The Progressive Patriot

MAY 1, 2010 9:01PM

A Message from the 47% Who Pay No Taxes

Rate: 18 Flag

If you are one to listen to commercial Talk Radio, watch Fox,  or have a friend who does, you will no doubt hear the sound bite that 47% Of Americans Pay No Taxes This is followed by a long list of demands, insinuations, and outright insults.  Why should they be allowed to vote?  Why do the hard working 53% have to support these lazy people?  Why don't they stop spending money foolishly and save it for important things?

glenn-beck-global-warming

 I am here today to reply to the above in my role as the unofficial spokesman of the 47%.  I was not elected to this position and I have no credentials, but if Glenn Beck can be the defacto leader of the Tea Party, I can be the leader of the 47%.  

First, let me say that the 47% want to make it clear that while we may not pay any federal income tax, we pay Medicare tax and social security tax and anyone with a lukewarm knowledge of the federal tax accounting knows that all the taxes go into the same bucket.  There is no lock box.  Further, most of us pay state tax, property tax, school taxes, tolls, sales tax, and a host of other taxes.  So say we pay no taxes is disingenuous, but I agree, it makes for good propaganda with the right crowd.  Secondly, please stop spreading the myth that the 47% spends money foolishly.  Fact is that we are actually spending less on many of the things that we purchased in years past.

If you need proof of this, please watch this video from Elizabeth Warren explaining the real conditions of the middle class in America. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akVL7QY0S8A

Two areas, however, that have really affected our budgets are the soaring costs of health care and education.  We are in the process of trying to lower these costs, if only some of you would get out of the way. 

uncle-sam-taxes

I want all of you in the 53% who pay taxes to know that we agree with you 100%.  We want to pay taxes too, we really do.  There is, however, one slight problem.  Since the Reagan Revolution, our incomes have not risen one bit and many of us have experienced a loss in actual inflation adjusted dollars. We were told by The Great Commnunicator that if we allowed people with great sums of wealth to keep that weatlh, these people would invest in America and build factories, communities, commerce centers and a shower of wealth that would eventually trickle down to us.  The only problem is that the wealthy did all these things overseas where labor was cheap.  They used their increased capital to shut down the plant in Naugatuck and open one up in DongGuan.  And what money they did spend here seems to have been in the form of credit default swaps, hedge funds, and other weird things that brought them fortunes and left us responsible for a bailout. 

george-griswold-haven-and-wife

 

Many of us were once part of the great middle class but with the onslaught of several government programs including but not limited to immigration policy, trade policy, labor policy and tax policy, we have seen our wage potential decimated as these policies have transferred our wealth potential to the wealthy.  Yes, you heard that right. Government policy, since Reagan, transferred wealth.  Of course the talk radio guys did not say much about this transfer, because it was going from many of us in the bottom to their employers, the guys in the top 5% who sign their paychecks.  Now that the 47% want the same government to do the same thing but only in the other direction, suddenly that's evil socialism.  To channel Glenn Beck, "People, can you not see the injustice, the tyranny, a world that our founders never imagined?  I weep as I watch this evil socialism"...and wipe my tears in a hankerchief of imported linen...

All we want is a return to the days when many of us paid more in taxes.  Yes, that will require allowing us to earn more money and that will take a reversal of a few things, but given the outrage of the 53% who pay taxes, I am sure they will understand.

middle_class_0226

 

So give us back our right to form worker's unions.  End trade agreements that make us compete with slave labor.  Stop the free flow of illegal immigration to work in your factories, tend to your gardens, and clean your houses.  Stop the predatory bank and investment policies.  Do all this, and more, and you will get what you are demanding.  We, the 47% will be able to earn what is rightfully ours and with that wealth, we will be able to pay or taxes.  

 

dam_workers

 

 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I'm only half way through and I had to rate it.

Don't let me down.
Excellent. Agreed! Reagan destroyed the Middle Class and initiated a period of proletarianization, whereby the Middle Class was destroyed and the whole nation began the downward march to proledom, thus proving the ideas of Marx.
OK, I'm done.

Well said.

Let's unite to take back our country from the evil lord of capitalism.

Can't we find a time when the middle class was prosperous and the poor were less poor? Is there not a model for us to go back to?

The tea party means nothing to me if there slogan is going to be: "We're gonna take back our country".

To where?

Let's pick a good model that benefits the most people.

I know that'd be socialist.
Feral Conservative? Are you like FDR, you know, the guy they said was a "traitor to his class?"
you still haven't grasped the fundamental problem:

you stand cap in hand, and ask, "please sir, may we have more."
but you are asking of the people who decided you should have less. can you see the problem there?

get democracy. a nation with citizen initiative will not suddenly become paradise, but over time it will evolve in the right direction. has to, money comes to power, and citizen initiative puts power in the hands of the citizen.
Magnificent! (That's right off the top of my head.)
There are times when I think that maybe I spend too much time on OS. Every time I try to get out, posts like this pull me back in. I am waiting to see if anyone has the effrontery to contradict or challenge your post. If so, the comment stream might get pretty long.
I readily agree to your self-appointment as leader of the 47%. Based on my long membership in that group, I considered appointing myself. I have to concede that you express our situation much better than I could. Your grasp of the realities of our political/economic situation is refreshing.
Conservatives frequently cite the Fifties as American's Golden Age, a time they'd like us to return to. Fair enough, in the Fifties, the top tax rate was 92% and the average tax burden of the wealthy was 50% of their income. I'm thinking if that were the case today, we'd have plenty of money for healthcare and deficit reduction.
to Al Loomis, maybe you missed a bit of sarcasm in the post. I am not asking the people who out us here to get us out of here. I have no hope that they will ever want to "play fair". I'm just pointing out to them that the same economic model that gave all the wealth to them is the one that keeps it from "us". My wife and I have friends who rail against Obama, unions, and the rest while at the same time, employ two illegal aliens who work for wages "under the table" and live in a tenement. When I asked them why they could not find legal labor in an area where unemployment is over 10%, they replied that the local residents want too much money. This, coming from a couple that owns three homes, two luxury SUV's and a rather large boat. They do not see the connection, or as Upton Sinclair once wrote, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
@ Tim4Change, no I am not a traitor to my class. However, I will freely admit that I share little with today's American conservatives who are nothing more than useful idiots for the cause of the wealthy corporations.
Hey! What are you complaining about? Rushbo and Crazy Glenn are as close to the 0% bracket as they can get. And I'll bet my bottom dollar that they pay regular visits to the Cayman Islands or Switzerland.
What a gentle little piece you've written. Too bad your target audience has no heart.
You nailed it. When I hear them say "47% don't pay taxes" I want to scream, because, as you said, it's not true. For low income people, sales taxes and property taxes and licensing fees are a bigger chunk of their income than they are for the wealthy. And people who have plenty have no clue about the costs (monetary and other) of being poor and lacking the choices that we like to take for granted, such as living in a safe neighborhood, being able to afford preventative health care measures, and having reliable transportation.
Let's "connect" a few more "dots."

While Adam Smith "capitalism" is a utopian ideal, we are now laboring under de facto Fascism...fascist plutocracy, more precisely.

What Marx called "capitalism" is actually "fascism."

The same fascist plutocracy's sectarian faction, after successfully assassinating Meriwether Lewis and President Lincoln, nailed the de facto anti-American, twin Fasces to the front wall of the House of Representatives just as codified Roman law nailed tens of thousands of Jews, and others, to crosses for twice denying that caesar was God Almighty. The first conviction for sedition was punished by a certain number of lashes with a whip-of-cords.

They built Roman Catholic "Big Oil" on unredressed "murder and arson;" financed Hitler and the Holocaust from their collection plates via Vatican banker Rockefeller's family bank (now the Iraqi State Bank), assassinated John and Martin to send us as catspaw to the papal fiefdom of Vietnam; slaughtered the innocent anti-papist Seventh Day Adventists at Waco; "Northwoods" the Murrah Federal Building; and cheated into office - through the votes of only the Roman Catholics on the SCOTUS - Hitler's banker's grandson, and JFK's assassin's son, a dry drunk, draft-dodging closet-queen who went on to commit 9/11 as "Reichstag Fire Redux" (Viz. "The New Pearl Harbor," Griffin, Ph.D.).

That is for whom Limbaugh ("The Roman Catholic Church is the rock-ribbed backbone of American moral values," intoned on his TV show as the camera panned two priests on the front row of the balcony while the modern pedophile scandal was erupting), Beck, Hannity, Coulter, Liddy, et al, work for...as knowing agents of the "Fifth Column" of the Roman Anti-Christ.

Expropriate the Roman Anti-Christ in America
Probity, Economy, Justice
The People sovereign
Death for Treason
Absolutely correct. Even more sad is the way the leaders of the Right have manipulated people into voting against their own economic interests and into believing that this is somehow the way things ought to be.
Agreed! ( the sarcasm that is )
Great rebuttal and thanks for pointing out how Reagan's policies helped the rich and screwed the poor. Though, to paraphrase an old chestnut, Reagan must have loved the poor because he created so many more of them.
While I agree with some of the posturing in the media, I felt compelled to present a well documented different view by George J. Viksnins at Georgetown.

http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/viksning/papers/Reaganomics.html
I'm sorry, I meant to say that I agree with the blog in that the media is posturing and not being clear on the facts. Typing too fast........
@ Tomreedton: I used to be a fan of Rush Limbaugh and the rest of the people/issues that the "American conservatives" are known for. I changed, thanks in part a friend who I always viewed as an adversary until I slowly realized that he was onto something and began to appreciate his point of view and eventually adopt much of it. I am proof that even if it seems that people do not want to listen, some will. So, while I do not think my blog will change the world, I do have faith that it can change a piece of it if I am as patient with people as some very nice people have been with me.
@bosticaster: Thanks very much for that link.
@The Feral Conservative: You're very welcome. I was referred to your site by someone on reddit. I'm going to keep reading. It's nice to see a blog with differing commentary that doesn't resort to a lot of angst and name calling. Sadly, I was seeing an abundance of both on Digg and reddit. I tend to lean a bit right from all here from what I can see but everyone at least seems to have reasonable, rational positions for what they believe. Thanks for some thoughtful commentary from everyone.
@Will Jones: I admit I got a tad lost in your post. I wasn't aware Limbaugh had a T.V. show anymore and I understood that Beck is a Mormon. I could be wrong. Also, is the " Roman Anti-Christ " reference alluding to the Apocrypha or just your dissatisfaction with the church?