“America treasures the relationship we have with our many Muslim friends, and we respect the vibrant faith of Islam which inspires countless individuals to lead lives of honesty, integrity, and morality. This year, may Eid also be a time in which we recognize the values of progress, pluralism, and acceptance that bind us together as a Nation and a global community. By working together to advance mutual understanding, we point the way to a brighter future for all."
When President George W. Bush said those words to mark 2002’s Eid al-Fitr, I agreed with him. I still do. But as the controversy surrounding the plan to build a mosque in Lower Manhattan continues to intensify along political and religious lines, our national discussion increasingly points the way to a much dimmer future.
I have spent my career fighting for religious freedom and combating discrimination at home and abroad, first at the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom and now at Human Rights First. Over the years, I’ve sat in the same room with countless foreign government officials and religious leaders and asked them to condemn violence and other human rights abuses fueled bydiscrimination and hatred. And no matter where I was—in Saudi Arabia or Russia or Pakistan or France—the American example of religious freedom, tolerance and inclusion—while not perfect—strengthened my belief that those values are universal and promoting them benefits all of us.
I have found that the vast majority of Americans cherish these values. On many occasions, leaders from all denominations have worked hand in hand to strengthen religious freedom at home and advance it abroad. Today’s challenges present yet another opportunity for these leaders to come together and demonstrate that the values that unite us are far more powerful than the fears that divide us.
It won’t be easy. Just this week, a cab driver in New York City was stabbed after the perpetrator asked if he was a Muslim. A Florida church is sponsoring a national “Burn a Koran Day” on September 11. Mosques planned for construction in Tennessee, Wisconsin, California and Florida have been challenged by Americans claiming that Islam is not a religion or that Muslims are inherently violent and at odds with U.S. values. Sponsors of the Park51 project are being asked to forego their constitutional rights because many believe an Islamic center has no place in the same neighborhood as the site of the 9/11 tragedy.
Genuine discourse about the propriety of the mosque is not unexpected. After all, open discussion and honest disagreement are part of the American fabric. But at this critical moment in time, all of us need to speak up and speak out to reject stereotypes and prejudices that lead to exclusion and even violence if we are serious about securing religious freedom and confronting hatred at home and abroad. We must defend that principle because it is what makes us different than our enemies.
This week at Gracie Mansion, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said it eloquently. He noted, “(I)f we say that a mosque and community center should not be built near the perimeter of the World Trade Center site, we would compromise our commitment to fighting terror with freedom. We would undercut the values and principles that so many heroes died protecting. We would feed the false impressions that some Americans have about Muslims. We would send a signal around the world that Muslim Americans may be equal in the eyes of the law, but separate in the eyes of their countrymen. And we would hand a valuable propaganda tool to terrorist recruiters, who spread the fallacy that America is at war with Islam. Islam did not attack the World Trade Center – Al-Qaeda did. To implicate all of Islam for the actions of a few who twisted a great religion is unfair and un-American.”
Mayor Bloomberg’s predictions are not rhetoric. They are reality. National Public Radio reported earlier this week that extremists are using the mosque debate and other events targeting Muslims as evidence of America’s “war on Islam”—evidence they are hoping will help them recruit young Muslims who visit jihadi chat rooms or frequent radical Islamic Web sites.
Vilification of Islam and Muslims harms our security efforts. Local and national law enforcement need to work together with all communities—including American Muslims—to protect the homeland. Our men and women in uniform in Iraq and Afghanistan need to work with local authorities and Muslim populations to form a more peaceful path forward, one in which conflict is addressed through a rule of law grounded in equality and protection of fundamental freedoms.
To date, the decision makers with power to influence the construction of the mosque in Lower Manhattan have done their best to uphold these ideas. They have stood up for religious freedom, inclusion and tolerance. They have upheld the Constitutional rights that make our nation great.
Now it’s our turn.
It’s time to put this debate back on course and recognize that hate-filled rhetoric, violence and intolerance hurt nobody but us. It does not keep us safe. It does not reflect our values. It does nothing but weaken our resilience as a nation and our position as an international example in the fight to defend the rights of all people – regardless of their race, religion, nationality, sexuality or political opinion.
Earlier this month as he appeared on WNYC’s The Brian Lehrer Show, former Bush and Reagan Administration advisor Ken Adelman noted that “the United States should stick with its values of tolerance and understanding ….” He then added that the he was “a little disappointed” that former President George W. Bush – whose remarks I quoted at the beginning of this piece – has not come out to give voice to the same ideals he so eloquently outlined in 2002. I agree. More of that kind of leadership from those who haven’t spoken out already is what the nation needs now to put us back on the right track.


Salon.com
Comments
We are specialized in offering all kinds of top brand shoes, jeans, t-shirts, bikini, swimwear, jacket, jerseys, watches, purses, handbags, belts, wallets , sunglasses and hats etc.
Accept paypal ,All the prices list on our website include shipping cost,insurance,tax etc..
$30 nike shoes,air jordan shoes,nike shox shoes,gucci shoes
$33 true religion jeans, ed hardy jeans,coogi jeans,affliction jeans, Laguna Beach Jeans
$16 ed hardy T-shirts,Coogi T-shirts,Christian Audigier T-shirts,Gucci T-shirts,Polo T-shirts.
$30 coach handbag,gucci handbag,prada handbag,chanel handbag,
$12 coach,chanel,lv,d&g sunglasses,$9 New Era caps.
The vast majority of people who object to the building of the mosque have no problem with their legal ability to build it there. Their objection is more personal. A lot of them believe because of the tradition of building a mosque on conquered land that this is just that, a reminder of what they destroyed.
So what is the tolerant point of view that the builders of Park51 are putting forward to those who believe that is the wrong site for this project? So far, all I've seen is all take and no give and we are going to do it, like it or not.
My sentence should read "Do you really think, for example, that many muslims, perhaps even most, would NOT prefer..." (meaning that they would see the skyline of Cairo as preferable to the skyline of NYC).
What do the two things have to do with each other? Are you saying that the activities the Park 51 people are doing to build a community center are in anyway interfering with the rebuilding of the church? Does anyone connected to the project have anything to do with anything regarding the rebuilding of the church? Who is the villian that is stopping the rebuilding of the church while promoting the construction of the "mosque"? There is no connection, there is no doing one to stop the other or favoring one over the other. New York is a big city and the two projects are subject to completely different oversight and permit.
"I also don't think we should be naive about islam, muslims, or how people feel about their cultural and religious heritage."
What should our not being naive look like? Should there be extra restrictions on Muslims? Should there be extra surveillance on Muslims? Are there laws we should make to protect our selves from Muslim take over? What you describe is a desperate sounding situation, but you don't seem to have any solutions to this problem.
The USA has always been xenophobic and, luckily, has greatly profited by getting over it.
I apologize if my comments sounded desperate -- that definitely wasn't my intention. I'm an optimist who thinks things ultimately work out for the best and they will in this as well. (As Jan Sand said above, "The USA has always been xenophobic and, luckily, has greatly profited by getting over it.")
I'm not sure if I'd agree we're xenophobic part (if we are we're pretty unsuccessful at it), but I think there will definitely be challenges ahead than none of us can really predict.
Indeed. Perhaps as a small token of tolerance and friendship Saudi Arabia would permit the construction of a church or synagogue somewhere -- anywhere -- in their country. Then as a token of mutual toleration and friendship Americans would enthusiastically support a mosque near the site where fifteen Saudi hijackers murdered almost three thousand people.
It is odd to me that we somehow have to prove our religious tolerance. We have many mosques across the country. Muslims have thrived here, and they openly practice their religion. Muslims are elected to office. We have Muslim military chaplains. With rare exceptions Muslims are treated better here than they are in countries in which Islam in the dominant religion.
In spite of all this, because of opposition to the particular location of a single mosque, we're now supposed to be "haters" and "bigots."
R. Willis writes: "A new mosque built in the same neighborhood but at a more decorous distance from Ground Zero would both meet the needs of his community for a place of worship and demonstrate to the broader community that American Muslims acknowledge and respect the suffering of their countrymen."
Amen to that. As Catnlion says, tolerance and respect work both ways.
HEY! IT'S NOT A MOSQUE!
And if Saudi Arabia decides to abide by its laws and not allow a church to be build, we should disregard our laws, our traditions, and our history by refusing to allow the construction of Park51? Since when did we go judging our selves by the actions of another nation? We're supposed to be better than Saudi Arabia, not just as bad - or worse. (The hijackers, by the way, were not all Saudi; some were Yemeni - not that you'd let little things like "facts" or "truth" change your argument.)
It is odd to me that we somehow have to prove our religious tolerance.
The First Amendment guarantees the protection of religious liberty. Have you ever heard the phrase "put your money where your mouth is?" Sometimes we are called upon to defend, even prove, our commitment to certain ideals. It takes strength and courage to do so, traits clearly lacking in a segment of the American population.
because of opposition to the particular location of a single mosque, we're now supposed to be "haters" and "bigots."
What else do you call people who shout "Muslims go home" at a man who just happens to pass by on the street? What else do you call people who say "Islam is the religion of Satan?" Maybe not all opponents of Park51 have such extreme beliefs - but the "moderate" elements of opposition seem to be suggesting we cave in to the angry mob and deny the right of Park51 to exist. At best, they are saying we must create an "equal but separate" regard for Muslims: they have the right to build their community center, but we get to approve its location, size, etc. (All of which, by the way, were decided in public meetings and determined through public procedures. Throughout the planning and approval process, there were no objections to its construction.)
What would be a "more decorous distance?" How big of a "First Amendment Exclusion Zone" do you want around Ground Zero?
Will you submit a list of other projects you will object to? Will you, for example, object to the "9/11 peace center" being planned by "liberal" organizations?
Additionally, will you allow that the "sensitivities" of pregnant women ought to be considered and agree with the banning of anti-abortion rallies near abortion clinics?
How far would you go to restrict the freedom of someone else in order to appease the sensitivities of some group? Would you agree to have your own liberty restricted in the same way?
I dare you to answer.
They can build the thing where ever they want. They have the legal right to do that. Only the nutty of the nutty have said they don't have the right to build it. You don't seem to understand nobody is saying they can't.
Just because it's legal, doesn't make it a great idea. At this point in time people are still to emotional about it. So the builders still want to build it despite what a large percentage of the people think. Those who think it should be built think those who don't think it's a good idea are haters. Just because someone thinks it's a bad idea how does that translate into hate? Putting twice the amount of jalapeño in my chili is not a good idea, but it doesn't mean I hate them.
So, what acts of tolerance have the builders done to show their tolerance to those who think this project is a bad idea?
I dare you to answer.
alqaeda is one consequence. now americans are faced with a shadowy threat, capable of dealing significant blows, and the home of the brave is exposed as the home of the clueless and timid.
america's leaders are not going to tell the truth about the war on terror, lest they be strung up on lampposts, or lose their jobs.
so this trivial nonsense about mosques is the release of undirected aggression, ignorant and fearful people kicking the dog for lack of any better plan.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2402973.ece
I do not believe there is any way around the cementing of such a name at this point other than to choose a different location in New York City that is not in the shadow of the World Trade Center. R
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $35
Tshirts (ed hardy,lacoste) $16
Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16
New era cap $15
Bikini (Ed hardy) $25
======= http://www.AooMall.com ========
Nobody is stopping the building of a Christian church, and anyway there are a number of Christian churches next to ground zero. The Greek Orthodox congregation that complained about not being allowed to rebuild is free to build on the property they own, where the former church once stood. Nobody is preventing that. The controversy was touched off because the congregation tried to arrange to take over a larger space to build a bigger church, and those plans fells through. Somehow the story was garbled on right-wing news outlets that New York City had stopped the congregation from rebuilding anywhere, which is not true.
It will not be "in the shadow of the World Trade Center." It won't even be visible from "Ground Zero." There are two huge buildings between the Park51 site and Ground Zero that are much taller than what the Park51 building will be. In fact, it will be in the shadow of a 20-story office complex.
As far as what people will call the building -- speaking as someone who was in lower Manhattan on 9/11, I have no problem calling it "Park51" or whatever else it is eventually named. I doubt it will be an issue for anyone else who is frequently in the neighborhood. As for the rest of you -- get over it.
I'm getting really tired of this. I was in bleeping lower Manhattan on 9/11 and am an eyewitness to the collapse of the towers, and yes, I am still pretty emotional about it. If I start thinking about it, it still makes me cry.
But you know what? I have had it up to here with out-of-towners proclaiming what New Yorkers are supposed to think and feel. You don't have a clue.
If you know the neighborhood, you know the Islamic center won't be visible from Ground Zero. The old Burlington Coat Factory that's in the space now has already been fixed up on the inside to accomodate Muslim prayer services, and lots of Muslims already go there every day, so in effect it's already a "mosque." And the sky did not fall, and no one in NYC is in the least bit traumatized by this.
The several acre "ground zero" site finally is being built upon, and in ten years it's going to be hard to tell exactly where the boundaries of "ground zero" were. It won't matter at all how many blocks away from the edge of it that Park51 happens to be.
In fact, we could even play a game -- plop out-of-towners down where one of the towers used to be, and challenge them to go find the Islamic Center and Swimming Pool of Death without a map or a compass or asking directions. It could take them hours, if they find it at all. Great fun.