I orginally wrote this in a comment on Walter Blevins' recent post on unions and public workers. I decided to post it here, because I want others to see it. My reaction to Walter's post was visceral. I respect his opinion greatly, and found his words thought-provoking; I don't want to start a war. But I want to be heard.
For the record, I am a public school teacher in California. I pay half of the cost of health insurance for my daughter and myself out of my salary. I happily pay toward my retirement out of my paycheck.
I am feeling defensive these days. I am a public servant. If I have served the public well over the course of my (proposed) 35-year teaching career, don’t I deserve a good retirement? Why should I "do my job" before I am allowed to defend my employment rights? Because I am a “servant?” Does that subjugate my right to earn a salary to support my family adequately or earn a decent retirement? My union needs to protect my job because I am at the mercy of the public, whose whims can be capricious, as we can plainly see. I believe I have the right to influence public policy if that policy influences me. If the public is my employee, then they need to provide me with decent salary and benefits, and if I am serving the public, then they better damn well be showing me some appreciation. If I’m doing my job, don’t I have the right to some protections and support, financially or otherwise?
Like I said, I’m feeling defensive. And righteous. And a little entitled. I do an important job, and I want to be acknowledged for it beyond merely words and kudos.
I agree that public workers deserve no more or less than private workers, and vice versa. But how do you propose we make it all “even?” The union is my safety net, because of people like Scott Walker.
God, I'm pissed off these days.


Salon.com
Comments
BUT it is nothing like here. I dont know how you put up with it.
HUGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
And you have every right to be ! I'm in full support of teachers and their unions.
♥R
I just happen to think that earning a living, decent benefits and a decent retirement are not too much to ask in return for my years of conscientious service. I remember how Prop 98 was supposed to fund education; how long was it before Ah-nold took that money away? I remember Enron ripping off this state in 2003, and I remember Pete Wilson absolutely ransacking city and county budgets back in '93-- something from which we've never truly recovered. He was also a big fan of building prisons the state couldn't afford to open and operate--how is THAT good money management?? Yet it's somehow "all our fault" that cities and counties are now broke. Even though we haven't had a budget delivered on time for years. And for each of those years, I've watched a tiny, stubborn minority in the legislature taking the whole state hostage, refusing to even CONSIDER ways to generate more revenue. All of which has cost the state millions of dollars and which has downgraded our credit rating.
During the tech boom of the late 1990's, our cost of living went up sharply and our pay raises did not keep up. We sure weren't the ones getting the 401K's then, back when they were worth having. My public sector co-employees wryly agreed that we'd gone into the wrong line of work to get rich. i am genuinely sorry that so many people got soaked in 2008 and 2009. But we never had what they did in the first place.
My union has made concessions and cooperated and done our part to make sure that as many people as possible kept their jobs. If we banded together to hold onto as much as we could, it was not to take advantage of the state, it was to keep the state from taking advantage of US. I pay for half my benefits too, and paying into my retirement pension effectively wiped out my last raise four years ago with a net loss of take home pay. Since then, no cost of living raises at all. If it looks like we've got it so good, it's only because everything ELSE got so monumentally fucked up by the disaster in 2008.
rated