The Biblio Files  

  our bookish life  

The Biblio Files

The Biblio Files
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S.
Birthday
January 01
Bio
We (Steve and Helen) irresponsibly gave up our promising careers in aviation and bookselling over ten years ago. Now books seem to have taken over our lives. We frequent libraries, bookstores, and thrift shops in search of interesting books. We buy/swap/sell, but mainly, we read. We both wear glasses and have been mistaken for librarians.

MY RECENT POSTS

DECEMBER 2, 2009 12:43AM

A Call for Help With My Harebrained New Year's Scheme

Rate: 10 Flag

I have a confession to make. I read The Lost Symbol by Dan Brown. I enjoyed it.

 

I didn't plan on reading it. But Steve (yes, I blame him) downloaded a sample of The Lost Symbol on the Kindle, got hooked, bought the rest of the book and read the whole thing. That really surprised me, so I took a look at it too and also got hooked.

 

It wasn't the best book I've ever read, the writing was not stellar, but it was well-paced and, like the best pulp stories, it kept me wanting to know what happened next. I could make the same comments about Gone With the Wind, which I re-read this year for the first time in forty years. GWTW was the bestselling book in America for both 1936 and 1937. I liked it when I first read it and I liked it just as much this time as I did when I was twelve.

pulp-fiction-poster

This unexpected excursion into the bestseller list got me thinking. We recently watched a DVD course from The Teaching Company called Great American Bestsellers. It covered bestsellers in this country from Thomas Paine's Common Sense, published in 1776, right up to Stephen King, John Grisham, and yes, Dan Brown. It was a fascinating series of lectures, even the ones about snoozers like The Last of the Mohicans.

 

Maybe it's time I gave the bestseller lists a closer look.

 

Normally, in choosing books, I flail about, randomly selecting the most attractive covers or intriguing titles, turning up my nose at the “popular” books. What is this, high school? Maybe those books are popular because...people like them? Is it possible that sheer snobbery is keeping me from enjoying the books the rest of America is reading?

 

So for the New Year, I intend to read NOTHING BUT bestsellers.

ny_times_bestsellers_banner

I'm not sure exactly how I'll go about it. I could limit my reading to choices from The New York Times Best Seller Lists, of which there are eleven (hardcover fiction, hardcover nonfiction, trade paperback fiction, mass market paperback fiction, paperback nonfiction, hardcover advice, paperback advice, graphic books, children's books, hardcover business, paperback business). In the course of a year, there are roughly 2,000 books on all the New York Times lists. That would provide a wide choice of popular, successful books.

 

Or I could limit myself to reading only the books at Wal*Mart or Costco. Some people are saying that once the bookstores have all gone out of business, big box discounters will be the only place to get books. I could get a taste of the future. I don't known how long I could last on the Wal*Mart diet though. I wandered through their book aisle today and found it to have a fair number of titles, but the number of categories was quite limited: Religion, Romance, Teen, Fiction, Biography (Palin, Huckabee, Beck).

 

Maybe I'll just read Oprah's picks.

oprahsbookclub

I'm open to suggestions. There's still a month to go before I start on my new reading program. Will this be the start of a mind-expanding experience that changes my life? Or will this be a brain-sapping nightmare from which there is No Return?

 

stay tuned

 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Just to add to your myriad of choices, why limited yourself to the current best sellers list? Beginning in January choose books from the NY Times Best Sellers for the year 1999. Maybe limit your choices to one of the top 10 hard cover fiction or non-fiction (they'll be in paperback now anyway). During February move on to 2000. And so forth. You'll get a taste of the last decade by the time you reach November and December, which will both be dedicated to 2009.
How about Amazon's top 50? That'll at least give you a bit of range, but put you in touch with recent publications. I do think that people who turn up their nose at bestsellers often make the mistake of turning up their nose at anything new. But there's something really energizing about being involved in what's happening in fiction or non-fiction now. Plus more and more major publishers are starting programs to keep bloggers in the know about what's coming out. If you show you're serious, I'm sure you'll be getting a regular supply of review copies before you know it.
tomreedtoon -- you may be onto something. Or maybe just on something...

stim -- I like the ides of including bestsellers from the past, but feel like that would be cheating a little. We know which books from the past have stood the test of time (GWTW) and which haven't (Anthony Adverse, which was as big a seller as GWTW in its day).

Juliet -- As much time (and money) as I spend on Amazon, that list didn't occur to me. I'm going to check it out. Alas, I have plenty of review copies coming in, mainly first novels and leadership advice. Go figure.
My problem with writers like Dan Brown is that the awful writing stops me from continuing no matter how good the story is.
R
Maybe my standards have dropped in six years -- when I tried to read The Da Vinci Code in 2003 I couldn't get past the writing and gave up after twenty pages. But The Lost Symbol's writing didn't get in the way as much.
I second Juliet's idea about Amazon. And I really did enjoy Dan Brown's Angels and Demons. The Da Vinci Code wasn't nearly as good.

I go into those books knowing exactly what I'm getting. And I enjoyed Angels and Demons the same way I'd enjoy a Danielle Steele or Nora Roberts bodice-ripper on the beach: casually.
My book group limits choices to major book award winners and nominees. And we don't reread authors. (We can do that on our own.) Works beautifully.
You've got a point there about the review lists. They can become like an infestation. But one advantage of keeping to best sellers is you can be blunt with publishers and just tell them that's all you do.
AshKW -- Another vote for the Amazon Top 50. I like your attitude.

Lea -- Award winning books is a different project I think. Those are the books that People Who Know think SHOULD be on the bestseller lists. But I think I'll adopt your idea of sticking to one book per author for this scheme.


Juliet -- Good point. I'm thinking I won't be relying on review copies, since bestsellers are readily available at the library and at a discount in Kindle version.
I don't read mysteries, so that eliminates lots from the NYT list. I look at award winners and also audible.com lists. And I check the Amazon list. Good luck!
Helen, Just found this: http://www.goodreads.com/award/goodreader/2009
however you do it -- let's start an OS book club!
Julie -- thanks for the link, I'm going to keep an eye on the results. It looks as if people really are reading the books on bestseller lists.

skeletnwmn -- there have been a couple of book clubs on Open Salon, I don't know if any are still going. MadTypist was doing one, Freaky Troll's was a riot, and I think fingerlakeswanderer had one. It's a good idea.