Challenge 12

US troops land in Israel for Austere Challenge 12

What do Austere Challenge 12, Theater Iran Near Term, Global Strike 2003, Vigilant Shield 07, and Concept Plan 8022 all have in common? They are all names of Pentagon war games simulating an attack on Iran. Most military war games are conducted in secret. Those listed above have been made public, presumably to help build consensus among the military brass and the Washington elite about the inevitability of war with Iran. Canadian researcher and globalization researcher Michel Chossudovksy writes about them in a January 8, 2012 Global Research article entitled When War Games Go Live

It’s Official: Iran Not Building Nuclear Weapons

Just to be clear here. The current US threats against Iran have nothing to do with Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons program. In the first place, they aren’t building nuclear weapons. On the January 8 Face the Nation,  Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta acknowledged that Iran is not trying to building nuclear weapons. You can read his exact words here: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-57354647/face-the-nation-transcript-january-8-2012/

In the second place, the US has been preparing to attack Iran for more than a decade. As I mention in my previous blogs about the covert war against Syria, war against both Iran and Syria have been part of the Pentagon’s Middle East strategy since the mid-nineties. As retried General Wesley Clark writes in “Winning Modern Wars,” US foreign policy over the last 20 years has focused on regime change in seven countries: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan. All seven, except Syria, are oil rich countries targeted owing to their refusal to privatize their oil resources for the benefit of Anglo American oil companies. Oil-poor Syria is a target because of its strategic alliance with oil-rich Iran. Please note that this policy has remained consistent whether Republicans or Democrats control Congress and the White House.

Why Israel Won’t Be Attacking Iran

Chossudovsky disputes the line promoted in the media (and by Panetta himself – http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/03/us-nuclear-iran-usa-israel-idUSTRE81202Z20120203), that Israel and the pro-Israel lobby is behind the current threats against Iran. Chossudovsky asserts that massive retaliation against Israel, the inevitable outcome of a US attack on Iran, has always been the chief disincentive preventing against launching one. Iran, which has a massive military industrial complex, is a top military power, only slightly behind Germany and Israel. Iran has the ability to mobilize one million troops practically overnight, as well as an extensive air force and Advance missiles capable of bombing Israel back to the Stone Age.

He stresses that Israel is incapable of launching a sneak attack in an effort to draw the US into a full blown war. Not only is Israel the Middle East country with the most to lose from war with Iran, but since 2008 Israel’s air defense forces have been fully integrated with those of the US and NATO. This makes it impossible for them to act unilaterally. One of the major goals of Austere Challenge 12, the January 2012 war games – the largest in world history – was to test these air defense. As Chossudovsky makes clear in a recent Guns and Butter interview, even NATO can’t protect Israel from massive civilian casualties and infrastructure damage from an Iranian counterattack. In his view, the recent escalation of US threats against Iran more likely reflect a shift in Washington’s views on Israel’s strategic importance to US interests. It now appears Washington is prepared to sacrifice Israel in pursuit of its ultimate goal: regime change in Tehran and privatization of Iran’s oil resources for the benefit of Anglo-American oil companies.

Setting the State for World War III

During the interview, Chossudovksy describes each of the five Pentagon war games listed above, making it clear that the US has been actively rehearsing a military attack on Iran since 2003. Theater Iran Near Term was a simulated attack on Iraq’s neighbor that occurred in May 2003, within days after US troops “liberated” Baghdad. According to the Canadian researcher, Pentagon are well of the treaties Russia and China (both nuclear powers) have committing them to come to Iran’s defense. Both rely heavily on Iran for their oil imports, a major reason why they refuse to go along with the sanctions. Chossudovksy believes Russia, which has a naval base in southern Syria, will likely come to their defense if they are attacked by NATO. This is why the 2006 war games called Vigilant Shield 07 included retaliatory strikes, not only against Iran (code named Irmingham), North Korea (code named Nemzee), Russia (code named Ruebeck) and China (code named Churya).

In other words, the US is setting the stage to launch World War III and a possible nuclear war between Russia, China and the US. The mainstream media has widely publicized the movement of US war ships to the Strait of Hormuz, an essential transit route for oil shipments from Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states that traverses Iranian territorial waters. They have not reported on the massive shipment in 2010 of weapons (and weapons advisors) to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf States, or the US troop build up in Israel (9,000 troops in January 2012) or Kuwait (15,000 troops in December 2011).

Removing Israel from “The Pages of Time”

Chossudovksy believes Iran would ultimately lose a war with the US, despite inflicting massive damage on civilians and US military installations in Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, as well as destroying Israel as a major Middle East power.

He’s struck by the irony of Israel’s new designation as “collateral damage” in a US conflict with Iran, in view of the infamous statement attributed to Iran President Ahmadinejad about wanting to wipe Israel off the map. The often repeated quote happens to be a fabrication. It’s actually a mistranslation of a prediction, rather than a threat, and was first uttered by the late Ayatollah Khomeini, not President Ahmadinejad. Before his death Khomeini made the prediction that the “regime occupying Jeruselum,” like the Soviet Union and the Shah of Iran would eventually “disappear from the pages of time.”

How ironic that the US, Israel’s oldest friend and ally, is about to fulfill this prophecy by preparing to launch a unilateral military assault on Iran.

Share and Enjoy: Print this article! Digg Sphinn del.icio.us Facebook Mixx Google Bookmarks Twitter StumbleUpon Twitthis

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I've been thinking about posting about this. In my view, there are mixed signals coming out of Israel regarding an attack on Iran. On the one hand, we have the ideological ravings of Bibi Netanyahu and Avigdor Lieberman, not to mention the proposed legislation of Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut. On the other, we have Ehud Barak speaking out of both sides of his mouth as to whether an attack on Israel should take place. And finally we have the strong opposition of the former heads of Mossad, Shin Bet, and the Israeli Cheif of Staff.

In Washington, the Israeli mouthpiece organization WINEP has recently issued a white paper saying that it's not necessary to attack Israel, and that sanctions should be allowed time.

From my opinion, the hardliners' insane ideology is in a head on collision with reality. And until Netanyahu & Co. can get all of their ducks in order within the Israeli government, an attack on Iran is not going to happen. Right now, I'm counting on facts being such stubborn things. Reality won't go away. The major problem for Netanyahu now is how to save his face.
Thanks, old new lefty. Your comments definitely advance the analysis and give us reason to hope war can be averted.
I still don't think the issue is who is going to attack Iran, Israel or the US or both. I thinks what is in the works now--the delay--is comprehensive calculations of the economic/market aftermath of the attack on Iran. That is the only issue among the "real" decision-makers. I, too, hope they come to the right decision. Excellent post. R
Thoth, I hope you are right. They clearly didn't "calculate" the aftermath of the attack on Iraq. We can always hop they have learned their lesson.
[r] how interesting is this, stuart. thank you. the borderline personality nation of Israel is nonetheless self-destructive because that is what comes with its willful paranoia. As for the codependent to the borderline nation, the US, how pathetic and cowardly to enable paranoia when one hasn't got it oneself.

This is what Pepe Escobar is saying re Iran and the US/Israel warmongering insanity and sanction madness:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/NB17Ak04.html

"Yet the vultures, jackals and hyenas of regime change/war can never be appeased in their sanction lust. The US is now forcing the EU to cut off Iran from Brussels-based SWIFT - the independent telecom mechanism/clearinghouse used by every bank in the world to exchange financial data (its official name is Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). Iran's Central Bank itself may become a victim."

"In a nutshell, SWIFT is the wheel that moves global financial transactions and trade. So if this is not an extended, remixed declaration of hardcore economic war against one country - nothing else is."

"Will it work? Hardly. It will certainly represent more devastation unleashed over "the Iranian people" - the vague entity of choice against which the US has "no quarrel". More than 40 Iranian banks use SWIFT to process financial transactions, and Iranians use it like everybody else in a globalized economy."

"It will drag SWIFT's carefully maintained reputation for trust and neutrality through the mud; imagine other member countries' reaction to the fact they can also be totally marginalized according to the US's whims. "

"Not to mention that Washington cannot tell SWIFT what to do; thus it is not so subtly applying "pressure", Mafia-style, on the Europeans. The "message" was delivered in person by David Cohen, the US Treasury Department's undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence."

"And all this for what? According to the relentless, suffocating barrage of spin in Western corporate media, to "perhaps" buy some time so the Obama administration can "persuade" the warmongering, nuclear-armed Likud government in Israel not to attack Iran this coming spring. "

snip

"If the Washington/Tel Aviv-promoted hysteria is already at fever pitch, wait for March 20, when the Iranian oil bourse will start trading oil in other currencies apart from the US dollar, heralding the arrival of a new oil marker to be denominated in euro, yen, yuan, rupee or a basket of currencies."

"That would suit Asian clients - from BRICS members India and China to US allies Japan and South Korea, not to mention NATO member Turkey. But that would also suit European clients, to pay for oil in their own currency. Tehran - as well as many key players in the developing world - does want to sink the petrodollar. That may be the straw to break the American camel's back."

Obama, Israel, et al. playing vicious at a losing game. No paradigm shift is coming from the West to partnership and cooperation. Just keeping up their nasty attempts at financial terrorism, but it is all gonna boomerang big time. A spine and a conscience would be nice in our leadership. And intelligence. Apparently we haven't hit a low enough economic bottom. The US and Israel have got to pull down the rest of the world, make them all hurt, to prove they are powerfully right and rightfully powerful. They are neither.
You write "...in view of the infamous statement attributed to Iran President Ahmadinejad about wanting to wipe Israel off the map. The often repeated quote happens to be a fabrication. It’s actually a mistranslation of a prediction, rather than a threat, and was first uttered by the late Ayatollah Khomeini. . ."

In fact, early this month Ayatollah KHAMENEI stated: “The Zionist regime is a true cancer tumor on this region that should be cut off,” the supreme leader said. “And it definitely will be cut off.”

That's pretty clear cut, no pun intended. Also, the Russians do NOT "have" a naval base in Syria. They visit from time to time, as do Iranian naval vessels. Such errors call into question the totality of your piece.
the ORIGINAL "infamous" statement about supposedly "wiping Israel off the face of the earth" was a shameless, deliberate mis-translation that got plenty of demonization/propaganda mileage! The "Zionist" regime is toxic for Israel and the rest of the globe, let alone Iran! The Zionist regime is not Israel or the Israeli people, thank God! It is a war-mongering borderline personality regime, and in this age of "regime change" imperialism it really ought to be the regime whose toxicity should be faced down and NOT enabled. As the ex-Bush, now-Obama USWarMachine steamrolling regime! Now I believe in trying non-violent but firm dealings with governments with toxic regimes, calling on international law and unity among honest nations. But instead, "anything goes" right now and "might makes right" and the bullies/addicts are seemingly willing to bring on WWIII.
Thanks, Libby, for your excellent addition to the content of this article.

According to Reuters, which most people consider a reliable mainstream source, the Russians definitely have a naval base in Syria. As per the following link:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/28/us-russia-syria-warships-idUSTRE7AR0S820111128
I think it is prophetic that the end of what was once thought to be "the world" may happen on, or about, 12/21/12 at a place called - Armageddon. Maybe the bible isn't so crazy after all...or, maybe it's all a self-fulfilling prophecy. Either way, it's crazy interesting.
One thing I note, Dr. is that the liars, dissemblers, deniers, revisionists, etc. NEVER seem to find the time to source their OPINIONS as do You and Libby.

Curious that!

GREAT post, as usual.

-R-
The Khamenei remark was widely reported. Here's a citation from that Zionist stronghold of South Dakota: http://southdakotapolitics.blogs.com/south_dakota_politics/2012/02/nazis-with-nukes.html
Regardless of who starts it, and no matter how insane it may be, Iran IS going to get attacked. Soon.
Ordinary joe is pretty ordinary as he goes to a South Dakota publication for his interpretation:

"As for item 3, let the following money quote from a recent speech by Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei suffice:

"The Zionist regime is a true cancer tumor on this region that should be cut off," the supreme leader said. "And it definitely will be cut off."

That is clear enough that anyone who ignores it puts his soul at risk. The Iranian regime is dedicated to the eradication of Israel.

Now for the reality, as is posted in numerous sites, with credibility AND a knowledge of Farsi:

"How about Ahmadinejad’s famous statement that he wanted to wipe Israel off the map? Here’s the problem: he didn’t say it. You heard that right. The famous line that has become the one-line argument for bombing Iran has been stated incorrectly — again and again. Repetition of a false charge doesn’t make it true. I’m not an expert in Farsi, but notice what Ahmadinejad said: “Imam ghoft een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad.” What does the word “rezhim-e” sound like to you? It turns out that it means “regime.” So what he was saying was that the Zionist regime should be eliminated. This is not at all the same as proposing that a country be wiped out."

http://original.antiwar.com/henderson/2012/02/05/is-iran-a-threat/

Can you grasp the difference between regime change, something america does with regularity, and the "eradication of israel?"

How ordinary to pick a South Dakota publication for clarification. There must be thousand, tens of thousands of Farsi speakers, there!
Both Israel and Iran are unstable, obnoxious and irrational nations, and that is what has me concerned. The sanctions are pushing Iran into desperation, which means that they are working. But Israel needs to find out that if they do any more unilateral actions, then they are on their own.