
I used to believe handing a girl a Barbie doll, princess costume or anything über-girly was like lobbing a grenade into her ego. I thought toys from the pink aisle siphoned the integrity out of girls, creating boy hungry wimps obsessed with shoes, fad diets and Gwyneth Paltrow movies.
Everyone knows the pink aisle is getting raunchier and bitchier by the minute with tarted up dolls and Halloween costumes, mani/pedi kits and shopping games featuring fake credit cards. And when they want to set aside their gooey princess fantasies, girls can revel in complete whoredom imitating stars like Rihanna, who make such smutty videos you need an STD test after watching them.
This week, the “save our girls” alarm was sounded once again with the release of Peggy Orenstein’s new book Cinderella Ate My Daughter. Orenstein wrote the book as a “quest to determine whether princess mania is merely a passing phase or a more sinister marketing plot”* after seeing how girl culture captivated her own daughter.
I have yet to read the book though I’m positive it’s juicy. Nonetheless, I find myself questioning whether I still believe Cinderella and all her weak-kneed counterparts are in fact eating our girls alive.
Princesses with their fluffy tutus and pointy crowns never did much for me as a kid. The castle would’ve been swell but I was happy to skip the whiny princess persona along with her flavorless prince companion. If anything, I wanted to be a Pink Lady from Grease gyrating against my bad boy “knight” Danny Zuko.
However, I did grow up with a collection of Barbie dolls but they all eventually ended up with shaved heads. In an apparent push for authenticity, I also drew nipples and pubes on their barren, plastic bodies. And because I didn’t have any Ken dolls, I made the girl dolls kiss each other whenever I wanted to create romantic scenes. Thus, I inadvertently designed Lesbian Punker Chick Barbie.
When your mom’s a former flower child who barely wears makeup let alone shaves, it’s near impossible to become a shallow twit whose life revolves around boys. So I had the Barbies, the dollhouses, the kitchen sets and plastic shopping carts. But I also had truckloads of books which my mother read to me and tons of artsy toys like paints, molding clay and even a wood burning set. Considering the burn scars on my fingers and legs, I’d say the Barbies were the least harmful of my toys.
All I’m saying is if my mom had allowed me to eat a steady diet of sugar, my teeth would’ve fallen out. But because she threw some apples and leafy greens in there, I ended up fine. I even started choosing the healthier stuff myself.
I hope to have a daughter one day. And I won’t be surprised if she starts walking around in a tiara and loses some of her feistiness once she discovers boys. It seems as inevitable as a son asking Santa for a fire truck and throwing rocks at birds. Helping a little kid navigate the culture to become a decent adult is probably a lot like teaching someone to drive. You sit in the passenger seat, give advice and encouragement, point out Mac trucks barreling toward them and comfort them if they crash. But you stay in the car.
Besides, these things fade. Girls get over wanting to be a princess, a fairy or Justin Bieber’s wife. I imagine if you love the bejesus out of them, they’ll have the confidence to come out of the phase with an identity.
If my daughter should one day come to me saying, “Behold, I am the Princess Malibu Barbie,” I shall not despair. Instead, I’ll tell her, “why be the princess when you can be queen? Why wait around for your pumpkin to turn into a carriage? Queens pick their king. Queens rule the land.”
If she’s anything like me, she’ll know where to find her own sense of majesty. And know she deserves nothing less.
*Publishers Weekly
[Photo from MegCabot.com]
Reprinted from Laura K. Warrell's blog Tart & Soul at www.TartandSoul.com.


Salon.com
Comments
I love her for that.
And I love her because I know she, too, would adore (and encourage creative play with) Lesbian Punk Barbie & Electric Chair Barbie.
What I think is abundantly clear--and I'm far, far from the first to say it--is that no plastic toy or media image can "destroy" girls (or boys for that matter) or impose unassailable hegemonic control over girls and boys in the face of good parenting and a well balanced diet of alternatives to tu-tus and Cobra Commander action figures.
I'd say let your daughter play with Barbie, don't make a fuss about it, and stand by to deliver gentle reality checks when necessary. Parents do well to give their kid some credit for basic sense.
PS: Love the kitty in your profile pic!
Why can't we embrace both truths; that boys and girls are different and on a *spectrum* most girls will fall towards the Barbie end and most boys to the GI Joe end and allow for the girls and boys who want to be or feel they belong somewhere else in that spectrum.
Making women ashamed for wanting to play with dolls, dress up, have children, take care of a home and a man, is as shameful as making one feel bad for wanting to be a CEO and a female wife.
One of the readers here said it best; her partner is anti-marriage and anti-reproduction *for herself*. She seems like the kind of woman who wouldn't push a girl away from dolls/men/domestic life if that is what she aspired to.
So let's stop blaming Barbie. Oh and if Peggy Orenstein wants to sound a real alarm, perhaps she'll sound one about the alarming suicide rate among teenage boys, not to mention the alarming rise in suicide rates among men in general (from 2/3 of the successful suicides to 80%) or the fact that boys are increasingly being left behind/out of education. Seems to me those are far more serious issues then a toy doll.
S.ophie, thanks for your vote of confidence!
Those two words alone make so many women cringe....Moi?!