Why Can't She Walk to School? in Today's New York Times
Another disturbing sign of the times: This article in today's Times about parents who are so afraid of stranger abduction that they drive a child 5 houses down (yes, you read that correctly) rather than let them walk, or even walk them themselves. Also in the article, a town in which people called 911 at the sight of a 10-year-old walking alone, resulting in a police reprimanding of the parent.
Something is extremely wrong with this picture! The areas of bizarreness and loss include: the dominance of an extreme and unfounded culture of fear, the complete absence of community, and the loss of independence for young people.
I wrote a comment on the New York Times site, which I'll repost here. It goes to the heart of a lot of issues I care deeply about:
"This article both saddened and outraged me. Something is deeply wrong with a society in which children walking or biking short distances to school and to play is not only not the norm, but is actively frowned upon and even criminalized. There are so many things wrong with this picture: Parents are living basically alone, completely car-dependent, with largely unfounded fears and guilt that they are passing on to their children. What is going to become of this generation of children when they go off to college and to jobs and are unable to navigate their surroundings or do anything for themselves?
Children should be given reasonable increments of responsibility, and adults should be there to participate with them and teach them. We biked with our child and taught her road safety. We walked with her to elementary school and taught her how to be aware, use her good judgment, and which neighbors and shopkeepers to call on for help if needed. She is now a relatively independent teen who can navigate our town, call on her own sense of self-reliance, and have a little well-earned space away from hovering parents.
I live in a very safe small town, as I suspect do most of the people quoted in the article. I think that speeding cars pose a much greater hazard than stranger abductions. To that end, our town has a very active Safe Routes to Schools program, which is a model for others, with bike lanes, crossing guards at hazardous intersections during school hours, community involvement and interest, and continuing efforts to make the roads safer for walking and biking. Each year, for the last several years, the amount of children walking or riding to schools here has risen, and many children do this in groups. (Perhaps some parents can channel the energy they spend fretting into organizing walking groups.)
When adults and older children are out on and using our streets, they also become safer for younger children, and we all reap the benefits that come with slowing down, spending quality time together, observing things, greeting neighbors, having fun, gaining independence, being outside, getting exercise, learning about our surroundings, and getting from place to place without a car, when possible."
Photo by Susan Sachs Lipman



Salon.com
Comments
I know many fearful parents who won't let their kids ride bikes in the neighborhood, walk a few blocks to a friend's house in daylight, or play in the front yard unattended. And I'm talking about fourth and fifth graders here, not toddlers!
My local school is also full of cars at drop-off time, with very few walkers.
I'm pretty sure that most children who are hit by cars and killed are not doing so while crossing the road but in parking lots and driveways.
On the first day of school it appeared that almost every child was at each bus stop.
I walk my dog by one of the stops every day. There are now about 4 students there and all of them with a parent( they are elementary students). Maybe they are afraid of the big guy with the scary black lab( He is sometimes overly friendly).
On rainy or very cold days some of these parents drive their little Buffy's and Todd's to the bus stop and sit their for 10-15 minutes in an idling vehicle.
When I used to drive around doing merchandising at supermarkets, the various elementary schools I passed all had a cop out front to direct traffic because the sissy parents just HAD to pick up their little darlings and tie up traffic on the streets in from of the schools.
I prevailed in the end, but always felt that these school individuals looked at me in a different way after that. I was a single mom with a job that didn't allow me to be home to pick up my child. It was a very frustrating situation to have someone else making a strong attempt to project their fears and values onto my situation.
Like the author, my now 14-yr old daughter is on the Police Explorer post in our community, can ride the bus or metro or subway all over Paris, London or New York and has an extremely strong and good sense of personal safety. I doubt she would be this well-equipped if she had been chauffered around the past five years.
Last I checked, this is still a free country.
Good point. That is why I'm working on trying to give my boys more independence, etc. That way they can take over the new world from the ones with helicopter parents.
So many quality-of-life areas suffer given the behaviors you all describe, like individual cars choking school zones or idling for minutes before a bus arrives to whisk all the children away. Where are considerations of community, health or perspective? Or childhood, for that matter? This way of living has always felt extremely wrong to me.
We were also the strange ones for a while, when my daughter was younger. She started walking to school by herself at around 10 and was repeatedly stopped by well-meaning parents, asking if she needed a ride. People even asked us if we felt safe about her walking, and we live in a very safe, walkable small town. When I was a scout leader, I had to fight the moms off when they wanted to drive the kids the 3 (!) blocks from the elementary school to Scout Hall. They thought we’d have more time for the meeting that way (and that they could squeeze in a few frantic errands.) They placed no value whatsoever on walking as an activity in and of itself. I stood my ground and the girls had their moment of relative freedom -- to walk, sing, and learn a tiny bit about a part of their town they would have just driven by. I consider this downright sick.
I see that Neil slipped in. I consider seat belts a reasonable precaution, relative to risk. I cannot say the same for keeping children under wraps until the age of 18 -- indeed, there's a great deal more harm in that scenario than possible benefit. (Though, of course, I'd like to explore other ways to reduce crime.)
I grew up in the 50s and 60s as a child and yes our parents warned us about strangers and to use common sense when out in the world. In all my days of childhood myself or any of my friends came close to being abducted. Once as a freshman a pervert tried to pick me up on the way from school, but a quick duck into the local market ended the potential danger.
We are raising a nation of children that have no idea how to think or act in real world. Is it a good idea to let your toddler or pre-school child wander the streets? NO. But, in graduated steps letting your children take on more and more responsibility not only teaches them independence, but how to cope in the world. To many teens lead a sheltered life and when they turn 16 are let loose with a car and no real idea or judgement to take care of themselves.
I blame the media for creating a state of high anxiety and fear about everyday life. It sells papers, but is it real or worth the fear it produces?
Yes! Please explore other ways--ways that do more concretely to keep the streets safe other than celebrate fear by shuttering kids away--ways which likewise reflect so much of the nation's political climate post George W and 911.
A girl in my 6th grade class was abducted and murdered--her body dumped in a grove. She had been cycling to school, late, on her own when she was forcibly taken by a guy in a pick-up. He was caught.
So, understanding that the threat is real, what is the sensible attitude? Personally, I think it is circumstantial. All the security in the world won't buy it (look at that Yale grad student, for example). But I know that your point--to the effect that all streets would be more safe if more people we're on them instead of moving through them in cars--is an excellent one and reflects the right attitude. This conversation needs to happen.
When does it become detrimental to their health? If you protect a child from a bully, when do they become unable to stand up for themselves?
Moderation, moderation in all things, please. It depends on the child, and it depends on the situation. But I don't see the harm in letting kids who are old enough and who know what they're doing walk or ride a bike to school.
Nobody seems to worry.... Let's hope for a change and let's give children an opportunity to fend for themselves and not raise them in an atmosphere of fear, this is the worst...
My kid has been taking the train into Tokyo for an hour every school day for two years. No doubt inspired by the Japanese story of a ~5-year-old~ going to the local market for her mother for the first time, my daughter's first observation of her trip at 11 was that there are four convenience stores and two Starbucks between the train station and her school.
In Japanese elementary school, she walked with a group every morning, and one of the most quintessential Japanese sights you can see is the sidewalks filled with walking groups of young children in the morning, tallest to shortest to second tallest bringing up the rear. It is a beautiful sight, kids running down the street, and, yes, me and the grannies and everyone else out on bikes telling them, Watch out, you little buggers, and don't hog the whole sidewalk, beep-beep!
But my kid is tall and tired of being a freak show, so she wants to try cool, hip, surely taller America. So she's going to try a semester at her aunt's in the Bay Area this spring, and already I'm telling her aunt, You no promise how to teach her to use and let her use the public transportation (might be a learning experience for you, too!), me no let her come.
I'll be damned if I'm going to let her go seek tall friends just to become INFANTALIZED by AMERICAN PARANOIA! Exhibit A: Birthers, Teaparty-ers, Racists, Homophobes, Generic Right-Wingers--some people never grow up!
Already the kid wants to go to college in NYC because of the public transit, and I'm like, OK, let's go there this summer and see how you feel on the subway at night. I think you'll be fine, but as long as you're going that far east, you might want to keep going and try Europe. They have tall people there and public transit, too!
Since you can't drive here 'til 20, frankly, I've become much more fearful of my daughter wanting to go to high school in the States and drive. Hell, it's all I can do to get her attention between her listening to old "Roseanne" episodes on YouTube, IMing her FB friends, and working on her PowerPoint homework; I can't even imagine her paying attention to the road sober, much less after having partied. The last train home here may be the "Sake-sen"/full of drunks, but at least the only danger is getting a load of some salaryman's bad breath.
Thanks for bringing this up again. I read these alarms every so often in the States, but I think it's systemic: part car culture, part paranoia, part more spread outness, part rabid nanny state. I'm like, If the bus turns out to be slow, you could always ride your aunt's bike to the mall, and the kid's like, But you have to wear a helmet in California, and I'm like, Yup, nothing like being in the most perfect weather on earth with a big hunk of plastic on your head! Well, let's find out what the fine is. Better to get you a fake ID to go helmetless than buy beer!
I love you, America. I want to come "home" (though if the kid goes to college in Europe and gets a green card/job, I wouldn't hesitate to take that health care), but you have really got to get a grip on how whacked you are, and this is merely one symptom.
I grew up in upper Manhattan, in a not-too-safe, not-too-sketchy neighborhood, in the 70's and 80's. I am exactly the same age as Etan Patz was when he disappeared. At nine, I was taught to take the bus by myself, and I walked all over the place by myself - to friends' houses, to the store for my parents, in Riverside Park on a secluded path when I wanted to clear my head. At fourteen I started riding the subway alone (there hadn't been any need to before that; high school was further away). Nothing bad ever happened to me. I was never, with the exception of my park walks, alone. How did I ever escape the terrible fate that surely should have awaited me? I don't mean to make light of the very real, terrible things that happen to people, but I think my experience is probably more the norm.
Though there are also counter-trends and groups, such as Safe Routes to Schools, Children and Nature Network, Free-Range Kids, and more, that are attempting to give people resources and information and move kids back into a childhood that includes unmediated activity and free play.
"paid the older kids a few dollars a week for their work." scribblenerd
if you were in India, people would do it for you for free! ths not 'work' it is duty.
In California, I suppose the Jaycee Dugard case is contributing to a local flare of anxiety, as Jaycee was originally snatched while waiting at her school bus stop. I totally agree that more parents out on the street walking with their kids to school is the fastest way to make streets safer. But the odds are in favor that most kids can make the trip safely throughout their school years. Arranging for a large party of kids to walk to school together each day is a good way for kids to get to know each other and for parents to back off a bit.
A lot of you related to the price we all are going to pay when this generation of over-coddled kids becomes adults, and doesn’t know how to navigate, emotionally or physically. I live in fear for when this group starts driving, among other things. I’m told that kids who bike and use the streets make better drivers, and this certainly rings true.
Iamsurly, you hit that nail on the head. As did AshKW and SaoKay.
Luluandphoebe, so did you and you bring up the extra issue of rudeness as a consequence of 1. not acquiring experiences with others from which to learn, and 2. thinking merely of oneself and not being part of a greater community. I think parents unwittingly demonstrate this by holing up in their homes with worry and fear instead of organizing walking groups, being with their neighbors, and using some of their energy to teach their kids something about life. Traveling short distances in a car precludes the opportunity to do any of those things and generally creates more problems, like congestion and lack of integration with our surroundings.
Besides, it’s actually fun for kids to walk, be with each other, get exercise, and have some sense of their own environments. A lot of us have wonderful memories of being outside and having free play.
Kathy and Shiral, thank you for sharing yours. Unmediated time is deeply lacking for this generation of children and I also fear for them when they are alone and need to delegate their own time. The most over-protected and -scheduled of them are on track to be the most over-equipped, bored group ever, with no personal inner resources of their own, because they were never given time to develop them.
Ghostrider, thank you for also hitting on the community and safety enhancement that occurs when more people are out using the streets.
Froggy, you likewise demonstrate the importance of having walkable communities, and this is another of my complete hobby horses. I hate how most suburbs are designed for car travel and are completely thoughtless (and soulless) otherwise. I think people who live in these places absolutely suffer from alienation (which happens to breed more fear) and loss of community. There is currently a lot of writing about how to take back many of these sorts of neighborhoods – all is not lost! In my own town, there is talk about making one of the routes to the high school more safe and appealing – widening sidewalks, promoting storefront businesses, etc.
(Rolling, thank you. I do live in a fairly leafy small town, at the base of a mountain, in Northern California. We’re fortunate to have available nature, paths to schools, and a little downtown for gathering.)
M Todd, Leeandra and Lenore, you all bring up good points about the relative safety of kids today compared to when most of us were kids, and the ridiculously low odds of stranger abduction. (Indeed, the vast majority of abductions are by estranged parents.)
Lornadoone, I’m sorry that you were also criminalized for giving your kid a little appropriate freedom, and cheered that you followed your own inner compass. Ridiculous.
Blackflon, I never understood the idling vehicles. Even if you don’t walk your kid to the bus, another opportunity is lost by not even exiting your car to walk over to your kid or say hello to people. (I know that would require a few extra minutes to park.) We’re all so atomized. I often felt alone with these feelings during the rare times I had to get in a line of cars to pick up my kid at the drop-off zone after school and wondered if others had similar feelings of alienation and unbalance.
Thank you, also, Helene and ButchyBabbles, for the welcome perspective from abroad!
Rolling, you also raise a good point about Scribblenerd’s idea about paying older children to walk with younger ones. While I think people of all ages should be paid for work, including caregiving, I agree that walking younger ones would ideally fall under the category of community and, if such a thing were institutionalized, would begin to naturally happen and we’d all be better for it. (That said, as a parent of a teen, I also recognize the power of a couple of dollars.)
Boys of summer, that’s insane about the bus! I’ve been clamoring for a bus in our town as a way to get school traffic off the streets, and lament that there isn’t district money to pay for one. I see in your tale further evidence of general alienation and fear, and wonder how we got to this silly, harmful point.